Decomposition of Prefixed Words in Russian

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1371-1390

  Kazanina, Nina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Lexical access; Masked priming; Morphological decomposition; Prefixation; Russian

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; RUSSIAN FEDERATION; SEMANTICS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); RUSSIA; SEMANTICS; VOCABULARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 82155170557     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0024335     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Andrews S. Morphological influences on lexical access: Lexical or nonlexical effects?. Journal of Memory and Language 1986, 25:726-740. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90046-X.
2. Baayen R.H., Davidson D.J., Bates D.M. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:390-412.
3. Baayen R.H., Dijkstra T., Schreuder R. Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language 1997, 37:94-117. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2509.
4. Balota D. Automatic semantic activation and episodic memory encoding. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1983, 22:88-104. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(83)80008-5.
5. Bodner G.E., Masson M.E.J. Beyond spreading activation: An influence of relatedness proportion on masked semantic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, 10:645-652.
6. Brown C., Hagoort P. The processing nature of the N400: Evidence from masked priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1993, 5:34-44. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1993.5.1.34.
7. Caramazza A., Laudanna A., Romani C. Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition 1988, 28:297-332. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(88)90017-0.
8. Colé P., Beauvillain C., Segui J. On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: A differential frequency effect. Journal of Memory and Language 1989, 28:1-13. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(89)90025-9.
9. Coltheart M., Davelaar E., Jonasson J.T., Besner D. Access to the internal lexicon. Attention and performance VI 1977, 535-555. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. S. Dornic (Ed.).
10. Diependaele K., Sandra D., Grainger J. Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words. Memory & Cognition 2009, 37:895-908. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.6.895.
11. Duñabeitia J.A., Laka I., Perea M., Carreiras M. Is Milkman a superhero like Batman? Constituent morphological priming in compound words. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2009, 21:615-640. doi: 10.1080/09541440802079835.
12. Feldman L.B., Barac-Cikoja D., Kostić A. Semantic aspects of morphological processing: Transparency effects in Serbian. Memory & Cognition 2002, 30:629-636. doi: 10.3758/BF03194964.
13. Feldman L.B., Basnight-Brown D.M. List context fosters semantic processing: Parallels between semantic and morphological facilitation when primes are forward masked. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:680-687. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.680.
14. Feldman L.B., Larabee J. Morphological facilitation following prefixed but not suffixed primes: Lexical architecture or modality-specific processes?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27:680-691. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.3.680.
15. Feldman L.B., O'Connor P.A., Moscoso del Prado F. Early morphological processing is morpho-semantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of lexical recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16:684-691. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.4.684.
16. Fiorentino R., Fund-Reznicek E. Masked morphological priming of compound constituents. The Mental Lexicon 2009, 4:159-193. doi: 10.1075/ml.4.2.01fio.
17. Forster K.I. Basic issues in lexical processing. Lexical representation and process 1989, 75-107. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.).
18. Forster K.I. The microgenesis of priming effects in lexical access. Brain and Language 1999, 68:5-15. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2078.
19. Forster K.I., Azuma T. Masked priming for prefixed words with bound stems: Does submit prime permit?. Language and Cognitive Processes 2000, 15:539-561. doi: 10.1080/01690960050119698.
20. Forster K.I., Davis C. Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1984, 10:680-698. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.10.4.680.
21. Forster K.I., Forster J.C. DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 2003, 35:116-124. doi: 10.3758/BF03195503.
22. Frauenfelder U.H., Schreuder R. Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity. Yearbook of morphology 1991 1992, 165-183. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. G. Booij, J. van Marle (Eds.).
23. Frost R., Forster K.I., Deutsch A. What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1997, 23:829-856. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.23.4.829.
24. Giraudo H., Grainger J. Effects of prime word frequency and cumulative root frequency in masked morphological priming. Language and Cognitive Processes 2000, 15:421-444. doi: 10.1080/01690960050119652.
25. Giraudo H., Grainger J. Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2001, 8:127-131. doi: 10.3758/BF03196148.
26. Grainger J., Colé P., Segui J. Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 1991, 30:370-384. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90042-I.
27. Hay J. Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative?. Linguistics 2001, 39:1041-1070. doi: 10.1515/ling.2001.041.
28. Kazanina N., Dukova-Zheleva G., Geber D., Kharlamov V., Tonciulescu K. Decomposition into multiple morphemes during lexical access: A masked priming study of Russian nouns. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:800-823. doi: 10.1080/01690960701799635.
29. Keuleers E., Diependaele K., Brysbaert M. Practice effects in large-scale visual word recognition studies: A lexical decision study on 14,000 Dutch mono- and disyllabic words and nonwords. Frontiers in Psychology 2010, 1. Article 174. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00174.
30. Longtin C.M., Segui J., Hallé P.A. Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes 2003, 18:313-334. doi: 10.1080/01690960244000036.
31. Marslen-Wilson W.D., Bozic M., Randall B. Early decomposition in visual word recognition: Dissociating morphology, form, and meaning. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:394-421. doi: 10.1080/01690960701588004.
32. Marslen-Wilson W.D., Tyler L.K., Waksler R., Older L. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review 1994, 101:3-33. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.3.
33. McCormick S.F., Brysbaert M., Rastle K. Is morphological decomposition limited to low-frequency words?. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 62:1706-1715. doi: 10.1080/17470210902849991.
34. McCormick S.F., Rastle K., Davis M.H. Is there a 'fete' in 'fetish'?: Effects of orthographic opacity on morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 58:307-326. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.05.006.
35. Perea M., Duñabeitia J.A., Carreiras M. Masked associative/semantic and identity priming effects across languages with highly proficient bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 58:916-930. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.01.003.
36. Perea M., Gotor A. Associative and semantic priming effects occur at very short stimulus-onset asynchronies in lexical decision and naming. Cognition 1997, 62:223-240. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00782-2.
37. Perea M., Lupker S.J. Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory & Cognition 2003, 31:829-841. doi: 10.3758/BF03196438.
38. Rastle K., Davis M.H. Morphological decomposition is based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:942-971. doi: 10.1080/01690960802069730.
39. Rastle K., Davis M.H., Marslen-Wilson W.D., Tyler L.K. Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes 2000, 15:507-537. doi: 10.1080/01690960050119689.
40. Rastle K., Davis M.H., New B. The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004, 11:1090-1098. doi: 10.3758/BF03196742.
41. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software] 2011, R Development Core Team, Available from http://www.R-project.org.
42. Scarborough D.L., Cortese C., Scarborough H.S. Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1977, 3:1-17. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.3.1.1.
43. Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. Modeling morphological processing. Morphological aspects of language processing 1995, 131-154. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. L.B. Feldman (Ed.).
44. Sharoff S. Meaning as use: Exploitation of aligned corpora for the contrastive study of lexical semantics. Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC02) 2002, 447-452. ELDA, Paris, France.
45. Smolka E., Komlósi S., Rösler F. When semantics means less than morphology: Processing German prefixed verbs. Language and Cognitive Processes 2009, 24:337-375. doi: 10.1080/01690960802075497.
46. Stockall L., Marantz A. A single route, full decomposition model of morphological complexity: MEG evidence. The Mental Lexicon 2006, 1:85-123. doi: 10.1075/ml.1.1.07sto.
47. Taft M. Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 2004, 57(A):745-765. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000477.
48. Taft M., Ardasinski S. Obligatory decomposition in reading prefixed words. The Mental Lexicon 2006, 1:183-199. doi: 10.1075/ml.1.2.02taf.
49. Taft M., Forster K.I. Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1975, 14:638-647. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-X.
50. Taft M., Kougious P. The processing of morpheme-like units in monomorphemic words. Brain and Language 2004, 90:9-16. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00415-2.
51. Williams J.N. Is automatic priming semantic?. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 1996, 8:113-162. doi: 10.1080/095414496383121.