Gifted education without gifted children: The case for no conception of giftedness

Conceptions of Giftedness: Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1-19

  Borland, James H ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928272152     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511610455.002     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Benbow, C. P. (1986). SMPY’s model for teaching mathematically precocious students. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the giftedand talented(pp. 1-26). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
2. Berlin, I. (1990). The crooked timber of humanity: Chapters in the history of ideas (H. Hardy, Ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Borland, J. H. (1989). Planning and implementing programs for the gifted. New York: Teachers College Press.
4. Borland, J. H. (1996a). Gifted education and the threat of irrelevance. Journal for theEducation of the Gifted, 19, 129-147.
5. Borland, J. H. (1996b). [Review of Playing Favorites by Mara Sapon-Shevin]. RoeperReview,18, 309-311.
6. Borland, J. H. (2003). The death of giftedness. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking giftededucation(pp. 105-124). New York: Teachers College Press.
7. Borland, J. H., & Wright, L. (1994). Identifying young, potentially gifted, economically disadvantaged students. Gifted Child Quarterly,38, 164-171.
8. Borland, J. H., & Wright, L. (2001). Identifying and educating poor and underrepresented gifted students. In K. A. Heller, F. J. M¨onks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.). International handbook of research and development of giftednessand talent(pp. 587-594). London: Pergamon Press.
9. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designsfor research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
10. Chandler, D. (2001). Semiotics for beginners. Retrieved from http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/S4B/sem02a.html
11. Coleman, L. J., & Cross, T. L. (2001). Being gifted in school: An introduction to development, guidance, and teaching. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
12. Delcourt, M. A. B., Loyd, B. H., Cornell, D. G., & Goldberg, M. D. (1994). Evaluation ofthe effects of programming arrangements on student learning outcomes. Charlottesville, VA: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
13. Ford, D. Y. (1996). Reversing underachievement among gifted Black students. New York: Teachers College Press.
14. Ford, D. Y., & Harris, J. J. (1999). Multicultural gifted education. New York: Teachers College Press.
15. Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage. (Original work published 1975.)
16. Franklin, B. M. (1987). The first crusade for learning disabilities. In T. Popkewitz (Ed.), The formation of school subjects: The struggle for creating an American institution (pp. 190-209). London: Falmer.
17. Gallagher, J. J. (1996). A critique of critiques of gifted education. Journal for theEducation of the Gifted, 19, 234-249.
18. Gallagher, S. (1999). An exchange of gazes. In J. L. Kinchloe, S. R. Steinberg, & L. E. Villeverde (Eds.), Rethinking intelligence(pp. 69-84). New York: Routledge.
19. Goddard, H. H. (1919). Psychology of the normal and the subnormal. New York: Dodd Mead.
20. Gray, J. (1996). Isaiah Berlin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21. Hall, S. (Ed.). (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifyingpractices:Vol. 2. Culture, media and identities. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22. Henry, T. S. (1920). Classroom problems in the education of gifted children. The nineteenthyearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part II). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Hollingworth, L. S. (1929). Gifted children: Their nature and nurture. New York: Macmillan.
24. Horowitz, F. D., & O’Brien, M. (Eds.) (1986). The gifted and talented: Developmentalperspectives(pp. 99-123).Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25. Kliebard, H. M. (1995). The struggle for the American curriculum. New York: Routledge.
26. Kuhn, T. S. (1962/1996). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Margolin, L. (1994). Goodness personified: The emergence of gifted children. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
28. Margolin, L. (1996). A pedagogy of privilege. Journal for the Education of the Gifted,19, 164-180.
29. Marland, S. P. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented. Report to Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
30. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31. Passow, A. H. (1989). Needed research and development in educating high ability children. Roeper Review, 11, 223-229.
32. Phillips, D. C. (1987). Philosophy, science, and social inquiry. Oxford, England: Pergamon.
33. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180-184, 261.
34. Sapon-Shevin, M (1994). Playing favorites: Gifted education and the disruption of community. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
35. Sapon-Shevin, M. (1996). Beyond gifted education: Building a shared agenda for school reform. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 194-214.
36. Shore, B. M., Cornell, D. G., Robinson, A., & Ward, V. S. (1991). Recommended practicesin gifted education: A critical analysis. New York: Teachers College Press.
37. Slavin, R. E. (1990). Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60, 471-499.
38. Sleeter, C. E. (1987). Why is there learning disabilities? In T. Popkewitz (Ed.), Theformation of school subjects: The struggle for creating an American institution(pp. 210-237). London: Falmer.
39. Southern, W. T., & Jones, E. D. (Eds.) (1991). The academic acceleration of gifted children. New York: Teachers College Press.
40. Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man. New York: Macmillan.
41. Stainback, W., & Stainback, S. (1990). Support networks for inclusive schooling: Interdependentintegrated education. Baltimore: Brookes.
42. Terman, L. M. (1925/1959). Genetic studies of genius. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
43. United States Department of Education. (1991). National educational longitudinalstudy 88. Final report: Gifted and talented education programs for eighth grade publicschool students. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Education, Office of Planning, Budget, and Evaluation.
44. Vaughn, V. L., Feldhusen, J. F., & Asher, W. J. (1991). Meta-analyses and review of research on pull-out programs in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly,35, 92-98.