Identifying gifted students: Educator beliefs regarding various policies, processes, and procedures

Journal for the Education of the Gifted

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 155-179

  Schroth, Stephen T ^a   Helfer, Jason A ^a  

^a KNOX COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 63049111208     PISSN: 01623532     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4219/jeg-2008-850     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Adler, M. J. (1998). The Paideia proposal: An educational manifesto. New York: Touchstone.
2. Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers' sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman.
3. Benbow, C. P., & Minor, L. L. (1990). Cognitive profile of verbally and mathematically precocious students: Implications for identification of the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 21-26.
4. Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1982). Consequences in high school and college of sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: A longitudinal perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 598-622.
5. Borland, J. H. (2005). Gifted education without gifted children: The case for no conception of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 1-19). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Borland, J. H., Schnur, R., & Wright, L. (2000). Economically disadvantaged students in a school for the academically gifted: A post-positivist inquiry into individual and family adjustment. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 13-32.
7. Borland, J. H., & Wright, L. (1994). Identifying young, potentially gifted, economically disadvantaged students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 164-171.
8. Brody, L. E., Assouline, S. G., & Stanley, J. C. (1990). Five years of early entrants: Predicting successful achievement in college. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 138-142.
9. Brody, L. E., & Stanley, J. C. (2005). Youths who reason exceptionally well mathematically and/or verbally: Using the MVT: D4 model to develop their talents. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 20-37). New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Brown, S. W., Renzulli, J. S., Gubbins, E. J., Siegle, D., Zhang, W., & Chen, C. H. (2005). Assumptions underlying the identification of gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 68-79.
11. Callahan, C. M. (1982). Myth: There must be "winners" and "losers" in identification and programming! Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 17-19.
12. Callahan, C. M. (2001). Fourth down and inches. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 12, 148-156.
13. Callahan, C. M., & Miller, E. M. (2005). A child-responsive model of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 38-51). New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Clark, B. (2001). Growing up gifted: Developing potential at school and in the home (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15. Cohen, R. J., & Swerdlik, M. E. (2005). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement (6th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
16. Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students (Vol. 1). Iowa City: The University of Iowa, The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
17. Cramond, B., & Martin, C. E. (1987). Inservice and preservice teachers' attitudes toward the academically brilliant. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 15-19.
18. Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (2003). Education of the gifted and talented (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
19. Deal, T. E., & Peterson, K. D. (1999). Shaping school culture: The heart of leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20. DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington, IN: National Education Service.
21. Duke, D. L. (2003). The challenges of educational change. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
22. Duke, D. L. (2005). Education empire: The evolution of an excellent suburban school system. Albany: The State University of New York Press.
23. Fink, A. (1995a). How to analyze survey data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Fink, A. (1995b). How to sample in surveys. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Fink, A. (1995c). The survey handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Ford, D. Y. (2003). Two other wrongs don't make a right: Sacrificing the needs of diverse students does not solve gifted education's unresolved problems. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26, 283-291.
27. Ford, D. Y., & Harris J. J. (1999). Multicultural gifted education. New York: Teachers College Press.
28. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
29. Gagné, F. (1983). Perceptions of programs for gifted children: Agreement on principles but disagreement over modalities. B.C. Journal of Special Education, 7, 113-127.
30. Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2003). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
31. Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography. Intelligence, 24, 13-23.
32. Gottfredson, L. S. (2003). The science and politics of intelligence in gifted education. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 25-40). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
33. Helfer, J. A., & Schroth, S. T. (2007, Spring). Seeing and seeing as: The challenges in the identification of gifted children. Conceptual Foundations, 15(1), 12-17.
34. Kaplan, S. N. (2005). Layering differentiated curricula for the gifted and talented. In F. A. Karnes & S. M. Bean (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (2nd ed., pp. 107-131). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
35. Lupkowski-Shoplik, A., Benbow, C. P., Assouline, S. G., & Brody, L. E. (2003). Talent searches: Meeting the needs of academically talented youth. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 204-218). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
36. Marland, S. P., Jr. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented, Volume 1. Report to the Congress of the United States by the U. S. Commissioner of Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
37. Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (2004). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparative procedure (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38. McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2007). What predicts teachers' attitudes toward the gifted? Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 246-255.
39. Monks, F. J., & Katzko, M. W. (2005). Giftedness and gifted education. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 187-200). New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Moon, T. R., & Callahan, C. M. (2001). Curricular modifications, family outreach, and a mentoring program: Impacts on achievement and gifted identification in high-risk primary students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 24, 305-321.
41. Oakes, J. (2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
42. Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43. Reis, S. M., & Small, M. A. (2005). The varied and unique characteristics exhibited by diverse gifted and talented learners. In F. A. Karnes & S. M. Bean (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (2nd ed., pp. 3-35). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
44. Renzulli, J. S. (1982). Myth: The gifted constitute 3-5% of the population. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 11-14.
45. Renzulli, J. S. (2003). Conception of giftedness and its relationship to the development of social capital. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 75-87). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
46. Renzulli, J. S., & Delcourt, M. A. B. (1986). The legacy and logic of research on the identification of gifted persons. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 20-23.
47. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). The school wide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence (2nd ed.). Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.
48. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2003). The schoolwide enrichment model: Developing creative and productive giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 184-203). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
49. Rimm, S. (1984). The characteristics approach: Identification and beyond. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 181-187.
50. Schroth, S. T. (2007). Levels of service. In C. M. Callahan & J. A. Plucker (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (pp. 281-294). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
51. Schroth, S. T., & Helfer, J. A. (2008). Urban school districts' enrichment programs: Who should be served? Journal of Urban Education, 5(1), 7-17.
52. Schunk, D. H. (1987). Peer models and children's behavioral change. Review of Educational Research, 52, 149-174.
53. Stanley, J. C. (1980). On educating the gifted. Educational Researcher, 9(3), 8-12.
54. Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Beyond g: The theory of successful intelli-gence. In R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), The general factor of intelligence: How general is it? (pp. 447-479). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55. Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Giftedness according to the theory of successful intelligence. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 88-99). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
56. Sternberg, R. J. (2005). The WICS model of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Concertions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 327-342). New York: Cambridge University Press.
57. Stronge, J. H. (2002). Qualities of effective teachers. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
58. Tannenbaum, A. J. (2003). Nature and nurture of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 45-59). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
59. Tomlinson, C. A. (2003). Fulfilling the promise of the differentiated classroom: Strategies and tools for responsive teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
60. Tomlinson, C. A., Callahan, C. M., & Lelli, K. M. (1997). Challenging expectations: Case studies of high-potential, culturally diverse young children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41(2), 5-17.
61. Tomlinson, C. A., Gould, H., Schroth, S. T., & Jarvis, J. (2006). Multiple case studies of teachers and classrooms successful in supporting academic success of high potential low economic students of color (Research Monograph No. 06220). Storrs: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
62. Tomlinson, C. A., Kaplan, S. N., Renzulli, J. S., Purcell, J., Leppien, J., & Burns, D. (2002). The parallel curriculum: A design to develop high potential and challenge high-ability learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
63. Torrance, E. P. (1984). The role of creativity in identification of the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 153-156.
64. VanTassel-Baska, J., & Brown, E. F. (2005). An analysis of gifted education curricular models. In F. A. Karnes & S. M. Bean (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (2nd ed., pp. 75-105). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
65. VanTassel-Baska, J., Feng, A. X., & Evans, B. L. (2007). Patterns of identification and performance among gifted students identified through performance tasks: A three-year analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 218-231.
66. Volker, M. A. (2006). Reporting effect size estimates in school psychology research. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 653-672.
67. Von Károlyi, C., Ramos-Ford, V, & Gardner, H. (2003). Multiple intelligences: A perspective on giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 100-112). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
68. Worrell, F. C., Szarko, J. E., & Gabelko, N. H. (2001). Multi-year persistence of nontraditional students in an academic talent development program. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 12, 80-89.
69. Wortham, S. C. (2008). Assessment in early childhood education (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.