Human-computer-intuition? Exploring the cognitive basis for intuition in embodied interaction

International Journal of Arts and Technology

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 235-254

  Antle, Alissa N ^a   Corness, Greg ^a   Droumeva, Milena ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Auditory environments; Embedded interaction; Embodied interaction; Embodied schema; Embodiment; Image schema; Interactive environments; Intuitive interaction; Metaphor; Responsive environments; Tangible user interfaces; Whole body interaction

Indexed keywords

MAPPING; USER INTERFACES;

AUDITORY ENVIRONMENTS; EMBEDDED INTERACTION; EMBODIED INTERACTION; EMBODIED SCHEMA; EMBODIMENT; IMAGE SCHEMATA; INTERACTIVE ENVIRONMENTS; INTUITIVE INTERACTION; METAPHOR; RESPONSIVE ENVIRONMENTS; TANGIBLE USER INTERFACES; WHOLE-BODY INTERACTIONS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 70349165846     PISSN: 17548853     EISSN: 17548861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJART.2009.028927     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Antle, A.N. (2007) 'The CTI framework: informing the design of tangible systems for children', Proceedings of Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, Baton Rouge, LA, USA: ACM Press, pp.195-202.
2. Antle, A.N., Corness, G. and Droumeva, M. (in press) 'What the body knows: exploring the benefits of embodied metaphors in hybrid physical digital environments', Interacting with Computers: Special Issue on Physicality, Elsevier.
3. Antle, A.N., Droumeva, M. and Corness, G. (2008) 'Playing with the sound maker: do embodied metaphors help children learn?' Proceedings of the Interaction Design for Children, Chicago, IL, USA: ACM Press, pp.178-185.
4. Barker, A. (1989) Greek Musical Writings: Volume II, Harmonic and Acoustic Theory, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Benford, S., Crabtree, A., Flintham, M., Drozd, A., Anastasi, R., Paxton, M., N., T., Adams, M. and J., R-F. (2006) 'Can you see me now?', ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), Vol. 13, pp.100-133.
6. Blackwell, A. (2006) 'The reification of metaphor as a design tool', ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), Vol. 13, No. 4, pp.490-530.
7. Budd, M. (2003) 'Musical movement and aesthetic metaphors', British Journal of Aesthetics, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp.209-223.
8. Carroll, J. and Thomas, J.C. (1982) 'Metaphors and the cognitive representation of computing systems', IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp.107-116.
9. Djajadiningrat, T., Wensveen, S., Frens, J. and Overbeeke, K. (2004) 'Tangible products: redressing the balance between appearance and action', Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Vol. 8, No. 5, pp.294-309.
10. Dourish, P. (2001) Where the Action Is, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
11. Erickson, T. (1990) 'Working with interface metaphors', in L. Brenda (Ed.) The Art of Human-Computer-Interface Design, New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
12. Fishkin, K. (2004) 'A taxonomy for and analysis of tangible interfaces', Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Vol. 8, No. 5, pp.347-358.
13. Hornecker, E. and Buur, J. (2006) 'Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction', Proceedings of the Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montréal, Québec, Canada: ACM Press, pp.437-446.
14. Hunt, A., Wanderley, M. and Paradis, M. (2002) 'The importance of parameter mapping in electronic instrument design', Proceedings of the Conference on New Instruments for Musical Expression, Dublin, Ireland, Singapore: National University of Singapore Press, pp.1-6.
15. Hurtienne, J. and Israel, J. (2007) 'Image schemas and their metaphorical extensions: intuitive patterns for tangible interaction', Proceedings of the Tangible and Embedded Interaction, Baton Rouge, LA: ACM Press, pp.127-134.
16. Jaques-Dalcroze, E. (1972) Eurhythmics Art and Education, New York, NY: Benjamin Blom Inc.
17. Jensenius, A.R. (2007) 'PhD thesis: action-sound: developing methods and tools to study music-related body movement', Available at: http://www.arj.no/ research/.
18. Johnson, M. (1987) 'The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason', Chicago, IL: Chicago Press.
19. Juntunen, M. and Hyvönen, L. (2004) 'Embodiment in musical knowing: how body movement facilitates learning within Dalcroze Eurhythmics', British Journal of Music Education, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp.199-214.
20. Kahneman, D. (2003) 'Nobel prize 2002 lecture: maps of bounded rationality: a perspective on intuitive judgment and choice', in Frängsmyr (Ed.) Les Prix Nobel, Stockholm: Nobel Foundation.
21. Koleva, B., Benford, S., Ng, K. and Rodden, T. (2003) 'A framework for tangible user interfaces', Proceedings of the Mobile HCI, Udine, Italy, pp.46-50.
22. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors We Live By, Chicago, IL: Chicago Press.
23. Laurel, B. (1986) 'Interface as mimesis', in D.A. Norman and S.W. Draper (Eds.) User Centered Systems Design, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence-Earlbaum.
24. Morales-Manzanares, R., Morales, E., Dannenberg, R.F. and Berger, J.F. (2001) 'SICIB: an interactive music composition system using body movements', Computer Music Journal, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp.25-36.
25. Myers, D.G. (2002) Intuition: Its Powers and Perils, USA: Yale University Press.
26. Norman, D.A. (1993) Things That Make Us Smart, New York, NY: Basic Books.
27. Rogers, Y. and Muller, H. (2005) 'A framework for designing sensor-based interactions to promote exploration and reflection', Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 64, No. 1, pp.1-15.
28. Rohrer, T. (2006) 'The body in space: dimensions of embodiment', in J. Zlatev, T. Ziemke, R. Frank and R. Dirven (Eds.) Body, Language and Mind, Vol. 2, Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
29. Sharlin, E., Watson, B., Kitamura, Y., Kishino, F. and Itoh, Y. (2004) 'On tangible user interfaces, humans and spatiality', Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Vol. 8, No. 5, pp.338-346.
30. Spool, J. (2005) 'What makes a design seem intuitive?' User Interface Engineering, Available at: http://www.uie.com/articles/design-intuitive/.
31. Svanæs, D. (2001) 'Context-aware technology: a phenomenological perspective', Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp.379-400.
32. Svanæs, D. and Verplank, W. (2000) 'In search of metaphors for tangible user interfaces', Proceedings of the Designing Augmented Reality Environments, Elsinore, Denmark: ACM Press, pp.121-129.
33. Terrenghi, L., Kirk, D., Sellen, A. and Izadi, S. (2007) 'Affordances for manipulation of physical versus digital media on interactive surfaces', Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA: ACM Press, pp.1157-1166.
34. Ullmer, B. and Ishii, H. (2000) 'Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces', IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 39, Nos. 3/4.
35. Winkler, T. (1995) 'Making motion musical: gesture mapping strategies for interactive computer music', Proceedings of the Computer Music Conference, San Francisco, CA: Computer Music Association, pp.261-264.
36. Wozny, L.A. (1989) 'The application of metaphor, analogy and conceptual models in computer systems', Interacting with Computers, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp.273-283.
37. Zuckerman, O., Arida, S. and Resnick, M. (2005) 'Extending tangible interfaces for education: digital Montessori-inspired manipulatives', Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Portland, Oregon: ACM Press, pp.859-868.