The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1090-1098

  Rastle, Kathleen ^a   Davis, Matthew H ^b   New, Boris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21944456345     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196742     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. BAAYEN, R. H., PIEPENBROCK, R., & VAN RIJN, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
2. BERTRAM, R., SCHREUDER, R., & BAAYEN, R. H. (2000). The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 489-511.
3. BRENT, M. R. (1999). Speech segmentation and word discovery: A computational perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 294-301.
4. CAIRNS, P., SHILLCOCK, R., CHATER, N., & LEVY, J. (1997). Bootstrapping word boundaries: A bottom-up corpus-based approach to speech segmentation. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 111-153.
5. COLTHEART, M., RASTLE, K., PERRY, C., LANGDON, R., & ZlEGLER, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
6. DAVIS, M. H., VAN CASTEREN, M., & MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D. (2003). Frequency effects in processing inflected Dutch nouns: A distributed connectionist account. In R. H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing (pp. 427-462). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
7. FELDMAN, L. B. (2000). Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1431-1444.
8. FELDMAN, L. B., & SOLTANO, E. G. (1999). Morphological priming: The role of prime duration, semantic transparency, and affix position. Brain & Language, 68, 33-39.
9. FORSTER, K. I., & DAVIS, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 680-698.
10. FORSTER, K. I., & FORSTER, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116-124.
11. GIRAUDO, H., & GRAINGER, J. (2000). Effects of prime word frequency and cumulative root frequency in masked morphological priming. Language & Cognitive Processes, 15, 421-444.
12. LANDAUER, T. K., & DUMAIS, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
13. LONGTIN, C.-M., SEGUI, J., & HALLÉ, P. A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language & Cognitive Processes, 18, 313-334.
14. MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D., TYLER, L. K., WAKSLER, R., & OLDER, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33.
15. NISWANDER, E., POLLATSEK, A., & RATNER, K. (2000). The processing of derived and inflected suffixed words during reading. Language & Cognitive Processes, 15, 389-420.
16. PASTIZZO, M. J., & FELDMAN, L. B. (2002). Discrepancies between orthographic and unrelated baselines in masked priming undermine a decompositional account of morphological facilitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 244-249.
17. PLAUT, D. C., & GONNERMAN, L. M. (2000). Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to language processing? Language & Cognitive Processes, 15, 445-485.
18. RASTLE, K., & DAVIS, M. [H.] (2003). Reading morphologically complex words: Some thoughts from masked priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 279-305). New York: Psychology Press.
19. RASTLE, K., DAVIS, M. H., MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D., & TYLER, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time course study. Language & Cognitive Processes, 15, 507-538.
20. RUECKL, J. G., & RAVEH, M. (1999). The influence of morphological regularities on the dynamics of a connectionist network. Brain & Language, 68, 110-117.
21. SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1987). Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance 12: The psychology of reading (pp. 245-263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. STANNERS, R. F., NEISER, J. J., HERNON, W. P., & HALL, R. (1979). Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18, 399-412.
23. TAFT, M. (1994). Interactive activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language & Cognitive Processes, 9, 271-294.
24. TAFT, M., & FORSTER, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval for prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 14, 638-647.