Morphological processing as we know it: An analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 3, Issue JUL, 2012, Pages

  Amenta, Simona ^a   Crepaldi, Davide ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Benchmark effects; Computational models; ERPs; Eye tracking; Morphological processing; Response times; Visual identification

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867078778     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232     Document Type: Review

References (144)

1. Alegre, M., and Gordon, P. (1999). Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. J. Mem. Lang. 40, 41-61.
2. Allen, M., and Badecker, W. (1999). Stem homograph inhibition and stem allomorphy: representing and processing inflected forms in a multilevel lexical system. J. Mem. Lang. 41, 105-123.
3. Allen, M., and Badecker, W. (2002). Stem homographs and lemma level representations. Brain Lang. 81, 79-88.
4. Allen, M., Badecker, W., and Osterhout, L. (2003). Morphological analysis in sentence processing: an ERP study. Lang. Cogn. Processes 18, 405-430.
5. Álvareza, C. J., Urrutiaa, M., Domínguez, A., and Sánchez-Casas, R. (2011). Processing inflectional and derivational morphology: electrophysiological evidence from Spanish. Neurosci. Lett. 490, 6-10.
6. Andrews, S. (1986). Morphological influences on lexical access: lexical or nonlexical effects? J. Mem. Lang. 25, 726-740.
7. Aronoff, M. (1976). Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
8. Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., and Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: evidence for a parallel dual-route model. J. Mem. Lang. 37, 94-117.
9. Baayen, R. H., Feldman, L. B., and Schreuder, R. (2006). Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words. J. Mem. Lang. 55, 290-313.
10. Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Durdevic, D. F., Hendrix, P., and Marelli, M. (2011). An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychol. Rev. 118, 438-481.
11. Baayen R. H., Wurm, L. H., and Aycock, J. (2007). Lexical dynamics for low-frequency complex words: a regression study across tasks and modalities. The Mental Lexicon 2, 419-463.
12. Badecker, W., and Allen, M. (2002). Morphological parsing and the perception of lexical identity: a masked priming study of stem homographs. J. Mem. Lang. 47, 125-144.
13. Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., and Yap, M. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 132, 283-316.
14. Barber, H., Dominguez, A., and de Vega, M. (2002). Human brain potentials indicate morphological decomposition in visual word recognition. Neurosci. Lett. 318, 149-152.
15. Beauvillain, C. (1996). The integration of morphological and whole-word form information during eye fixations on prefixed and suffixed words. J. Mem. Lang. 35, 801-820.
16. Bertram, R., Baayen, R. H., and Schreuder, R. (2000a). Effects of family size for complex words. J. Mem. Lang. 42, 390-405.
17. Bertram, R., Schreuder, R., and Baayen, R. H. (2000b). The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: the role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. Cognition 26, 489-511.
18. Bertram, R., Laine, M., and Karvinen, K. (1999). The interplay of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity in lexical processing: evidence from a morphologically rich language. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 28, 213-226.
19. Bradley, D. C. (1979). "Lexical representation of derivational relation," in Juncture, eds M. Aronoff and M. L. Kean (Cambridge: MIT Press), 37-55.
20. Burani, C., and Caramazza, A. (1987). Representation and processing of derived words. Lang. Cogn. Process 2, 217-227
21. Burani, C., Dovetto, F. M., Thornton, A. M., and Laudanna, A. (1997). "Accessing and naming affixed pseudo-words," in Yearbook of Morphology 1996, eds G. Booij, and J. von Marle (Dordrecht: Kluer Academic Publishers), 55-72.
22. Burani, C., Marcolini, S., and Stella, G. (2002). How early does morpholexical reading develop in readers of a shallow orthography? Brain Lang. 81, 568-586
23. Burani, C., Salmaso, D., and Caramazza, A. (1984). Morphological structure and lexical access. Visible Lang. 18, 342-352.
24. Burani, C., and Thornton, A. M. (2003). "The interplay of root, suffix and whole-word frequency in processing derived words," in Morpho- logical Structure in Language Pro- cessing, eds R. H. Baayen, and R. Schreuder (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter), 157-208.
25. Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., and Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cogni- tion 28, 297-332
26. Carreiras, M., Perdomo, A., and Meseguer, E. (2005). Are stem homographs and orthographic neighbours processed differently during silent reading? Lang. Cogn. Process 20, 317-339.
27. Chateau, D., Knudsen, V. E., and Jared, D. (2002). Masked priming of prefixes and the influence of spelling- meaning consistency. Brain Lang. 81, 587-600
28. Christianson, K., Johnson, R. L., and Rayner, K. (2005). Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 31, 1327-1339.
29. Colé, P., Beauvillain, C., and Segui, J. (1989). On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: a differential frequency effect. J. Mem. Lang. 28, 1-13.
30. Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., Coltheart, M., and Nickels, L. (2010). "Fell" primes "fall," but does "bell" prime "ball"? Masked priming with irregularlyinflected primes. J. Mem. Lang. 63, 83-99.
31. Davis, M. H., and Rastle, K. (2010). Form and meaning in early morphological processing: comment on Feldman, O'Connor, and Moscoso del Prado Martin (2009). Psychon. Bull. Rev. 17, 749-755.
32. De Jong, N., Schreuder, R., and Baayen, R. H. (2000). The morphological family size effect and morphology. Lang. Cogn. Process 15, 329-365.
33. Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pelleg, S., Pollatsek, A., and Rayner, K. (2003). Early morphological effects in reading: evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 10, 415-422.
34. Devlin, J. T., Jamison, H. L., Matthews, P. M., and Gonnerman, L. M. (2004). Morphology and the internal structure of words. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 14984-14988.
35. Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., and Grainger, J. (2005). Masked crossmodal morphological priming: unravelling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition. Lang. Cogn. Process 20, 75-114.
36. Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., and Grainger, J. (2009). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: the case of prefixed words. Mem. Cogn. 37, 895-908.
37. Dominguez, A., Alija, M., Rodriguez-Ferreiro, J., and Cuetos, F. (2010). The contribution of prefixes to morphological processing of Spanish words. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 22, 569-595.
38. Domínguez, A., de Vega, M., and Barber, H. (2004). Event-related brain potentials elicited by morphological, homographic, orthographic, and semantic priming. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 598-608.
39. Drews, E., and Zwitserlood, P. (1995). Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 21, 1098-1116.
40. Duñabeitia, J. A., Kinoshita, S., Carreiras, M., and Norris, D. (2011). Is morpho-orthographic decomposition purely orthographic? Evidence from masked priming in the same - different task. Lang. Cogn. Process 26, 509-529.
41. Duñabeitia, J. A., Laka, I., Perea, M., and Carreiras, M. (2009a). Is Milkman a superhero like Batman? Constituent morphological priming in compound words. Eur. J. Cogn. Psy- chol. 21, 615-640.
42. Duñabeitia, J. A., Molinaro, N., Laka, I., Estévez, A., and Carreiras, M. (2009b). N250 effects for letter transpositions depend on lexicality: "casual" or "causal"? Neuroreport 4, 381-387.
43. Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., and Carreiras, M. (2007). Do transposedletter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition. Cognition 105, 691-703
44. Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., and Carreiras, M. (2008). Does darkness lead to happiness? Masked suffix priming effects. Lang. Cogn. Process 23, 1002-1020.
45. El Yagoubi, R., Chiarelli, V., Mondini, S., Perrone, G., Danieli, M., and Semenza, C. (2008). Neural correlates of Italian nominal compounds and potential impact of headedness effect: an ERP study. Cogn. Neu- ropsychol. 25, 559-581.
46. Feldman, L. B., O'Connor, P. A., and Del Prado Martín, F. M. (2009). Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: a violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 16, 684-691.
47. Feldman, L. B., Soltano, E. G., Pastizzo, M. J., and Francis, S. E. (2004). What do graded effects of semantic transparency reveal about morphological processing? Brain Lang. 90, 17-30.
48. Fiorentino, R., and Fund-Reznicek, E. (2009). Masked morphological priming of compound constituents. Ment. Lex. 4, 159-193.
49. Fiorentino, R., and Poeppel, D. (2007). Compound words and structure in the lexicon. Lang. Cogn. Process 22, 953-1000.
50. Forster, K. I., and Azuma, T. (2000). Masked priming for prefixed words with bound stems: does submit prime permit? Lang. Cogn. Process 15, 539-561.
51. Forster, K. I., and Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 10, 680-698
52. Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., and Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: repetition or partial activation? Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 39, 211-251.
53. Fowler, C. A., Napps, S. E., and Feldman, L. (1985). Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Mem. Cogn. 13, 241-255.
54. Frost, R., Deutsch, A., Gilboa, O., Tannenbaum, M., and Marslen-Wilson, W. (2000). Morphological priming: dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors. Mem. Cogn. 28, 1277-1288.
55. Frost, R., Forster, K. I., and Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A maskedpriming investigation of morphological representation. J. Exp. Psy- chol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 23, 829-56. Retrieved from
56. Giraudo, H., and Grainger, J. (2000). Effects of prime word frequency and cumulative root frequency in masked morphological priming. Lang. Cogn. Process 15, 421-444.
57. Giraudo, H., and Grainger, J. (2001). Priming complex words: evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 8, 127-131.
58. Giraudo, H., and Grainger, J. (2003). "On the role of derivational affixes in recognizing complex words: evidence from masked priming," in Morphological Structure in Lan- guage Processing, eds R. H. Baayen, R. Shreuder (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter), 209-232.
59. Gold, B. T., and Rastle, K. (2007). Neural correlates of morphological decomposition during visual word recognition. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19, 1983-1993
60. Gonnerman, L. M., Seidenberg, M. S., and Andersen, E. S. (2007). Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 136, 323-345.
61. Grainger, J., Colé, P., and Segui, J. (1991). Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. J. Mem. Lang. 30, 370-384.
62. Grainger, J., and Jacobs, M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple readout model. Psychol. Rev. 103, 518-565.
63. Grainger, J., and Whitney, C. (2004). Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 58-59.
64. Grainger, J., and Ziegler, J. C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Front. Psychol. 2, 54.
65. Järvikivi, J., Bertram, R., and Niemi, J. (2006). Affixal salience and the processing of derivational morphology: the role of suffix allomorphy. Lang. Cogn. Process 21, 394-431.
66. Järvikivi, J., and Niemi, J. (2002). Formbased representation in the mental lexicon: priming (with) bound stem allomorphs in Finnish. Brain Lang. 81, 412-423.
67. Juhasz, B. J., and Berkowitz, R. N. (2011). Effects of morphological families on English compound word recognition: a multitask investigation. Lang. Cogn. Process 26, 653-682.
68. Juhasz, B. J., Starr, M. S., Inhoff, A. W., and Placke, L. (2003). The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations. Br. J. Psychol. 94, 223-244.
69. Justus, T., Larsen, J., de Mornay Davies, P., and Swick, D. (2008). Interpreting dissociations between regular and irregular past-tense morphology: evidence from event-related potentials. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neu- rosci. 8, 178-194.
70. Kazanina, N. (2011). Decomposition of prefixed words in Russian. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn.37, 1371-1390.
71. Kazanina, N., Dukova-Zheleva, G., Geber, D., Kharlamov, V., and Tonciulescu, K. (2008). Decomposition into multiple morphemes during lexical access: a masked priming study of Russian nouns. Lang. Cogn. Process 23, 800-823.
72. Kielar, A., and Joanisse, M. F. (2009). Graded effects of regularity in language revealed by N400 indices of morphological priming. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 22, 1373-1398.
73. Kielar, A., Joanisse, M. F., and Hare, M. L. (2008). Priming English past tense verbs: rules or statistics? J. Mem. Lang. 58, 327-346.
74. Kuperman, V., Bertram, R., and Baayen, R. H. (2008). Morphological dynamics in compound processing. Lang. Cogn. Process 23, 1089-1132.
75. Kuperman, V., Bertram, R., and Baayen, R. H. (2010). Processing trade-offs in the reading of Dutch derived words. J. Mem. Lang. 62, 83-97.
76. Kurylowicz, J. (1964). The Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Winter.
77. Kutas, M., and Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annu. Rev. Psychol., 62, 621-647.
78. Laudanna, A., Badecker, W., and Caramazza, A. (1989). Priming homographic stems. J. Mem. Lang. 28, 531-546.
79. Laudanna, A., Badecker, W., and Caramazza, A. (1992). Processing inflectional and derivational morphology. J. Mem. Lang. 31, 333-348.
80. Laudanna, A., and Burani, C. (1995). "Distributional properties of derivational affixes: implications for processing," in Morphological Aspects of Language Processing, ed. L. B. Feldman (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 345-364.
81. Laudanna, A., Burani, C., and Cermele, A. (1994). Prefixes as processing units. Lang. Cogn. Process 9, 295-316
82. Lavric, A., Clapp, A., and Rastle, K. (2007). ERP evidence of morphological analysis from orthography: a masked priming study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19, 866-877.
83. Lavric, A., Pizzagalli, D., Forstmeier, S., and Rippon, G. (2001). Mapping dissociations in verb morphology. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5, 301-308.
84. Lehtonen, M., Cunillera, T., Rodríguez-Fornells, A., Hultén, A., Tuomainen, J., and Laine, M. (2007). Recognition of morphologically complex words in Finnish: evidence from eventrelated potentials. Brain Res. 1148, 123-137.
85. Leinonen, A., Bratticoa, P., Järvenpääc, M., and Krausea, C. M. (2008). Event-related potential (ERP) responses to violations of inflectional and derivational rules of Finnish. Brain Res. 1218, 181-193.
86. Leinonen, A., Grönholm-Nyman, P., Järvenpää, M., Söderholm, C., Lappia, O., Laine, M., and Krause, C. M. (2009). Neurocognitive processing of auditorily and visually presented inflected words and pseudowords: evidence from a morphologically rich language. Brain Res. 1275, 54-66.
87. Lemhöfer, K., Koester, D., and Schreuder, R. (2011). When bicycle pump is harder to read than bicycle bell: effects of parsing cues in first and second language compound reading. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 18, 364-370.
88. Lima, S., and Pollatsek, A. (1983). Lexical access via an orthographic code? The basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS) reconsidered. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 22, 310-332.
89. Linares, R. E., Rodriguez-Fornell, A., and Clahsen, H. (2006). Stem allomorphy in the Spanish mental lexicon: evidence from behavioral and ERP experiments. Brain Lang. 97, 110-120.
90. Longtin, C.-M., Segui, J., and Hallé , P. A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Lang. Cogn. Process 18, 313-334.
91. Lupker, S. J., Perea, M., and Davis, C. J. (2008). Transposed-letter effects: consonants, vowels and letter frequency. Lang. Cogn. Process 23, 93-116.
92. Marslen-Wilson, W., and Tyler, L. K. (1998). Rules, representations, and the English past tense. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2, 428-435.
93. Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., and Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychol. Rev. 101, 3-33.
94. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Bozic, M., and Randall, B. (2008). Early decomposition in visual word recognition: dissociating morphology, form, and meaning. Lang. Cogn. Process 23, 394-421.
95. McCormick, S. F., Brysbaert, M., and Rastle, K. (2009). Is morphological decomposition limited to lowfrequency words? Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 62, 1706-1715.
96. McKinnon, R., Allen, M., and Osterhout, L. (2003). Morphological decomposition involving nonproductive morphemes: ERP evidence. Neuroreport 6, 883-886.
97. Meunier, F., and Longtin, C. -M. (2007). Morphological decomposition and semantic integration in word processing. J. Mem. Lang. 56, 457-471.
98. Meunier, F., and Marslen-Wilson, W. (2004). Regularity and irregularity in French verbal inflection. Lang. Cogn. Process 19, 561-580.
99. Meunier, F., and Segui, J. (1999). Morphological priming effect: the role of surface frequency. Brain Lang. 68, 54-60.
100. Monsell, S. (1985). "Repetition and the lexicon,"in Progress in the Psychology of Language, ed. A. W. Ellis (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associated), 147-195.
101. Morris, J., Frank, T., Grainger, J., and Holcomb, P. J. (2007). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: an ERP investigation. Psychophysiology 44, 506-521. Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Schreuder, R., De Jong, N. H., and Baayen, R. H. (2005). Changing places: a cross-language
102. Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Kostic, A., and Baayen, R. H. (2004). Putting the bits together: an information theoretical perspective on morphological processing. Cogni- tion 94, 1-18.
103. Münte, T. F., Say, T., Clahsen, H., Schiltz, K., and Kutas, M. (1999). Decomposition of morphologically complex words in English: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Cogn. Brain Res. 7, 241-253.
104. Norris, D., and Kinoshita, S. (2008). Perception as evidence accumulation and Bayesian inference: insights from masked priming. J. Exp. Psy- chol. Gen. 137, 434-455.
105. Pastizzo, M. J., and Feldman, L. B. (2002). Discrepancies between orthographic and unrelated baselines in masked priming undermine a decompositional account of morphological facilitation. J. Exp. Psy- chol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 28, 244-249.
106. Pastizzo, M. J., and Feldman, L. B. (2004). Morphological processing: a comparison between free and bound stem facilitation. Brain Lang. 90, 31-39.
107. Paterson, K. B., Alcock, A., and Liversedge, S. P. (2011). Morphological priming during reading:evidence from eye movements. Lang. Cogn. Process 26, 600-623.
108. Perea, M., and Carreiras, M. (2006). Do transposed-letter effects occur across lexeme boundaries? Psychon. Bull. Rev. 13, 418-422.
109. Perea, M., and Lupker, S. J. (2003). Does judge activate COURT? Transposedletter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Mem. Cognit. 31, 829-841.
110. Perea, M., and Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. J. Mem. Lang. 51, 231-246.
111. Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science 253, 530-254.
112. Plag, I., and Baayen, R. H. (2009). Suffix ordering and morphological processing. Language 85, 109-152.
113. Pollatsek, A., and Hyönä, J. (2005). The role of semantic transparency in the processing of Finnish compound words. Lang. Cogn. Process 20, 261-290.
114. Pylkkänën, L., Feintuch, S., Hopkins, E., and Marantz, A. (2004). Neural correlates of the effects of morphological family frequency and family size: an MEG study. Cognition 91, B35-B45.
115. Rastle, K., Davis, M., Marslen-Wilson, W., and Tyler, L. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: a timecourse study. Lang. Cogn. Process 15, 507-537.
116. Rastle, K., and Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Lang. Cogn. Process 23, 942-971.
117. Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., and New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother's brothel: morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 11, 1090-1098.
118. Raveh, M. (2002). The contribution of frequency and semantic similarity to morphological processing. Brain Lang. 81, 312-325.
119. Rodriguez-Fornell, A., Münte, T. F., and Clahsen, H. (2002). Morphological priming in Spanish verb forms: an ERP repetition priming study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 14, 443-454.
120. Rueckl, J. G., and Aicher, K. A. (2008). Are CORNER and BROTHER morphologically complex? Not in the long term. Lang. Cogn. Process 23, 972-1001.
121. Rueckl, J. G., and Rimzhim, A. (2011). On the interaction of letter transpositions and morphemic boundaries. Lang. Cogn. Process 26, 482-508.
122. Sandra, D. (1990). On the representation and processing of compound words: automatic access to constituent morphemes does not occur. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 42, 529-567.
123. Schoonbaert, S., and Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: effects of repeated and transposed letters. Lang. Cogn. Process 19, 333-367.
124. Schreuder, R. (1997). How complex simplex words can be. J. Mem. Lang. 37, 118-139.
125. Schreuder, R., and Baayen, H. (1994). Prefix stripping re-revisited. J. Mem. Lang. 33, 357-375.
126. Shoolman, N., and Andrews, S. (2003). "Racehorses, reindeer, and sparrows: using masked priming to investigate morphological influences on compound word identification," in Masked Priming: The State of the Art, eds S. Kinoshita and S. J. Lupker (New York, NY: Psychology Press), 241-278.
127. Stanners, R. F., Neiser, J. J., Hernon, W. P., and Hall, R. (1979). Memory representation for morphologically related words. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 18, 399-412
128. Stockall, L., and Marantz, A. (2006). A single route, full decomposition model of morphological complexity. Ment. Lex. 1, 1871-1340.
129. Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Mem. Cogn. 7, 263-272.
130. Taft, M. (1985). The lexical account of word naming considered further. Behav. Brain Sci. 8, 727.
131. Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Lang. Cogn. Process 9, 271-294.
132. Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 57, 745-765.
133. Taft, M., and Ardasinski, S. (2006). Obligatory decomposition in reading prefixed words. Ment. Lex. 1, 183-199.
134. Taft, M., and Forster, K. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 14, 638-647.
135. Taft, M., and Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 15, 607-620.
136. Taft, M., Hambly, G., and Kinoshita, S. (1986). Visual and auditory recognition of prefixed words. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 38, 351-365.
137. Taft, M., and Kougious, P. (2004). The processing of morpheme-like units in monomorphemic words. Brain Lang. 90, 9-16.
138. Taft, M., Zhu, X., and Peng, D. (1999). Positional specificity of radicals in
139. Chinese characters recognition. J. Mem. Lang. 40, 498-519.
140. Vannest, J., and Boland, J. E. (1999). Lexical morphology and lexical access. Brain Lang. 68, 324-332.
141. Vergara-Martínez, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., Laka, I., and Carreiras, M. (2009). ERP correlates of inhibitory and facilitative effects of constituent frequency in compound word reading. Brain Res. 1257, 53-64.
142. Weyerts, H., Münte, T. F., Smid, H. G. O. M., and Heinze, H. (1996). Mental representations of morphologically complex words: an event-related potential study with adult humans. Neurosci. Lett. 206, 125-128.
143. Zwitserlood, P. (1994). The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Neuroreport 9, 341-368.
144. Zwitserlood, P., Bolwieder, A., and Drews, E. (2005). Priming morphologically complex verbs by sentence contexts: effects of semantic transparency and ambiguity. Lang. Cogn. Process 20, 295-415.