Masked cross-modal morphological priming: Unravelling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 20, Issue 1-2, 2005, Pages 75-114

  Diependaele, Kevin ^a   Sandra, Dominiek ^a   Grainger, Jonathan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FACILITATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LANGUAGE TEST; MORPHOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 14644418470     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960444000197     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
2. Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 297-332.
3. De Jong, N. H., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2000). The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 329-365.
4. Feldman, L. B., Soltano, E. G., Pastizzo, M. J., & Francis, S. E. (2004). What do graded effects of semantic transparency reveal about morphological processing? Brain and Language, 90, 17-30.
5. Ford, M. A., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2001). Morphological effects in lexical access: Evidence from cross-modal masked priming. Abstracts of the 12th Conference of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology, Edinburgh, Scotland.
6. Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10, 680-698.
7. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 35, 116-124.
8. Frost, R., Ahissar, M., Gotesman, R., & Tayeb, S. (2003). Are phonological effects fragile? The effect of luminance and exposure duration on form priming and phonological priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 346-378.
9. Frost, R., Deutsch, A., Gilboa, O., Tannenbaum, M., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2000). Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors. Memory and Cognition, 28, 1277-1288.
10. Frost, R., Forster, K. I., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 829-856.
11. Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2000). Effects of prime word frequency and cumulative root frequency in masked morphological priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 421-444.
12. Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2001). Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 127-131.
13. Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2003). A supralexical model for French derivational morphology. In E. M. H. Assink and D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross-language studies (pp. 139-157). New York: Kluwer Academic.
14. Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1994). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Effects of masked homophone primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 218-233.
15. Grainger, J., Diependaele, K., Spinelli, E., Ferrand, L., & Farioli, F. (2003). Masked repetition and phonological priming within and across modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 29, 1256-1269.
16. Jacobs, A. M., Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1995). The incremental priming technique: A method for determining within-condition priming effects. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 1101-1110.
17. Kouider, S., & Dupoux, E. (2001). A functional disconnection between spoken and visual word recognition: Evidence from unconscious priming. Cognition, 82, B35-B49.
18. Longtin, C.-M., Segui, J., & Hallé, P. A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 313-334.
19. Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33.
20. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-405.
21. McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (1998). Morphology in word recognition. In A. Spencer and A. M. Zwicky (Eds.), Handbook of morphology (pp. 406-427). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
22. Meunier, F., & Segui, J. (2002). Cross-modal morphological priming in French. Brain and Language, 81, 89-102.
23. New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L., & Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE [A lexical database on the internet for contemporary French: LEXIQUE]. L'Année Psychologique, 101, 447-462.
24. Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2003). Reading morphologically complex words: Some thoughts from masked priming. In S. Kinoshita, & S. Lupker, (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 279-305). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
25. Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (in press). The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.
26. Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 507-537.
27. Sandra, D. (1990). On the representation and processing of compound words: Automatic access of constituent morphemes does not occur. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A, 529-567.
28. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modelling morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131-154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
29. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 118-139.
30. Seidenberg, M. S. (1987). Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? In M. Coltheart, (Ed.), Attention and Performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 245-263). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
31. Slowiaczek, L. M., & Hamburger, M. B. (1992). Prelexical facilitation and lexical interference in auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18 1239-1250.
32. Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271-294.
33. Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638-647.