Obligatory decomposition in reading prefixed words

Mental Lexicon

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 183-199

  Taft, Marcus ^a   Ardasinski, Sam ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cross language differences; Individual differences in reading; Lexical processing; Orthographic processing; Syllabic processing

Indexed keywords

EID: 51249136516     PISSN: 18711340     EISSN: 18711375     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/ml.1.2.02taf     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 94-117.
2. Bertram, R., Laine, M., & Karvinen, K. (1999). The interplay of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity in lexical processing: Evidence from a morphological rich language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 213-226.
3. Bertram, R., Schreuder, R, & Baayen, R. H. (2000). The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homophony, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 489-511.
4. Carroll, J. B., Davies, P., & Richman, B. (1971). The American Heritage word frequency book. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
5. Cole, P., Beauvillain, C., & Segui, J. (1989). On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: A differential frequency effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 1-13.
6. Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2000). Prime word frequency in masked morphological and orthographic priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 421-444.
7. Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2003). A supralexical model for French derivational morphology. In E. Assink, & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words (pp. 139-157). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
8. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, R.I.: Brown University Press.
9. Niemi, J., Laine, M., & Tuominen, J. (1994). Cognitive morphology in Finnish: Foundations of a new model. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 423-446.
10. Niswander, E., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2000). The processing of derived and inflected suffixed words during reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 389-420.
11. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131-154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assocs.
12. Sereno, J. A., & Jongman, A. (1997). Processing of English inflectional morphology. Memory and Cognition, 25, 425-437.
13. Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory & Cognition, 7, 263-272
14. Taft, M. (1991). Reading and the mental lexicon. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
15. Taft, M. (2003). Morphological representation as a correlation between form and meaning. In E. Assink, & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words (pp. 113-137). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
16. Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 745-765
17. Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638-647.
18. Taft, M., Hambly, G., & Kinoshita, S. (1986). Visual and auditory recognition of prefixed words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 38A, 351-366.
19. Taft, M., & van Graan, F. (1998). Lack of Phonological mediation in a semantic categorization task. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 203-224.