Event-related potential (ERP) responses to violations of inflectional and derivational rules of Finnish

Brain Research

Volumn 1218, Issue , 2008, Pages 181-193

  Leinonen, Alina ^a   Brattico, Pauli ^a,b   Järvenpää, Miika ^a   Krause, Christina M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

Derivation; Event related potential; Finnish morphology; Inflection; Linear summation; Morphology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; FINLAND; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LANGUAGE TEST; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MORPHOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONEME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL STIMULATION; WORD LIST RECALL; WORD RECOGNITION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPREHENSION; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FINLAND; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS;

EID: 46349091926     PISSN: 00068993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.04.049     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Allen M., Badecker W., and Osterhout L. Morphological analysis in sentence processing: an ERP study. Lang. Cogn. Processes 18 (2003) 405-430
2. Anderson S.R. Where's morphology?. Ling. Inq. 13 (1982) 571-612
3. Aronoff M. Morphology by Itself (1994), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass
4. Beard R. Derivation. In: Spencer A., and Zwicky A.M. (Eds). The Handbook of Morphology (1998), Blackwell, Oxford 44-65
5. Bertram R., Laine M., and Karvinen K. The interplay of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity in lexical processing: evidence from a morphologically rich language. J. Psychol. Res. 28 (1999) 213-225
6. Bertram R., Laine M., Baayen R.H., Schreuder R., and Hyönä J. Affixal homonymy triggers full-form storage, even with inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language. Cognition 74 (2000) B13-B25
7. Bochner H. Simplicity in generative morphology (1992), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin
8. Brattico P. A category-free model of Finnish derivational morphology. SKY J. Linguist. 18 (2005) 7-46
9. Brattico P., Leinonen A., and Krause C.M. On the limits of productive word formation: experimental data from Finnish. SKY J. Linguist. 20 (2007) 109-139
10. Bybee J. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form (1985), John Benjamins, Amsterdam
11. Delorme A., and Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics. J. Neurosci. Methods 134 (2004) 9-21
12. Feldman L.B. Beyond orthography and phonology: differences between inflections and derivations. J. Mem. Lang. 33 (1994) 442-470
13. Friederici A.D. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6 (2002) 78-84
14. Gross M., Say T., Kleingers M., Clahsen H., and Münte T. Human brain potentials to violations in morphologically complex Italian words. Neurosci. Lett. 241 (1998) 83-86
15. Hagoort P., Wassenaar M.E.D., and Brown C.M. Syntax-related ERP-effects in Dutch. Cogn. Brain Res. 16 (2003) 38-50
16. Hakulinen A., Vilkuna M., Korhonen R., Koivisto V., Heinonen T., and Alho I. Iso suomen kielioppi. SKS:n toimituksia 950 (2004), Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura, Helsinki
17. Hyönä J., Vainio S., and Laine M. A morphological effect obtains for isolated words but not for words in sentence context. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 14 (2002) 417-433
18. Hyönä J., Laine M., and Niemi J. Effects of a word's morphological complexity on reader's eye fixation patterns. In: Findlay J., Kentridge R., and Walker R. (Eds). Eye Movement Research: Mechanisms, Processes and Applications (1995), Elsevier, Amsterdam 445-452
19. Janssen U., Wiese R., and Schlesewsky M. Electrophysiological responses to violations of morphosyntactic and prosodic features in derived German nouns. J. Neurolinguist. 19 (2006) 466-482
20. Kaan E., Harris A., Gibson E., and Holcomb P.J. The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Lang. Cogn. Processes 15 (2000) 159-201
21. Karlsson F. Suomen kielen äänne- ja muotorakenne (1983), WSOY, Helsinki
22. Kimura M., Katayama J., and Murohashi H. Positive difference in ERPs reflects independent processing of visual changes. Psychophysiology 42 (2005) 369-379
23. Koester D., Gunter T.C., and Wagner S. The morphosyntactic decomposition and semantic composition of German compound words investigated by ERPs. Brain Lang. 102 (2007) 64-79
24. Laine M., and Koivisto M. Lexical access to inflected words as measured by lateralized visual lexical decision. Psychol. Res. 61 (1998) 220-229
25. Laudanna A., Badecker W., and Caramazza A. Processing inflectional and derivational morphology. J. Mem. Lang. 31 (1992) 333-348
26. Lehtonen M., Cunillera T., Rodríguez-Fornells A., Hultén A., Tuomainen J., and Laine M. Recognition of morphologically complex words in Finnish: evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Res. 1148 (2007) 123-137
27. Linares R.E., Rodriguez-Fornells A., and Clahsen H. Stem allomorphy in the Spanish mental lexicon: Evidence from behavioral and ERP experiments. Brain Lang. 97 (2006) 110-120
28. Lück M., Hahne A., and Clahsen H. Brain potentials to morphologically complex words during listening. Brain Res. 1077 (2006) 144-152
29. Marangolo P., and Piras F. Dissociations in processing derivational morphology: the right basal ganglia involvement. Neuropsychologia 46 (2008) 196-205
30. Marangolo P., Piras F., Galati G., and Burani C. Functional anatomy of derivational morphology. Cortex 42 (2006) 1093-1106
31. Marslen-Wilson W.D., and Tyler L.K. Morphology, language and the brain: the decompositional substrate for language comprehension. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, B 362 (2007) 823-836
32. McKinnon R., Allen M., and Osterhout L. Morphological decomposition during lexical processing: evidence from event-related potentials. NeuroReport 14 (2003) 883-886
33. McQueen J.M., and Cutler A. Morphology in word recognition. In: Spencer A., and Zwicky A.M. (Eds). The Handbook of Morphology (1998), Blackwell, Oxford & Malden, MA 406-427
34. Meunier F., and Longtin C.M. Morphological decomposition and semantic integration in word processing. J. Mem. Lang. 56 (2007) 457-471
35. Morris J., and Holcomb P.J. Event-related potentials to violations of inflectional verb morphology in English. Cogn. Brain Res. 25 (2005) 963-981
36. Münte T.F., Matzke M., and Johannes S. Brain activity associated with syntactic incongruencies in words and pseudo-words. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 9 (1997) 318-329
37. Niemi J., Laine M., and Tuominen J. Cognitive morphology in Finnish: foundations of a new model. Lang. Cogn. Processes 3 (1994) 423-446
38. Newman A.J., Ullman M.T., Pancheva R., Waligura D.L., and Neville H.J. An ERP study of regular and irregular English past tense inflection. NeuroImage 34 (2007) 435-445
39. Osterhout L., and Mobley L.A. Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. J. Mem. Lang. 34 (1995) 739-773
40. Osterhout L., and Nicol J. On the distinctiveness, independence, and time course of the brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies. Lang. Cogn. Processes 14 (1999) 283-317
41. Osterhout L., Holcomb P.J., and Swinney D.A. Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. J. Exper. Psychol., Learn., Mem., Cogn. 20 (1994) 786-803
42. Otten L.J., and Rugg M.D. Interpreting event-related brain potentials. In: Handy T.C. (Ed). Event-related potentials. A methods handbook (2005), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass 3-17
43. Palolahti M., Leino S., Jokela M., Kopra K., and Paavilainen P. Event-related potentials suggest early interaction between syntax and semantics during on-line sentence comprehension. Neurosci. Lett. 384 (2005) 222-227
44. Penke M., Weyerts H., Gross M., Zander E., Münte T.F., and Clahsen H. How the brain processes complex words: an event-related potential study of German verb inflections. Cogn. Brain Res. 6 (1997) 37-52
45. Raveh M. The contribution of frequency and semantic similarity to morphological processing. Brain Lang. 83 (2002) 312-325
46. Rodriguez-Fornells A., Clahsen H., Lleó C., Zaake W., and Münte T.F. Event-related brain responses to morphological violations in Catalan. Cogn. Brain Res. 11 (2001) 47-58
47. Scalise S. Generative morphology (1986), Foris, Dordrecht
48. Schriefers H., Friederici A.D., and Graetz P. Inflectional and derivational morphology in the mental lexicon: symmetries and asymmetries in repetition priming. Q. J. Exp. Psychol., A. 44 (1992) 373-390
49. Stanners R.F., Neiser J.J., Hernon W.P., and Hall R. Memory representation for morphologically related words. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 18 (1979) 399-412
50. Stump G.T. Inflection. In: Spencer A., and Zwicky A.M. (Eds). The Handbook of Morphology (1998), Blackwell, Oxford & Malden, MA 13-43
51. Ueno M., and Kluender R. Event-related brain indices of Japanese scrambling. Brain Lang. 86 (2003) 243-271
52. Ueno M., and Garnsey S.M. Gap-filling vs. filling gaps: event-related brain indices of subject and object relative clauses in Japanese. In: McGloin N.H., and Mori J. (Eds). Proceedings of the 15th Japanese/Korean Linguistics Conference (2006), CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA 288-301
53. Vannest J., Bertram R., Jarvikivi J., and Niemi J. Counterintuitive cross-linguistic differences: more morphological computation in English than in Finnish. J. Psycholinguist Res. 31 (2002) 83-106
54. Weyerts H., Penke M., Dohrn U., Clahsen H., and Münte T.F. Brain potentials indicate differences between regular and irregular German plurals. NeuroReport 8 (1997) 957-962