Transposed-letter effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 93-116

  Lupker, Stephen J ^a   Perea, Manuel ^b   Davis, Colin J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATIVE MEMORY; CONSONANT; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MASKING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VOWEL; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 38049178780     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960701579714     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Berent, I. and Perfetti, C. A. (1995) A rose is a REEZ: The two cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English. Psychological Review, 102, pp. 146-184.
2. Berent, I., Bouissa, R. and Tuller, B. (2001) The effect of shared structure and content on reading nonwords: Evidence for a CV skeleton. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, pp. 1042-1057.
3. Buchwald, A. and Rapp, B. (2006) Consonants and vowels in orthographic representations. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, pp. 308-337.
4. Caramazza, A., Chialant, D., Capasso, D. and Miceli, G. (2000) Separable processing of consonants and vowels. Nature, 403, pp. 428-430.
5. Caramazza, A. and Miceli, G. (1990) The structure of graphemic representations. Cognition, 37, pp. 243-297.
6. Chambers, S. M. (1979) Letter and order information in lexical access. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, pp. 225-241.
7. Cubelli, R. (1991) A selective deficit for writing vowels in acquired dysgraphia. Nature, 353, pp. 258-260.
8. Davis, C. J. (1999) The Self-Organising Lexical Acquisition and Recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition
9. Davis, C. J. and Bowers, J. S. (2006) Contrasting five theories of letter position coding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, pp. 535-557.
10. Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C. and Carter, R. (1987) Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, pp. 211-251.
11. Forster, J. C. and Forster, K. I. (2003) DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, pp. 116-124.
12. Frankish, C. and Turner, E. (2007) SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, pp. 189-211.
13. Gómez, P., Ratcliff, R. and Perea, M. (2007) The overlap model of the encoding of letter positions
14. Grainger, J. and Jacobs, A. M. (1996) Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, pp. 518-565.
15. Grainger, J., Kiyonaga, K. and Holcomb, P. J. (2006) The time-course of orthographic and phonological code activation. Psychological Science, 17, pp. 1021-1026.
16. Grainger, J. and Van Heuven, W. (2003) Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. The mental lexicon, pp. 1-24. Nova Science Publishers, New York
17. Johnson, R. L., Perea, M. and Rayner, K. (2007) Transposed-letter effects in reading: Evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, pp. 209-229.
18. Kucera, H. and Francis, W. (1967) Computational analysis of present-day American English, Brown University Press, Providence, RI
19. Mayzner, M. S. and Tresselt, M. E. (1965) Tables of single-letter and digram frequency counts for various word-length and letter position combinations. Psychonomic Monograph Supplements, 1, pp. 13-32.
20. McClelland, J. L. and Rumelhart, D. E. (1981) An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, pp. 375-407.
21. Miceli, G., Capasso, R., Benvegnu, B. and Caramazza, A. (2004) The categorical distinction of vowel and consonant representations: Evidence from dysgraphia. Neurocase, 10, pp. 109-121.
22. O'Connor, R. E. and Forster, K. I. (1981) Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 9, pp. 78-92.
23. Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E. and Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982) An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: The word superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, pp. 573-594.
24. Perea, M. and Carreiras, M. (1998) Effects of syllable frequency and syllable neighborhood frequency in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, pp. 134-144.
25. Perea, M. and Carreiras, M. (2006) Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, pp. 1600-1613.
26. Perea, M. and Carreiras, M. (2006) Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a syllable level?. Experimental Psychology, 53, pp. 308-315.
27. Perea, M. and Lupker, S. J. (2003) Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. Masked priming: State of the art, pp. 97-120. Psychology Press, Hove, UK
28. Perea, M. and Lupker, S. J. (2003) Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory & Cognition, 31, pp. 829-841.
29. Perea, M. and Lupker, S. J. (2004) Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, pp. 231-246.
30. Perea, M., Rosa, E. and Gómez, C. (2005) The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, pp. 301-314.
31. Schoonbaert, S. and Grainger, J. (2004) Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, pp. 333-367.
32. Tainturier, M. J. and Caramazza, A. (1996) The status of double letters in graphemic representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, pp. 53-73.
33. Whitney, C. (2001) How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, pp. 221-243.