Getting down to details: Using theories of cognition and learning to inform tangible user interface design

Interacting with Computers

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-20

  Antle, Alissa N ^a   Wise, Alyssa F ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

cognition; cognitive theories; design framework; design guidelines; design knowledge; design research; embodied interaction; learning; learning theories; natural user interfaces; physicality; tangible computing; tangible interaction; tangible user interfaces

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; TAXONOMIES;

COGNITION; COGNITIVE THEORY; DESIGN FRAMEWORKS; DESIGN KNOWLEDGE; DESIGN RESEARCH; EMBODIED INTERACTION; LEARNING; LEARNING THEORY; NATURAL USER INTERFACES; PHYSICALITY; TANGIBLE COMPUTING; TANGIBLE INTERACTION; TANGIBLE USER INTERFACES;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 84876374377     PISSN: 09535438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/iwc/iws007     Document Type: Article

References (129)

1. Abrahamson, D. (2004) Embodied Spatial Articulation: A Gesture Perspective on Student Negotiation Between Kinesthetic Schemas and Epistemic Forms in Learning Mathematics. In Proc. Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter. of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Windsor, Ontario, pp. 791-797.
2. Ackermann, E. (1996) Perspective-Taking and Object Construction: Two Keys to Learning. In Kafai, Y. and Resnick, M. (eds), Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking, and Learning in a Digital World, pp. 25-35. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey.
3. Ackermann, E. (2007) Experiences of Artifacts: People's Appropriation, Objects' Affordances. In von Glasersfeld, E. (ed.) Key Works in Radical Constructivism, pp. 149-159, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam.
4. Africano, D., Berg, S., Lindbergh, K., Lundholm, P., Nilbrink, F. and Persson, A. (2004) Designing Tangible Interfaces for Children's Collaboration. In Proc. Extended Abstracts of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 853-868, Vienna, ACM Press.
5. Ainsworth, S. (2006) DeFT: a conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learn. Instr., 16, 183-198. (Pubitemid 43717601)
6. Antle, A.N. (2007) The CTI Framework: Informing the Design of Tangible Systems for Children. In Proc. Conf. Tangible and Embedded Interaction, pp. 195-202. Baton Rouge, LA., ACM Press,. (Pubitemid 47482770)
7. Antle, A.N. (2009) Embodied child computer interaction-why embodiment matters. ACM Inter., 16, 27-30.
8. Antle, A.N. (2012) Exploring how children use their hands to think: an embodied interactional analysis. Behav. Inf. Technol., 1-17, in Press. doi:10.1080/0144929X.0142011.0630415.
9. Antle, N., Bevans,A.,Tanenbaum, J., Seaborn, K. and Wang, S. (2011a) Futura: Design for Collaborative Learning and Game Play on a Multi-Touch Digital Tabletop. In Proc. Conf. Tangibles Embodied and Embedded Interaction, Funchal, pp. 93-100. ACM Press.
10. Antle, A.N., Corness, G. and Bevans, A. (2011b) Springboard: Designing Image Schema Based Embodied Interaction for an Abstract Domain. In England, D. (ed.) Human-Computer Interaction Series: Whole Body Interaction, pp. 7-18. Springer, London.
11. Antle, A.N., Corness, G. and Bevans,A. (2013) Balancing justice: comparing whole body and controller-based interaction for an abstract domain. Int. J. Arts Technol., Special Issue on Whole Body Interaction, in Press. http://www.antle.iat.sfu.ca/EmbodiedMetaphor/.
12. Antle, A.N., Corness, G. and Droumeva, M. (2009a) Human-computer- intuition? Exploring the cognitive basis for intuition in embodied interaction. Int. J. Art Technol., 2, 235-254.
13. Antle, A.N., Corness, G. and Droumeva, M. (2009b) What the body knows: exploring the benefits of embodied metaphors in hybrid physical digital environments. Interact. Comput. (Special Issue on Enactive Interfaces), 21, 66-75.
14. Antle, A.N., Droumeva, M., Corness, G. (2008) Playing with the sound maker: do embodied metaphors help children learn? In Proc. Conf. Interaction Design and Children, Chicago, pp. 178-185, ACM Press.
15. Antle, A.N., Droumeva, M. and Ha, D. (2009c) Hands on What? Comparing Children's Mouse-Based and Tangible-Based Interaction. In Proc. Conf. Interaction Design and Children, Como, pp. 80-88, ACM Press.
16. Antle, A.N., Wise, A.F. and Nielsen, K. (2011c) Towards Utopia: Designing Tangibles for Learning. In Proc. Conf. Interact. Design Children, Ann Arbor, pp. 11-20. ACM Press.
17. Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephan, C., Sikes, J. and Snapp, M. (1978) The Jigsaw Classroom, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills.
18. Atkinson, R.C. and Shiffrin, R.M. (1968) Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes. In: Spence, K.W. and Spence, J.T. (eds) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, pp. 89-195, Academic, NewYork.
19. Baddeley, A.D. (1986) Working Memory, 11th edn, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
20. Baddeley, A.D. (2001) Is working memory still working? Am. Psychol., 56, 851-864. (Pubitemid 33699206)
21. Bakker, S., Antle, A.N. and van den Hoven, E. (2009) Identifying Embodied Metaphors in Children's Sound-Action Mappings. In Proc. Conf. Interaction Design and Children, Como, pp. 140-149. ACM Press.
22. Bakker, S., Antle, A.N. and van den Hoven, E. (2012) Embodied metaphors in tangible interaction design. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput., 16, 433-449.
23. Bakker, S., van den Hoven, E. and Antle, A.N. (2011) MoSo Tangibles: Evaluating Embodied Learning. In Proc. Conf.Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, Funchal, pp. 85-92. ACM Press, NY.
24. Bednar, A.K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T.M. and Perry, J.D. (1995) Theory into Practice: How do We Link? In: Duffy, T.M. and Jonassen, D.H. (eds) Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation, pp. 17-34, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale.
25. Brosterman N. (1997) Inventing Kindergarten, Harry N. Abrams, NewYork.
26. Capon, N. and Kuhn, D. (2004) What's so GoodAbout Problem-Based Learning? Cognition Instruct., 22, 61-79.
27. Chipman, G., Druin, A., Beer, D., Fails, J., Guha, M. and Simms, S. (2006)ACase Study ofTangible Flags:ACollaborativeTechnology to Enhance Field Trips. In Proc. Conf. Interaction Design and Children, Tampere, pp. 1-8. ACM Press. (Pubitemid 46644983)
28. Clark,A. (1997) Being There: Putting Brain, Body andWorld Together Again. MIT Press, Cambridge.
29. Clark, H.H. and Brennan, S.E. (1991) Grounding in Communication. In: Resnick, L.B., Levine, J.M. and Teasley, S.D. (eds) Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, pp. 127-149. American Psychological Association,Washington, DC.
30. Conole, G., Dyke, M., Oliver, M. and Seale, J. (2004) Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design. Comput. Educ., 43, 17-33.
31. Cronjé, J. (2006) Paradigms regained: toward integrating objectivism and constructivism in instructional design and the learning sciences. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 54, 387-416. (Pubitemid 44257827)
32. Dewey, J. (1938) Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. Holt and Co., NewYork.
33. Dillenbourg, P. (1999a) Collaborative-Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Elsevier, NewYork.
34. Dillenbourg, P. (1999b) What do You Mean by "Collaborative Learning"? In: Dillenbourg, P. (ed.) Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, pp. 1-16. Elsevier Science, NewYork.
35. Dillenbourg, P. (2002) Over-scripting CSCL: The Risks of Blending Collaborative Learning with Instructional Design. In Kirschner, P. (ed.) Three Worlds of CSCL: Can We Support CSCL? Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen.
36. Dillenbourg, P. and Jermann, P. (2007) Designing Integrative Scripts. In Fischer, F., Mandl, H., Haake, J. and Kollar, I. (eds.) Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: Cognitive, Computational, and Educational Perspectives, pp. 275-295. Springer, NewYork.
37. Duffy, T.M., Kirkley, J.R., del Valle, R., Malopinsky, L., Scholten, C., Neely, G., Wise, A.F. and Chang, J. (2006) Online Teacher Professional Development: A Learning Architecture. In Dede, C. (ed.) Online Professional Development for Teachers: Emerging Models and Methods, pp. 175-197. Harvard Education Press, Cambridge.
38. Edge, D. and Blackwell, A.F. (2006) Correlates of the cognitive dimensions for tangible user interface. J. Vis. Lang. Comput., 17, 366-394. (Pubitemid 44172065)
39. Ertmer, P.A. and Newby, T.J. (1993) Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Perform. Improv. Q., 6, 50-72.
40. Fernaeus, Y. and Tholander, J. (2005) "Looking at the Computer but Doing It on Land": Children's Interactions in a Tangible Programming Space. In Proc. HCI 2005, pp. 3-18. Springer.
41. Fernaeus,Y. and Tholander, J. (2006) Finding Design Qualities in a Tangible Programming Space. In Proc. Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, Quebec, pp. 447-456. ACM Press. (Pubitemid 44032129)
42. Ferris, K. and Bannon, L. (2002) " A Load of Ould Boxology!". In Proc. Conf. Designing Interactive Systems, London, pp. 41-49. ACM Press.
43. Fishkin, K. (2004)A taxonomy for and analysis of tangible interfaces. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput., 8, 347-358.
44. Fitzmaurice, G., Ishii, H. and Buxton,W. (1995) Bricks: Laying the Foundations for Graspable User Interfaces. In Proc. Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems Denver, Co, pp. 442-449. ACM Press/Wesley.
45. Glos, J. and Cassell, J. (1997) Rosebud: Technological Toys for Storytelling. In Proc. Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, pp. 359-360. ACM.
46. Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005) Hearing Gesture: How Our Hands Help Us Think. First Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
47. Golightly, D. and Gilmore, D. (1997) Breaking the Rules of Direct Manipulation. In Proc. INTERACT, London, pp. 156-163. ACM Press.
48. Hollan, J., Hutchins, E. and Kirsh, D. (2000) Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. Transact. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 7, 174-196.
49. Holland, D., Wilkie, K., Bouwer, A., Dalgleish, M. and Mulholland, P. (2011) Whole Body Interaction in Abstract Domains. In: England, D. (ed.) Human Computer Interaction Series:Whole Body Interaction, pp. 19-34. Springer, London.
50. Horn, M.S., Crouser, R.J. and Bers, M.U. (2012) Tangible interaction and learning: the case for a hybrid approach. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput., 16, 379-389.
51. Hornecker, E. (2005) A Design Theme for Tangible Interaction: Embodied Facilitation. In Proc. Conf. Computer-Supported CooperativeWork, Paris, pp. 23-44. Springer.
52. Hornecker, E., Marshall, P. and Rogers, Y. (2007) From Entry to Access-HowShareability ComesAbout. In Proc. Conf. Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, pp. 328-342. ACM Press, Helsinki.
53. Howison, M., Trninic, D., Reinholz, D. and Abrahamson, D. (2011) The Mathematical Imagery Trainer: From Embodied Interaction to Conceptual Learning. In: Proc. Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, pp. 1989-1998. ACM Press.
54. Hulme, C. and Mackenzie, S. (1992) Working Memory and Severe Learning Difficulties. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hove.
55. Hurtienne, J. (2009) Cognition in HCI: An Ongoing Story, Human Technology, 5, 12-28.
56. Hutchins, E. (1995) Cognition in theWild. MIT Press, Cambridge.
57. Inkpen, K., Ho-Ching, W., Kuederle, O., Scott, S. and Shoemaker, G. (1999) This is Fun! We're All Best Friends and We're All Playing: Supporting Children's Synchronous Collaboration. In Proc. Conf. Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, Palo Alto, pp. 1-12. International Society of the Learning Sciences.
58. Järvelä, S., Häkkinen, P., Arvaja, M. and Leinonen, P. (2004) Instructional Support in CSCL. In Strijbos, J.W., Kirschner, P. and Martens, R. (eds) WhatWe Know About CSCL, pp. 115-139. Springer, Netherlands.
59. Johnson, M. (1987) The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
60. Kerawalla, L., Pearce, D. and Yuill, N., Luckin, R. and Harris, A. (2008) I'm keeping those there, are you? The role of a new user interface paradigm-separate control of shared space (SCOSS)-in the collaborative decision-making process. Comput. Educ., 50, 193-206. (Pubitemid 47538846)
61. Kerzel, D. (2001) Visual short-term memory is influenced by haptic perception. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Memory Cognition, 27, 1101-1109. (Pubitemid 33683974)
62. Kirschner, P.A. (2002) Cognitive load theory: implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learn. Instr., 12, 1-10. (Pubitemid 39659593)
63. Koleva, B., Benford, S., Ng, K. and Rodden, T. (2003) A Framework for Tangible User Interfaces. In The Real World User Interfaces Workshop at the 5th International Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI 2003) Mobile HCI, Physical InteractionWorkshop on RealWorld User Interfaces. Mobile HCI, Udine, pp. 46-50.
64. Koschmann, T. and CSCL (1996) Theory and Practice of an Emerging Paradigm, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Malwah.
65. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P.A. and Jochems, W. (2003) Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Comput. Hum. Behav., 19, 335-353.
66. Lakens, D., Schneider, I.K., Jostmann, N.B. and Schubert, T.W. (2011) Telling things apart: The distance between response keys influences categorization times. Psychol. Sci., 22, 887-890.
67. Lipponen, L. (2002) Exploring Foundations for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. In Stahl, G. (ed.) Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, pp. 72-81. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale.
68. Manches, A. and O'Malley, C. (2012) Tangibles for learning: a representational anlaysis of physical manipulation. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput., 16, 405-419.
69. Manches, A., O'Malley, C. and Benford, S. (2009) Physical Manipulation: Evaluating the Potential for Tangible Designs. In Proc. Conf. Tangible Embedded Interact., Cambridge, pp. 77-84. ACM Press.
70. Manches, A., O'Malley, C. and Benford, S. (2010) The role of physical representations in solving number problems: a comparison of young children's use of physical and virtual materials. Comput. Educ., 54, 622-640.
71. Marco, J., Cerezo, E., Baldassarri, S., Mazzonne, E. and Read, J. (2009) Bringing Tabletop Technologies to Kindergarten Children. In Proc. Conf. on Human. Computer Interaction, Cambridge, pp. 103-111. BCS.
72. Marshall, P. (2007) DoTangible Interfaces Enhance Learning? In Proc. Conf. Tangible and Embedded Interaction, Baton Rouge, pp. 163-170. ACM Press.
73. Marshall, P., Cheng, P.C.H. and Luckin, R. (2010) Tangibles in the Balance: a Discovery Learning Task with Physical or Graphical Materials. In Proc. Conf. Tangible Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, Funchal, pp. 153-160. ACM Press.
74. Marshall, P., Fleck, R., Harris, A., Rick, J., Hornecker, E., Rogers, Y., Yuill, N. and Dalton, N.S. (2009) Fighting for Control: Children's Embodied InteractionsWhen Using Physical and Digital Representations. In Proc. Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, pp. 2149-2152. ACM Press.
75. Marshall, P., Morris, R., Rogers, Y., Kreitmayer, S. and Davies, M. (2011) Rethinking 'multi-user': an in-the-wild study of how groups approach a walk-up-and-use tabletop interface. In Proc. Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems,Vancouver, pp. 3033-3042. ACM.
76. Marshall, P., Price, S. and Rogers,Y. (2003) Conceptualising Tangibles to Support Learning. In Proc. Conf. Interaction Design and Children, Preston, pp. 101-109. ACM Press.
77. Martin, T. and Schwartz, D. (2005) Physically distributed learning: adapting and reinterpreting physical environments in the development of fraction concepts. Cognit. Sci., 29, 587-625. (Pubitemid 41223556)
78. Mayer, R.E. (2009) Multimedia Learning, 2nd edn., Cambridge University Press, NewYork.
79. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002) Phenomenology of Perception; Translated by Colin Smith, Routledge, London.
80. Miller, C., Lehman, J. and Koedinger, K. (1999) Goals and learning in microworlds. Cognit. Sci., 23, 305-336.
81. Miller, G.A. (1956) Human memory and the storage of information. IRE Transact. Inf. Theory, 2, 129-137.
82. Miyake, N., Masukawa, H. and Shirouzou, H. (2001) The Complex Jigsaw as an Enhancer of Collaborative Knowledge Building in Undergraduate Introductory Science Courses. In Proc. Eur. Conf. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, Maastricht, pp. 454-461. Maastricht University.
83. Montessori, M. (1966) The Secret of Childhood. Ballantine Books, NewYork.
84. O'Malley, C. (1995) Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Springer, Berlin.
85. O'Malley, C. and Stanton-Fraser, D. (2004) Literature Review in Learning with Tangible Technologies, NESTA Futurelab, Bristol.
86. Papert, S. (1993) Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books, NewYork.
87. Pavio, A. (1991) Dual coding theory: retrospect and current status. Can. J. Psychol., 45, 255-287.
88. Piaget, J. (1937) The Construction of Reality in the Child. Basic Books, NewYork.
89. Piaget, J. (1977) The Development of Thought: Equilibrium of Cognitive Structures. Viking Press, NewYork.
90. Price, S., Falcao,T.P., Sheridan, J.G. and Roussos, G. (2009) The Effect of Representation Location on Interaction in a Tangible Learning Environment. In Proc. Conf. Tangible and Embedded Interaction, Cambridge, pp. 85-92. ACM Press.
91. Price, S., Rogers, Y., Scaife, M., Stanton, D. and Neale, H. (2003) Using tangibles to promote novel forms of playful learning. Interact. Comput., 15, 169-185.
92. Price, S., Sheridan, J.G., Falcao, T.P. and Roussos, G. (2008) Towards a framework for investigating tangible environments for learning. Int. J. Art Technol. (Special Issue on Tangible and Embedded Interaction), 1, 351-368.
93. Raffle, H., Parkes, A., Ishii, H. and Lifton, J. (2006) Beyond Record and Play: Backpacks: Tangible Modulators for Kinetic Behavior. In Proc. Conf. Human. Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, pp. 681-690, ACM Press. (Pubitemid 44032157)
94. Randell, C., Price, S., Rogers, Y., Harris, E. and Fitzpatrick, G. (2004) The ambient horn: designing a novel audio-based learning experience. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput., 8, 144-161.
95. Resnick, M. (1998) Technologies for lifelong kindergarten. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 46, 43-55. (Pubitemid 128373076)
96. Resnick, M., Martin, F., Berg, R., Borovoy, R., Colella,V., Kramer, K. and Silverman, B. (1998) Digital manipulatives: new toys to think with. In Proc. Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, Los Angeles, pp. 281-287. ACM Press/Wesley.
97. Rick, J. (2012) Proportion: A Tablet App for Collaborative Learning. In Proc. Conf. Interaction Design for Children, Bremen, Germany, pp. 316-319. ACM Press.
98. Rogers, Y. and Muller, H. (2006) A framework for designing sensorbased interactions to promote exploration and reflection in play. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., 64, 1-14. (Pubitemid 41681998)
99. Rogers,Y., Scaife, M., Gabrielli, S., Smith, H. and Harris, E. (2002)A conceptual framework for mixed reality environments: designing novel learning activities for young children. Presence, 11, 677-686. (Pubitemid 36103498)
100. Roschelle, J. and Teasley, S. (1995) The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving. In O'Malley, C. (ed.) Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, pp. 69-197, Springer, Berlin.
101. Savery, J. and Duffy, T. (1996) Problem Based Learning: An Instructional Model and Its Constructivist Framework. In:Wilson, B. (ed.) Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies In Instructional Design, pp. 135-148., Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs.
102. Schwartz, D.L. and Bransford, J.D. (1998) A time for telling. Cognit. Instruct., 16, 475-522. (Pubitemid 128368485)
103. Schwartz, D.L. and Martin, T. (2004) Inventing to prepare for learning: the hidden efficiency of original student production in statistics instruction. Cognit. Instruct., 22, 129-184. (Pubitemid 38808943)
104. Schwartz, D.L. and Martin, T. (2006) Distributed learning and mutual adaptation. Pragmat. Cogn., 14, 313-332. (Pubitemid 44541569)
105. Seaborn, K., Riecke, B. and Antle, A.N. (2010) Exploring the Interplay ofVisual and Haptic Modalities in a Pattern-MatchingTask. In Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Haptic Audio Visual Environments and Games, Phoenix, pp. 1-6. IEEE Press.
106. Sfard, A. (1998) On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educ. Researcher, 27, 4-13. (Pubitemid 128056715)
107. Shaer, O., Leland, N., Calvillo-Gamez, E.H. and Jacob, R.J.K. (2004) The TAC paradigm: specifying tangible user interfaces. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput., 8, 359-369.
108. Smith, P.L. and Ragan, T.J. (1993) Instructional Design, Macmillan, NewYork.
109. Speelpenning, T., Antle, A.N., Doring, T. and van den Hoven, E. (2011) Exploring How a Tangible Tool Enables Collaboration in a Multi-Touch Tabletop Game. In Proc. INTERACT, Lisbon, pp. 605-621. ACM Press.
110. Stahl, G., Koschmann, T. and Suthers, D. (2006) Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning:An Historical Perspective. In Sawyer, R.K. (ed.) Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, pp. 409-426. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
111. Stanton, D., Bayon, V., Neale, H., Ghali, A., Benford, S., Cobb, S., Ingram, R., O'Malley, C., Wilson, J. and Pridmore, T. (2001) Classroom Collaboration in the Design of Tangible Interfaces for Storytelling. In Proc. Conf. Hum. Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, pp. 482-489. ACM Press. (Pubitemid 32393392)
112. Stolterman, E. and Wiberg, M. (2010) Concept-driven interaction design research. Hum. Comput. Interact., 25, 95-118.
113. Suthers, D. and Hundhausen, C. (2003) An empirical study of the effects of representational guidance on collaborative learning. J. Learn. Sci., 12, 183-219.
114. Suthers, D., Vatrapu, R., Medina, R., Joseph, S. and Dwyer, N. (2008) Beyond threaded discussion: representational guidance in asynchronous collaborative learning environments, Comput. Educ., 50, 1103-1127. (Pubitemid 351483931)
115. Suzuki, H. and Kato, H. (1995) Interaction-Level Support for Collaborative Learning: AlgoBlock an Open Programming Language. In Proc. Conf. Comput. Support for Collaborative Learning, Bloomington, pp. 349-355. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale.
116. Sweller, J. (1988) Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cognit. Sci. Multidiscip. J., 12, 257-285.
117. Sweller, J. and Chandler, P. (1991) Evidence for cognitive load theory. Cognit. Instruct., 8, 351-362.
118. Thelen, E. (1995) Motor development: a new synthesis. Am. Psychol., 50, 79-95.
119. Ullmer, B. and Ishii, H. (2000) Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces. IBM Syst. J., 39, 915-931. (Pubitemid 32087755)
120. Underkoffler, J. and Ishii, H. (1999) Urp: a luminous-tangible workbench for urban planning and design. In Proc. Human Factors in Computing Systems, Pittsburgh, pp. 386-393. ACM Press.
121. van Bruggen, J.M., Kirschner, P.A. and Jochems, W. (2002) External representation of argumentation in CSCL and the management of cognitive load. Learn. Instruct., 12, 121-138. (Pubitemid 39659599)
122. van den Hoven, E. and Eggen, B. (2004) Tangible Computing in Everyday Life. In Proc. Eur. Symp.on Ambient Intelligence, Eindenhoven, pp. 230-242. Springer.
123. von Glaserfeld, E. (1989) Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese, 80, 121-140.
124. Wickens, C.D. and Hollands, J.G. (2000) Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
125. Wilson, B. and Myers, K. (2000) Situated Cognition in Theoretical and Practical Context. In Jonassen, D. and Land, S. (eds) Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments, pp. 57-88, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah.
126. Wise, A.F., Padmanabhan, P. and Duffy, T.M. (2009) Connecting online learners with diverse local practices: the design of effective common reference points for conversation. Distance Education, 30, 317-338.
127. Zimmerman, J., Stolterman, E. and Forlizzi, J. (2010)AnAnalysis and Critique of Research Through Design:Towards a Formalization of a Research Approach. In Proc. Conf. Designing Interactive Systems, Aarhus, pp. 310-319. ACM Press.
128. Zuckerman, O., Arida, S. and Resnick, M. (2005) Extending Tangible Interfaces for Education: Digital Montessori-Inspired Manipulatives. In Proc. Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, Portland, pp. 859-868. ACM Press. (Pubitemid 41809121)
129. Zufferey, G., Jermann, P., Lucchi, A. and Dillenbourg, P. (2009) TinkerSheets: Using Paper Forms to Control andVisualizeTangible Simulations. In Proc. Conf. Tangible and Embedded Interaction, Cambridge, pp. 377-384. ACM Press.