Form and meaning in early morphological processing: Comment on feldman, O'Connor, and Moscoso del Prado Martín (2009)

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 749-755

  Davis, Matthew H ^a   Rastle, Kathleen ^b  

^a MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPREHENSION; HUMAN; NOTE; READING; RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS; SPEECH;

COMPREHENSION; HUMANS; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS; SPEECH;

EID: 78149427799     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.5.749     Document Type: Note

References (38)

1. Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 802-814.
2. Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E. J. (2003). Beyond spreading activation: An influence of relatedness proportion on masked semantic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 645-652.
3. Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2005). Discontinuous morphology in time: Incremental masked priming in Arabic. Language & Cognitive Processes, 20, 207-260.
4. De Almeida, R. G., & Libben, G. (2005). Changing morphological structures: The effect of sentence context on the interpretation of structurally ambiguous English trimorphemic words. Language & Cognitive Processes, 20, 373-394.
5. Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., & Vinckier, F. (2005). The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 335-341.
6. Devlin, J. T., Jamison, H. L., Matthews, P. M., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2004). Morphology and the internal structure of words. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 14984-14988.
7. Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2005). Masked crossmodal morphological priming: Unraveling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition. Language & Cognitive Processes, 20, 75-114.
8. Feldman, L. B., O'Connor, P. A., & Moscoso del Prado Martín, F. (2009). Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 684-691.
9. Feldman, L. B., Soltano, E. G., Pastizzo, M. J., & Francis, S. E. (2004). What do graded effects of semantic transparency reveal about morphological processing? Brain & Language, 90, 17-30.
10. Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 680-698.
11. Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 211-251.
12. Frost, R., Deutsch, A., Gilboa, O., Tannenbaum, M., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2000). Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1277-1288.
13. Frost, R., Forster, K. I., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 829-856.
14. Gold, B. T., & Rastle, K. (2007). Neural correlates of morphological decomposition during visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1983-1993.
15. Goldacre, B. (2008). Bad science. London: HarperCollins.
16. Hyönä, J., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Reading Finnish compound words: Eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1612-1627.
17. Kazanina, N., Dukova-Zheleva, G., Geber, D., Kharlamov, V., & Tonciulescu, K. (2008). Decomposition into multiple morphemes during lexical access: A masked priming study of Russian nouns. Language & Cognitive Processes, 23, 800-823.
18. Lavric, A., Clapp, A., & Rastle, K. (2007). ERP evidence of morphological analysis from orthography: A masked priming study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 866-877.
19. Light, R. J., & Pillemer, D. B. (1984). Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
21. Longtin, C. M., Segui, J., & Halle, P. A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language & Cognitive Processes, 18, 313-334.
22. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Bozic, M., & Randall, B. (2008). Early decomposition in visual word recognition: Dissociating morphology, form, and meaning. Language & Cognitive Processes, 23, 394-421.
23. Marslen-Wilson, W. [D.], Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33.
24. Marslen-Wilson, W. [D.], & Zhou, X. (1999). Abstractness, allomorphy, and lexical architecture. Language & Cognitive Processes, 14, 321-352.
25. McCormick, S. F., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Is there a "fete" in "fetish"? Effects of orthographic opacity on morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 58, 307-326.
26. McCormick, S. F., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2009). Adore-able not adorable? Orthographic underspecification studied with masked repetition priming. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 813-836.
27. Morris, J., Frank, T., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2007). Seequalmantic transparency and masked morphological priming: An ERP investigation. Psychophysiology, 44, 506-521.
28. Norris, D., & Kinoshita, S. (2008). Perception as evidence accumulation and Bayesian inference: Insights from masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 434-455.
29. Oldham, P. D. (1962). A note on the analysis of repeated measures of the same subjects. Journal of Chronic Disability, 15, 969-977.
30. Peters, J. L., Sutton, A. J., Jones, D. R., Abrams, K. R., & Rushton, L. (2006). Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295, 676-680.
31. Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2003). Reading morphologically complex words: Some thoughts from masked priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 279-305). New York: Psychology Press.
32. Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition is based on the analysis of orthography. Language & Cognitive Processes, 23, 942-971.
33. Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language & Cognitive Processes, 15, 507-537.
34. Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1090-1098.
35. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1997). How complex simple words can be. Journal of Memory & Language, 37, 118-139.
36. Sterne, J. A. C., & Egger, M. (2001). Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: Guidelines on choice of axis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54, 1046-1055.
37. Sterne, J. A. C., & Harbord, R. M. (2004). Funnel plots in meta-analysis. Stata Journal, 4, 127-141.
38. Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language & Cognitive Processes, 9, 271-294.