Preventing replication fork collapse to maintain genome integrity

DNA Repair

Volumn 32, Issue , 2015, Pages 149-157

  Cortez, David ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

ATR; Fork collapse; IPOND; Replication checkpoint; Replisome

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA SEQUENCE; DNA SYNTHESIS; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPLISOME; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; DNA REPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOUSE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

CYCLINE; DNA; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE GAMMA;

ANIMALS; DNA; DNA DAMAGE; DNA POLYMERASE III; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMANS; MICE; PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

EID: 84938484731     PISSN: 15687864     EISSN: 15687856     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.04.026     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Mechali M. Eukaryotic DNA replication origins: many choices for appropriate answers. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:728-738.
2. Zeman M.K., Cimprich K.A. Causes and consequences of replication stress. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014, 16:2-9.
3. Aguilera A., Garcia-Muse T. R loops: from transcription byproducts to threats to genome stability. Mol. Cell 2012, 46:115-124.
4. Halazonetis T.D., Gorgoulis V.G., Bartek J. An oncogene-induced DNA damage model for cancer development. Science 2008, 319:1352-1355.
5. Cimprich K.A., Cortez D. ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9:616-627.
6. Nam E.A., Cortez D. ATR signalling: more than meeting at the fork. Biochem. J. 2011, 436:527-536.
7. Lopez-Contreras A.J., Fernandez-Capetillo O. The ATR barrier to replication-born DNA damage. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2010, 9:1249-1255.
8. Byun T.S., Pacek M., Yee M.C., Walter J.C., Cimprich K.A. Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATR-dependent checkpoint. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:1040-1052.
9. Mouron S., Rodriguez-Acebes S., Martinez-Jimenez M.I., Garcia-Gomez S., Chocron S., Blanco L., Mendez J. Repriming of DNA synthesis at stalled replication forks by human. PrimPol-Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013, 20:1383-1389.
10. Garcia-Gomez S., Reyes A., Martinez-Jimenez M.I., Chocron E.S., Mouron S., Terrados G., Powell C., Salido E., Mendez J., Holt I.J., Blanco L. PrimPol an archaic primase/polymerase operating in human cells. Mol. Cell 2013, 52:541-553.
11. Carr A.M., Paek A.L., Weinert T. DNA replication: failures and inverted fusions. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011, 22:866-874.
12. Bensimon A., Simon A., Chiffaudel A., Croquette V., Heslot F., Bensimon D. Alignment and sensitive detection of DNA by a moving interface. Science 1994, 265:2096-2098.
13. Jackson D.A., Pombo A. Replicon clusters are stable units of chromosome structure: evidence that nuclear organization contributes to the efficient activation and propagation of S phase in human cells. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 140:1285-1295.
14. Norio P., Schildkraut C.L. Visualization of DNA replication on individual Epstein-Barr virus episomes. Science 2001, 294:2361-2364.
15. Tercero J.A., Diffley J.F. Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature 2001, 412:553-557.
16. Brewer B.J., Fangman W.L. The localization of replication origins on ARS plasmids in S. cerevisiae. Cell 1987, 51:463-471.
17. Cobb J.A., Bjergbaek L., Shimada K., Frei C., Gasser S.M. DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1. EMBO J. 2003, 22:4325-4336.
18. De Piccoli G., Katou Y., Itoh T., Nakato R., Shirahige K., Labib K. Replisome stability at defective DNA replication forks is independent of S phase checkpoint kinases. Mol. Cell 2012, 45:696-704.
19. Olive P.L. Cell proliferation as a requirement for development of the contact effect in Chinese hamster V79 spheroids. Radiat. Res. 1989, 117:79-92.
20. Ager D.D., Dewey W.C., Gardiner K., Harvey W., Johnson R.T., Waldren C.A. Measurement of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Radiat. Res. 1990, 122:181-187.
21. Couch F.B., Bansbach C.E., Driscoll R., Luzwick J.W., Glick G.G., Betous R., Carroll C.M., Jung S.Y., Qin J., Cimprich K.A., Cortez D. ATR phosphorylates SMARCAL1 to prevent replication fork collapse. Genes Dev. 2013, 27:1610-1623.
22. Cordeiro-Stone M., Makhov A.M., Zaritskaya L.S., Griffith J.D. Analysis of DNA replication forks encountering a pyrimidine dimer in the template to the leading strand. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 289:1207-1218.
23. Sogo J.M., Lopes M., Foiani M. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 2002, 297:599-602.
24. Ray Chaudhuri A., Hashimoto Y., Herrador R., Neelsen K.J., Fachinetti D., Bermejo R., Cocito A., Costanzo V., Lopes M. Topoisomerase I poisoning results in PARP-mediated replication fork reversal. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2012, 19:417-423.
25. Cox M.M., Goodman M.F., Kreuzer K.N., Sherratt D.J., Sandler S.J., Marians K.J. The importance of repairing stalled replication forks. Nature 2000, 404:37-41.
26. Gabbai C.B., Marians K.J. Recruitment to stalled replication forks of the PriA DNA helicase and replisome-loading activities is essential for survival. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2010, 9:202-209.
27. Bizard A.H., Hickson I.D. The dissolution of double Holliday junctions. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 2014, 6:a016477.
28. Anand R.P., Lovett S.T., Haber J.E. Break-induced DNA replication. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 2013, 5:a010397.
29. Malkova A., Ira G. Break-induced replication: functions and molecular mechanism. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2013, 23:271-279.
30. Kolodner R.D., Putnam C.D., Myung K. Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 2002, 297:552-557.
31. Nam E.A., Zhao R., Cortez D. Analysis of mutations that dissociate G(2) and essential S phase functions of human ataxia telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286:37320-37327.
32. Desany B.A., Alcasabas A.A., Bachant J.B., Elledge S.J. Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Genes Dev. 1998, 12:2956-2970.
33. Paciotti V., Clerici M., Scotti M., Lucchini G., Longhese M.P. Characterization of mec1 kinase-deficient mutants and of new hypomorphic mec1 alleles impairing subsets of the DNA damage response pathway. Mol.Cell. Biol. 2001, 21:3913-3925.
34. Tercero J.A., Longhese M.P., Diffley J.F. A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response. Mol. Cell 2003, 11:1323-1336.
35. Zhao X., Muller E.G., Rothstein R. A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. Mol. Cell 1998, 2:329-340.
36. Brown E.J., Baltimore D. ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality. Genes Dev. 2000, 14:397-402.
37. Liu Q., Guntuku S., Cui X.S., Matsuoka S., Cortez D., Tamai K., Luo G., Carattini-Rivera S., DeMayo F., Bradley A., Donehower L.A., Elledge S.J. Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint. Genes Dev. 2000, 14:1448-1459.
38. Cortez D., Guntuku S., Qin J., Elledge S.J. ATR and ATRIP: partners in checkpoint signaling. Science 2001, 294:1713-1716.
39. Lopes M., Cotta-Ramusino C., Pellicioli A., Liberi G., Plevani P., Muzi-Falconi M., Newlon C.S., Foiani M. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 2001, 412:557-561.
40. Alvino G.M., Collingwood D., Murphy J.M., Delrow J., Brewer B.J., Raghuraman M.K. Replication in hydroxyurea: it's a matter of time. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27:6396-6406.
41. Feijoo C., Hall-Jackson C., Wu R., Jenkins D., Leitch J., Gilbert D.M., Smythe C. Activation of mammalian Chk1 during DNA replication arrest: a role for Chk1 in the intra-S phase checkpoint monitoring replication origin firing. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 154:913-923.
42. Merrick C.J., Jackson D., Diffley J.F. Visualization of altered replication dynamics after DNA damage in human cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:20067-20075.
43. Meister P., Taddei A., Ponti A., Baldacci G., Gasser S.M. Replication foci dynamics: replication patterns are modulated by S-phase checkpoint kinases in fission yeast. EMBO J. 2007, 26:1315-1326.
44. Toledo L.I., Altmeyer M., Rask M.B., Lukas C., Larsen D.H., Povlsen L.K., Bekker-Jensen S., Mailand N., Bartek J., Lukas J. ATR prohibits replication catastrophe by preventing global exhaustion of RPA. Cell 2013, 155:1088-1103.
45. Trenz K., Smith E., Smith S., Costanzo V. ATM and ATR promote Mre11 dependent restart of collapsed replication forks and prevent accumulation of DNA breaks. EMBO J. 2006, 25:1764-1774.
46. Ammazzalorso F., Pirzio L.M., Bignami M., Franchitto A., Pichierri P. ATR and ATM differently regulate WRN to prevent DSBs at stalled replication forks and promote replication fork recovery. EMBO J. 2010, 29:3156-3169.
47. Davies S.L., North P.S., Dart A., Lakin N.D., Hickson I.D. Phosphorylation of the Bloom's syndrome helicase and its role in recovery from S-phase arrest. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004, 24:1279-1291.
48. Branzei D., Foiani M. Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:208-219.
49. Cobb J.A., Schleker T., Rojas V., Bjergbaek L., Tercero J.A., Gasser S.M. Replisome instability, fork collapse, and gross chromosomal rearrangements arise synergistically from Mec1 kinase and RecQ helicase mutations. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:3055-3069.
50. Lucca C., Vanoli F., Cotta-Ramusino C., Pellicioli A., Liberi G., Haber J., Foiani M. Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome-fork association and signalling in response to replication pausing. Oncogene 2004, 23:1206-1213.
51. Katou Y., Kanoh Y., Bando M., Noguchi H., Tanaka H., Ashikari T., Sugimoto K., Shirahige K. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 2003, 424:1078-1083.
52. Dimitrova D.S., Gilbert D.M. Temporally coordinated assembly and disassembly of replication factories in the absence of DNA synthesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2000, 2:686-694.
53. Hashimoto Y., Puddu F., Costanzo V. RAD51- and MRE11-dependent reassembly of uncoupled CMG helicase complex at collapsed replication forks. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2012, 19:17-24.
54. Ragland R.L., Patel S., Rivard R.S., Smith K., Peters A.A., Bielinsky A.K., Brown E.J. RNF4 and PLK1 are required for replication fork collapse in ATR-deficient cells. Genes Dev. 2013, 27:2259-2273.
55. Yu C., Gan H., Han J., Zhou Z.X., Jia S., Chabes A., Farrugia G., Ordog T., Zhang Z. Strand-specific analysis shows protein binding at replication forks and PCNA unloading from lagging strands when forks Stall. Mol. Cell 2014, 56:551-563.
56. Sirbu B.M., Couch F.B., Feigerle J.T., Bhaskara S., Hiebert S.W., Cortez D. Analysis of protein dynamics at active, stalled, and collapsed replication forks. Genes Dev. 2011, 25:1320-1327.
57. Follonier C., Oehler J., Herrador R., Lopes M. Friedreich's ataxia-associated GAA repeats induce replication-fork reversal and unusual molecular junctions. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013, 20:486-494.
58. Neelsen K.J., Zanini I.M., Herrador R., Lopes M. Oncogenes induce genotoxic stress by mitotic processing of unusual replication intermediates. J. Cell Biol. 2013, 200:699-708.
59. Tatsumi K., Strauss B. Production of DNA bifilarly substituted with bromodeoxyuridine in the first round of synthesis: branch migration during isolation of cellular DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1978, 5:331-347.
60. Gari K., Decaillet C., Stasiak A.Z., Stasiak A., Constantinou A. The Fanconi anemia protein FANCM can promote branch migration of Holliday junctions and replication forks. Mol. Cell 2008, 29:141-148.
61. Betous R., Mason A.C., Rambo R.P., Bansbach C.E., Badu-Nkansah A., Sirbu B.M., Eichman B.F., Cortez D. SMARCAL1 catalyzes fork regression and Holliday junction migration to maintain genome stability during DNA replication. Genes Dev. 2012, 26:151-162.
62. Betous R., Couch F.B., Mason A.C., Eichman B.F., Manosas M., Cortez D. Substrate-selective repair and restart of replication forks by DNA translocases. Cell Rep. 2013, 3:1958-1969.
63. Machwe A., Karale R., Xu X., Liu Y., Orren D.K. The Werner and Bloom syndrome proteins help resolve replication blockage by converting (regressed) holliday junctions to functional replication forks. Biochemistry 2011, 50:6774-6788.
64. Gari K., Decaillet C., Delannoy M., Wu L., Constantinou A. Remodeling of DNA replication structures by the branch point translocase FANCM. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:16107-16112.
65. Opresko P.L., Sowd G., Wang H. The Werner syndrome helicase/exonuclease processes mobile D-loops through branch migration and degradation. PloS One 2009, 4:e4825.
66. Achar Y.J., Balogh D., Haracska L. Coordinated protein and DNA remodeling by human HLTF on stalled replication fork. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011.
67. Machwe A., Xiao L., Groden J., Orren D.K. The Werner and Bloom syndrome proteins catalyze regression of a model replication fork. Biochemistry 2006, 45:13939-13946.
68. Ciccia A., Nimonkar A.V., Hu Y., Hajdu I., Achar Y.J., Izhar L., Petit S.A., Adamson B., Yoon J.C., Kowalczykowski S.C., Livingston D.M., Haracska L., Elledge S.J. Polyubiquitinated PCNA recruits the ZRANB3 translocase to maintain genomic integrity after replication stress. Mol. Cell 2012, 47:396-409.
69. Fugger K., Mistrik M., Neelsen K.J., Yao Q., Zellweger R., Kousholt A.N., Haahr P., Chu W.K., Bartek J., Lopes M., Hickson I.D., Sorensen C.S. FBH1Catalyzes regression of stalled replication forks. Cell Rep. 2015.
70. Manosas M., Perumal S.K., Croquette V., Benkovic S.J. Direct observation of stalled fork restart via fork regression in the T4 replication system. Science 2012, 338:1217-1220.
71. Mason A.C., Rambo R.P., Greer B., Pritchett M., Tainer J.A., Cortez D., Eichman B.F. A structure-specific nucleic acid-binding domain conserved among DNA repair proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014.
72. Bansbach C.E., Betous R., Lovejoy C.A., Glick G.G., Cortez D. The annealing helicase SMARCAL1 maintains genome integrity at stalled replication forks. Genes Dev. 2009, 23:2405-2414.
73. Ciccia A., Bredemeyer A.L., Sowa M.E., Terret M.E., Jallepalli P.V., Harper J.W., Elledge S.J. The SIOD disorder protein SMARCAL1 is an RPA-interacting protein involved in replication fork restart. Genes Dev. 2009, 23:2415-2425.
74. Postow L., Woo E.M., Chait B.T., Funabiki H. Identification of SMARCAL1 as a component of the DNA damage response. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:35951-35961.
75. Yusufzai T., Kong X., Yokomori K., Kadonaga J.T. The annealing helicase HARP is recruited to DNA repair sites via an interaction with RPA. Genes Dev. 2009, 23:2400-2404.
76. Yuan J., Ghosal G., Chen J. The annealing helicase HARP protects stalled replication forks. Genes Dev. 2009, 23:2394-2399.
77. Bhat K.P., Betous R., Cortez D. High-affinity DNA-binding domains of replication protein A (RPA) direct SMARCAL1-dependent replication fork remodeling. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290:4110-4117.
78. Thangavel S., Berti M., Levikova M., Pinto C., Gomathinayagam S., Vujanovic M., Zellweger R., Moore H., Lee E.H., Hendrickson E.A., Cejka P., Stewart S., Lopes M., Vindigni A. DNA2 drives processing and restart of reversed replication forks in human cells. J. Cell Biol. 2015, 208:545-562.
79. Zellweger R., Dalcher D., Mutreja K., Berti M., Schmid J.A., Herrador R., Vindigni A., Lopes M. Rad51-mediated replication fork reversal is a global response to genotoxic treatments in human cells. J. Cell Biol. 2015, 208:563-579.
80. Berti M., Ray Chaudhuri A., Thangavel S., Gomathinayagam S., Kenig S., Vujanovic M., Odreman F., Glatter T., Graziano S., Mendoza-Maldonado R., Marino F., Lucic B., Biasin V., Gstaiger M., Aebersold R., Sidorova J.M., Monnat R.J., Lopes M., Vindigni A. Human RECQ1 promotes restart of replication forks reversed by DNA topoisomerase I inhibition. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013, 20:347-354.
81. Bansbach C.E., Boerkoel C.F., Cortez D. SMARCAL1 and replication stress: an explanation for SIOD?. Nucleus 2010, 1:245-248.
82. Betous R., Glick G.G., Zhao R., Cortez D. Identification and characterization of SMARCAL1 protein complexes. PLoS One 2013, 8:e63149.
83. Davies S.L., North P.S., Hickson I.D. Role for BLM in replication-fork restart and suppression of origin firing after replicative stress. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007, 14:677-679.
84. Franchitto A., Pirzio L.M., Prosperi E., Sapora O., Bignami M., Pichierri P. Replication fork stalling in WRN-deficient cells is overcome by prompt activation of a MUS81-dependent pathway. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 183:241-252.
85. Cotta-Ramusino C., Fachinetti D., Lucca C., Doksani Y., Lopes M., Sogo J., Foiani M. Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells. Mol. Cell 2005, 17:153-159.
86. Hu J., Sun L., Shen F., Chen Y., Hua Y., Liu Y., Zhang M., Hu Y., Wang Q., Xu W., Sun F., Ji J., Murray J.M., Carr A.M., Kong D. The intra-s phase checkpoint targets dna2 to prevent stalled replication forks from reversing. Cell 2012, 149:1221-1232.
87. Binz S.K., Sheehan A.M., Wold M.S. Replication protein A phosphorylation and the cellular response to DNA damage. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2004, 3:1015-1024.
88. Cortez D., Glick G., Elledge S.J. Minichromosome maintenance proteins are direct targets of the ATM and ATR checkpoint kinases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004, 101:10078-10083.
89. Trenz K., Errico A., Costanzo V. Plx1 is required for chromosomal DNA replication under stressful conditions. EMBO J. 2008, 27:876-885.
90. Yoo H.Y., Shevchenko A., Dunphy W.G. Mcm2 is a direct substrate of ATM and ATR during DNA damage and DNA replication checkpoint responses. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:53353-53364.
91. Murphy A.K., Fitzgerald M., Ro T., Kim J.H., Rabinowitsch A.I., Chowdhury D., Schildkraut C.L., Borowiec J.A. Phosphorylated RPA recruits PALB2 to stalled DNA replication forks to facilitate fork recovery. J. Cell Biol. 2014, 206:493-507.
92. Woodward A.M., Gohler T., Luciani M.G., Oehlmann M., Ge X., Gartner A., Jackson D.A., Blow J.J. Excess Mcm2-7 license dormant origins of replication that can be used under conditions of replicative stress. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 173:673-683.
93. Ge X.Q., Jackson D.A., Blow J.J. Dormant origins licensed by excess Mcm2-7 are required for human cells to survive replicative stress. Genes Dev. 2007, 21:3331-3341.
94. Ibarra A., Schwob E., Mendez J. Excess MCM proteins protect human cells from replicative stress by licensing backup origins of replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2008, 105:8956-8961.
95. Sarbajna S., West S.C. Holliday junction processing enzymes as guardians of genome stability. Trends Biochem.Sci. 2014, 39:409-419.
96. Leman A.R., Noguchi E. Local and global functions of timeless and tipin in replication fork protection. Cell Cycle 2012, 11:3945-3955.
97. Bermejo R., Kumar A., Foiani M. Preserving the genome by regulating chromatin association with the nuclear envelope. Trends Cell Biol. 2012, 22:465-473.
98. Aparicio O.M., Stout A.M., Bell S.P. Differential assembly of Cdc45p and DNA polymerases at early and late origins of DNA replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999, 96:9130-9135.
99. Masumoto H., Sugino A., Araki H. Dpb11 controls the association between DNA polymerases alpha and epsilon and the autonomously replicating sequence region of budding yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000, 20:2809-2817.
100. Calzada A., Hodgson B., Kanemaki M., Bueno A., Labib K. Molecular anatomy and regulation of a stable replisome at a paused eukaryotic DNA replication fork. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:1905-1919.
101. Sabatinos S.A., Green M.D., Forsburg S.L. Continued DNA synthesis in replication checkpoint mutants leads to fork collapse. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2012, 32:4986-4997.
102. Segurado M., Diffley J.F.X. Separate roles for the DNA damage checkpoint protein kinases in stabilizing DNA replication forks. Genes Dev. 2008, 22:1816-1827.