Genomic and transcriptome analyses reveal that MAPK- and phosphatidylinositol-signaling pathways mediate tolerance to 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furaldehyde for industrial yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Scientific Reports

Volumn 4, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Zhou, Qian ^a   Liu, Z Lewis ^b   Ning, Kang ^a   Wang, Anhui ^c   Zeng, Xiaowei ^a   Xu, Jian ^a  

^a QINGDAO INSTITUTE OF BIOENERGY AND BIOPROCESS TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b NATIONAL CENTER FOR AGRICULTURAL UTILIZATION RESEARCH   (United States)

^c CHINA THREE GORGES UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

5-HYDROXYMETHYLFURFURAL; FURFURAL;

ANALOGS AND DERIVATIVES; ANTIFUNGAL RESISTANCE; CELL WALL; DRUG EFFECTS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

CELL WALL; DRUG RESISTANCE, FUNGAL; FURALDEHYDE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENOMICS; MAP KINASE SIGNALING SYSTEM; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84923262241     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep06556     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Vertès, A. Q. N., Yukawa, H. & Blaschek, H. Biomass to Biofuels: Strategies for Global Industries. (Wiley, 2010).
2. Wall, J. D. H. C. & Demain, A. Bioenergy. (ASM Press, 2008).
3. Gasch, A. P. & Werner-Washburne, M. The genomics of yeast responses to environmental stress and starvation. Funct Integr Genomics 2, 181-192 (2002).
4. Gasch, A. P. et al. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol cell 11, 4241-4257 (2000).
5. Ma, M. & Liu, Z. L. Comparative transcriptome profiling analyses during the lag phase uncover YAP1, PDR1, PDR3, RPN4, and HSF1 as key regulatory genes in genomic adaptation to the lignocellulose derived inhibitor HMF for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Genomics 11, 660 (2010).
6. Liu, Z. Genomic adaptation of ethanologenic yeast to biomass conversion inhibitors. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 73, 27-36 (2006).
7. Runquist, D., Hahn-Hagerdal, B. & Radstrom, P. Comparison of heterologous xylose transporters in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels 3, 5 (2010).
8. Young, E., Poucher, A., Comer, A., Bailey, A. & Alper, H. Functional Survey for Heterologous Sugar Transport Proteins, Using Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a Host. Appl Environ Microbiol 77, 3311-3319 (2011).
9. Moon, J., Lewis Liu, Z., Ma, M. & Slininger, P. J. New genotypes of industrial yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae engineered with YXI and heterologous xylose transporters improve xylose utilization and ethanol production. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 2, 247-254 (2013).
10. Lewis, J. A., Elkon, I. M., McGee, M. A., Higbee, A. J. & Gasch, A. P. Exploiting Natural Variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Identify Genes for Increased Ethanol Resistance. Genetics 186, 1197-1205 (2010).
11. Liu, Z. L., Ma, M. & Song, M. Evolutionarily engineered ethanologenic yeast detoxifies lignocellulosic biomass conversion inhibitors by reprogrammed pathways. Mol Genet Genomics 282, 233-244 (2009).
12. Shima, J. & Takagi, H. Stress-tolerance of baker's-yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cells: stress-protective molecules and genes involved in stress tolerance. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 53, 155-164 (2009).
13. Argueso, J. L. et al. Genome structure of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain widely used in bioethanol production. Genome Res 19, 2258-2270 (2009).
14. Stambuk, B. U., Dunn, B., Alves Jr, S. L., Duval, E. H. & Sherlock, G. Industrial fuel ethanol yeasts contain adaptive copy number changes in genes involved in vitamin B1 and B6 biosynthesis. Genome Res 19, 2271-2278 (2009).
15. Liu, Z. L. et al. Adaptive response of yeasts to furfural and 5- hydroxymethylfurfural and new chemical evidence for HMF conversion to 2,5- bis-hydroxymethylfuran. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 31, 345-352 (2004).
16. Mannazzu, I., Clementi, F. & Ciani, M. Strategies and criteria for the isolation and selection of autochthonous starters. Biodivers Biotechnol Wine Yeasts, 19-35 (2002).
17. Bradbury, J. E. et al. A homozygous diploid subset of commercial wine yeast strains. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 89, 27-37 (2006).
18. Liu, Z. L. & Moon, J. A novel NADPH-dependent aldehyde reductase gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae NRRL Y-12632 involved in the detoxification of aldehyde inhibitors derived from lignocellulosic biomass conversion. Gene 446, 1-10 (2009).
19. Sehnem, N. T. et al. 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural induces ADH7 and ARI1 expression in tolerant industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain P6H9 during bioethanol production. Bioresour Technol 133, 190-196 (2013).
20. Zerbino, D. R. & Birney, E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 18, 821-829 (2008).
21. Quevillon, E. et al. InterProScan: protein domains identifier. Nucleic Acids Res 33, W116-W120 (2005).
22. Blasco, L., Veiga-Crespo, P. & Villa, T. G. FPG1, a gene involved in foam formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 28, 437-451 (2011).
23. Borneman, A. R. et al. Whole-genome comparison reveals novel genetic elements that characterize the genome of industrial strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 7, e1001287 (2011).
24. Schacherer, J., Shapiro, J. A., Ruderfer, D. M. & Kruglyak, L. Comprehensive polymorphism survey elucidates population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 458, 342-345 (2009).
25. Tusher, V. G., Tibshirani, R. & Chu, G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98, 5116 (2001).
26. Stanley, D., Chambers, P. J., Stanley, G. A., Borneman, A. & Fraser, S. Transcriptional changes associated with ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 88, 231-239 (2010).
27. Lin, F. M., Qiao, B. & Yuan, Y. J. Comparative proteomic analysis of tolerance and adaptation of ethanologenic Saccharomyces cerevisiae to furfural, a lignocellulosic inhibitory compound. Appl Environ Microbiol 75, 3765-3776 (2009).
28. Liu, Z. L. in Microbial Stress Tolerance for Biofuels Vol. 22 Microbiology Monographs (ed Zonglin Lewis Liu) Ch. 12, 279-299 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012).
29. Herskowitz, I. MAP kinase pathways in yeast: For mating and more. Cell 80, 187-197 (1995).
30. Chen, R. E. & Thorner, J. Function and regulation in MAPK signaling pathways: Lessons learned from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophy Acta-Mol Cell Res 1773, 1311-1340 (2007).
31. Yvert, G. et al. Trans-acting regulatory variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the role of transcription factors. Nat Genet 35, 57-64 (2003).
32. Sadeh, A., Baran, D., Volokh, M. & Aharoni, A. Conserved motifs in the Msn2-activating domain are important for Msn2-mediated yeast stress response. J Cell Sci 125, 3333-3342 (2012).
33. Ostrander, D. B. & Gorman, J. A. The Extracellular Domain of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sln1p Membrane Osmolarity Sensor Is Necessary for Kinase Activity. J Bacteriol 181, 2527-2534 (1999).
34. Lawless, C. et al. Upstream sequence elements direct post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression under stress conditions in yeast. BMC Genomics 10, 7 (2009).
35. Slattery, M. G., Liko, D. & Heideman, W. The Function and Properties of the Azf1 Transcriptional Regulator Change with Growth Conditions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell 5, 313-320 (2006).
36. Mirzaei, H. et al. Systematic measurement of transcription factor-DNA interactions by targeted mass spectrometry identifies candidate gene regulatory proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110, 3645-3650 (2013).
37. Posas, F., Takekawa, M. & Saito, H. Signal transduction by MAP kinase cascades in budding yeast. Curr Opin Biotechnol 1, 175-182 (1998).
38. Lin, F. M., Tan, Y. & Yuan, Y. J. Temporal quantitative proteomics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to a nonlethal concentration of furfural. Proteomics 9, 5471-5483 (2009).
39. Mollapour, M. & Piper, P. Hog1p mitogen-activated protein kinase determines acetic acid resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Yeast Res 6, 1274-1280 (2006).
40. Park, J., Kim, J., Park, S. & Kim, D. Characterization of CpSte11, a MAPKKK gene of Cryphonectria parasitica, and initial evidence of its involvement in the pheromone response pathway. Mol Plant Pathol 13, 240-250 (2012).
41. Wera, S., Bergsma, J. C. T. & Thevelein, J. M. Phosphoinositides in yeast: genetically tractable signalling. FEMS Yeast Res 1, 9-13 (2001).
42. Dove, S. K. et al. Osmotic stress activates phosphatidylinositol-3,5-bisphosphate synthesis. Nature 390, 187-192 (1997).
43. Walch-Solimena, C. & Novick, P. The yeast phosphatidylinositol-4-OH kinase Pik1 regulates secretion at the Golgi. Nat Cell Biol 1, 523-525 (1999).
44. Johnson, A. D. et al. SNAP: a web-based tool for identification and annotation of proxy SNPs using HapMap. Bioinformatics 24, 2938-2939 (2008).
45. Moon, J. & Liu, Z. L. Engineered NADH-dependent GRE2 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae by directed enzyme evolution enhances HMF reduction using additional cofactor NADPH. Enzyme Microb Technol 50, 115-120 (2012).
46. O'Rourke, S. M. & Herskowitz, I. The Hog1 MAPK prevents cross talk between the HOG and pheromone response MAPK pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev 12, 2874 (1998).
47. Bowman, M. J. et al. Stereochemistry of furfural reduction by a Saccharomyces cerevisiae aldehyde reductase that contributes to in situ furfural detoxification. Appl Environ Microbiol 76, 4926-4932 (2010).
48. Baker Brachmann, C. et al. Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: A useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other application. Yeast 14, 115-132 (1998).
49. Li, L., Stoeckert, C. J. & Roos, D. S. OrthoMCL: Identification of Ortholog Groups for Eukaryotic Genomes. Genome Res 13, 2178-2189 (2003).
50. Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32, 1792-1797 (2004).
51. Talavera, G. & Castresana, J. Improvement of Phylogenies after Removing Divergent and Ambiguously Aligned Blocks from Protein Sequence Alignments. Syst Biol 56, 564-577 (2007).
52. Guindon, S. et al. New Algorithms and Methods to Estimate Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies: Assessing the Performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol 59, 307-321 (2010).
53. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754-1760 (2009).
54. Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078-2079 (2009).
55. DePristo, M. A. et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet 43, 491-498 (2011).
56. Grant, J. R., Arantes, A. S., Liao, X. & Stothard, P. In-depth annotation of SNPs arising from resequencing projects using NGS-SNP. Bioinformatics 27, 2300-2301 (2011).
57. Duncan, D., Prodduturi, N. & Zhang, B. WebGestalt2: an updated and expanded version of the Web-based Gene Set Analysis Toolkit. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 1-1 (2010).
58. Letunic, I., Yamada, T., Kanehisa, M. & Bork, P. iPath: interactive exploration of biochemical pathways and networks. Trends Biochem Sci 33, 101-103 (2008).
59. Liu, Z. L. & Slininger, P. J. Universal external RNA controls for microbial gene expression analysis using microarray and qRT-PCR. J Microbiol Methods 68, 486-496 (2007).
60. Hegde, P. et al. A concise guide to cDNA microarray analysis. BioTechniques 29, 548-550, 552-544, 556 passim (2000).