Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 829-841

  Perea, Manuel ^a   Lupker, Stephen J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION THEORY; ERROR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LINGUISTICS; MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; STATE DEPENDENT LEARNING; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL MEMORY; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 0242267555     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196438     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. ADAMS, M. J. (1979). Models of word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 133-176.
2. ANDREWS, S. (1996). Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 775-800.
3. BODNER, G. E., & MASSON, M. E. J. (1997). Masked repetition priming for words and nonwords: Evidence for a nonlexical basis for priming. Journal of Memory & Language, 37, 268-293.
4. BODNER, G. E., & MASSON, M. E. J. (in press). Beyond spreading activation: An influence of relatedness proportion on masked semantic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
5. BOURASSA, D. C., & BESNER, D. (1998). When do nonwords activate semantics? Implications for models of visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 26, 61-74.
6. CHAMBERS, S. M. (1979). Letter and order information in lexical access. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18, 225-241.
7. CLARK, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12, 335-359.
8. COHEN, J. (1976). Random means random. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 15, 261-262.
9. COLTHEART, M., DAVELAAR, E., JONASSON, J. F., & BESNER, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. COLTHEART, M., RASTLE, K., PERRY, C., ZIEGLER, J., & LANGDON, R. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
11. DAVIS, C. J. (1999). The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales.
12. DE GROOT, A. M. B., & NAS, G. L. J. (1991). Lexical representation of cognates and noncognates in compound bilinguals. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 90-123.
13. DE GROOT, A. M. B., THOMASSEN, A. J. W. M., & HUDSON, P. T. W. (1982). Associative facilitation of word recognition as measured from a neutral prime. Memory & Cognition, 10, 358-370.
14. DE MOOR, W., & BRYSBAERT, M. (2000). Neighborhood-frequency effects when primes and targets have different lengths. Psychological Research, 63, 159-162.
15. DOSHER, B. A. (1976). The retrieval of sentences from memory: A speed-accuracy study. Cognitive Science, 8, 291-310.
16. DRIEGHE, D., & BRYSBAERT, M. (2002). Strategic effects in associative priming with words, homophones and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 962-982.
17. ESTES, W. K. (1975). The locus of inferential and perceptual processes in letter identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104, 122-145.
18. ESTES, W. K., ALLMEYER, D. H., & REDER, S. M. (1976). Serial position functions for letter identification at brief and extended exposure durations. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 1-15.
19. FORSTER, K. I. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In R. J. Wales & E. W. Walker (Eds.), New approaches to language mechanisms (pp. 257-287). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
20. FORSTER, K. I., & DAVIS, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 680-698.
21. FORSTER, K. I., DAVIS, C., SCHOKNECHT, C., & CARTER, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 211-251.
22. FORSTER, K. I., MOHAN, K., & HECTOR, J. (2003). The mechanics of masked priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Maskedpriming: State of the art (pp. 3-37). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
23. FRIEDMANN, N., & GVION, A. (2001). Letter position dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 673-696.
24. FROST, R., FORSTER, K. I., & DEUTSCH, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 829-856.
25. GÓMEZ, P., PEREA, M., & RATCLIFF, R. (2002, April). Dinámica temporal de la activación léxica en pseudopalabras [Time course of lexical activation in pseudowords]. Paper presented at the 4th meeting of the Sociedad Española de Psicología Experimental, Oviedo, Spain.
26. GONNERMAN, L. M., & PLAUT, D. C. (2000, April). Semantic and morphological effects in maskedpriming. Poster presented at the 7th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, San Francisco.
27. GRAINGER, J. (1992). Orthographic neighborhoods and visual word recognition. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 131-146). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
28. GRAINGER, J., & JACOBS, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
29. HINTZMAN, D. L., & CURRAN, T. (1997). Comparing retrieval dynamics in recognition memory and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 228-247.
30. HOLMES, V. M., & NG, E. (1993). Word-specific knowledge, word-recognition strategies, and spelling ability. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 230-257.
31. HUMPHREYS, G. W., EVETT, L. J., & QUINLAN, P. T. (1990). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 517-560.
32. JACOBS, A. M., REY, A., ZIEGLER, J. C., & GRAINGER, J. (1998). MROM-p: An interactive activation, multiple readout model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In J. Grainger & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 147-188). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. JOHNSON, N. F., & PUGH, K. R. (1994). An examination of cohort models of visual word recognition: On the role of letters in word-level processing. Cognitive Psychology, 26, 240-346.
34. JOORDENS, S., & BECKER, S. (1997). The long and short of semantic priming effects in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 1083-1105.
35. JORDAN, T. R. (1990). Presenting words without interior letters: Superiority over single letters and influence of postmark boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 891-909.
36. KEPPEL, G. (1976). Words as random variables. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 15, 263-265.
37. KUČERA, H., & FRANCIS, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
38. LUKATELA, G., CARELLO, C., SAVIĆ, M., UROŠEVIĆ, Z., & TURVEY, M. T. (1998). When nonwords activate semantics better than words. Cognition, 68, B31-B40.
39. LUKATELA, G., & TURVEY, M. T. (1994). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming from words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 107-128.
40. MASSON, M. E. J., & ISAAK, M. I. (1999). Masked priming of words and nonwords in a naming task: Further evidence for a nonlexical basis for priming. Memory & Cognition, 27, 399-412.
41. McCLELLAND, J. L. (1986). The programmable blackboard model of reading. In J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Exploration in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. II: Psychological and biological models (pp. 122-169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. McCLELLAND, J. L., & RUMELHART, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Pt. 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
43. MOZER, M. (1987). Early parallel processing in reading: A connectionist approach. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 83-104). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. NORRIS, D. (1986). Word recognition: Context effects without priming. Cognition, 22, 93-361.
45. O'CONNOR, R. E., & FORSTER, K. I. (1981). Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 9, 78-92.
46. PAAP, K. R., NEWSOME, S. L., McDONALD, J. E., & SCHVANEVELDT, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: The word superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573-594.
47. PEREA, M. (1998). Orthographic neighbours are not all equal: Evidence using an identification technique. Language & Cognitive Processes, 13, 77-90.
48. PEREA, M., & CARREIRAS, M. (1998). Effects of syllable frequency and neighborhood syllable frequency in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1-11.
49. PEREA, M., & GOTOR, A. (1997). Associative and semantic priming effects occur at very short SOAs in lexical decision and naming. Cognition, 67, 223-240.
50. PEREA, M., & LUPKER, S. J. (2003). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 97-120). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
51. PEREA, M., & ROSA, E. (2002a). Does the proportion of associatively related pairs modulate the associative priming effect at very brief stimulus-onset asynchronies? Acta Psychologica, 110, 103-124.
52. PEREA, M., & ROSA, E. (2000b). The effects of associative and semantic priming in the lexical decision task. Psychological Research, 66, 180-194.
53. PERESSOTTI, F., & GRAINGER, J. (1999). The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 691-706.
54. PEXMAN, P. M., & LUPKER, S. J. (1999). The impact of semantic ambiguity on visual word recognition: Do homophone and polysemy effects co-occur? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 323-334.
55. PEXMAN, P. M., LUPKER, S. J., & JARED, D. (2001). Homophone effects in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 139-156.
56. POLLATSEK, A., & WELL, A. (1995). On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: A suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 785-794.
57. RAAIJMAKERS, J. G. W., SCHRIJNEMAKERS, J. M. C., & GREMMEN, F. (1999). How to deal with "the language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory & Language, 41, 416-429.
58. RATCLIFF, R. (1981). A theory of order relations in perceptual matching. Psychological Review, 88, 552-572.
59. RATCLIFF, R., GÓMEZ, P.,& McKOON, G. (in press). A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. Psychological Review.
60. RATCLIFF, R., & McKOON, G. (1982). Speed and accuracy in the processing of false statements about semantic information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 8, 16-36.
61. RATCLIFF, R., & McKOON, G. (1995). Sequential effects in lexical decision: Tests of compound cue retrieval theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1380-1388.
62. REED, A. V. (1973). Speed-accuracy trade-off in recognition memory. Science, 181, 574-576.
63. RUMELHART, D. E., & McCLELLAND, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Pt. 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60-94.
64. SEIDENBERG, M. S., & McCLELLAND, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
65. SERENO, J. A. (1991). Graphemic, associative, and syntactic priming effects at a brief stimulus onset asynchrony in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 459-477.
66. SMITH, J. E. K. (1976). The assuming-will-make-it-so fallacy. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 15, 262-263.
67. STONE, G. O., & VAN ORDEN, G. C. (1993). Strategic control of processing in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 744-774.
68. TAFT, M., & VAN GRAAN, F. (1998). Lack of phonological mediation in a semantic categorization task. Journal of Memory & Language, 38, 203-224.
69. WHITNEY, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221-243.
70. WIKE, E. L., & CHURCH, J. D. (1976). Comments on Clark's "The language-as fixed-effect fallacy." Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 15, 249-255.
71. WILLIAMS, J. N. (1996). Is automatic priming semantic? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 8, 113-161.
72. ZEELENBERG, R., PECHER, D., DE KOK, D., & RAAIJMAKERS, J. G. W. (1998). Inhibition for nonword primes in lexical decision re-examined: The influence of instructions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1068-1079.