The processing of morpheme-like units in monomorphemic words

Brain and Language

Volumn 90, Issue 1-3, 2004, Pages 9-16

  Taft, Marcus ^a   Kougious, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; SEMANTICS; SPEECH ARTICULATION; WORD RECOGNITION;

HUMANS; MEMORY; MENTAL PROCESSES; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; READING; SEMANTICS;

EID: 2542422729     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00415-2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Burani C., Laudanna A. Units of representation for derived words in the lexicon. Frost R., Katz L. Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning. 1992;North-Holland, Amsterdam
2. Drews E., Zwitserlood P. Morphological and orthographic visual similarity in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 21:1995;1098-1116
3. Emmorey K. Auditory morphological priming in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes. 4:1989;73-92
4. Feldman L.B. Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 26:2000;1431-1444
5. Forster K.I., Azuma T. Masked priming for prefixed words with bound stems: Does. submit prime permit ? Language and Cognitive Processes. 15:2000;539-562
6. Forster K.I., Davis C. Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 10:1984;680-698
7. Frost R. Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin. 123:1998;71-99
8. Lukatela G., Lukatela K., Turvey M.T. Further evidence for phonological constraints on visual lexical access: TOWED primes FROG. Perception & Psychophysics. 53:1993;461-466
9. Marslen-Wilson W., Tyler L.K., Waksler R., Older L. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review. 101:1994;3-33
10. Perea M., Gotor A. Associative and semantic priming effects occur at very short stimulus-onset asynchronies in lexical decision and naming. Cognition. 62:1997;223-240
11. Pinker S., Ullman M. The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Science. 6:2002;456-463
12. Plaut D., Gonnerman L.M. Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Language and Cognitive Processes. 15:2000;445-485
13. Plaut D.C., McClelland J.L., Seidenberg M.S., Patterson K. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review. 103:1996;56-115
14. Rastle K., Davis M.H., Marslen-Wilson W.D., Tyler L.K. Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes. 15:2000;507-537
15. Rueckl J.G., Mikolinski M., Raveh M., Miner C.S., Mars F. Morphological priming, fragment completion, and connectionist networks. Journal of Memory and Language. 36:1997;382-405
16. Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. Modeling morphological processing. Feldman L.B. Morphological aspects of language processing. 1995;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
17. Seidenberg M.S., Gonnerman L.M. Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 4:2000;353-361
18. Taft M. Lexical access via an orthographic code: The Basic Orthographic Syllabic Structure (BOSS). Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 18:1979;21-39
19. Taft M. Morphographic processing. The BOSS re-emerges. Coltheart M. Attention and performance. Vol. XII:1987;Erlbaum, London
20. Taft M. Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes. 9:1994;271-294
21. Taft M. Processing of orthographic structure by adults of different reading ability. Language and Speech. 44:2001;351-376
22. Taft M. Orthographic processing of polysyllabic words by native and non-native English speakers. Brain and Language. 81:2002;532-544
23. Taft M. Morphological representation as a correlation between form and meaning. Assink E., Sandra D. Reading complex words. 2003;Kluwer, Amsterdam
24. Taft, M. (in press). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
25. Taft M., Forster K.I. Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 14:1975;638-647
26. Taft M., Hambly G., Kinoshita S. Visual and auditory recognition of prefixed words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology. 38A:1986;351-366
27. Van Orden G.C. A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory & Cognition. 15:1987;181-198