Priming morphologically complex verbs by sentence contexts: Effects of semantic transparency and ambiguity

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 20, Issue 1-2, 2005, Pages 395-415

  Zwitserlood, Pienie ^a   Bolwiender, Agnes ^b   Drews, Etta ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SUNDERLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMBIGUITY; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; FACILITATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LANGUAGE ABILITY; MORPHOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 14644408054     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960444000160     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Baayen, H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistics Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
2. Baumann, H., Nagengast, J., & Klaas, G. (1993). New experimental set up (NESU). The Netherlands: Max-Planck-Institute for Psycholinguistics.
3. Bentin, S., & Feldman, L. B. (1990). The contribution of morphological and semantic relatedness to repetition priming at long and short lags: Evidence from Hebrew. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A, 693-711.
4. Bergman, M., Hudson, P. T. W., & Eling, P. E. (1988). How simple complex words can be. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 41-72.
5. Booij, G. (1990). The boundary between morphology and syntax: Separable complex verbs in Dutch. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology, 3 (pp. 45-63). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
6. Booij, G. (2002). The morphology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2001). Morphological units in the Arabic mental lexicon. Cognition, 81, 65-92.
8. Burani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1987). Representation and processing of derived words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 217-227.
9. Caramazza, A., Laudanna A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 297-332.
10. Cottrell, G. W. (1988). A model of lexical access of ambiguous words. In S. L. Small, G. W. Cottrell, & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Lexical ambiguity resolution: Perspectives from psycholinguistics, neuropsychology and artificial intelligence (pp. 179-194). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
11. Dohmes, P., Zwitserlood, P., & Bölte, J. (2004). The impact of morphological complexity and semantic transparency on picture naming. Brain and Language, 90, 203-212.
12. Drews, E., & Zwitserlood, P. (1995). Effects of morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(5), 1098-1116.
13. Feldman, L. B. (1990). Morphological relationships revealed through the repetition priming task. In M. Noonan, P. Downing, & S. Lima (Eds.), Linguistics and literacy (pp. 239-254). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14. Feldman, L. B., & Andjelkovic, D. (1992). Morphological analysis in word recognition. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 343-360). Amsterdam: North Holland.
15. Feldman, L. B., Barac-Cikoja, D., & Kostic, A. (2002). Semantic aspects of morphological processing: Transparency effects in Serbian. Memory and Cognition, 30, 629-636.
16. Feldman, L. B., & Fowler, C. A. (1987). The inflected noun system in Serbo-Croatian: Lexical representations of morphological structure. Memory and Cognition, 15, 1-12.
17. Feldman, L. B., & Soltano, E. G. (1999). Morphological priming: The role of prime duration, semantic transparency, and affix position. Brain and Language, 68, 33-39.
18. Frauenfelder, U. H., & Schreuder, R. (1992). Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology, 1991 (pp. 165-183). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
19. Frazier, L., Flores d'Arcais, G. B., & Coolen, R. (1993). Processing discontinuous words: On the interface between lexical and syntactic processing. Cognition, 47, 219-249.
20. Frost, R., & Bentin, S. (1992). Processing phonological and semantic ambiguity: Evidence from semantic priming at different SOAs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18(1) 58-68.
21. Frost, R., Deutsch, A., Gilboa, O., Tannenbaum, M., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2000). Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors. Memory and Cognition, 28, 1277-1288.
22. Frost, R., Forster, K. I., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 829-856.
23. Gentner, D. (1981). Some interesting differences between verbs and nouns. Cognition and Brain Theory, 4, 161-178.
24. Kawamoto, A. H. (1988). Distributed representations of ambiguous words and their resolution in a connectionist network. In S. L. Small, G. W. Cottrell, & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Lexical ambiguity resolution: Perspectives from psycholinguistics, neuropsychology and artificial intelligence (pp. 195-228). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
25. Laudanna, A., Badecker, W., & Caramazza, A. (1989). Priming homographic stems. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 531-546.
26. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.
27. Longtin, C.-M., Segui, J., & Hallé, P. A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 313-334.
28. Lüdeling, A. (1999). On particle verbs and similar constructions in German. Doctoral dissertation, University of Tübingen.
29. Lukatela, G., Gligorijevic, B., Kostic, A., & Turvey, M. T. (1980). Representation of inflected nouns in the internal lexicon. Memory and Cognition, 8, 415-423.
30. Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33.
31. Napps, S. E. (1989). Morphemic relations in the lexicon: Are they distinct from semantic and formal relationships? Memory and Cognition, 17, 729-739.
32. Plaut, D., & Gonnerman, L. G. (2000). Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Language and Cognitive Processes, 15 445-485.
33. Plunkett, K., & Marchmann, V. (1993). From rote learning to system building: Acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets. Cognition, 48, 21-69.
34. Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 507-537.
35. Roelofs, A., & Baayen, R. H. (2002). Morphology by itself in planning the production of spoken words. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 132-138.
36. Rueckl, J. G., Mikolinski, M., Raveh, M., Miner, C. S., & Mars, F. (1997). Morphological priming, fragment completion, and connectionist networks. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 382-405.
37. Sandra, D. (1990). On the representation and processing of compound words: Automatic access to constituent morphemes does not occur. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A, 529-567.
38. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131-154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
39. Schreuder, R. (1990). Lexical processing of verbs with separable particles. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology, 3 (pp. 65-79). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
40. Schreuder, R., Grendel, M., Poulisse, N., Roelofs, A., & van de Voort, M. (1990). Lexical processing, morphological complexity and reading. In D. Balota, G. B. Flores d'Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 125-141). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
41. Schriefers, H. (1999). Morphology and word recognition. In A. D. Friederici (Ed.), Language comprehension: A biological perspective (pp. 101-132). Berlin: Springer.
42. Schriefers, H., Zwitserlood, P., & Roelofs, A. (1991). The identification of morphologically complex words: Continuous processing or decomposition? Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 26-47.
43. Seidenberg, M. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. M., & Bienkowski, M. (1982). Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 489-537.
44. Shillcock, R. (1990). Lexical hypotheses in continuous speech. In G. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing (pp. 24-49). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Simpson, G. B. (1981). Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 120-136.
46. Simpson, G. B. (1994). Context and the processing of ambiguous words. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 359-374). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
47. Stolz, J. A., & Feldman, L. B. (1995). The role of orthographic and semantic transparency of the base morpheme in morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 109-129). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
48. Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)considerations of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645-659.
49. Tabossi, P. (1988). Accessing lexical ambiguity in different types of sentential contexts. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 324-340.
50. Tabossi, P., Colombo, L., & Job, R. (1987). Accessing lexical ambiguity: Effects of context and dominance. Psychological Research, 49, 161-167.
51. Taft, M., Hambly, G., & Kinoshita, S. (1986). Visual and auditory recognition of prefixed words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A, 351-366.
52. Tyler, L. K., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Rentoul, J., & Hanney, P. (1988). Continuous and discontinuous access in spoken-word recognition: The role of derivational prefixes. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 368-381.
53. Van Dale (1995). Groot Woordenboek der Nederlandse Taal. Utrecht/Antwerpen: Van Dale Lexicografie, Nijhoff.
54. Yantis, S., & Meyer, D. E. (1988). Dynamics of activation in semantic and episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117(2), 130-147.
55. Zwitserlood, P. (1989). The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing. Cognition, 32 25-64.
56. Zwitserlood, P. (1990). Comments on the paper by Schreuder. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology, 3 (pp. 81-85). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
57. Zwitserlood, P. (1994). The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(3), 341-368.
58. Zwitserlood, P. (1996). Processing Dutch equivalents of "bring along" and "bring about" in sentence contexts. 37th meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago, November 1996.
59. Zwitserlood, P., Bölte, J., & Dohmes, P. (2002). Where and how morphologically complex words interplay with naming pictures. Brain and Language, 81, 358-367.
60. Zwitserlood, P., Drews, E., Bolwiender, A., & Neuwinger, E. (1996). Kann man Geschenke umbringen? Assoziative Bahnungsexperimente zur Bedeutungsheterogenität von Verben. In C. Habel, S. Kanngießer, & G. Rickheit (Eds.), Perspektiven der kognitiven Linguistik. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.