What do graded effects of semantic transparency reveal about morphological processing?

Brain and Language

Volumn 90, Issue 1-3, 2004, Pages 17-30

  Feldman, Laurie Beth ^a,b   Soltano, Emily G ^c   Pastizzo, Matthew J ^a,b   Francis, Sarah E ^d  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b HASKINS LABORATORIES   (United States)

^c WORCESTER STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

Cross modal lexical decision; Derivations; Graded morphological facilitation; Morphological decomposition; Morphological family size; Morphological processing; Semantic transparency; Visual short term lexical decision

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FACILITATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; LINGUISTICS; NORMAL HUMAN; SCORING SYSTEM; SEMANTICS; STIMULUS; VISUAL STIMULATION; WORD RECOGNITION;

DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; MEMORY; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 2542481649     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00416-4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (50)

1. Badecker W., Allen M. Morphological parsing, lemma competition and conscious word perception: A masked priming study of stem homographs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1999
2. Bentin S., Feldman L.B. The contribution of morphological and semantic relatedness to repetition priming at short and long lags: Evidence from Hebrew. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 42:1990;693-711
3. Baayen H., Burani C., Schreuder R. Effects of semantic markedness in the processing of regular nominal singulars and plurals in Italian. Booij G.E., van Marle J. Yearbook of morphology 1996. 1996;13-33 Kluwer, Dordrecht
4. Baayen R.H., Dijkstra T., Schreuder R. Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual route model. Journal of Memory and Language. 36:1997;94-117
5. Baayen R.H., Piepenbrock R., Gulikers L. The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM), Linguistic Data Consortium. 1995;University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
6. Baayen H., Schreuder R. War and Peace. Morphemes and full forms in a non-interactive activation parallel dual route model. Brain and Language. 1999;60
7. Baayen H., Tweedie F.J, Schreuder R. The subjects as a simple random effect fallacy: Subject variability and morphological family effects in the mental lexicon. Brain and Language. 81:2002;55-65
8. Becker S., Moscovitch M., Behrmann M., Joordens S. Long-term semantic priming: A computational account and empirical evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 23:1997;1059-1082
9. Bertram R., Baayen R.H., Schreuder R. Effects of family size for complex words. Journal of Memory and Language. 42:2000;390-405
10. Burani C., Laudanna A. Units of representation for derived words in the lexicon. Frost R., Katz L. Advances in psychology: Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning. 1992;27-44 Elsevier, Amsterdam
11. Bybee J. Diachronic and typological properties of morphology and their implication for representation or semantic compositionality. Feldman L.B. Morphological aspects of language processing. 1995;225-246 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
12. Butterworth B. Lexical representation. Butterworth B. Language production. Vol. 2:1983;257-294 Academic Press, San Diego, CA
13. De Jong N.H., Feldman L.B., Schreuder R., Pastizzo M.J., Baayen R.H. The processing and representation of Dutch and English compounds: Peripheral morphological, and central orthographic effects. Brain and Language. 81:2002;555-567
14. De Jong N.H., Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes. 15:2000;329-365
15. Deutsch A., Frost R., Forster K. Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 24:1998;1238-1255
16. Feldman L.B. Morphological relationships revealed through the repetition priming task. Noonan M., Downing P., Lima S. Linguistics and literacy. 1992;239-254 John Benjamins, Amsterdam
17. Feldman L.B. Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 26:2000;1431-1444
18. Feldman L.B., Barac-Cikja D., Kostić A. Semantic aspects of morphological processing: transparency effects in Serbian. Memory & Cognition. 30:2002;629-636
19. Feldman L.B., Pastizzo M.J. Morphological facilitation: The role of semantic transparency and family size. Baayen R.H., Schreuder R. Morphological Structure in Language Processing. 2004;Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany
20. Feldman L.B., Prostko B. Graded aspects of morphological processing: Task and processing time. Brain and Language. 81:2002;1-16
21. Feldman L.B., Raveh M. Semantic aspects of morphological processing. Shimron J. Language processing and language acquisition in languages with root-based morphology. 2003;John Benjamins, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
22. Feldman L.B., Soltano E.G. Morphological priming: The role of prime duration, semantic transparency and affix position. Brain and Language. 60:1999;33-39
23. Feldman, L. B., & Stotko, E. (1990). Unpublished data
24. Forster K.I., Davis C. Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 10:1984;680-698
25. Frost R., Forster K., Deutsch A. What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew: A masked priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 23:1997;829-856
26. Frost R., Deutsch A., Gilboa O., Tannenbaum M., Marslen-Wilson M. Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic and morphological facilitation. Memory & Cognition. 28:2000;1277-1286
27. Gonnerman, L. M. (1999). Morphology and the lexicon: Exploring the semantics-phonology interface. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Department of Linguistics. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
28. Hay J. Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative? Linguistics. 2001
29. Kučera H., Francis N. Computational analysis of present-day American English. 1967;Brown University Press, Providence, RI
30. Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y. B., & Sandra, D. (1997). Semantic transparency and compound fracture. CASNET Working Papers, 9, 3-13
31. Lukatela G., Gligorijević B., Kostić A., Turvey M.T. Representation of inflected nouns in the internal lexicon. Memory & Cognition. 8:1980;415-423
32. Marslen-Wilson W., Tyler L., Waksler R., Older L. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review. 101:1994;3-33
33. Nikolova R., Jarema G. Interaction of morphological structure and prefix transparency in the processing of Bulgarian aspectual verb forms. Brain and Language. 81:2002;649-665
34. Pastizzo M.J., Feldman L.B. Discrepancies between orthographic and unrelated baselines in masked priming undermine a decompositional account of morphological facilitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 28:2002;244-249
35. Pastizzo M.J., Feldman L.B. Does prime modality influence morphological processing? Brain and Language. 81:2002;28-41
36. Pastizzo, M. J., & Feldman, L. B. (2004). What do bound and free stem facilitation reveal about morphological processing? Brain and Language, this issue
37. Plaut D.C., Gonnerman L.M. Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Language and Cognitive Processes. 15:2000;445-486
38. Rastle K., Davis M.H., Marslen-Wilson W.D., Tyler L.K. Morphology and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time course study. Language and Cognitive Processes. 15:2000;507-537
39. Raveh, M., & Feldman, L. B. (1998). The contribution of morphological relatives and affix position to morphological processing. Paper presented at the X Congress of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology, Jerusalem, Israel
40. Raveh M., Rueckl J. Equivalent effects of inflected and derived primes: Long-term morphological priming in fragment completion and lexical decision. Journal of Memory and Language. 42:2000;103-119
41. Raveh, M. (1999). The contribution of frequency and semantic similarity to morphological processing. Dissertation submitted to The University of Connecticut
42. Rueckl J.G., Mikolinski M., Raveh M., Miner C.S., Mars F. Morphological priming, connectionist networks, and masked fragment completion. Journal of Memory and Language. 36:1997;382-405
43. Sanchez-Casas, R., Igoa, I., & Garcia-Albea, J. (1999). Priming effects in orthographic and morphologically related words: Data from Spanish. Paper presented at the Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Morphological Processing Conference, Aix-en-Provence, France
44. Sandra D. On the representation and processing of compound words: automatic access of constituent morphemes does not occur. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 42:1990;529-567
45. Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. Modeling morphological processing. Feldman L.B. Morphological aspects of language processing. 1995;131-154 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
46. Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language. 37:1997;118-139
47. Schreuder R., Burani C., Baayen R.H. Parsing and semantic opacity. Assink E., Sandra D. Reading complex words: Neuropsychology and cognition. 2003;Kluwer, The Netherlands, Amsterdam
48. Seidenberg M.S., Gonnerman L.M. Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 4:2000;288-289
49. Taft M., Forster K.I. Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 14:1975;638-647
50. Zwitserlood P. The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Sandra D., Taft M. Morphological structure, lexical representation and lexical access. 1994;341-368 Erlbaum, East Sussex