Cognitive and affective learning outcomes of gifted elementary school students

Gifted Child Quarterly

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 359-381

  Delcourt, Marcia A B ^a,d   Cornell, Dewey G ^b   Goldberg, Marc D ^c  

^a WESTERN CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^c Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services   (United States)

^d Department of Education and Educational Psychology ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Components of gifted programs; Outcomes of gifted programs

Indexed keywords

EID: 35248891122     PISSN: 00169862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0016986207306320     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Aldrich, P. W., & Mills, C. J. (1989). A special program for highly able rural youth in grades five and six. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 11-14.
2. Archambault, F. X., Jr., Westberg, K. L., Brown, S. W., Hallmark, B. W., Emmons, C. L., & Zhang, W. (1993). Regular classroom practices with gifted students: Results of a national survey of classroom teachers (Research Monograph No. 93102).
3. Storrs, CT: The University of Connecticut, The National Research Center of the Gifted and Talented.
4. Aulls, M. W., & Shore, B. M. (2007). Inquiry in education: Volume I. The conceptual foundations for research as a curricular imperative. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Baldwin, A. (1985). Programs for the gifted and talented: Issues concerning minority populations. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O'Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 223-250). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6. Brody, L., & Benbow, C. P. (1987). Accelerative strategies: How effective are they for the gifted? Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 105-110.
7. Carter, K. R. (1986). A cognitive outcomes study to evaluate curriculum for the gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10, 41-55.
8. Coleman, D. R. (1983). Effects of the use of a writing scale by gifted primary students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27, 114-121.
9. Coleman, J. M., & Fults, B. A. (1982). Self-concept and the gifted classroom: The role of social comparisons. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 116-119.
10. Coleman, J. M., & Fults, B. A. (1983). Self-concept and the gifted child. Roeper Review, 5, 44-47.
11. Coleman, L. J., & Cross, T. L. (2001). Being gifted in school. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
12. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
13. Cooley, M., Cornell, D., & Lee, C. (1990). Peer acceptance and self-concept of high-ability black students in a summer gifted program. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 166-177.
14. Cornell, D. G., Delcourt, M. A. B, Bland, L. C., & Goldberg, M. D. (1990, November). What happens to students in gifted programs? The learning outcomes study at the University of Virginia. Research Panel at the thirty-seventh annual convention of the National Association for Gifted Children, Little Rock, AR.
15. Cox, J., & Daniel, N. (1984). The pull-out model. Gifted Child Today, 34, 55-61.
16. Cox, J., Daniel, N., & Boston, B. O. (1985). Educating able learners: Programs and promising practices. Austin, TX: University of Texas.
17. Delcourt, M. A. B., & Evans, K. (1995). The qualitative extension of the learning outcomes study (Report No. RM940710). Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
18. Delcourt, M. A. B., Loyd, B. H., & Bland, L. C. (1992, April). Achievement, attitudes, and self-concept: An examination of measurement issues for gifted students across sex and racial/ethnic status. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
19. Delcourt. M. A. B., Loyd, B. H., Bland, L. C., Moon, T., & Perie, M. (1993, April). Trends in achievement and intrinsic/extrinsic motivation of high-ability children. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
20. Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning and instruction. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
21. Feldhusen, J. F., Sayler, M. F., Nielsen, M. E., & Kolloff, P. B. (1990). Self-concepts of gifted children in enrichment programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 380-387.
22. Ford, D. Y., Harris, J. J., Tyson, C. A., & Trotman M. F. (2002). Beyond deficit thinking: Providing access for gifted African American students. Roeper Review, 24, 52-58.
23. Ford, D. Y., Moore, J. L., & Milner, H. R. (2005). Beyond culture blindness: A model of culture with implications for gifted education. Roeper Review, 27, 97-103.
24. Fordham, S., & Ogbu, J. U. (1986). Black students' school success: Coping with the "burden of 'acting white'." Urban Review, 18, 176-206.
25. Fox, L. H., & Washington, J. (1985). Programs for the gifted and talented: Past, present, and future. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O'Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 197-221). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26. Frasier, M. M. (1979). Counseling the culturally diverse gifted. In N. Colangelo & R. T. Zaffrann (Eds.), New voices in counseling the gifted (pp. 304-311). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
27. Gallagher, J. J. (1986). The need for programs for young gifted children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 6, 1-8.
28. Gallagher, J. J., Weiss, P., Oglesby, K., & Thomas, T. (1983). The status of gifted/talented education: United States surveys of needs, practices, and policies. Ventura County, CA: Ventura County Superintendent of Schools Office.
29. Goldberg, M. D. (1994). A developmental investigation of intrinsic motivation: Correlates, causes, and consequences in high-ability students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
30. Goldberg, M. D., & Cornell, D. G. (1998). The influence of intrinsic motivation and self-concept on academic achievement in second- and third-grade students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 21, 179-205.
31. Goldring, E. B. (1990). Assessing the status of information on classroom organizational frameworks for gifted students. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 313-326.
32. Grantham, T. C. (2002). Straight talk on the issue of underrepresentation: An interview with Dr. Mary M. Frasier. Roeper Review, 24, 50-51.
33. Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. J. (2005). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
34. Haensley, P. A., Shiver, D., & Fulbright, M. (1980). Task commitment as the productive determiner of giftedness. Roeper Review, 3, 21-24.
35. Harter, S. (1980). Manual for the scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom. Denver, CO: University of Denver.
36. Harter, S. (1985). Manual for the self-perception profile for children. Unpublished manuscript. University of Denver, Denver, CO.
37. Harter, S., & Zimpf, C. (1986). Social comparison processes influencing the self-perceptions of gifted children. Denver, CO: University of Denver.
38. Henderson, B. B., McGuire, S., Betchart, N., & Loughlin, M. (1988). Intrinsic motivation and interests in gifted children: Interrelationships and development. Paper presented at the meetings of the Conference on Human Development, Charleston, SC.
39. Hieronymus, A. N., Hoover, H. D., & Lindquist, E. F. (1986). The Iowa Tests of Basic Skills. Chicago, IL: Riverside.
40. Hoge, R. D., & Renzulli, J. S. (1991). Self-concept and the gifted child (Research-based Decision Making Series No. 9103).
41. Storrs, CT: The University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
42. Hollingshead, A. B. (1975). Four-factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript. Yale University, New Haven, CT.
43. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Maruyama, G. (1983). Interdependence and interpersonal attraction among heterogeneous and homogeneous individuals: A theoretical formulation and a meta-analysis of the research. Review of Research in Education, 53, 415-424.
44. Kaplan, S. N. (1981). The should nots and shoulds of developing an appropriate curriculum for the gifted. In W. B. Barbe & J. S. Renzulli (Eds.), Psychology and education of the gifted (pp. 351-368). New York: Irvington.
45. Kulik, J. A. (1992). An analysis of the research on ability grouping: Historical and contemporary perspectives (Research-based Decision Making Series No. 9204). Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
46. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1987). Effects of ability grouping on student achievement. Equity & Excellence, 23, 22-30.
47. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1991). Ability grouping and gifted students. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 178-196). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
48. Lewis, J. D., & Knight, H. V. (2000). Self-concept in gifted youth: An investigation employing the Piers-Harris subscales. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 45-53.
49. Lynch, S., & Mills, C. J. (1990). The skills reinforcement project (SRP): An academic program for high potential minority youth. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 363-379.
50. MacKinnon, D. W. (1978). In search of human effectiveness: Identifying and developing creativity. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation.
51. Maddux, C. D., Scheiber, L. M., & Bass, J. E. (1982). Self-concept and social distance in gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 77-81.
52. Maker, C. J. (Ed.). (1986). Critical issues in gifted education. Rockville, MD: Aspen.
53. Maker, C. J., & Schiever, S. W. (Eds.). (1989). Critical issues in gifted education: Volume II. Defensible programs for cultural ethnic minorities. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
54. Marsh, H. W., Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (1988). A multi-faceted academic self-concept: Its hierarchical structure and its relation to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 366-380.
55. Menacker, J. (1990). Equal educational opportunity: Is it an issue of race or socioeconomic status? Urban Education, 25, 317-325.
56. National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). Digest of education statistics tables and figures. Retrieved February 24, 2006, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d00/dt007.asp.
57. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
58. Olenchak, F. R. (1990). School change through gifted education: Effects on elementary students' attitudes toward learning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 66-78.
59. Olenchak, F. R., & Renzulli, J. S. (1989). The effectiveness of the schoolwide enrichment model on selected aspects of elementary school change. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 36-46.
60. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. M., Kulieke, M. J., & Krasney, N. (1988). Personality dimensions of gifted adolescents: A review of the empirical literature. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 347-352.
61. Parke, B. N. (1983). Use of self-instructional materials with gifted primary-aged students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27, 29-34.
62. Reis, S. M. (1981). TAG serves the gifted and talented. Today's Education, 70, 22E-25E.
63. Reis, S. M., Eckert, R. D., Schreiber, F. J., Jacobs, J., Briggs, C., Gubbins, E. J., Coyne, M., & Muller, L. M. (in press). The schoolwide enrichment model reading study. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
64. Reis, S. M., Westberg, K. L., Kulikowich, J., Gaillard, F., Hébert, T., Plucker, J., Purcell, J. H., Rogers, J. B., & Smist, J. M. (1993). Why not let high-ability students start school in January? The curriculum compacting study (Research Monograph 93106).
65. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
66. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180-184, 261.
67. Renzulli, J. S., Reid, B. D., & Gubbins, E. J. (1991). Setting and agenda: Research priorities for the gifted and talented through the year 2000. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
68. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
69. Richert, E. S. (1986). Identification of gifted children in the United States: The need for pluralistic assessment. Roeper Review, 8, 68-72.
70. Roberts, C., Ingram, C., & Harris, C. (1992). The effect of special versus regular classroom programming on higher cognitive processes of intermediate elementary aged gifted and average ability students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15, 332-343.
71. Robinson, A. (1990). Cooperation or exploitation? The argument against cooperative learning for talented students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 9-27.
72. Rogers, C. M., Smith, M. D., & Coleman, J. M. (1978). Social comparison in the classroom: The relationship between academic achievement and self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 50-57.
73. Rogers, K. B. (1991). The relationship of grouping practices to the education of the gifted and talented learner (Research-based Decision Making Series No. 9101). Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
74. Rogers, K. B. (2002). Grouping the gifted and talented: Questions and answers. Roeper Review, 24, 103-107.
75. Shields, C. M. (2002). A comparison study of student attitudes and perceptions in homogeneous and heterogeneous classrooms. Roeper Review, 24, 115-119.
76. Shore, B. M., Aulls, M. W., & Delcourt, M. A. B. (Eds.). (2007). Inquiry in education: Volume II. Overcoming barriers to successful implementation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
77. Shore, B. M., Cornell, D. G., Robinson, A., & Ward, V. S. (1992). Recommended practices in gifted education: A critical analysis. New York: Teachers College.
78. Shore, B. M., & Delcourt, M. A. B. (1996). Effective curricular and program practices in gifted education and the interface with general education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 20(2), 138-154.
79. Slavin, R. E. (1987). Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57, 293-336.
80. Slavin, R. E. (1988). Synthesis of research on grouping in elementary and secondary schools. Educational Leadership, 46(1), 67-76.
81. Slavin, R. E. (1990). Ability grouping, cooperative learning and the gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 3-8.
82. Stedtnitz, U. (1986). The influence of educational enrichment on self-efficacy and interest levels in young children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 6, 39-49.
83. Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (1986). Conceptions of giftedness. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University.
84. Stoddard, E. P., & Renzulli, J. S. (1983). Improving the writing skills of talent pool students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27, 21-27.
85. Swiatek, M., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (2003). Elementary and middle school student participation in gifted programs: Are gifted students underserved? Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 118-130.
86. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper & Row.
87. Terman, L. M. (1959). Genetic studies of genius: The gifted group at mid-life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
88. Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
89. U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Census 2000 Summary File 1, Matrix PCT11. Retrieved February 24, 2006, from http://factfinder.census.gov/ servlet/.
90. Van Tassel-Baska, J. (1987). Point-counterpoint: The ineffectiveness of the pull-out program model in gifted education, a minority perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10, 255-263.
91. Van Tassel-Baska, J., Willis, G. B., & Meyer, D. (1989). Evaluation of a full-time self-contained class for gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 7-10.
92. Vaughn, V. L., Feldhusen, J. F., & Asher, J. W. (1991). Meta-analyses and review of research on pull-out programs in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 92-98.
93. Westberg, K. L., Archambault, F. X., Jr., Dobyns, S. M., & Salvin, T. J. (1993). An observational study of instructional and curricular practices used with gifted and talented students in regular classrooms (Research Monograph No. 93104). Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center of the Gifted and Talented.
94. Wilson, J. W. (1980). The declining significance of race. Chicago: University of Chicago.
95. Worrell, F. C. (2005). Global and domain-specific self-concepts in academically talented Asian American and White adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 90-97.