Embodied child computer interaction: Why embodiment matters

Interactions

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 27-30

  Antle, Alissa N ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT; COGNITIVE STRUCTURES; COMPUTER INTERACTIONS; CULTURAL ENVIRONMENTS; DIGITAL MEDIAS; EMBODIED COGNITIONS; HUMAN BODIES; INTERACTIVE ARTS; PHYSICAL ACTIONS; SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITIES; THINKING SKILLS;

EID: 62949112686     PISSN: 10725520     EISSN: 15583449     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1487632.1487639     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Djajadiningrat, T., K. Overbeeke, and S. Wensveen. "But how, Donald, tell us how? On the creation of meaning in interaction design through feedforward and inherent feedback." Proceedings ofDIS '02, 285-291. New York: ACM Press, 2002.
2. Piaget, J. The Origins of Intelligence In Children. New York: University Press, 1952.
3. Healy, J.M. Failure to Connect: How Computers Affect Our Children's Minds. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1998.
4. Dourish, P. Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2001.
5. Clark, A. Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1997.
6. Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago Press, 1980.g
7. Fernaeus, Y. and J. Tholander. "Finding design qualities in a tangible programming space." Proceedings of CHI 2006, 447-458. New York: ACM Press, 2006.
8. Antle, A.N., M. Drourneva, and D. Ha. "Hands on what? Comparing children's mouse-based and tangible-based interaction." (under review, available at http://www.antle.iat.sfu.ca/Physicality/ThinkingWithHands.)
9. Antle, A.N., G. Corness, and M. Droumeva. "What the body knows: Exploring the benefits of embodied metaphors in hybrid physical digital enviro ments" Interacting with Computers, special issue on physicality. Elsevier, (in press).