Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 745-765

  Taft, Marcus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION;

HUMANS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VOCABULARY;

EID: 2542547302     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980343000477     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Allen, M., & Badecker, W. (1999). Stem homograph inhibition and stem allomorphy: Representing and processing inflected forms in a multilevel lexical system. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 105-123.
2. Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 94-117.
3. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX Lexical Database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
4. Beauvillain, C. (1996). The integration of morphological and whole word form information during eye fixations on prefixed and suffixed words. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 801-820.
5. Bertram, R., Laine, M., & Karvinen, K. (1999). The interplay of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity in lexical processing: Evidence from a morphological rich language. Journal of Psycholinguistik Research, 28, 213-226.
6. Bertram, R., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2000). The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homophony, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 489-511.
7. Bradley, D. C. (1979). Lexical representation of derivational relation. In M. Aronoff & M. L. Kean (Eds.), Juncture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Burani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1987). Representation and processing of derived words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 217-227.
9. Burani, C., & Laudanna, A. (1992). Units of representation for derived words in the lexicon. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
10. Burani, C., Salmaso, D., & Caramazza, A. (1984). Morphological structure and lexical access. Visible Language, 18, 342-352.
11. Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 297-332.
12. Carroll, J. B., Davies, P., & Richman, B. (1971). The American Heritage word frequency book. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
13. Colé, P., Beauvillain, C., & Segui, J. (1989). On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: A differential frequency effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 1-13.
14. Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2000). Prime word frequency in masked morphological and orthographic priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 421-444.
15. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
16. Niemi, J., Laine, M., & Tuominen, J. (1994). Cognitive morphology in Finnish: Foundations of a new model. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 423-446.
17. Niswander, E., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2000). The processing of derived and inflected suffixed words during reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 389-420.
18. Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science, 153, 530-535.
19. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131-154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
20. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 118-139.
21. Sereno, J. A., & Jongman, A. (1997). Processing of English inflectional morphology. Memory and Cognition, 25, 425-437.
22. Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory & Cognition, 7, 263-272.
23. Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271-294.
24. Taft, M. (2003). Morphological representation as a correlation between form and meaning. In E. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words. Amsterdam: Kluwer.
25. Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638-647.
26. Taft, M., Hambly, G., & Kinoshita, S. (1986). Visual and auditory recognition of prefixed words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A, 351-366.