Goals and learning in microworlds

Cognitive Science

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 305-336

  Miller, Craig S ^a   Lehman, Jill Fain ^a   Koedinger, Kenneth R ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038341524     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog2303_2     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anderson J.R. Rules of the mind. 1993;Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
2. Chabay, R., & Sherwood, B. (1989). The electricity project and the cT programming language. (Technical Report 89-10). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, Center for Design of Educational Computing.
3. Chi M.T.H., Bassock M., Lewis M., Reimann P., Glaser R. Self-explanation How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems . Cognitive Science. 13:1989;145-182.
4. Clements D.H. Effects of Logo and CAI environments on cognition and creativity. Journal of Educational Psychology. 78:1986;309-318.
5. Clements D.H. Metacomponential development in a Logo programming environment. Journal of Educational Psychology. 82:1990;141-149.
6. Conati, C., & Lehman, J. F. (1993). EFH-Soar: Modeling education in highly interactive environments. In P. Torasso (Ed.), Advances in artificial intelligence, lecture notes in artificial intelligence, LNCS 728 (pp. 47-58). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
7. Conati C., Lehman J.F. Toward a model of student education in microworlds. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. 1993;353-358 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
8. diSessa A.A. Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction. 10:1993;105-225.
9. Klahr D., Dunbar K. Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science. 12:1988;1-55.
10. Klahr D., Carver S.M. Cognitive objectives in a Logo debugging curriculum Instruction, learning, and transfer . Cognitive Psychology. 20:1988;362-404.
11. Laird J.E., Newell A., Rosenbloom P.S. Chunking in soar The anatomy of a general learning mechanism . Machine Learning. 1:1986;11-46.
12. Lawler R. Designing computer based microworlds. Byte. 7:1982;138-146.
13. Lehman J.F., Laird J.E., Rosenbloom P.S. A gentle introduction to soar, an architecture for human cognition. Scarborough D., Sternberg S. Invitation to cognitive science. Vol. 4:1996;211-253 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
14. Lehrer R., Littlefield J., Wottreng B. Seeding Mindstorms with LogoWriter Using LOGO in the elementary classroom . 1991;Interactive Education Technologies, Fontana, WI.
15. Lehrer R., Randle L., Sancilio L. Learning preproof geometry with LOGO. Cognition and Instruction. 6:1989;159-184.
16. Lewis M., Anderson J. Discrimination of operator schemata in problem solving Learning from examples . Cognitive Psychology. 17:1985;26-65.
17. Mertz J.S. Using a simulated student for instructional design. Greer J. Proceedings of the 7th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. 1993;453-460 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Charlottesville, VA.
18. Morris C.D., Bransford J.D., Franks J.J. Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 16:1977;519-533.
19. Newell A. Unified theories of cognition. 1990;Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
20. Papert S. Mindstorms Children, computers, and powerful ideas . 1980;Basic Books, New York.
21. Pea R.R., Kurland D.M. On the cognitive effects of learning computer programming. New Ideas in Psychology. 2:(2):1984;137-168.
22. Schank R.C., Farrel R. Creativity in education A standard for computer-based teaching . Machine-Mediated Learning. 2:1988;175-194.
23. Schauble L., Glaser R., Raghavan K., Reiner M. Causal models and experimentation strategies in scientific reasoning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2:1991;201-238.
24. Schauble L., Klopfer L.E., Raghavan K. Students' transition from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 28:(9):1991;859-882.
25. Sherwood B., Chabay R. Electrical interactions and the atomic structure of matter Adding qualitative reasoning to a calculus-based electricity and magnetism course . Caillot M. Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Learning Electricity or Electronics with Advanced Educational Technology. 1991;23-35 Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
26. Simon, H. A., & Lea, G. (1974). Problem solving and rule induction: A unified view. In L. W. Gregg (Ed.), Knowledge and cognition (pp. ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Simon T. Claims for Logo - What should we believe and why? Rutkowska J.C., Crook C. Computers, cognition, and development. 1987;115-133 John Wiley and Sons, New York.
28. Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving Effects on learning . Cognitive Science. 12:1988;257-285.
29. Sweller J., Levine M. Effects of goal specificity on means-ends analysis and learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 8:1982;463-474.
30. Sweller J., Mawer R., Ward M. Development of expertise in mathematical problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 112:1983;639-661.
31. VanLehn K., Ohlsson S., Nason R. Applications of simulated students An exploration . Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 5:1994;135-175.
32. Vollmeyer R., Burns B.D., Holyoak K.J. The impact of goal specificity and systematicity of strategies on the acquisition of problem structure. Ram A., Eiselt K. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. 1994;Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
33. White B.Y. Designing computer games to help physics students understand Newton's laws of motion. Cognition and Instruction. 1:1984;69-108.