Affixal salience and the processing of derivational morphology: The role of suffix allomorphy

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 394-431

  Järvikivi, Juhani ^a   Bertram, Raymond ^a   Niemi, Jussi ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FINLAND; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LINGUISTICS; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL MEMORY;

EID: 33646706323     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960400013213     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Allen, M., & Badecker, W. (2002). Inflectional regularity: Probing the nature of lexical representation in a cross-modal priming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 705-722.
2. Anshen, F., & Aronoff, M. (1988). Producing morphologically complex words. Linguistics, 26, 641-655.
3. Aronoff, M. (1976). Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Baayen, R. H. (1994). Productivity in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 447-469.
5. Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 94-117.
6. Baayen, R. H., & Lieber, R. (1991). Productivity and English derivation: A corpus-based study. Linguistics, 29, 801-844.
7. Baayen, R. H., & Schreuder, R. (1996). Modelling the processing of morphologically complex words. In T. Dijkstra & K. de Smedt (Eds.), Computational psycholinguistics (pp. 166-191). London: Taylor & Francis.
8. Bertram, R. (2000). Morphology in the mind: Word processing in Finnish and Dutch. Doctoral dissertation. Turku, Finland: Painosalama Oy.
9. Bertram, R., Baayen, R. H., Schreuder, R. (2000a). Effects of family size for derived and inflected words. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 390-405.
10. Bertram, R., Baayen, R. H., Schreuder, R., Laine, M., & Hyönä, J. (2000b). Affixal homonymy triggers full form storage, even with inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language. Cognition, 74, B13-B25.
11. Bertram, R., Laine, M., & Karvinen, K. (1999). The interplay of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity in lexical processing: Evidence from a morphologically rich language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 213-226.
12. Bertram, R., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2000c). The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homonymy and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 489-511.
13. Bradley, D. (1979). Lexical representation of derivational relation. In M. Aronoff & M. L. Kean (Eds.), Juncture (pp. 37-55). Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri.
14. Burani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1987). Representation and processing of derived words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 217-227.
15. Burani, C., & Laudanna, A. (1992). Units of representation for derived words in the lexicon. In Frost, R. & Katz, L. (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 361-376). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
16. Burani, C., Thornton, A. M., Iacobini, C., & Laudanna, A. (1995). Investigating morphological non-words. In W. U. Dressler & C. Burani (Eds.), Crossdisciplinary approaches to morphology (pp. 37-53). Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
17. Burani, C., Dovetto, F., Thornton, A., & Laudanna, A. (1997). Accessing and naming suffixed pseudo-words. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1996 (pp. 55-72). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
18. Bybee, J. (1985) Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
19. Bybee, J. (2001) Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Clark, E. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25 (2), 257-271.
22. Colé, P., Beauvillain, C., & Segui, J. (1989). On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: A differential frequency effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 1-13.
23. Colé, P., Segui, J., & Taft, M. (1997). Words and morphemes as units for lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 312-330.
24. Davis, M., van Casteren, M., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2003). Frequency effects in processing inflected Dutch nouns: A distributed connectionist account. In R. H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing (pp. 427-462). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
25. Dressler, W. U. (1998). What is the core of morphology? In J. Niemi, T. Odlin, & J. Heikkinen, (Eds.), Language contact, variation and change (pp. 15-32). Joensuu, Finland: University of Joensuu Press.
26. Drews, E., & Zwitserlood, P. (1995). Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21 (5), 1098-1116.
27. Frauenfelder, U., & Schreuder, R. (1992). Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1991 (pp. 165-183). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
28. Grainger, J., O'Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., & Seguí, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 189-195.
29. Hankamer, J. (1989). Morphological parsing and the lexicon. In W. D. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 392-408). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Hay, J. (2001). Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative? Linguistics, 39 (6), 1041-1070.
31. Hyönä, J., Laine, M., & Niemi, J. (1995). Effects of a word's morphological complexity on readers' eye fixation pattern. In J. M. Findlay, R. Kentridge, & R. Walker (Eds.), Eye movement research: Mechanisms, processes and applications (pp. 445-452). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
32. Järvikivi, J., & Niemi, J. (2002a). Form-based representation in the mental lexicon: Priming (with) bound stem allomorphs in Finnish. Brain and Language, 81, 412-423.
33. Järvikivi, J., & Niemi, J. (2002b). Allomorphs as paradigm indices: On-line experiments with Finnish free and bound stems. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 15, 119-143.
34. Karlsson, F. (1983). Suomen äänne- ja muotorakenne [The phonological and morphological structure of Finnish]. Porvoo, Finland: WSOY.
35. Karlsson, F., & Koskenniemi, K. (1985). A process model of morphology and lexicon. Folia Linguistica, XIX, 207-231.
36. Klepousniotou, E. (2002). Processing multiple unrelated meanings versus multiple related senses. Oral presentation at The Third International Conference on the Mental Lexicon, Banff, Canada, October 6-8, 2002.
37. Laine, M. (1996). Lexical status of inflectional and derivational suffixes: Evidence from Finnish. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 37, 238-248.
38. Laine, M., & Niemi, J. (1997). Reading morphemes. Aphasiology, 11 (9), 913-926.
39. Laine, M., Niemi, J., Koivuselkä-Sallinen, P., & Hyönä, J. (1995). Morphological processing of polymorphemic nouns in a highly inflecting language. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 457-502.
40. Laine, M., Vainio, S., & Hyönä, J. (1999). Lexical access routes to nouns in a morphologically rich language. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 109-135.
41. Laine, M., & Virtanen, P. (1996). Turun Sanomat Computerized Lexical Database. Unpublished corpus and database program, University of Turku, Finland.
42. Laudanna, A., & Burani, C. (1995). Distributional properties of derivational affixes: Implications for processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 345-364). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33.
44. Marslen-Wilson, W., & Zhou, X. (1999). Abstractness, allomorphy and lexical architecture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 321-352.
45. New, B., Brysbaert, M., Segui, J., Ferrand, L., & Rastle, K. (2004). The processing of singular and plural nouns in French and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 568-585.
46. Niemi, J., & Laine, M. (1992). Lexical representations and morphological operations: An analysis of Finnish spontaneous speech errors. In J. Niemi (Ed.), Studia linguistica Careliana: A festschrift for Kalevi Wiik on the occasion of his 60th birthday (pp. 79-104). Joensuu, Finland: Joensuun yliopiston monistuskeskus.
47. Niemi, J., Laine, M., & Tuominen, J. (1994). Cognitive morphology in Finnish: Foundations of a new model. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 423-446.
48. Penttilä, A. (1957). Suomen kielioppi [Finnish grammar]. Porvoo, Finland: WSOY.
49. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1994). Prefix-stripping re-revisited. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 357-375.
50. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131-154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
51. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 118-139.
52. Sproat, R. (1992). Morphology and computation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
53. Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory and Cognition, 7, 263-272.
54. Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 745-765.
55. Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 607-620.
56. Vannest, J., Bertram, R., Järvikivi, J., & Niemi, J. (2002). Counterintuitive cross-linguistic differences: More morphological computation in English than in Finnish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 83-106.
57. Vannest, J., & Boland, J. (1999). Lexical morphology and lexical access. Brain and Language, 68, 324-332.
58. Vesikansa, J. (1977). Johdokset [Derivations]. Porvoo, Finland: WSOY.