Morphological processing: A comparison between free and bound stem facilitation

Brain and Language

Volumn 90, Issue 1-3, 2004, Pages 31-39

  Pastizzo, Matthew J ^a   Feldman, Laurie B ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Forward masked priming; Free and bound stem facilitation; Morphological family size

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FACILITATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; NORMAL HUMAN; SEMANTICS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORD RECOGNITION;

DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 2542471405     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00417-6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Aronoff M. Word formation in generative grammar. 1976;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
2. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania
3. Bergman M.W., Hudson P.T.W., Eling P.A.T.M. How simple complex words can be: Morphological processing and word representations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 40:1988;41-72
4. Bertram R., Baayen R.H., Schreuder R. Effects of family size for complex words. Journal of Memory and Language. 42:2000;390-405
5. Boudelaa S., Marslen-Wilson W. Morphological units in the Arabic mental lexicon. Cognition. 81:2001;65-92
6. Burani C. The lexical representation of prefixed words: Data from production tasks. Acta Linguistica Hungarica. 40:1990;95-113
7. De Jong N.H., Feldman L.B., Schreuder R., Pastizzo M.J., Baayen R.H. The processing and representation of Dutch and English compounds: Peripheral morphological, and central orthographic effects. Brain and Language. 81:2001;555-567. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2547
8. De Jong N.H., Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes. 15:2000;329-365
9. De Moor W., Brysbaert M. Neighborhood-frequency effects when primes and targets are of different lengths. Psychological Research. 63:2000;159-162
10. Emmorey K.D. Auditory morphological priming in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes. 4:1989;73-92
11. Feldman L.B. Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 26:2000;1431-1444
12. Feldman L.B., Bentin S. Morphological analysis of disrupted morphemes: Evidence from Hebrew. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 47A:1994;407-435
13. Feldman L.B., Pastizzo M.J. Morphological facilitation: The role of semantic transparency and family size. Baayen R.H., Schreuder R. Morphological structure in language processing. 2004;Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin
14. Feldman, L. B., Soltano, E. G., Pastizzo, M. J., & Francis, S. (2004). What do graded effects of semantic transparency reveal about morphological processing?
15. Forster K.I., Azuma T. Masked priming for prefixed words with bound stems: Does submit prime permit? Language and Cognitive Processes. 15:2000;539-561
16. Forster K.I., Davis C. Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 10:1984;680-698
17. Forster K.I., Davis C., Schoknecht C., Carter R. Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 39A:1987;211-251
18. Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2000). On the role of derivational affixes in recognizing complex words: Evidence from masked priming. Linguistics
19. Grainger J., Colé P., Segui J. Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language. 30:1991;370-384
20. Kučera H., Francis N. Computational analysis of present - day American English. 1967;Brown University Press, Providence, RI
21. Marslen-Wilson W.D., Tyler L.K., Waksler R., Older L. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review. 101:1994;3-33
22. Melinger A.P. Morphological complexity in English prefixed words: An experimental investigation (Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International. 61:2001;A4752
23. Oxford English Dictionary. (1999). Oxford University Press. [CDROM]
24. Pastizzo M.J., Feldman L.B. Does prime modality influence morphological processing? Brain and Language. 81:2001;28-41. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2504
25. Pastizzo M.J., Feldman L.B. Discrepancies between orthographic and unrelated baselines in masked priming undermine a decompositional account of morphological facilitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 28:2002;244-249
26. Roelofs A., Baayen H. Morphology by itself in planning the production of spoken words. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 9:2002;132-138
27. Stanners R.F., Neiser J.J., Painton S. Memory representation for prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 18:1979;733-743
28. Taft M. Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory and Cognition. 7:1979;263-272
29. Taft M. Prefix stripping revisited. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 20:1981;289-297
30. Taft M. Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes. 9:1994;271-294
31. Taft M., Forster K.I. Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 14:1975;638-647
32. Taft M., Zhu X. The representation of bound morphemes in the lexicon: A Chinese study. Feldman L.B. Morphological aspects of language processing. 1995;293-316 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ