The talent search model: Past, present, and future

Gifted Child Quarterly

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 320-329

  Swiatek, Mary Ann ^a,b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b KidsPeace Athlete Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Above level testing; Academic acceleration; Ceiling effect; DT PI model; Talent search

Indexed keywords

EID: 35048887041     PISSN: 00169862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0016986207306318     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Assouline, S. G., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (2003). Developing mathematical talent: A guide for challenging and educating gifted students. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
2. Bartkovich, K. G., & Mezynski, K. (1981). Fast-paced precalculus mathematics for talented junior high students: Two recent SMPY programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25(2), 73-80.
3. Benbow, C. P. (1992). Academic achievement in mathematics and science of students between ages 13 and 23: Are there differences among students in the top one percent of mathematical ability? Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 51-61.
4. Benbow, C. P., Perkins, S., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). Mathematics taught at a fast pace: A longitudinal evaluation of SMPY's first class. In C. P. Benbow & J. C. Stanley (Eds.), Academic precocity: Aspects of its development (pp. 51-78). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
5. Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). An eight-year evaluation of SMPY: What was learned? In C. P. Benbow & J. C. Stanley (Eds.), Academic precocity: Aspects of its development (pp. 205-214). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6. Carnegie Mellon Institute for Talented Elementary Students (2004a). EXPLORE score interpretation guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
7. Carnegie Mellon Institute for Talented Elementary Students. (2004b). Information and resources. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
8. Carnegie Mellon Institute for Talented Elementary Students. (2004c). Summer program 2004. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
9. Center for Talented Youth, (n.d.a). Center for Talented Youth home page. Retrieved July 17, 2007, from http://www.cty.jhu.edu.
10. Center for Talented Youth, (n.d.b). Distance learning course catalog. Retrieved October 6, 2004, from http://www.cty.jhu.edu/cde/catalog. html.
11. Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students (Vol. I). Iowa City, IA: The Connie Belin and Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
12. Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Lu, W.-H. (1994). Using EXPLORE as an above-level instrument in the search for elementary student talent. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development: Proceedings from the 1993 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 281-297). Dayton, OH: Ohio Psychology Press.
13. Ebmeier, H., & Schmulbach, S. (1989). An examination of the selection practices used in the talent search program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33(4), 134-141.
14. Education Program for Gifted Youth, (n.d.). Education Program for Gifted Youth. Retrieved October 6, 2004, from http://www-epgy.stanford.edu.
15. Enersen, D. L. (1993). Summer residential programs: Academics and beyond. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(4), 169-176.
16. Fox, L. H. (1974). A mathematics program for fostering precocious achievement. In J. C. Stanley, D. P. Keating, & L. H. Fox (Eds.), Mathematical talent: Discovery, description, and development (pp. 101-125). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
17. George, W. C. (1979). The talent-search concept: An identification strategy for the intellectually gifted. The Journal of Special Education, 13, 221-237.
18. Gilheany, S. (2001). The Irish Centre for Talented Youth - An adaptation of the Johns Hopkins talent search model. Gifted and Talented International, 16, 102-104.
19. Holahan, W., & Sawyer, R. N. (1986). The counseling and consultation component of TIP's Summer Residential Program. Roeper Review, 9(2), 108-113.
20. Jarosewich, T., & Stocking, V. B. (2003). Talent search: Student and parent perceptions of out-of-level testing. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 14(3), 137-149.
21. Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1994). The Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth: The first three decades of a planned 50-year study of intellectual talent. In R. F. Subotnik & K. D. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 255-281). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
22. Lunny, J. F. (1983). Fast-paced mathematics classes for a rural county. In C. P. Benbow & J. C. Stanley (Eds.), Academic precocity: Aspects of its development (pp. 79-85). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
23. Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. E., & Assouline, S. G. (1993). Identifying mathematically talented elementary students: Using the lower level of the SSAT. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 118-123.
24. Lupkowski-Shoplik, A., Benbow, C. P., Assouline, S. G., & Brody, L. E. (2003). Talent searches: Meeting the needs of academically talented youth. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 204-218). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
25. Lupkowski-Shoplik, A., & Swiatek, M. A. (1999). Elementary student talent searches: Establishing appropriate guidelines for qualifying test scores. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43(4), 265-272.
26. Lynch, S. J. (1992). Fast-paced high school science for the academically talented: A six-year perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(3), 147-154.
27. McCarthy, C. R. (1998). Assimilating the talent search model into the school day. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9, 114-123.
28. Mills, C. J., Ablard, K. E., & Gustin, W. C. (1994). Academically talented students' achievement in a flexibly paced mathematics program. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 495-511.
29. Mills, C. J., Ablard, K. E., & Lynch, S. J. (1992). Academic talented students' preparation for advanced-level coursework after individually-paced precalculus class. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16(1), 3-17.
30. Moore, N. D., & Wood, S. S. (1988). Mathematics in elementary school: Mathematics with a gifted difference. Roeper Review, 10(4), 231-234.
31. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1989). Development of academic talent: The role of summer programs. In J. VanTassel-Baska & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Patterns of influence on gifted learners: The home, the self, and the school (pp. 214-230). New York: Teachers College Press.
32. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1998a). Research evidence regarding the validity and effects of talent search educational programs. Journal for Secondary Gifted Education, 9, 134-138.
33. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1998b). Talent search: Purposes, rationale, and role in gifted education. Journal for Secondary Gifted Education, 9, 106-113.
34. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2003). Special summer and Saturday programs for gifted students. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 219-228). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
35. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2004). Talent searches and accelerated programming for gifted students. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & M. U. M. Gross (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students (Vol. II, pp. 69-76). Iowa City, IA: The Connie Belin and Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
36. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. M., Kulieke, M. J., Willis, G. B., & Krasney, N. S. (1989). An analysis of the validity of SAT entrance scores for accelerated classes. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13(1), 37-54.
37. Rimm, S. B. (2003). Underachievement: A national epidemic. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds)., Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 424-443). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
38. Rimm, S. B., & Lovance, K. J. (1992). The use of subject and grade skipping for the prevention and reversal of under-achievement. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 100-105.
39. Sawyer, R., & Braunstein, P. (1988, April). The relationship between ACT and SAT scores among academically talented seventh grade students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New Orleans, LA.
40. Southern, W. T., & Jones, E. D. (1992). The real problems with academic acceleration. Gifted Child Today, 15(2), 34-38.
41. Southern, W. T., Jones, E. D., & Fiscus, E. D. (1989). Practitioner objections to the academic acceleration of gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33(1), 29-35.
42. Stanley, J. C. (1976). Use of tests to discover talent. In D. P. Keating (Ed.), Intellectual talent: Research and development (pp. 3-22). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
43. Stanley, J. C. (1977-78). The predictive value of the SAT for brilliant seventh- and eighth-graders. The College Board Review, 106, 31-37.
44. Stanley, J. C. (1978). SMPY's DT-PI model: Diagnostic testing followed by prescriptive instruction. Intellectually Talented Youth Bulletin, 4(10), 7-8.
45. Stanley, J. C. (1996). In the beginning: The Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues (pp. 225-235). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
46. Stanley, J. C., & Benbow, C. P. (1986). Youths who reason exceptionally well mathematically. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 361-387). New York: Cambridge University Press.
47. Stanley, G. E., & York, A. V. (1988, April). The ACT assessment as a measure for identifying talented seventh grade youth. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New Orleans, LA.
48. Stephens, K. R., & Karnes, F. A. (2000). State definitions for the gifted and talented revisited. Exceptional Children, 66, 219-238.
49. Stocking, V. B., & Goldstein, D. (1992). Course selection and performance of very high ability students: Is there a gender gap? Roeper Review, 15(1), 48-51.
50. Swiatek, M. A., & Benbow, C. P. (1991). A ten-year longitudinal study of students in a fast-paced mathematics program. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 138-150.
51. Swiatek, M. A., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (2003). Elementary and middle school student participation in gifted programs: Are gifted students underserved? Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 118-130.
52. Swiatek, M. A., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (2005). An evaluation of the Elementary Student Talent Search by families and schools. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 247-259.
53. Talent Identification Program. (1985). A guide to the talent search for local school personnel. Durham, NC: Duke University.
54. Touron, J. (2001). School and College Ability Test (SCAT) validation in Spain: Overview of the process and some results. Gifted and Talented International, 16, 104-107.
55. Vaille, W., Ashton, T., Carlon, G., & Rankin, F. (2001). Acceleration: A coat of many colours. Roeper Review, 24(1), 14-19.
56. VanTassel-Baska, J. (1983). Statewide replication in Illinois of the Johns Hopkins Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth. In C. P. Benbow & J. C. Stanley (Eds.), Academic precocity: Aspects of its development (pp. 179-191). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
57. VanTassel-Baska, J. (1984). The talent search as an identification model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28(4), 172-176.
58. VanTassel-Baska, J. (1996). Contributions of the talent-search concept to gifted education. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues (pp. 236-245). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
59. VanTassel-Baska, J. (1998). A critique of the talent searches: Issues, problems, and possibilities. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9, 139-144.
60. VanTassel-Baska, J., Landau, M., & Olszewski, P. (1984). The benefits of summer programming for gifted adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 8(1), 73-82.
61. VanTassel-Baska, J., & Willis, G. (1987). A three year study of the effects of low income on SAT scores among the academically able. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31(4), 169-173.