What the body knows: Exploring the benefits of embodied metaphors in hybrid physical digital environments

Interacting with Computers

Volumn 21, Issue 1-2, 2009, Pages 66-75

  Antle, Alissa N ^a   Corness, Greg ^a   Droumeva, Milena ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Audio environments; Augmented environments; Embodied interaction; Metaphor; Physical interaction

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY;

AUDIO ENVIRONMENTS; AUGMENTED ENVIRONMENTS; EMBODIED INTERACTION; METAPHOR; PHYSICAL INTERACTIONS;

UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING;

EID: 59649092532     PISSN: 09535438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.intcom.2008.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Andersen K. 'ensemble': playing with sensors and sound. Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria (2004), ACM Press 1239-1242
2. Antle A.N., Droumeva M., and Corness G. Playing with The Sound Maker: Do embodied metaphors help children learn?. Proceedings of Conference on Interaction Design for Children, Chicago, IL, USA (2008), ACM Press 178-185
3. Aoki P., Grinter R., Hurst A., Szymanski M., Thorton T., Woodruff A., and Voce S. Exploring the interplay or conversation and mobile audio spaces. Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Minneapolis, MI, USA (2002), ACM Press 431-438
4. Aristotle. Rhetoric (2004), Kessinger Publishing
5. Barker A. Greek Musical Writings: Volume II, Harmonic and Acoustic Theory (1989), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
6. Black M. Models and Metaphors (1962), Cornell University Press, Uthaca, NY, USA
7. Blackwell A. The reification of metaphor as a design tool. ACM Transactions on Computer Human Interaction (TOCHI) 13 4 (2006) 490-530
8. Blackwell A., Edge D., Dubuc L., and Rode J. Using solid diagrams for tangible interface prototyping. IEEE Pervasive Computing 4 4 (2005) 74-77
9. Budd M. Musical movement and aesthetic metaphors. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 3 (2003) 209-223
10. Carroll J., and Thomas J.C. Metaphors and the cognitive representation of computing systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 12 2 (1982) 107-116
11. Clark A. Being There: Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again (1997), Bradford Books, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA
12. Clark A. An embodied cognitive science?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 9 (1999) 345-351
13. Dourish P. Where the Action Is (2001), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA
14. Droumeva M., Antle A.N., and Wakkary R. Exploring ambient sound techniques in the design of responsive environments for children. Proceedings of Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, Baton Rouge, LA, USA (2007), ACM Press 171-178
15. Erickson T. Working with interface metaphors. In: Brenda L. (Ed). The Art of Human-Computer-Interface Design (1990), Addison-Wesley, New York, NY, USA
16. D. Fenza, M. Luca, S. Canazza, A. Rodia, 2005. Physical movement and musical gestures: a multilevel mapping strategy. In: Proceedings of Sound and Music Computing. Available from: .
17. Ferris K., and Bannon L. ...a load of ould boxology!. Proceedings of Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, London, England (2002), ACM Press 41-49
18. Fishkin K. A taxonomy for and analysis of tangible interfaces. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 8 5 (2004) 347-358
19. Gallagher S. How the Body Shapes the Mind (2005), Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK
20. Gibson J.J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (1979), Lawrence Erlbaum, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, USA
21. Goldin-Meadow S. Hearing Gesture: How Our Hands Help Us Think (2005), First Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA
22. Hunt A., Wanderley M., and Paradis M. The importance of parameter mapping in electronic instrument design. Proceedings of Conference on New Instruments for Musical Expression, Dublin, Ireland (2002), National University of Singapore Press, Singapore 1-6
23. Hurtienne J., and Israel J. Image schemas and their metaphorical extensions: Intuitive patterns for tangible interaction. Proceedings on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, Baton Rouge, LA, USA (2007), ACM Press 127-134
24. Imaz M., and Benyon D. Designing with Blends: Conceptual Foundations of Human Computer Interaction and Software Engineering (2007), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA
25. Jaques-Dalcroze E. Eurhythmics Art and Education (1972), Benjamin Blom Inc., New York, NY, USA
26. Jensenius, A.R., 2007. Ph.D. Thesis, Action-sound: Developing methods and tools to study music-related body movement. Available from: .
27. Johnson M. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason (1987), Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA
28. Juntunen M., and Hyvönen L. Embodiment in musical knowing: How body movement facilitates learning within Dalcroze Eurhythmics. British Journal of Music Education 21 2 (2004) 199-214
29. Klemmer S., Hartmann B., and Takayama L. How bodies matter: Five themes for interaction design. Proceedings of Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, University Park, PA, USA (2006), ACM Press 140-149
30. Koleva B., Benford S., Ng K., and Rodden T. A framework for tangible user interfaces. Proceedings on Mobile HCI Conference: Physical Interaction (PI03) Workshop on Real World User Interfaces, Udine, Italy (2003), ACM Press 1-5
31. Lakoff G., and Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By (1980), Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA
32. Laurel B. Interface as mimesis. In: Norman D.A., and Draper S.W. (Eds). User Centered Systems Design (1986), Lawrence-Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, USA
33. Merleau-Ponty M. Phenomenology of Perception. (Colin Smith, Trans.) (2002), Routledge, London, UK
34. Morales-Manzanares R., Morales E., Dannenberg R.F., and Berger J.F. SICIB: an interactive music composition system using body movements. Computer Music Journal 25 2 (2001) 25-36
35. Myers D.G. Intuition: Its Powers and Perils (2002), Yale University Press, USA
36. Piaget J. The Origins of Intelligence in Children (1952), University Press, New York, NY, USA
37. Proctor R., and Vu K.-P. Stimulus Response Compatibility Principles: Data, Theory and Application (2006), CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, USA
38. Ryan, R.M., 2006. The Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI). Available from: .
39. Searl J. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts (1979), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
40. Svanæs, D., 2000. Ph.D. Thesis, Understanding interactivity: steps to phenomenology of human-computer interaction. Department of Computer Science, Trondheim, Norway. Available from: .
41. Svanæs D. Context-aware technology: a phenomenological perspective. Human Computer Interaction 16 (2001) 379-400
42. Varela F.J., Thompson E., and Rosch E. The Embodied Mind (1991), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA
43. Williams A., Kabisch R., and Dourish P. From interaction to participation: configuring space through embodied interaction. Proceedings of UbiComp, Toyko, Japan (2005), ACM Press 287-304
44. Wilson M. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9 4 (2002) 625-636
45. Wittgenstein L. Philosophical Investigations (1953), Blackwell, Oxford, UK
46. Wozny L.A. The application of metaphor, analogy and conceptual models in computer systems. Interacting with Computers 1 3 (1989) 273-283
47. Wrinkler T. Making motion musical: gesture mapping strategies for interactive computer music. Proceedings on Computer Music Conference (1995), Computer Music Association, San Francisco, CA, USA
48. Xie L., Antle A.N., and Motamedi N. Are tangibles more fun? Comparing children's enjoyment and engagement using physical, graphical and tangible user interfaces. Proceedings of Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, Bonn, Germany (2008), ACM Press 191-198
49. Zigelbaum J., Millner A., Desai B., and Ishii H. BodyBeats: whole-body, musical interfaces for children. Extended Abstracts of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2006), ACM Press 1595-1600