Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 895-908

  Diependaele, Kevin ^a   Sandra, Dominiek ^b   Grainger, Jonathan ^c  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^c AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MORPHOLOGY; SEMANTICS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; WORD RECOGNITION;

ATTENTION; HUMANS; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHONETICS; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 70349209219     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/MC.37.6.895     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. BAAYEN, R. H., DAVIDSON, D. J., & BATES, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory & Language, 59, 390-412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
2. BAAYEN, R. H., PIEPENBROCK, R., & GULIKERS, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
3. BAAYEN, R. H., WURM, L. H., & AYCOCK, J. (2007). Lexical dynamics for low-frequency complex words: A regression study across tasks and modalities. Mental Lexicon, 2, 419-463.
4. BEAUVILLAIN, C. (1996). The integration of morphological and whole-word form information during eye fixations on prefixed and suffixed words. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 801-820.
5. BERGMAN, M. W., HUDSON, P. T. W., & ELING, P. A. T. M. (1988). How simple complex words can be: Morphological processing and word representations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 41-72.
6. CHATEAU, D., KNUDSEN, E. V., & JARED, D. (2002). Masked priming of prefixes and the influence of spelling-meaning consistency. Brain & Language, 81, 587-600.
7. COLÉ, P., BEAUVILLAIN, C., & SEGUI, J. (1989). On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: A differential frequency effect. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 1-13.
8. DEUTSCH, A., FROST, R., & FORSTER, K. I. (1998). Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1238-1255.
9. DIEPENDAELE, K., GRAINGER, J., & SANDRA, D. (in press). Derivational morphology and skilled reading: An empirical overview. In M. Spivey, M. Joanisse, & K. McRae (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. DIEPENDAELE, K., SANDRA, D., & GRAINGER, J. (2005). Masked crossmodal morphological priming: Unravelling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition. Language & Cognitive Processes, 20, 75-114. doi:10.1080/01690960444000197
11. DIEPENDAELE, K., ZIEGLER, J., & GRAINGER, J. (in press). Fast phonology and the bi-modal interactive activation model. European Journal of Experimental Psychology.
12. DUÑABEITIA, J. A., PEREA, M., & CARREIRAS, M. (2007). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition. Cognition, 105, 691-703. doi:10.1016/j. cognition.2006.12.001
13. DUÑABEITIA, J. A., PEREA, M., & CARREIRAS, M. (2008). Does darkness lead to happiness? Masked suffix priming effects. Language & Cognitive Processes, 23, 1002-1020. doi:10.1080/01690960802164242
14. FELDMAN, L. B., BARAC-CIKOJA, D., & KOSTIC, A. (2002). Semantic aspects of morphological processing: Transparency effects in Serbian. Memory & Cognition, 30, 629-636.
15. FORSTER, K. I., & DAVIS, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 680-698.
16. FORSTER, K. I., & FORSTER, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116-124.
17. GIRAUDO, H., & GRAINGER, J. (2000). Effects of prime word frequency and cumulative root frequency in masked morphological priming. Language & Cognitive Processes, 15, 421-444.
18. GIRAUDO, H., & GRAINGER, J. (2003). On the role of derivational affixes in recognizing complex words: Evidence from masked priming. In R. H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing (pp. 209-232). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
19. GOLD, B. T., & RASTLE, K. (2007). Neural correlates of morphological decomposition during visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1983-1993.
20. GRAINGER, J., COLÉ, P., & SEGUI, J. (1991). Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 370-384.
21. GRAINGER, J., DIEPENDAELE, K., SPINELLI, E., FERRAND, L., & FARIOLI, F. (2003). Masked repetition and phonological priming within and across modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 1256-1269. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1256
22. GRAINGER, J., & FERRAND, L. (1994). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Effects of masked homophone primes. Journal of Memory & Language, 33, 218-233.
23. HAY, J. B., & BAAYEN, R. H. (2005). Shifting paradigms: Gradient structure in morphology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 342-348. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.002
24. HYMAN, L. M. (2008). Directional asymmetries in the morphology and phonology of words, with special reference to Bantu. Linguistics, 46, 309-350. doi:10.1515/LING.2008.012
25. KOUIDER, S., & DUPOUX, E. (2001). A functional disconnection between spoken and visual word recognition: Evidence from unconscious priming. Cognition, 82, B35-B49.
26. LAUDANNA, A., & BURANI, C. (1995). Distributional properties of derivational affixes: Implications for processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 345-364). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. LAVRIC, A., CLAPP, A., & RASTLE, K. (2007). ERP evidence of morphological analysis from orthography: A masked priming study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 866-877. (Pubitemid 46740453)
28. LIBBEN, G. (1994). How is morphological decomposition achieved? Language & Cognitive Processes, 9, 369-391.
29. LONGTIN, C.-M., & MEUNIER, F. (2005). Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing. Journal of Memory & Language, 53, 26-41. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.008 (Pubitemid 40801101)
30. LONGTIN, C.-M., SEGUI, J., & HALLÉ, P. A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language & Cognitive Processes, 18, 313-334. doi:10.1080/01690960244000036
31. MARSLEN-WILSON, W., TYLER, L. K., WAKSLER, R., & OLDER, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33. (Pubitemid 24976784)
32. MCCORMICK, S. F., RASTLE, K., & DAVIS, M. H. (2008). Is there a "fete" in "fetish"? Effects of orthographic opacity on morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 58, 307-326. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.05.006
33. MEUNIER, F., & SEGUI, J. (2002). Cross-modal morphological priming in French. Brain & Language, 81, 89-102. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2509
34. MORRIS, J., FRANK, T., GRAINGER, J., & HOLCOMB, P. J. (2007). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: An ERP investigation. Psychophysiology, 44, 506-521. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00538.x (Pubitemid 46905334)
35. PLAUT, D. C., & GONNERMAN, L. M. (2000). Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Language & Cognitive Processes, 15, 445-485.
36. RASTLE, K., & DAVIS, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language & Cognitive Processes, 23, 942-971. doi:10.1080/01690960802069730
37. RASTLE, K., DAVIS, M. H., MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D., & TYLER, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language & Cognitive Processes, 15, 507-537. (Pubitemid 30687813)
38. RASTLE, K., DAVIS, M. H., & NEW, B. (2004). The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1090-1098.
39. SCHREUDER, R., & BAAYEN, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131-154). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. SEIDENBERG, M. S., & GONNERMAN, L. M. (2000). Explaining deriva tional morphology as the convergence of codes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 353-361.
41. SLOWIACZEK, L. M., & HAMBURGER, M. (1992). Prelexical facilitation and lexical interference in auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 1239-1250.
42. SLOWIACZEK, L. M., MCQUEEN, J. M., SOLTANO, E. G., & LYNCH, M. (2000). Phonological representations in prelexical speech processing: Evidence from form-based priming. Journal of Memory & Language, 43, 530-560.
43. TAFT, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language & Cognitive Processes, 9, 271-294.
44. TAFT, M., & FORSTER, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 14, 638-647.
45. TAFT, M., & KOUGIOUS, P. (2004). The processing of morphemelike units in monomorphemic words. Brain & Language, 90, 9-16. doi:10.1016/S0093- 934X(03)00415-2
46. WURM, L. H. (1997). Auditory processing of prefixed English words is both continuous and decompositional. Journal of Memory & Language, 37, 438-461.