Point/counterpoint

Roeper Review

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 10-11

  Coleman, Laurence J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007816332     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783190409554280     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Coleman L., Sanders, M., & Cross T. (1997). Perennial debates and tacit assumptions in the education of gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41(3), 44-50.
2. Cross T. & Coleman L. (in press.) School-based conceptions of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Gagne, F. (1985). Giftedness and talent: Reexamining a reexamination of the definition. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 103-112.
4. Gagne, F. (1998). A proposal for subcategories within gifted and talented populations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 87-95.
5. Marland, S. P. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U. S. Commissioner of Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
6. Renzulli, J. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53-92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Stanley, J., Keating, D., & Fox, L. (1974). Mathematical talent: Discovery, description, and development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8. Sternberg, R., & Davidson, J. (Eds.). (1986). Conceptions of giftedness. New York: Cambridge University Press.