An Amorphous Model for Morphological Processing in Visual Comprehension Based on Naive Discriminative Learning

Psychological Review

Volumn 118, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 438-481

  Baayen, R Harald ^a   Milin, Petar ^b,c   rević, Dusica Filipović ^b,c   Hendrix, Peter ^a   Marelli, Marco ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOVI SAD   (Serbia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

Author keywords

A morphous morphology; Compound cue theory; Morphological processing; Naive discriminative learning; Rescorla Wagner equations

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COMPREHENSION; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; VISION;

COMPREHENSION; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; VERBAL LEARNING; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79960444823     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0023851     Document Type: Article

References (160)

1. Anderson J.R. Learning and memory: An integrated approach 2000, Wiley, New York, NY.
2. Anderson S. A-morphous morphology 1992, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
3. Arnon I., Snider N. Syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language 2010, 62:67-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.005.
4. Aronoff M. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes 1994, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Baayen R.H. Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. Yearbook of morphology 1991 1992, 109-149. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. G.E. Booij, J. van Marle (Eds.).
6. Baayen R.H. Productivity in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes 1994, 9:447-469. doi: 10.1080/01690969408402127.
7. Baayen R.H. Word frequency distributions 2001, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
8. Baayen R.H. Data mining at the intersection of psychology and linguistics. Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones 2005, 69-83. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. A. Cutler (Ed.).
9. Baayen R.H. Morphological productivity. Handbook of corpus linguistics 2008, 899-919. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany. M. Kytö, A. Lüdeling (Eds.).
10. Baayen R.H. Corpus linguistics in morphology: Morphological productivity. Corpus linguistics: An international handbook 2009, 900-919. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany. A. Lüdeling, M. Kytö (Eds.).
11. Baayen R.H. The directed compound graph of English: An exploration of lexical connectivity and its processing consequences. Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 2010, 17:383-402.
12. Baayen, R. H. (in press). Corpus linguistics and naive discriminative learning. Brazilian Journal of Applied Linguistics.
13. Baayen R.H., Davidson D., Bates D. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:390-412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005.
14. Baayen R.H., Dijkstra T., Schreuder R. Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual route model. Journal of Memory and Language 1997, 37:94-117. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2509.
15. Baayen R.H., Feldman L., Schreuder R. Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words. Journal of Memory and Language 2006, 55:290-313.
16. Baayen, R. H., & Hendrix, P. (2011, January). Sidestepping the combinatorial explosion: Towards a processing model based on discriminative learning. Empirically examining parsimony and redundancy in usage-based models. Paper presented at the meeting of Linguistic Society of America, Pittsburgh, PA.
17. Baayen R.H., Levelt W., Schreuder R., Ernestus M. Paradigmatic structure in speech production. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 43: Vol. 1. The main session 2008, 1-29. Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, IL. M. Elliott, J. Kirby, O. Sawada, E. Staraki, S. Yoon (Eds.).
18. Baayen R.H., Milin P. Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research 2010, 3(2):12-28.
19. Baayen R.H., Piepenbrock R., Gulikers L. The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM] 1995, University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia.
20. Baayen R.H., Renouf A. Chronicling the times: Productive lexical innovations in an English newspaper. Language 1996, 72:69-96. doi: 10.2307/416794.
21. Baayen R.H., Wurm L., Aycock J. Lexical dynamics for low-frequency complex words: A regression study across tasks and modalities. Mental Lexicon 2007, 2:419-463.
22. Balota D.A., Cortese M., Sergent-Marshall S., Spieler D., Yap M. Visual word recognition for single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004, 133:283-316. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.283.
23. Bannard C., Matthews D. Stored word sequences in language learning: The effect of familiarity on children's repetition of four-word combinations. Psychological Science 2008, 19:241-248. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02075.x.
24. Bates D. Fitting linear mixed models in R. R News 2005, 5:27-30.
25. Bauer L. Morphological productivity 2001, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
26. Beard R. On the extent and nature of irregularity in the lexicon. Lingua 1977, 42:305-341. doi: 10.1016/0024-3841(77)90102-4.
27. Beard R. Lexeme-morpheme base morphology: A general theory of inflection and word formation 1995, State University of New York, Albany.
28. Belis M., Guiasu S. A quantitative-qualitative measure of information in cybernetics system. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 1968, 14:593-594. doi: 10.1109/TIT.1968.1054185.
29. Belsley D.A., Kuh E., Welsch R.E. Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity 1980, Wiley, New York, NY.
30. Bergen B.K. The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language 2004, 80:290-311. doi: 10.1353/lan.2004.0056.
31. Bertram R., Baayen R.H., Schreuder R. Effects of family size for complex words. Journal of Memory and Language 2000, 42:390-405. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2681.
32. Bertram R., Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2000, 26:489-511. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.2.489.
33. Blevins J.P. Stems and paradigms. Language 2003, 79:737-767. doi: 10.1353/lan.2003.0206.
34. Blevins J.P. English inflection and derivation. Handbook of English linguistics 2006, 507-536. Blackwell, London, England. B. Aarts, A.M. McMahon (Eds.).
35. Bloomfield L. Language 1933, Allen & Unwin, London, England.
36. Booij G.E. Compounding and derivation: Evidence for construction morphology. Morphology and its demarcations 2005, 109-132. Benjamins, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. W.U. Dressler, D. Kastovsky, O.E. Pfeiffer, F. Rainer (Eds.).
37. Booij G.E. Compounding and construction morphology. The Oxford handbook of compounding 2009, 201-216. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. R. Lieber, P. Štekauer (Eds.).
38. Booij G.E. Construction morphology 2010, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
39. Borowsky R., Cummine J., Owen W., Friesen C., Shih F., Sarty G. FMRI of ventral and dorsal processing streams in basic reading processes: Insular sensitivity to phonology. Brain Topography 2006, 18:233-239. doi: 10.1007/s10548-006-0001-2.
40. Boudelaa S., Marslen-Wilson W.D. Morphological units in the Arabic mental lexicon. Cognition 2001, 81:65-92. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00119-6.
41. Bowers J., Davis C., Hanley D. Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a " hat" in " that" ?. Journal of Memory and Language 2005, 52:131-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.09.003.
42. Brandon S.E., Vogel E.H., Wagner A.R. Stimulus representation in SOP: I. Theoretical rationalization and some implications. Behavioural Processes 2003, 62:5-25. doi: 10.1016/S0376-6357(03)00016-0.
43. Brants T., Franz A. Web 1T 5-gram version 1 [Data file] 2006, Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia, PA.
44. Bruza P., Kitto K., Nelson D., McEvoy C. Extracting spooky-activation-at-a-distance from considerations of entanglement. Proceedings of the Third Quantum Interaction Symposium 2009, 71-83. Springer, Berlin, Germany. P. Bruza, D. Sofge, W. Lawless, K. van Rijsbergen, M. Klusch (Eds.).
45. Bruza P., Kitto K., Nelson D., McEvoy C. Is there something quantum-like about the human mental lexicon?. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2009, 53:362-377. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2009.04.004.
46. Burnard L. Users' reference guide to the British National Corpus 1995, Oxford University Computing Service, Oxford, England.
47. Chater N., Tenenbaum J.B., Yuille A. Probabilistic models of cognition: Conceptual foundations. Trends in Cognitive Science 2006, 10:287-291. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.007.
48. Christianson K., Johnson R., Rayner K. Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:1327-1339. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1327.
49. Coltheart M., Rastle K., Perry C., Langdon R., Ziegler J. The DRC model: A model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review 2001, 108:204-256. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204.
50. Dabrowska E. Words as constructions. New directions in cognitive linguistics 2009, 201-224. Benjamins, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. V. Evans, S. Pourcel (Eds.).
51. Danks D. Equilibria of the Rescorla-Wagner model. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2003, 47:109-121. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2496(02)00016-0.
52. Daw N., Shohamy D. The cognitive neuroscience of motivation and learning. Social Cognition 2008, 26:593-620. doi: 10.1521/soco.2008.26.5.593.
53. Dayan P., Kakade S. Explaining away in weight space. Advances in neural information processing systems 2001, 13:451-457. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. T.K. Leen, T.G. Dietterich, V. Tresp (Eds.).
54. De Jong N.H., Feldman L.B., Schreuder R., Pastizzo M., Baayen R.H. The processing and representation of Dutch and English compounds: Peripheral morphological, and central orthographic effects. Brain and Language 2002, 81:555-567. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2547.
55. De Jong N.H., Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes 2000, 15:329-365. doi: 10.1080/01690960050119625.
56. De Jong N.H., Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. Morphological resonance in the mental lexicon. Morphological structure in language processing 2003, 65-88. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany. R.H. Baayen, R. Schreuder (Eds.).
57. Deutsch A., Frost R., Forster K.I. Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1998, 24:1238-1255. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.24.5.1238.
58. Dijkstra T., Moscoso del Prado Martín F., Schulpen B., Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. A roommate in cream: Morphological family size effects on interlingual homograph recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes 2005, 20:7-41. doi: 10.1080/01690960444000124.
59. Ellis N.C. Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics 2006, 27:1-24. doi: 10.1093/applin/ami038.
60. Erelt M. Estonian language 2003, Estonian Academy, Tallinn.
61. Evans N., Levinson S. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2009, 32:429-448. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999094X.
62. Feldman L.B. Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2000, 26:1431-1444. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1431.
63. Feldman L.B., O'Connor P.A., Moscoso del Prado Martín F. Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16:684-691. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.4.684.
64. Fellbaum C.E. WordNet: An electronic database 1998, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
65. Filipović urvić D., urević D., Kostić A. Vector based semantic analysis reveals absence of competition among related senses. Psihologija 2008, 42:95-106. doi: 10.2298/PSI0901095F.
66. Frauenfelder U.H., Schreuder R. Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity. Yearbook of morphology 1991 1992, 165-183. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. G.E. Booij, J.V. Marle (Eds.).
67. Gallistel C.R. Conditioning from an information perspective. Behavioural Processes 2003, 62:89-101. doi: 10.1016/S0376-6357(03)00019-6.
68. Gallistel C.R., Gibbon J. The symbolic foundations of conditioned behavior 2002, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
69. Giraudo H., Grainger J. Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2001, 8:127-131. doi: 10.3758/BF03196148.
70. Gluck M.A., Bower G.H. From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1988, 117:227-247. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.117.3.227.
71. Goldberg A. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language 2006, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
72. Good I.J. The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika 1953, 40:237-264.
73. Grainger J., Jacobs A.M. Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review 1996, 103:518-565. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.518.
74. Gries S. Shouldn't it be breakfunch? A quantitative analysis of blend structure in English. Linguistics 2004, 42:639-667. doi: 10.1515/ling.2004.021.
75. Gries S. Cognitive determinants of subtractive word-formation processes: A corpus-based perspective. Cognitive Linguistics 2006, 17:535-558. doi: 10.1515/COG.2006.017.
76. Gries S., Stefanowitsch A. Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on alternations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 2004, 9:97-129. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri.
77. Harm M.W., Seidenberg M.S. Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review 1999, 106:491-528. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.491.
78. Harm M.W., Seidenberg M.S. Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review 2004, 111:662-720. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.491.
79. Hawkins J., Blakeslee S. On intelligence 2004, Holt, New York, NY.
80. Hay J.B. Causes and consequences of word structure 2003, Routledge, New York, NY.
81. Hendrix, P., & Baayen, R. H. (2011). The naive discriminative reader: A dual route model of reading aloud using naive discriminative learning. Manuscript submitted for publication.
82. Hockett C. Refurbishing our foundations: Elementary linguistics from an advanced point of view 1987, Benjamins, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
83. Hsu A.S., Chater N., Vitányi P. The probabilistic analysis of language acquisition: Theoretical, computational, and experimental analysis. Cognition 2011, Advance online publication. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.02.013.
84. Jackendoff R. Compounding in the parallel architecture and conceptual semantics. The Oxford handbook of compounding 2009, 105-128. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. P. Lieber, R. Štekauer (Eds.).
85. Juhasz B., Starr M., Inhoff A., Placke L. The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: Evidence from lexical decision, naming, and eye fixations. British Journal of Psychology 2003, 94:223-244. doi: 10.1348/000712603321661903.
86. Juola J., Ward N., McNamara T. Visual search and reading rapid serial presentations of letter strings, words, and text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1982, 111:208-227. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.111.2.208.
87. Jurafsky D., Martin J. Speech and language processing: An introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics, and speech recognition 2000, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
88. Just M.A., Carpenter P.A., Woolley J.D. Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1982, 111:228-238. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.111.2.228.
89. Kostić A., Katz L. Processing differences between nouns, adjectives, and verbs. Psychological Research 1987, 49:229-236. doi: 10.1007/BF00309031.
90. Kostić A., Marković T., Baucal A. Inflectional morphology and word meaning: Orthogonal or co-implicative domains?. Morphological structure in language processing 2003, 1-44. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany. R.H. Baayen, R. Schreuder (Eds.).
91. Kostić D. Sintaktičke funkcije padežih oblika u srpskohrvatskom jeziku [Syntactic functions of cases in Serbo-Croatian] 1965, Institute for Experimental Phonetics and Speech Pathology, Belgrade, Serbia.
92. Kostić D. Frekvencijski rečnik savremenog srpskog jezika [Frequency dictionary of contemporary Serbian language] 1999, Institute for Experimental Phonetics and Speech Pathology and Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia, Retrieved from http://www.serbian-corpus.edu.rs/ie/structure/estruct.html.
93. Kuperman V., Bertram R., Baayen R.H. Morphological dynamics in compound processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:1089-1132. doi: 10.1080/01690960802193688.
94. Kuperman V., Schreuder R., Bertram R., Baayen R.H. Reading of multimorphemic Dutch compounds: Towards a multiple route model of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35:876-895. doi: 10.1037/a0013484.
95. Landauer T., Dumais S. A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review 1997, 104:211-240. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211.
96. Levenshtein V.I. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady 1996, 10:707-710.
97. Libben G., Gibson M., Yoon Y., Sandra D. Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and Language 2003, 84:50-64. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00520-5.
98. Lieber R. Deconstructing morphology: Word formation in syntactic theory 1992, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
99. Lukatela G., Gligorijević B., Kostić A., Turvey M.T. Representation of inflected nouns in the internal lexicon. Memory & Cognition 1980, 8:415-423. doi: 10.3758/BF03211138.
100. Lukatela G., Mandić Z., Gligorijević B., Kostić A., Savić M., Turvey M.T. Lexical decision for inflected nouns. Language and Speech 1978, 21:166-173.
101. Lund K., Burgess C. Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1996, 28:203-208. doi: 10.3758/BF03204766.
102. Marslen-Wilson W.D., Tyler L.K., Waksler R., Older L. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review 1994, 101:3-33.
103. Matthews P.H. Morphology: An introduction to the theory of word structure 1974, Cambridge University Press, London, England.
104. McDonald S., Ramscar M. Testing the distributional hypothesis: The influence of context judgements of semantic similarity. Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society 2001, 611-616. Cognitive Science Society, Edinburgh, Scotland. J.D. Moore, K. Stenning (Eds.).
105. Milin P., Filipović Durdević D., Moscoso del Prado Martín F. The simultaneous effects of inflectional paradigms and classes on lexical recognition: Evidence from Serbian. Journal of Memory and Language 2009, 60:50-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.08.007.
106. Milin P., Kuperman V., Kostić A., Baayen R.H. Paradigms bit by bit: An information-theoretic approach to the processing of paradigmatic structure in inflection and derivation. Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition 2009, 214-252. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. J.P. Blevins, J. Blevins (Eds.).
107. Miller R.R., Barnet R.C., Grahame N.J. Assessment of the Rescorla-Wagner model. Psychological Bulletin 1995, 117:363-386. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.363.
108. Moscoso del Prado Martín F. Paradigmatic effects in morphological processing: Computational and cross-linguistic experimental studies 2003, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
109. Moscoso del Prado Martín F., Bertram R., Häikiö T., Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. Morphological family size in a morphologically rich language: The case of Finnish compared to Dutch and Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2004, 30:1271-1278. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1271.
110. Moscoso del Prado Martín F., Deutsch A., Frost R., Schreuder R., De Jong N.H., Baayen R.H. Changing places: A cross-language perspective on frequency and family size in Hebrew and Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language 2005, 53:496-512. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.07.003.
111. Moscoso del Prado Martín F., Kostić A., Baayen R.H. Putting the bits together: An information theoretical perspective on morphological processing. Cognition 2004, 94:1-18.
112. Nelson D.L., McEvoy C., Pointer L. Spreading activation or spooky action at a distance?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:42-51. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.1.42.
113. New B., Ferrand L., Pallier C., Brysbaert M. Re-examining word length effects in visual word recognition: New evidence from the English Lexicon Project. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:45-52. doi: 10.3758/BF03193811.
114. Norris D. The Bayesian reader: Explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. Psychological Review 2006, 113:327-357. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.327.
115. Norris D., Kinoshita S. Perception as evidence accumulation and Bayesian inference: Insights from masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General 2008, 137:434-455.
116. Hierarchical temporal memory including HTM cortical learning algorithms (Version 0.1.1) 2010, Numenta, Retrieved from http://www.numenta.com/htm-overview/education.php.
117. Plag I., Baayen R.H. Suffix ordering and morphological processing. Language 2009, 85:106-149.
118. Plaut D.C., Gonnerman L.M. Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing?. Language and Cognitive Processes 2000, 15:445-485. doi: 10.1080/01690960050119661.
119. Pollatsek A., Hyönä J., Bertram R. The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26:820-833. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.820.
120. Ramscar M., Yarlett D. Linguistic self-correction in the absence of feedback: A new approach to the logical problem of language acquisition. Cognitive Science 2007, 31:927-960. doi: 10.1080/03640210701703576.
121. Ramscar M., Yarlett D., Dye M., Denny K., Thorpe K. The effects of feature-label-order and their implications for symbolic learning. Cognitive Science 2010, 34:909-957. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01092.x.
122. Rapp B. The nature of sublexical orthographic organization: The bigram trough hypothesis examined. Journal of Memory and Language 1992, 31:33-53. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(92)90004-H.
123. Rastle K., Davis M.H., New B. The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004, 11:1090-1098. doi: 10.3758/BF03196742.
124. Ratcliff R., Gomez P., McKoon G. A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. Psychological Review 2004, 111:159-182. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.159.
125. Ratcliff R., McKoon G. A retrieval theory of priming in memory. Psychological Review 1988, 95:385-408. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.3.385.
126. Rescorla R.A. Pavlovian conditioning: It's not what you think it is. American Psychologist 1988, 43:151-160. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.43.3.151.
127. Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. Modeling morphological processing. Morphological aspects of language processing 1995, 131-154. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. L.B. Feldman (Ed.).
128. Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language 1997, 37:118-139. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2510.
129. Schreuder R., Burani C., Baayen R.H. Parsing and semantic opacity. Reading complex words: Cross-language studies 2003, 159-189. Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. E. Assink, D. Sandra (Eds.).
130. Schultz W. Getting formal with dopamine and reward. Neuron 2002, 36:241-263. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00967-4.
131. Seidenberg M.S. Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy. Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading 1987, 245-264. Erlbaum, Hove, England. M. Coltheart (Ed.).
132. Seidenberg M.S., Gonnerman L.M. Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:353-361. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01515-1.
133. Seidenberg M.S., McClelland J.L. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review 1989, 96:523-568. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523.
134. Shannon C.E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 1948, 27:379-423.
135. Shaoul, C., Westbury, C., & Baayen, R. H. (2009, November). Agreeing with Google: We are sensitive to the relative orthographic frequency of phrases. Poster session presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston, MA.
136. Shillcock R., Kirby S., McDonald S., Brew C. Filled pauses and their status in the mental lexicon. Proceedings of the 2001 conference of disfluency in spontaneous speech 2001, 53-56. International Speech Communication Association, Edinburgh, Scotland.
137. Siegel S., Allan L.G. The widespread influence of the Rescorla-Wagner model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1996, 3:314-321. doi: 10.3758/BF03210755.
138. Stanojčić V., Popović L. Gramatika srpskog jezika [Serbian language grammar] 2005, Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva, Belgrade, Serbia.
139. St.Clair M.C., Monaghan P., Ramscar M. Relationships between language structure and language learning: The suffixing preference and grammatical categorization. Cognitive Science 2009, 33:1317-1329. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01065.x.
140. Stefanowitsch A., Gries S. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 2003, 8:209-243. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste.
141. Stevanović M. Savremeni srpskohrvatski jezik [Contemporary Serbian language] 1989, Naučna Knjiga, Belgrade, Serbia.
142. Stump G. Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure 2001, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
143. Taft M. Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory & Cognition 1979, 7:263-272. doi: 10.3758/BF03197599.
144. Taft M. Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 1994, 9:271-294. doi: 10.1080/01690969408402120.
145. Taft M. Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 2004, 57(A):745-765.
146. Taft M., Forster K.I. Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1975, 14:638-647. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-X.
147. Taft M., Forster K.I. Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1976, 15:607-620. doi: 10.1016/0022-5371(76)90054-2.
148. Taneja I. On generalized information measures and their applications. Advances in Electronic and Electron Physics 1989, 76:327-413.
149. Taneja I., Pardo L., Gil P., Gil M. Generalized Shannon-Gibbs type weighted inequalities. Proceedings of the third international conference on information processing and management of uncertainty in knowledge-based systems 1990, 398-399. Springer-Verlag, London, England.
150. Tremblay A., Baayen R.H. Holistic processing of regular four-word sequences: A behavioral and ERP study of the effects of structure, frequency, and probability on immediate free recall. Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication 2010, 151-173. Continuum International, London, England. D. Wood (Ed.).
151. Van Rijn H., Anderson J.R. Modeling lexical decision as ordinary retrieval. Proceedings of the fifth international conference on cognitive modeling 2003, 207-212. Universitats-Verlag Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany.
152. Venables W.N., Ripley B.D. Modern applied statistics with S-Plus 2003, Springer, New York, NY. 4th ed.
153. Vogel E.H., Brandon S.E., Wagner A.R. Stimulus representation in SOP: II. An application to inhibition of delay. Behavioural Processes 2003, 62:27-48. doi: 10.1016/S0376-6357(03)00050-0.
154. Wagner A., Rescorla R. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory 1972, 64-99. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, NY. A.H. Black, W.F. Prokasy (Eds.).
155. White S.J. Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:205-223. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.205.
156. Whitney C. How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2001, 8:221-243. doi: 10.3758/BF03196158.
157. Wood S.N. Generalized additive models 2006, Chapman & Hall, New York, NY.
158. Yarkoni T., Balota D., Yap M. Moving beyond Coltheart's N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15:971-979.
159. Yuille A. The Rescorla-Wagner algorithm and maximum likelihood estimation of causal parameters. Advances in neural information processing systems 2005, 17:1585-1592. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. L.K. Saul, Y. Weiss, L. Bottou (Eds.).
160. Yuille A. Augmented Rescorla-Wagner and maximum likelihood estimation. Advances in neural information processing systems 2006, 18:1561-1568. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Y. Weiss, B. Schölkopf, J. Platt (Eds.).