Frequency Effects and the Representational Status of Regular Inflections

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 41-61

  Alegre, Maria ^a   Gordon, Peter ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0003008572     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2607     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Anshen F., Aronoff M. Producing morphologically complex words. Linguistics. 26:1988;641-655.
2. Baayen H. Discussion: On frequency, transparency and productivity. Yearbook of morphology. 1991;Foris, Dordrecht. p. 181-208.
3. Burani C., Caramazza A. Representation and processing of derived words. Language and Cognitive Processes. 2:1987;217-227.
4. Burani C., Laudanna A. Units of representation for derived words. Frost R., Katz L. Orthography, phonology, and meaning. 1992;361-376 North-Holland, Amsterdam.
5. Burani C., Salmaso D., Caramazza A. Morphological structure and lexical access. Visible Language. 4:1984;348-358.
6. Butterworth B. Lexical representation. Butterworth B. Language production. 1983;257-294 Academic Press, London.
7. Bybee J. L. Diachronic and typological properties of morphology and their implications for representation. Feldman L. B. Morphological aspects of language processing. 1995;225-246 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
8. Bybee J. L., Moder C. L. Rules and schemes in the development and use of the English past tense. Language. 59:1983;251-270.
9. Bybee J. L., Slobin D. I. Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language. 58:1982;265-289.
10. Caramazza A., Laudanna A., Romani C. Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition. 28:1988;297-332.
11. Caramazza A., Miceli G., Silveri M. C., Laudanna A. Reading mechanisms and the organization of the lexicon: Evidence from acquired dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 2:1985;81-114.
12. Chialant D., Caramazza A. Where is morphology and how is it processed? The case of written word recognition. Feldman L. B. Morphological aspects of language processing. 1995;55-78 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
13. Cole P., Beauvillain C., Segui J. On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: A differential frequency effect. Journal of Memory and Language. 28:1989;1-13.
14. Cutler A. Lexical complexity and sentence processing. Flores d'Arcais G. B., Jarvella R. J. The process of language understanding. 1983;43-79 Wiley, New York.
15. Emmorey K. D. Auditory morphological priming in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes. 4:1989;73-92.
16. Fowler C. A., Napps S. E., Feldman L. Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory and Cognition. 13:1985;241-255.
17. Francis W. N., Kučera H. Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. 1982;Houghton, Mifflin, Boston.
18. Frauenfelder U. H., Schreuder R. Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity. Booij G. E., van Marle J. Yearbook of morphology. 1991;165-183 Foris, Dordrecht.
19. Grainger J. Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language. 29:1990;228-244.
20. Grainger J., O'Regan J. K., Jacobs A. M., Segui J. On the role of competing units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect. Perception and Psychophysics. 45:1989;189-195.
21. Laudanna A., Badecker W., Caramazza A. Priming homographic stems. Journal of Memory and Language. 28:1989;531-546.
22. Laudanna A., Badecker W., Caramazza A. Processing inflectional and derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language. 31:1992;333-348.
23. Lukatela G., Gligorijevic B., Kostic A. Representation of inflected nouns in the internal lexicon. Memory and Cognition. 8:1980;415-423.
24. MacWhinney B., Leinbach J. Implementations are not conceptualizations: Revising the verb learning model. Cognition. 40:1991;121-157.
25. Marcus, G. F. Brinkmann, U. Clahsen, H. Wiese, R. Woest, A. Pinker, S. 1993, German inflection: The exception that proves the rule, MIT Center for Cognitive Science.
26. Marcus G. F., Pinker S., Ullman M., Hollander M., Rosen T. J., Xu F. Overregularization in Language Acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. 1992;Chicago University Press.
27. Marslen-Wilson W., Tyler L. K., Waksler R., Older L. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review. 101:1994;3-33.
28. Napps S. E. Morphemic relationships in the lexicon: Are they distinct from semantic and formal relationships. Memory and Cognition. 17:1989;729-739.
29. Napps S. E., Fowler C. A. Formal relationships among words and the organization of the mental lexicon. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 16:1987;257-272.
30. Pinker S. Rules of language. Science. 253:1991;530-535.
31. Pinker S., Prince A. On language and connectionism: Analysis of a Parallel Distributed Processing model of language acquisition. Cognition. 28:1988;73-193.
32. Pinker S., Prince A. Regular and irregular morphology and the psychological status of rules of grammar. Proceedings of the 1991 Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 1991.
33. Plaut D. C., McClelland J. L., Seidenberg M. S. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review. 103:1996;56-115.
34. Plunkett K., Marchman V. U-shaped Learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perceptron: Implications for child language acquisition. Cognition. 38:1991;43-102.
35. Prasada S., Pinker S. Generalization of regular and irregular morphological patterns. Language and Cognitive Processes. 8:1993;1-56.
36. Prasada, S. Pinker, S. Snyder, W. 1990, Some evidence that irregular forms are retrieved from memory but regular forms are rule generated.
37. Rubin G. S., Becker C. A., Freeman R. H. Morphological structure and its effect on visual word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 18:1979;757-767.
38. Rumelhart D. E., McClelland J. L. On learning the past tenses of English verbs. McClelland J. L., Rumelhart D. E. Parallel distributed processing. 1986;216-271 MIT Press, Cambridge.
39. Sandra D. The morphology of the mental lexicon: Internal word structure viewed from a psycholinguistic perspective. Language and Cognitive Processes. 9:1994;227-269.
40. Schneider W. Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM-PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation and Computers. 20:1988;206-217.
41. Schreuder R., Baayen R. H. Modeling morphological processing. Feldman L. B. Morphological aspects of language processing. 1995;131-156 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
42. Seidenberg M. S., McClelland J. L. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review. 96:1989;523-568.
43. Segui J., Zubizarreta M. L. Mental representation of morphologically complex words and lexical access. Linguistics. 23:1985;759-774.
44. Stemberger J. Phonological and lexical constraints on morphological processing. Feldman L. B. Morphological aspects of language processing. 1995;247-270 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
45. Stemberger J. P., MacWhinney B. Are inflected forms stored in the lexicon. Hammond M., Noonan M. Theoretical morphology: Approaches in modern linguistics. 1988;101-116 Academic Press, San Diego.
46. Stanners R. F., Neisser J. J., Hernon W. P., Hall R. Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 18:1979;399-412.
47. Taft M. Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory and Cognition. 7:1979;263-272.
48. Xu, F. Pinker, S. 1992, Weird past tense forms.