A dual-route approach to orthographic processing

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 2, Issue APR, 2011, Pages

  Grainger, Jonathan ^a   Ziegler, Johannes C ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Dual route theory; Orthographic processing; Visual word recognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858004225     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054     Document Type: Article

References (113)

1. Acha, J., and Perea, M. (2008). The effects of length and transposedletter similarity in lexical decision: evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers. Br. J. Psychol. 99, 245-264.
2. Acha, J., and Perea, M. (2010). Does kaniso activate CASINO? Input coding schemes and phonology in visualword recognition. Exp. Psychol. 57, 245-251.
3. Aghababian, V., and Nazir, T. (2000). Developing normal reading skills: aspects of the visual processes underlying word recognition. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 76, 123-150.
4. Alario, F. X., De Cara, B., and Ziegler, J. C. (2007). Automatic activation of phonology in silent reading is parallel: evidence from beginning and skilled readers. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 97, 205-219.
5. Andrews, S. (1996). Lexical retrieval and selection processes: effects of transposed letter confusability. J. Mem. Lang. 35, 775-800.
6. Andrews, S., and Davis, C. J. (1999). Interactive activation accounts of morphological decomposition: finding the trap in mousetrap? Brain and Lang. 68, 355-361.
7. Bar, M., Kassam, K. S., Ghuman, A. S., Boshyan, J., Schmidt, A. M., Dale, A. M., Hamalainen, M. S., Marinkovic, K., Schacter, D. L., Rosen, B. R., and Halgren, E. (2006). Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 449-454.
8. Bick, A. S., Goelman, G., and Frost, R. (2011). Hebrew brain vs. English brain: language modulates the way it is processed. J. Cogn. Neurosci. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21583.[Epub ahead of print].
9. Bijeljac-Babic, R., Millogo, V., Farioli, F., and Grainger, J. (2004). A developmental investigation of word length effects in reading using a new on-line word identification paradigm. Read. Writ. 17, 411-431.
10. Bonatti, L. L., Pena, M., Nespor, M., and Mehler, J. (2005). Linguistic constraints on statistical computations: the role of consonants and vowels in continuous speech processing. Psychol. Sci. 16, 451-459.
11. Booth, J. R., Burman, D. D., Meyer, J. R., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., and Mesulam, M. M. (2003). Relation between brain activation and lexical performance. Hum. Brain Mapp. 19, 155-169.
12. Borowsky, R., Cummine, J., Owen, W. J., Friesen, C. K., Shih, F., and Sarty, G. E. (2006). FMRI of ventral and dorsal processing streams in basic reading processes: insular sensitivity to phonology. Brain Topogr. 18, 233-239.
13. Braun, M., Hutzler, F., Ziegler, J. C., Dambacher, M., and Jacobs, A. M. (2009). Pseudohomophone effects provide evidence of early lexico-phonological processing in visual word recognition. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 1977-1989.
14. Caramazza, A., and Hillis, A. E. (1990). Spatial representation of words in the brain implied by studies of a unilateral neglect patient. Nature 346, 267-269.
15. Carreiras, M., Ferrand, L., Grainger, J., and Perea, M. (2005). Sequential effects of masked phonological priming. Psychol. Sci. 16, 585-589.
16. Castles, A., Davis, C., Cavalot, P., and Forster, K. I. (2007). Tracking the acquisition of orthographic skills in developing readers: masked form priming and transposed-letter effects. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 97, 165-182.
17. Chambers, S. M. (1979). Letter and order information in lexical access. J. Verbal Learn. Behav. 18, 225-241.
18. Cohen, L., and Dehaene, S. (2009). "Ventral and dorsal contributions to word reading," in The Cognitive Neurosciences, 4th Edn., ed. M. S. Gazzaniga (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 789-804.
19. Cohen, L., Dehaene, S., Vinckier, F., Jobert, A., and Montavont, A. (2008). Reading normal and degraded words: contribution of the dorsal and ventral visual pathways. Neuroimage 40, 353-366
20. Cohen, L., Lehericy, S., Chochon, F., Lemer, C., Rivaud, S., and Dehaene, S. (2002). Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the visual word form area. Brain 125, 1054-1069.
21. Colé, P., Bouton, S., Leuwers, C., Casalis, S., and Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2011). Stem and derivational suffix processing during reading by French second and third graders. Appl. Psycholinguist. (in press).
22. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., and Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud dual-route and paralleldistributed-processing approaches. Psychol. Rev. 100, 589-608.
23. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., and Ziegler, J. C. (2001). DRC: a dual-route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychol. Rev. 108, 204-256.
24. Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychol. Rev. 117, 713-758.
25. Davis, M. H., and Rastle, K. (2010). Form and meaning in early morphological processing: comment on Feldman, O'Connor and Moscoso del Prado Martin. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 17, 749-755.
26. Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., and Vinckier, F. (2005). The neural code for written words: a proposal. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 335-341.
27. Dehaene, S., Jobert, A., Naccache, L., Ciuciu, P., Poline, J. B., Le Bihan, D., and Cohen, L. (2004). Letter binding and invariant recognition of masked words. Psychol. Sci. 15, 307-313.
28. Diependaele, K., Grainger, J., and Sandra, D. (2011). "Derivational morphology and skilled reading: an empirical overview," in The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics, eds M. Spivey, M. Joanisse, and K. McRae (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
29. Diependaele, K., Ziegler, J., and Grainger, J. (2010). Fast phonology and the bimodal interactive activation model. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 22, 764-778.
30. Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., and Grainger, J. (2005). Masked cross-modal morphological priming: unraveling morphoorthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition. Lang. Cogn. Process. 20, 75-114.
31. Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., and Grainger, J. (2009). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: the case of prefixed words. Mem. Cogn. 37, 895-908.
32. Dufau, S., Lété, B., Touzet, C., Glotin, H., Ziegler, J., and Grainger, J. (2010). A developmental perspective on visual word recognition: new evidence and a self-organizing model. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 22, 669-694.
33. Ehri, L. C. (1992). "Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding," in Reading Acquisition, eds P. B. Gough, L. E. Ehri, and R. Treiman (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 105-143.
34. Ellis, A. W., and Young, A. (1988). Human Cognitive Neuropsychology. London: Erlbaum
35. Feldman, L. B., O'Connor, P. A., and Moscoso del Prado Martín, F. (2009). Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: a violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 16, 684-691.
36. Ferrand, L., and Grainger, J. (1994). Effects of orthography are independent of phonology in masked form priming. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Exp. Psychol. 47A, 365-382.
37. Fischer-Baum, S., McCloskey, M., and Rapp, B. (2010). Representation of letter position in spelling: evidence from acquired dysgraphia. Cognition, 115, 466-490.
38. Frankish, C., and Barnes, L. (2008). Lexical and sublexical processes in the perception of transposed-letter anagrams. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 61, 381-391.
39. Frankish, C., and Turner, E. (2007). SIHGT and SUNOD: the role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams. J. Mem. Lang. 56, 189-211.
40. Frost, R. (2009). "Reading in Hebrew vs. reading in English: is there a qualitative difference?" in How Children Learn to Read: Current Issues and New Directions in the Integration of Cognition, Neurobiology and Genetics of Reading and Dyslexia Research and Practice, eds K. Pugh and P. McCradle (London: Psychology Press), 235-254.
41. Frost, R., Ahissar, M., Gotesman, R., and Tayeb, S. (2003). Are phonological effects fragile? The effect of luminance and exposure duration on form priming and phonological priming. J. Mem. Lang. 48, 346-378
42. Giraudo, H., and Grainger, J. (2001). Priming complex words: evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 8, 127-131.
43. Glotin, H., Warnier, P., Dandurand, F., Dufau, S., Lété, B., Touzet, C., Ziegler, J., and Grainger, J. (2010). An adaptive resonance theory account of the implicit learning of orthographic word forms. J. Physiol. (Paris) 104, 19-26.
44. Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., and Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: a model of letter position coding. Psychol. Rev. 115, 577-601.
45. Gomez, R. L. (2002). Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychol. Sci. 13, 431-436.
46. Goswami, U., and Ziegler, J. C. (2006). A developmental perspective on the neural code for written words. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 142-143.
47. Goswami, U., Ziegler, J. C., Dalton, L., and Schneider, W. (2001). Pseudohomophone effects and phonological recoding procedures in reading development in English and German. J. Mem. Lang. 45, 648-664.
48. Grainger, J. (2008). Cracking the orthographic code: an introduction. Lang. Cogn. Process. 23, 1-35.
49. Grainger, J., Colé, P., and Segui, J. (1991). Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. J. Mem. Lang. 30, 370-384.
50. Grainger, J., Diependaele, K., Spinelli, E., Ferrand, L., and Farioli, F. (2003). Masked repetition and phonological priming within and across modalities. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 29, 1256-1269.
51. Grainger, J., and Dufau, S. (2011). "The front-end of visual word recognition," in Visual Word Recognition, Vol. 1: Models and Methods, Orthography and Phonology, ed. J. S. Adelman (Hove: Psychology Press).
52. Grainger, J., and Ferrand, L. (1994). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: effects of masked homophone primes. J. Mem. Lang. 33, 218-233.
53. Grainger, J., Granier, J. P., Farioli, F., Van Assche, E., and van Heuven, W. J. (2006a). Letter position information and printed word perception: the relative-position priming constraint. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 32, 865-884.
54. Grainger, J., Kiyonaga, K., and Holcomb, P. J. (2006b). The time-course of orthographic and phonological code activation. Psychol. Sci. 17, 1021-1026.
55. Grainger, J., and Holcomb, P. J. (2009). Watching the word go by: on the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Lang. Linguist. Compass 3, 128-156.
56. Grainger, J., and Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple readout model. Psychol. Rev. 103, 518-565.
57. Grainger, J., and van Heuven, W. (2003). "Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception," in The Mental Lexicon, ed. P. Bonin (New York: Nova Science Publishers), 1-24.
58. Grainger, J., and Whitney, C. (2004). Does the human mind read words as a whole? Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 58-59
59. Grainger, J., and Ziegler, J. (2008). "Crosscode consistency effects in visual word recognition," in Single-Word Reading: Biological and Behavioral Perspectives, eds E. L. Grigorenko and A. Naples (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 129-157.
60. Grossberg, S. (1987). Competitive learning: from interactive activation to adaptive resonance. Cogn. Sci. 11, 23-63
61. Jacobs, A. M., and Grainger, J. (1994). Models of visual word recognition sampling the state of the art. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 20, 1311-1334.
62. Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C., and Grainger, J. (1998). "MROM-P: an interactive activation, multiple readout model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition," in Localist Connectionist Approaches to Human Cognition, eds J. Grainger and A. M. Jacobs (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 147-188.
63. Jobard, G., Crivello, F., and Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2003). Evaluation of the dual route theory of reading: a metanalysis of 35 neuroimaging studies. Neuroimage 20, 693-712
64. Kohonen, T. (1982). Self-organizing formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biol. Cybern. 43, 5969.
65. Le Pelley, M. E. (2010). "Attention and human associative learning," in Associative Learning: From Brain to Behaviour, eds C. J. Mitchell and M. E. Le Pelley (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 187-216.
66. Longtin, C.-M., and Meunier, F. (2005). Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing. J. Mem. Lang. 53, 26-41.
67. Lukatela, G., and Turvey, M. T. (1994). Visual access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones, and pseudohomophones. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 123, 331-353.
68. McClelland, J. L., and Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychol. Rev. 88, 375-407.
69. Mechelli, A., Crinion, J. T., Long, S., Friston, K. J., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Patterson, K., McClelland, J. L., and Price, C. J. (2005). Dissociating reading processes on the basis of neuronal interactions. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 1753-1765.
70. Mel, B. W., and Fiser, J. (2000). Minimizing binding errors using learned conjunctive features. Neural Comput. 12, 731-762.
71. Morris, J., Frank, T., Grainger, J., and Holcomb, P. J. (2007). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: an ERP investigation. Psychophysiology 44, 506-521.
72. Morris, J., Porter, J. H., Grainger, J., and Holcomb, P. J. (2011). Effects of lexical status and morphological complexity in masked priming: an ERP study. Lang. Cogn. Process. (in press).
73. Mozer, M. C. (1987). "Early parallel processing in reading: A connectionist approach," in Attention and performance XII: The Psychology of Reading ed. M. Coltheart (Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.), 83-104.
74. O'Connor, R. E., and Forster, K. I. (1981). Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition. Mem. Cogn. 9, 78-92
75. Pacton, S., and Perruchet, P. (2008). An attention-based associative account of adjacent and non-adjacent dependency learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Lear. Mem. Cogn. 34, 80-96.
76. Perea, M., Abu Mallouh, R., and Carreiras, M. (2010). The search of an input coding scheme: transposed-letter priming in Arabic. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 17, 375-380.
77. Perea, M., and Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. J. Mem. Lang. 51, 231-246.
78. Perea, M., Rosa, E., and Gomez, C. (2005). The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task. Percept. Psychophys. 67, 301-314.
79. Peressotti, F., and Grainger, J. (1999). The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming. Percept. Psychophys. 61, 691-706.
80. Perfetti, C. A., and Bell, L. (1991). Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: evidence from backward masking and priming. J. Mem. Lang. 30, 473-485.
81. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., and Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychol. Rev. 114, 273-315.
82. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., and Zorzi, M. (2010). Beyond single syllables: large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the connectionist dual process (CDP+) model. Cogn. Psychol, 61, 106-151.
83. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., and Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychol. Rev. 103, 56-115.
84. Pugh, K. R., Mencl, W. E., Jenner, A. R., Katz, L., Frost, S. J., Lee, J. R., Shaywitz, S. A., and Shaywitz, B. A. (2000). Functional neuroimaging studies of reading and reading disability (developmental dyslexia). Ment. Retard Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev. 6, 207-213.
85. Rastle, K., and Brysbaert, M. (2006). Masked phonological priming effects in English: are they real? Do they matter? Cogn. Psychol. 53, 97-145.
86. Rastle, K., and Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Lang. Cogn. Process. 23, 942-971.
87. Rosazza, C., Cai, Q., Minati, L., Paulignan, Y., and Nazir, T. A. (2009). Early involvement of dorsal and ventral pathways in visual word recognition: an ERP study. Brain Res. 1272, 32-44.
88. Sandak, R., Mencl, W. E., Frost, S. J., and Pugh, K. R. (2004). The neurobiological basis of skilled and impaired reading: recent findings and new directions. Sci. Stud. Read. 8, 273-292.
89. Schoonbaert, S., and Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: effects of repeated and transposed letters. Lang. Cogn. Process. 19, 333-367.
90. Seidenberg, M. S., and McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychol. Rev. 96, 523-568.
91. Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition 55, 151-218.
92. Solomyak, O., and Marantz, A. (2009). Evidence for early morphological decomposition in visual word recognition. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 22, 2042-2057.
93. Sprenger-Charolles, L. Siegel, L. S., Béchennec, D., and Serniclaes, W. (2003). Development of phonological and orthographic processing in reading aloud, in silent reading, and in spelling: A longitudinal study. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 84, 194-217.
94. Stevens, M. and Grainger, J. (2003). Letter visibility and the viewing position effect in visual word recognition. Percept. Psychophys. 65, 133-151.
95. Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., and Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 124, 107-136.
96. Ullman, S., Vidal-Naquet, M., and Sali, E. (2002). Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 682-687.
97. Van Assche, E., and Grainger, J. (2006). A study of relative-position priming with superset primes. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 32, 399-415.
98. Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: spelling, sound, and reading. Mem. Cogn. 15, 181-198.
99. Velan, H., and Frost, R. (2009). Lettertransposition effects are not universal: the impact of transposing letters in Hebrew. J. Mem. Lang. 61, 285-302.
100. Velan, H., and Frost, R. (2011). Words with and without internal structure: what determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing? Cognition 118, 141-156.
101. Vinckier, F., Dehaene, S., Jobert, A., Dubus, J. P., Sigman, M., and Cohen, L. (2007). Hierarchical coding of letter strings in the ventral stream: dissecting the inner organization of the visual word-form system. Neuron 55, 143-156
102. von der Malsburg, C. (1999). The what and why of binding: the modeler's perspective. Neuron 24, 95-104.
103. Welvaert, M., Farioli, F., and Grainger, J. (2008). Graded effects of number of inserted letters in superset priming. Exp. Psychol. 55, 54-63.
104. Wheat, K. L., Cornelissen, P. L., Frost, S. J., and Hansen, P.C. (2010). During visual word recognition, phonology is accessed within 100 ms and may be mediated by a speed production code: evidence from magnetoencephalography. J. Neurosci. 30, 5229-5233.
105. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: the SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 8, 221-243.
106. Whitney, C., and Cornelissen, P. (2005). Letter-position encoding and dyslexia. J. Res. Read. 28, 274-301.
107. Whitney, C., and Cornelissen, P. (2008). SERIOL reading. Lang. Cogn. Process. 23, 143-164.
108. Wilson, L. B., Tregallas, J. R., Slason, E., Pasko, B. E., and Rojas, D. C. (2011). Implicit phonological priming during visual word recognition. Neuroimage 55, 724-731.
109. Ziegler, J. C., Ferrand, L., Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., and Grainger, J. (2000). Visual and phonological codes in letter and word recognition: evidence from incremental priming. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Exp. Psychol. 53A, 671-692.
110. Ziegler, J. C., and Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychol. Bull. 131, 3-29.
111. Ziegler, J. C., Jacobs, A. M., and Klueppel, D. (2001). Pseudohomophone effects in lexical decision: still a challenge for current word recognition models. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27, 547-559.
112. Zorzi, M. (2010). The connectionist dual process (CDP) approach to modelling reading aloud. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 22, 836-860.
113. Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., and Butterworth, B. (1998). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24, 1131-1161.