Morphological analysis in sentence processing: An ERP study

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 405-430

  Allen, Mark ^a   Badecker, William ^b   Osterhout, Lee ^c  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ERROR; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; RELIABILITY; SEMANTICS; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 0041423677     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960244000054     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Alegre, M., & Gordon, P. (1999). Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 41-61.
2. Allen, M., & Badecker, W. (2000) Morphology: the internal structure of words. In B. Rapp (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits reveal about the human mind/brain (pp. 211-232). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
3. Anderson, S. (1992). A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Baayen, H., & Schreuder, R. (1999). War and peace: Morphemes and full forms in a noninteractive activation parallel dual-route model. Brain and Language, 68, 27-32.
5. Baayen, H.. Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 94-117.
6. Bertram, R., Hyönä, J., & Laine, M. (2000). The role of context in morphological processing: Evidence from Finnish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 367-388.
7. Bertram, R., Laine, M., & Karvinen, K. (1999). The interplay of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity in lexical processing: Evidence from a morphologically rich language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 213-226.
8. Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology, Cognition, 28, 297-332.
9. Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 991-1060.
10. Cutler, A., Hawkins, J., & Gilligan, G. (1985). The suffixing preference: A processing explanation. Linguistics, 23, 723-758.
11. Frauenfelder, U., & Schreuder, R. (1992). Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1991 (pp. 165-183). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
12. Gross, M., Say, T., Kleingers, M., Münte, T., & Clahsen, H. (1998). Human brain potentials to violations in morphologically complex Italian words. Neuroscience Letters, 241, 83-86.
13. Haggoort, P., & Brown, C. (1994). Brain responses to lexical ambiguity resolution and parsing. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 45-80). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
14. Haggoort, P., & Brown, C. (1999). Gender electrified: Evidence on the syntactic nature of gender processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 715-728.
15. Haggoort, P., Brown, C., & Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift (SPs) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 439-483.
16. Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: Early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 193-204.
17. Joanisse, M., & Seidenberg, M. (1999). Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: A connectionist model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 7592-7597.
18. Kutas, M. & Hillyard, S. (1980). Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words. Biological Psychology, 11, 99-116.
19. Kutas, M. & Hillyard, S. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161-163.
20. Laine, M., Vainio, S., & Hyönä, J. (1999). Lexical access routes to nouns in a morphologically rich language. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 109-135.
21. Laudanna, A., Badecker, W., & Caramazza, A. (1989). Priming homographic stems. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 531-546.
22. Marcus, G., Brinkmann, U., Clahsen, H., Wiese, R., & Pinker, S. (1995). German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 189-256.
23. Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. (1997). Dissociating types of mental computation. Nature, 387, 592-594.
24. Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. (1998). Rules, representations, and the English past tense. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2, 428-435.
25. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Hare, M., & Older, L. (1993). Inflectional morphology and phonological regularity in the English mental lexicon. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 693-698). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
26. McQueen, J., & Cutler, A. (1998). Morphology in word recognition. In A. Zwicky & A. Spencer (Eds.), Handbook of morphology (pp. 406-427). Oxford: Blackwell.
27. Münte, T., Say, T., Clahsen, H., Schiltz, K., & Kutas, M. (1999). Decomposition of morphologically complex words in English: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 241-253.
28. Niswander, E., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2000). The processing of derived and inflected suffixed words during reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 389-420.
29. Osterhout, L. (1997). On the brain response to syntactic anomalies: Manipulations of word position and word class reveal individual differences. Brain and Language, 59, 494-522.
30. Osterhout, L., & Mobley, L. (1995). Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 739-773.
31. Osterhout, L., & Nicol, J. (1999). On the distinctiveness, independence, and time course of the brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 283-317.
32. Penke, M., Weyerts, H., Gross, M., Zander, E., Münte, T., & Clahsen, H. (1997). How the brain processes complex words: An event-related potential study of German verb inflections. Cognitive Brain Research, 6, 37-52.
33. Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science, 253, 530-535.
34. Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: the ingredients of language. New York: Basic Books.
35. Prasada, S., & Pinker, S. (1993). Generalization of regular and irregular morphological patterns. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 1-56.
36. Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Clahsen, H., Lleó, C., Zaake, W., & Münte, T. (2001). Event-related brain responses to morphological violations in Catalan. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 47-58.
37. Rueckl, J., Mikolinski, M., Raveh, M., Miner, C., & Mars, F. (1997). Morphological priming, fragment completion, and connectionist networks. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 382-405.
38. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131-154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
39. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, H. (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 118-139.
40. Sonnenstuhl, I., Eisenbeiss, S., & Clahsen, H. (1999). Morphological priming in the German mental lexicon. Cognition, 72, 203-236.
41. Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory and Cognition, 7, 263-272.
42. Tyler, L. (1992). Spoken language comprehension: An experimental approach to disordered and normal processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Ullman, M. (1999). Acceptability ratings of regular and irregular past-tense forms: Evidence for a dual-system model of language from word frequency and phonological neighborhood effects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 47-67.
44. Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1987). Ambiguous words in context: An event-related potential analysis of the time course of meaning activation. Journal of Memory and Cognition, 26, 188-208.
45. Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1990). Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials. Memory and Cognition, 18, 380-393.
46. Weyerts, H., Penke, M., Dohrn, U., Clahsen, H., & Münte, T. (1997). Brain potentials indicate differences between regular and irregular German noun plurals. NeuroReport, 8, 957-962.