Letter transpositions within and across morphemes

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1327-1339

  Christianson, Kiel ^a   Johnson, Rebecca L ^b   Rayner, Keith ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Letter transpositions; Lexical access; Reading; Visual word recognition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; READING; RECOGNITION; VISION;

HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 30544437690     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1327     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Allen, M., & Badecker, W. (1999). Stem homograph inhibition and stem allomorphy: Representing and processing inflected forms in a multilevel lexical system. Journal of Memory & Language, 41, 105-123.
2. Andrews, S. (1996). Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 775-800.
3. Andrews, S., Miller, B., & Rayner, K. (2004). Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 285-311.
4. Ashby, J., & Rayner, K. (2004). Representing syllable information in word recognition during silent reading: Evidence from eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 391-426.
5. Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision phase. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340-357.
6. Bertram, R., Hyönä, J., & Pollatsek, A. (2004). Morphological parsing and the use of segmentation cues in reading Finnish compounds. Journal of Memory & Language, 51, 325-345.
7. Blair, I. V., Urland, G. R., & Ma, J. E. (2002). Using internet search engines to estimate word frequency. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 34, 286-290.
8. Bock, J. K. (1986). Meaning, sound, and syntax: Lexical priming in sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 575-586.
9. Bruner, J. S., & O'Dowd, D. (1958). A note on the informativeness of parts of words. Language & Speech, 1, 98-101.
10. Caramazza, A., Chialant, D., Capasso, D., & Miceli, G. (2000). Separable processing of consonants and vowels. Nature, 403, 428-430.
11. Centre for Lexical Information. (1993). The Celex lexical database. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Max Planck Institute.
12. Chambers, S. M. (1979). Letter and order information in lexical access. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 225-241.
13. Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335-359.
14. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Ziegler, J., & Langdon, R. (2001). DRC: A dual-route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
15. Davis, C. J. (1999). The self-organizing lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales.
16. Feldman, L. B., & Soltano, E. G. (1999). Morphological priming: The role of prime duration, semantic transparency, and affix position. Brain and Language, 68, 33-39.
17. Forster, K. I. (1998). The pros and cons of masked priming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 203-233.
18. Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schonknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 39, 211-251.
19. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
20. Griffin, Z. M. (2003). A reversed word-length effect in coordinating the preparation and articulation of words in speaking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 603-609.
21. Holmes, V. M., & Ng, E. (1993). Word-specific knowledge, word-recognition strategies, and spelling ability. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 230-257.
22. Huckauf, A., & Heller, D. (2002). What various kinds of errors tell us about lateral masking effects. Visual Cognition, 9, 889-910.
23. Inhoff, A. W. (1989). Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: Are word access codes used to integrate lexical information across interword fixations? Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 441-461.
24. Johnson, R. L., Perea, M., & Rayner, K. (2005). Tranposed letter effects in reading: Evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. Manuscript submitted for review.
25. Juhasz, B. J., Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (2005). The role of interword spaces in the processing of English compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 291-316.
26. Juhasz, B. J., Starr, M. S., Inhoff, A. W., & Placke, L. (2003). The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: Evidence from naming, lexical decisions, and eye fixations. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 223-244.
27. Kessler, B., Treiman, R., & Mullennix, J. (2002). Phonetic biases in voice key response time measurements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 145-171.
28. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
29. Lee, H.-W., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2001). The relative contribution of consonants and vowels to word identification during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 189-205.
30. Longtin, C. M., Segui, J., & Halle, P. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 313-334.
31. Lorch, R. F., Jr., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 149-157.
32. Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R, & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33.
33. McBride-Chang, C., Cho, J.-R., Wagner, R. K., Shu, H., Zhao, A., Cheuk, C. S.-M., & Muse, A. (2005). Changing models across cultures: Associations of phonological awareness and morphological structure awareness to vocabulary and word recognition in second graders from Beijing, Hong Kong, Korea, and America. Manuscript submitted for review.
34. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
35. O'Connor, R. E., & Forster, K. I. (1981). Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 9, 78-92.
36. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003a). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita and S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 97-120). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
37. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003b). Does JUGDE activate COURT? Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked associative priming. Memory & Cognition, 31, 829-841.
38. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231-246.
39. Perea, M., Rosa, E., & Gómez, C. (2005). The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 301-314.
40. Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
41. plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
42. Pollatsek, A., Hyönä, J., & Bertram, R. (2000). The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 820-833.
43. Psychology Software Tools. (2004). E-Prime (Version 1.1) [Computer software]. Pittsburgh, PA: Author.
44. Rastle, K., Davis, M., Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 507-538.
45. Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2003). Reading morphologically complex words: Some thoughts from masked priming. In Kinoshita, S. & Lupker, S. J. (Eds), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 279-305). New York: Psychology Press.
46. Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychological Bulletin & Review, 11, 1090-1098.
47. Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Schilling, H. E. H., Rayner, K., & Chumbley, J. I. (1998). Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1270-1281.
49. Seidenberg, M. S. (1987). Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? In Coltheart, M. (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 245-263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221-243.