Morphological priming without morphological relationship

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 313-334

  Longtin, Catherine Marie ^a   Segui, Juan ^a   Hallé, Pierre A ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; FRANCE; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; VISION; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 0038388280     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960244000036     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Allen, M., & Badecker, W. (1999). Stem homograph inhibition and stem allomorphy: Representing and processing inflected forms in a multi-level lexical system. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 105-123.
2. Badecker, W., & Allen, M. (2002). Morphological parsing and the perception of lexical identity: A masked priming study of stem homographs. Journal of Memory and Language, 47 (1), 125-144.
3. Bertram, R., Laine, M., Baayen, R.H., Schreuder, R., & Hyönä, J. (2000a). Affixal homonymy triggers full-form storage, even with inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language. Cognition, 74, B13-B25.
4. Bertram, S., Laine, M., & Karvinen, K. (1999). The interplay of words formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity in lexical processing: Evidence from a morphologically rich language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 213-226.
5. Bertram, R., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2000b). The balance storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 489-511.
6. Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (2000). Non-concatenative morphemes in language processing: Evidence from Modern Standard Arabic. Proceedings of SWAP, Nijmegen, MPI for Psycholinguistics, 23-26.
7. Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (2001). Morphological units in the Arabic mental lexicon. Cognition, 81 (1), 65-92.
8. Burani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1987). Representation and processing of derived words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2 (3/4), 217-227.
9. Burani, C., Dovetto, F.M., Thornton, A.M., & Laudanna, A. (1997). Accessing and naming suffixed pseudo-words. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1996 (pp. 55-72). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
10. Colé, P., Beauvillain, C., & Segui, J. (1989). On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: A differential frequency effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 1-13.
11. Content, A., Mousty, P., & Radeau, M. (1990). BRULEX: Une base de données lexicales informatisée pour le français écrit et parlé. L'Année Psychologique, 90, 551-566.
12. Deutsch, A., Frost, R., & Forster, K.I. (1998). Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1238-1255.
13. Drews, E., & Zwitserlood, P. (1995). Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21 (5), 1098-1116.
14. Feldman, L.B., & Soltano, E.G. (1999). Morphological priming: The role of prime duration, semantic transparency, and affix position. Brain and Language, 68, 33-39.
15. Ferrand, L., & Alario, F.-X. (1998). Normes d'associations verbales pour 366 noms d'objets concrets. L'Année Psychologique, 98, 689-739.
16. Forster, K.I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680-698.
17. Frost, R., Deutsch, A., & Forster, K.I. (2000a). Decomposing morphologically complex words in an nonlinear morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 751-765.
18. Frost, R., Deutsch, A., Gilboa, O., Tannenbaum, M., & Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (2000b). Morphological priming: dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors. Memory and Cognition, 28 (8), 1277-1288.
19. Frost, R., Forster, K.I., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23 (4), 829-856.
20. Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2001). Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8 (1), 127-131.
21. Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (in press). On the role of derivational affixes in recognizing complex words: Evidence from masked priming. In H. Baayen (Ed.), Aspects of morphological processing. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
22. Gonnerman, L.M. (1999). Morphology and the lexicon: Exploring the semantic-phonology interface. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.
23. Grainger, J., Colé, P., & Segui, J. (1991). Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 370-384.
24. Laudanna, A., Badecker, W., & Caramazza, A. (1989). Priming homographic stems. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 531-546.
25. Laudanna, A., Badecker, W., & Caramazza, A. (1992). Processing inflectional and derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 333-348.
26. Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (2001). Access to lexical representations: Cross-linguistic issues. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16 (5/6), 699-708.
27. Marslen-Wilson, W.D., Tyler, L.K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101 (1), 3-33.
28. McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (1998). Morphology in word recognition. In A. Spencer & A.M. Zwicky (Eds.), Handbook of Morphology (pp. 406-427). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
29. Meunier, F., & Segui, J. (1999). Morphological priming effect: The role of surface frequency. Brain and Language, 68, 54-60.
30. Pastizzo, M.J., & Feldman, L.B. (2002). Discrepancies between orthographic and unrelated baselines in masked priming undermine a decompositional account of morphological facilitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28 (1), 244-249.
31. Plaut, D.C., & Gonnerman, L.G. (2000). Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Language and Cognitive Processes, 15 (4/5), 445-485.
32. Rastle, K., Davis, M.H., Marslen-Wilson, W.D., & Tyler, L.K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15 (4/5), 507-537.
33. Rey-Debove, J. (1984). Le domaine de la morphologie lexicale. Cahiers de Lexicologie, 45, 3-19.
34. Rey-Debove, J., & Rey, A. (1993). Le Nouveau Petit Robert. Paris: Editions Le Robert.
35. Seidenberg, M.S., & Gonnerman, L.M. (2000). Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4 (9), 353-361.
36. Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory and Cognition, 7, 263-272.
37. Taft, M., & Forster, K.I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 638-647.