Local and global functions of Timeless and Tipin in replication fork protection

Cell Cycle

Volumn 11, Issue 21, 2012, Pages 3945-3955

  Leman, Adam R ^a   Noguchi, Eishi ^a  

^a DREXEL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Checkpoint; Cohesion; Csm3; Difficult to replicate sites; DNA replication; Fork pausing; Fork protection complex; FPC; Genome integrity; Swi1; Swi3; Timeless; Tipin; Tof1

Indexed keywords

DNA BINDING PROTEIN; FORK PROTECTION COMPLEX PROTEIN; GENOMIC DNA; PROTEIN DERIVATIVE; REPETITIVE DNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

CHROMOSOME REPLICATION; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPLICATION; DNA STRUCTURE; GENOME; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; REVIEW; TELOMERE;

EID: 84869392858     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.21989     Document Type: Review

References (128)

1. Unsal-Kaçmaz K, Chastain PD, Qu P-P, Minoo P, Cordeiro-Stone M, Sancar A, et al. The human Tim/Tipin complex coordinates an Intra-S checkpoint response to UV that slows replication fork displacement. Mol Cell Biol 2007; 27:3131-42; PMID:17296725; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.02190-06.
2. Chou DM, Elledge SJ. Tipin and Timeless form a mutually protective complex required for genotoxic stress resistance and checkpoint function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:18143-7; PMID:17116885; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.0609251103.
3. Gotter AL, Suppa C, Emanuel BS. Mammalian TIMELESS and Tipin are evolutionarily conserved replication fork-associated factors. J Mol Biol 2007; 366:36-52; PMID:17141802; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2006.10.097.
4. Yoshizawa-Sugata N, Masai H. Human Tim/Timelessinteracting protein, Tipin, is required for efficient progression of S phase and DNA replication checkpoint. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:2729-40; PMID:17102137; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1074/jbc.M605596200.
5. Mayer ML, Pot I, Chang M, Xu H, Aneliunas V, Kwok T, et al. Identification of protein complexes required for efficient sister chromatid cohesion. Mol Biol Cell 2004; 15:1736-45; PMID:14742714; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1091/mbc.E03-08-0619.
6. rd, Russell P. Swi1 and Swi3 are components of a replication fork protection complex in fission yeast. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:8342-55; PMID:15367656; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1128/MCB.24.19.8342-8355.2004.
7. Calzada A, Hodgson B, Kanemaki M, Bueno A, Labib K. Molecular anatomy and regulation of a stable replisome at a paused eukaryotic DNA replication fork. Genes Dev 2005; 19:1905-19; PMID:16103218; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.337205.
8. Errico A, Costanzo V, Hunt T. Tipin is required for stalled replication forks to resume DNA replication after removal of aphidicolin in Xenopus egg extracts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:14929-34; PMID:17846426; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706347104.
9. Gambus A, Jones RC, Sanchez-Diaz A, Kanemaki M, van Deursen F, Edmondson RD, et al. GINS maintains association of Cdc45 with MCM in replisome progression complexes at eukaryotic DNA replication forks. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8:358-66; PMID:16531994; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1382.
10. Katou Y, Kanoh Y, Bando M, Noguchi H, Tanaka H, Ashikari T, et al. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 2003; 424:1078-83; PMID:12944972; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature01900.
11. Matsumoto S, Ogino K, Noguchi E, Russell P, Masai H. Hsk1-Dfp1/Him1, the Cdc7-Dbf4 kinase in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, associates with Swi1, a component of the replication fork protection complex. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:42536-42; PMID:16263721; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M510575200.
12. Tanaka H, Kubota Y, Tsujimura T, Kumano M, Masai H, Takisawa H. Replisome progression complex links DNA replication to sister chromatid cohesion in Xenopus egg extracts. Genes Cells 2009; 14:949-63; PMID:19622120; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2443.2009.01322.x.
13. Leman AR, Noguchi C, Lee CY, Noguchi E. Human Timeless and Tipin stabilize replication forks and facilitate sister-chromatid cohesion. J Cell Sci 2010; 123:660-70; PMID:20124417; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.057984.
14. Egel R, Beach DH, Klar AJ. Genes required for initiation and resolution steps of mating-type switching in fission yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1984; 81:3481-5; PMID:6587363; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.81.11.3481.
15. Park H, Sternglanz R. Identification and characterization of the genes for two topoisomerase I-interacting proteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 1999; 15:35-41; PMID:10028183; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ (SICI)1097-0061(19990115)15:1〈35::AIDYEA340〉3.0.CO;2-R.
16. Foss EJ. Tof1p regulates DNA damage responses during S phase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2001; 157:567-77; PMID:11156979.
17. Sanchez Y, Desany BA, Jones WJ, Liu Q, Wang B, Elledge SJ. Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science 1996; 271:357-60; PMID:8553072; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/ science.271.5247.357.
18. Murakami H, Okayama H. A kinase from fission yeast responsible for blocking mitosis in S phase. Nature 1995; 374:817-9; PMID:7723827; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/374817a0.
19. Noguchi E, Noguchi C, Du LL, Russell P. Swi1 prevents replication fork collapse and controls checkpoint kinase Cds1. Mol Cell Biol 2003; 23:7861-74; PMID:14560029; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.23.21.7861-7874.2003.
20. Lee BS, Grewal SI, Klar AJ. Biochemical interactions between proteins and mat1 cis-acting sequences required for imprinting in fission yeast. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:9813-22; PMID:15509785; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.22.9813- 9822.2004.
21. Paulsen RD, Cimprich KA. The ATR pathway: fine-tuning the fork. DNA Repair (Amst) 2007; 6:953-66; PMID:17531546; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep. 2007.02.015.
22. Unsal-Kaçmaz K, Mullen TE, Kaufmann WK, Sancar A. Coupling of human circadian and cell cycles by the timeless protein. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:3109-16; PMID:15798197; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.8.3109-3116.2005.
23. Smith KD, Fu MA, Brown EJ. Tim-Tipin dysfunction creates an indispensible reliance on the ATR-Chk1 pathway for continued DNA synthesis. J Cell Biol 2009; 187:15-23; PMID:19805627; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200905006.
24. Zou L, Elledge SJ. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 2003; 300:1542-8; PMID:12791985; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1083430.
25. Chini CC, Chen J. Human claspin is required for replication checkpoint control. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:30057-62; PMID:12766152; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1074/jbc.M301136200.
26. Kumagai A, Dunphy WG. Claspin, a novel protein required for the activation of Chk1 during a DNA replication checkpoint response in Xenopus egg extracts. Mol Cell 2000; 6:839-49; PMID:11090622; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S1097-2765(05)00092-4.
27. Nakaya R, Takaya J, Onuki T, Moritani M, Nozaki N, Ishimi Y. Identification of proteins that may directly interact with human RPA. J Biochem 2010; 148:539- 47; PMID:20679368; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jb/mvq085.
28. Kemp MG, Akan Z, Yilmaz S, Grillo M, Smith-Roe SL, Kang TH, et al. Tipin-replication protein A interaction mediates Chk1 phosphorylation by ATR in response to genotoxic stress. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:16562-71; PMID:20233725; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.110304.
29. Lopez-Mosqueda J, Maas NL, Jonsson ZO, Defazio-Eli LG, Wohlschlegel J, Toczyski DP. Damage-induced phosphorylation of Sld3 is important to block late origin firing. Nature 2010; 467:479-83; PMID:20865002; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/nature09377.
30. Zegerman P, Diffley JF. Checkpoint-dependent inhibition of DNA replication initiation by Sld3 and Dbf4 phosphorylation. Nature 2010; 467:474-8; PMID:20835227; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09373.
31. Masai H, Matsumoto S, You Z, Yoshizawa-Sugata N, Oda M. Eukaryotic chromosome DNA replication: where, when, and how? Annu Rev Biochem 2010; 79:89-130; PMID:20373915; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.052308. 103205.
32. Zou L, Stillman B. Assembly of a complex containing Cdc45p, replication protein A, and Mcm2p at replication origins controlled by S-phase cyclin-dependent kinases and Cdc7p-Dbf4p kinase. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20:3086-96; PMID:10757793; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.20.9.3086-3096.2000.
33. +, a Schizosaccharomyces pombe gene related to Saccharomyces cerevisiae CDC7, is required for chromosomal replication. EMBO J 1995; 14:3094-104; PMID:7621824.
34. Brown GW, Kelly TJ. Purification of Hsk1, a minichromosome maintenance protein kinase from fission yeast. J Biol Chem 1998; 273:22083-90; PMID:9705352; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.34.22083.
35. Shimmoto M, Matsumoto S, Odagiri Y, Noguchi E, Russell P, Masai H. Interactions between Swi1-Swi3, Mrc1 and S phase kinase, Hsk1 may regulate cellular responses to stalled replication forks in fission yeast. Genes Cells 2009; 14:669-82; PMID:19422421; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2443.2009. 01300.x.
36. Sommariva E, Pellny TK, Karahan N, Kumar S, Huberman JA, Dalgaard JZ. Schizosaccharomyces pombe Swi1, Swi3, and Hsk1 are components of a novel S-phase response pathway to alkylation damage. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:2770-84; PMID:15767681; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.7.2770-2784.2005.
37. Bensimon A, Simon A, Chiffaudel A, Croquette V, Heslot F, Bensimon D. Alignment and sensitive detection of DNA by a moving interface. Science 1994; 265:2096-8; PMID:7522347; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.7522347.
38. Tourrière H, Versini G, Cordón-Preciado V, Alabert C, Pasero P. Mrc1 and Tof1 promote replication fork progression and recovery independently of Rad53. Mol Cell 2005; 19:699-706; PMID:16137625; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2005.07.028.
39. Mirkin EV, Mirkin SM. Replication fork stalling at natural impediments. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2007; 71:13-35; PMID:17347517; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/ MMBR.00030-06
40. Lisby M, Rothstein R, Mortensen UH. Rad52 forms DNA repair and recombination centers during S phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98:8276-82; PMID:11459964; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.121006298.
41. Lisby M, Mortensen UH, Rothstein R. Colocalization of multiple DNA double-strand breaks at a single Rad52 repair centre. Nat Cell Biol 2003; 5:572-7; PMID:12766777; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb997.
42. Urtishak KA, Smith KD, Chanoux RA, Greenberg RA, Johnson FB, Brown EJ. Timeless Maintains Genomic Stability and Suppresses Sister Chromatid Exchange during Unperturbed DNA Replication. J Biol Chem 2009; 284:8777-85; PMID:19112184; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M806103200.
43. Aguilera A, Gómez-González B. Genome instability: a mechanistic view of its causes and consequences. Nat Rev Genet 2008; 9:204-17; PMID:18227811; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg2268.
44. Jones RM, Petermann E. Replication fork dynamics and the DNA damage response. Biochem J 2012; 443:13-26; PMID:22417748; http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/ BJ20112100.
45. Pearson CE, Nichol Edamura K, Cleary JD. Repeat instability: mechanisms of dynamic mutations. Nat Rev Genet 2005; 6:729-42; PMID:16205713; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg1689.
46. Bastia D, Mohanty BK. Termination of DNA replication. In: DePamphilis ML, ed. DNA replication and human disease. Cold Spring Harbor, N. Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2006:155-174.
47. Labib K, Hodgson B. Replication fork barriers: pausing for a break or stalling for time? EMBO Rep 2007; 8:346-53; PMID:17401409; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/sj.embor.7400940.
48. Liu G, Leffak M. Instability of (CTG)n·(CAG)n trinucleotide repeats and DNA synthesis. Cell Biosci 2012; 2:7; PMID:22369689; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-3701-2-7.
49. Mirkin SM. Expandable DNA repeats and human disease. Nature 2007; 447:932-40; PMID:17581576; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05977.
50. Dalgaard JZ, Klar AJ. swi1 and swi3 perform imprinting, pausing, and termination of DNA replication in S. pombe. Cell 2000; 102:745-51; PMID:11030618; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00063-5.
51. Kaykov A, Holmes AM, Arcangioli B. Formation, maintenance and consequences of the imprint at the mating-type locus in fission yeast. EMBO J 2004; 23:930-8; PMID:14765111; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600099.
52. Vengrova S, Dalgaard JZ. RNase-sensitive DNA modification(s) initiates S. pombe mating-type switching. Genes Dev 2004; 18:794-804; PMID:15059961; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.289404.
53. Eydmann T, Sommariva E, Inagawa T, Mian S, Klar AJS, Dalgaard JZ. Rtf1-mediated eukaryotic site-specific replication termination. Genetics 2008; 180:27-39; PMID:18723894; http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.108.089243.
54. Mohanty BK, Bairwa NK, Bastia D. The Tof1p-Csm3p protein complex counteracts the Rrm3p helicase to control replication termination of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:897-902; PMID:16418273; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506540103.
55. Kobayashi T. The replication fork barrier site forms a unique structure with Fob1p and inhibits the replication fork. Mol Cell Biol 2003; 23:9178-88; PMID:14645529; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.23.24.9178-9188.2003.
56. Kobayashi T, Horiuchi T. A yeast gene product, Fob1 protein, required for both replication fork blocking and recombinational hotspot activities. Genes Cells 1996; 1:465-74; PMID:9078378; http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2443.1996. d01-256.x.
57. Krings G, Bastia D. Sap1p binds to Ter1 at the ribosomal DNA of Schizosaccharomyces pombe and causes polar replication fork arrest. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:39135-42; PMID:16195226; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M508996200.
58. Mejía-Ramírez E, Sánchez-Gorostiaga A, Krimer DB, Schvartzman JB, Hernández P. The mating type switchactivating protein Sap1 Is required for replication fork arrest at the rRNA genes of fission yeast. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:8755-61; PMID:16166653; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB. 25.19.8755-8761.2005.
59. Sánchez-Gorostiaga A, López-Estraño C, Krimer DB, Schvartzman JB, Hernández P. Transcription termination factor reb1p causes two replication fork barriers at its cognate sites in fission yeast ribosomal DNA in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:398-406; PMID:14673172; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.1.398-406.2004.
60. Krings G, Bastia D. swi1- and swi3-dependent and independent replication fork arrest at the ribosomal DNA of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:14085-90; PMID:15371597; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 0406037101.
61. Gerber JK, Gögel E, Berger C, Wallisch M, Müller F, Grummt I, et al. Termination of mammalian rDNA replication: polar arrest of replication fork movement by transcription termination factor TTF-I. Cell 1997; 90:559-67; PMID:9267035; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80515-2.
62. Brewer BJ, Lockshon D, Fangman WL. The arrest of replication forks in the rDNA of yeast occurs independently of transcription. Cell 1992; 71:267-76; PMID:1423594; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(92)90355-G.
63. Grummt I, Maier U, Ohrlein A, Hassouna N, Bachellerie JP. Transcription of mouse rDNA terminates downstream of the 3′ end of 28S RNA and involves interaction of factors with repeated sequences in the 3′spacer. Cell 1985; 43:801-10; PMID:4075406; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(85)90253-3.
64. Kuhn A, Bartsch I, Grummt I. Specific interaction of the murine transcription termination factor TTF I with class-I RNA polymerases. Nature 1990; 344:559-62; PMID:2181320; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/344559a0.
65. López-estraño C, Schvartzman JB, Krimer DB, Hernández P. Co-localization of polar replication fork barriers and rRNA transcription terminators in mouse rDNA. J Mol Biol 1998; 277:249-56; PMID:9514756; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1997.1607.
66. Ward TR, Hoang ML, Prusty R, Lau CK, Keil RL, Fangman WL, et al. Ribosomal DNA replication fork barrier and HOT1 recombination hot spot: shared sequences but independent activities. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20:4948-57; PMID:10848619; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.20.13.4948-4957.2000.
67. Zhao A, Guo A, Liu Z, Pape L. Molecular cloning and analysis of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Reb1p: sequence-specific recognition of two sites in the far upstream rDNA intergenic spacer. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:904-10; PMID:9016645; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.4.904.
68. Azvolinsky A, Giresi PG, Lieb JD, Zakian VA. Highly transcribed RNA polymerase II genes are impediments to replication fork progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell 2009; 34:722-34; PMID:19560424; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.05.022.
69. Deshpande AM, Newlon CS. DNA replication fork pause sites dependent on transcription. Science 1996; 272:1030-3; PMID:8638128; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1126/science.272.5264.1030.
70. Hodgson B, Calzada A, Labib K. Mrc1 and Tof1 regulate DNA replication forks in different ways during normal S phase. Mol Biol Cell 2007; 18:3894-902; PMID:17652453; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E07-05-0500.
71. Sekedat MD, Fenyö D, Rogers RS, Tackett AJ, Aitchison JD, Chait BT. GINS motion reveals replication fork progression is remarkably uniform throughout the yeast genome. Mol Syst Biol 2010; 6:353; PMID:20212525; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2010.8.
72. Sabouri N, McDonald KR, Webb CJ, Cristea IM, Zakian VA. DNA replication through hard-to-replicate sites, including both highly transcribed RNA Pol II and Pol III genes, requires the S. pombe Pfh1 helicase. Genes Dev 2012; 26:581-93; PMID:22426534; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.184697.111.
73. Voineagu I, Freudenreich CH, Mirkin SM. Checkpoint responses to unusual structures formed by DNA repeats. Mol Carcinog 2009; 48:309-18; PMID:19306277; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mc.20512.
74. Voineagu I, Narayanan V, Lobachev KS, Mirkin SM. Replication stalling at unstable inverted repeats: interplay between DNA hairpins and fork stabilizing proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105:9936-41; PMID:18632578; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804510105.
75. Darlow JM, Leach DR. The effects of trinucleotide repeats found in human inherited disorders on palindrome inviability in Escherichia coli suggest hairpin folding preferences in vivo. Genetics 1995; 141:825-32; PMID:8582629.
76. Fu YH, Kuhl DP, Pizzuti A, Pieretti M, Sutcliffe JS, Richards S, et al. Variation of the CGG repeat at the fragile X site results in genetic instability: resolution of the Sherman paradox. Cell 1991; 67:1047-58; PMID:1760838; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(91)90283-5.
77. Voineagu I, Surka CF, Shishkin AA, Krasilnikova MM, Mirkin SM. Replisome stalling and stabilization at CGG repeats, which are responsible for chromosomal fragility. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2009; 16:226-8; PMID:19136957; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1527.
78. Shishkin AA, Voineagu I, Matera R, Cherng N, Chernet BT, Krasilnikova MM, et al. Large-scale expansions of Friedreich's ataxia GAA repeats in yeast. Mol Cell 2009; 35:82-92; PMID:19595718; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.06. 017.
79. Liu G, Chen X, Gao Y, Lewis T, Barthelemy J, Leffak M. Altered replication in human cells promotes DMPK (CTG)(n) • (CAG)(n) repeat instability. Mol Cell Biol 2012; 32:1618-32; PMID:22354993; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/MCB.06727-11.
80. Makovets S, Herskowitz I, Blackburn EH. Anatomy and dynamics of DNA replication fork movement in yeast telomeric regions. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:4019-31; PMID:15082794; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.9.4019-4031.2004.
81. Miller KM, Rog O, Cooper JP. Semi-conservative DNA replication through telomeres requires Taz1. Nature 2006; 440:824-8; PMID:16598261; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04638.
82. de Lange T. Shelterin: the protein complex that shapes and safeguards human telomeres. Genes Dev 2005; 19:2100-10; PMID:16166375; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1101/gad.1346005.
83. Sfeir A, Kosiyatrakul ST, Hockemeyer D, MacRae SL, Karlseder J, Schildkraut CL, et al. Mammalian telomeres resemble fragile sites and require TRF1 for efficient replication. Cell 2009; 138:90-103; PMID:19596237; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.021.
84. Ohki R, Ishikawa F. Telomere-bound TRF1 and TRF2 stall the replication fork at telomeric repeats. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:1627-37; PMID:15007108; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh309.
85. Grandin N, Charbonneau M. Mrc1, a non-essential DNA replication protein, is required for telomere end protection following loss of capping by Cdc13, Yku or telomerase. Mol Genet Genomics 2007; 277:685-99; PMID:17323081; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00438-007-0218-0.
86. Leman AR, Dheekollu J, Deng Z, Lee SW, Das MM, Lieberman PM, et al. Timeless preserves telomere length by promoting efficient DNA replication through human telomeres. Cell Cycle 2012; 11:2337-47; PMID:22672906; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.20810.
87. Xhemalce B, Riising EM, Baumann P, Dejean A, Arcangioli B, Seeler J-S. Role of SUMO in the dynamics of telomere maintenance in fission yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:893-8; PMID:17209013; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 0605442104.
88. Moser BA, Nakamura TM. Protection and replication of telomeres in fission yeast. Biochem Cell Biol 2009; 87:747-58; PMID:19898524; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1139/O09-037.
89. Uhlmann F, Nasmyth K. Cohesion between sister chromatids must be established during DNA replication. Curr Biol 1998; 8:1095-101; PMID:9778527; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70463-4.
90. Gerlich D, Koch B, Dupeux F, Peters J-M, Ellenberg J. Live-cell imaging reveals a stable cohesin-chromatin interaction after but not before DNA replication. Curr Biol 2006; 16:1571-8; PMID:16890534; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.cub.2006.06.068.
91. Strunnikov AV, Larionov VL, Koshland D. SMC1: an essential yeast gene encoding a putative headrod-tail protein is required for nuclear division and defines a new ubiquitous protein family. J Cell Biol 1993; 123:1635-48; PMID:8276886; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.123.6.1635.
92. Michaelis C, Ciosk R, Nasmyth K. Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell 1997; 91:35-45; PMID:9335333; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)80007-6.
93. Schmiesing JA, Ball AR Jr., Gregson HC, Alderton JM, Zhou S, Yokomori K. Identification of two distinct human SMC protein complexes involved in mitotic chromosome dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:12906-11; PMID:9789013; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.22.12906.
94. Haering CH, Löwe J, Hochwagen A, Nasmyth K. Molecular architecture of SMC proteins and the yeast cohesin complex. Mol Cell 2002; 9:773-88; PMID:11983169; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00515-4.
95. Losada A, Yokochi T, Kobayashi R, Hirano T. Identification and characterization of SA/Scc3p subunits in the Xenopus and human cohesin complexes. J Cell Biol 2000; 150:405-16; PMID:10931856; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1083/jcb.150.3.405.
96. Sumara I, Vorlaufer E, Gieffers C, Peters BH, Peters JM. Characterization of vertebrate cohesin complexes and their regulation in prophase. J Cell Biol 2000; 151:749-62; PMID:11076961; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.151.4.749.
97. Skibbens RV, Corson LB, Koshland D, Hieter P. Ctf7p is essential for sister chromatid cohesion and links mitotic chromosome structure to the DNA replication machinery. Genes Dev 1999; 13:307-19; PMID:9990855; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.13.3.307.
98. Tóth A, Ciosk R, Uhlmann F, Galova M, Schleiffer A, Nasmyth K. Yeast cohesin complex requires a conserved protein, Eco1p(Ctf7), to establish cohesion between sister chromatids during DNA replication. Genes Dev 1999; 13:320-33; PMID:9990856; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.13.3.320.
99. Zhang J, Shi X, Li Y, Kim BJ, Jia J, Huang Z, et al. Acetylation of Smc3 by Eco1 is required for S phase sister chromatid cohesion in both human and yeast. Mol Cell 2008; 31:143-51; PMID:18614053; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. molcel.2008.06.006.
100. Liu J, Krantz ID. Cornelia de Lange syndrome, cohesin, and beyond. Clin Genet 2009; 76:303-14; PMID:19793304; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004. 2009.01271.x.
101. McNairn AJ, Gerton JL. Cohesinopathies: One ring, many obligations. Mutat Res 2008; 647:103-11; PMID:18786550; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2008. 08.010.
102. Vega H, Waisfisz Q, Gordillo M, Sakai N, Yanagihara I, Yamada M, et al. Roberts syndrome is caused by mutations in ESCO2, a human homolog of yeast ECO1 that is essential for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Nat Genet 2005; 37:468-70; PMID:15821733; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng1548.
103. Rabitsch KP, Tóth A, Gálová M, Schleiffer A, Schaffner G, Aigner E, et al. A screen for genes required for meiosis and spore formation based on whole-genome expression. Curr Biol 2001; 11:1001-9; PMID:11470404; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00274-3.
104. Chan RC, Chan A, Jeon M, Wu TF, Pasqualone D, Rougvie AE, et al. Chromosome cohesion is regulated by a clock gene paralogue TIM-1. Nature 2003; 423:1002-9; PMID:12827206; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature01697.
105. Formosa T, Nittis T. Dna2 mutants reveal interactions with Dna polymerase alpha and Ctf4, a Pol alpha accessory factor, and show that full Dna2 helicase activity is not essential for growth. Genetics 1999; 151:1459-70; PMID:10101169.
106. Hanna JS, Kroll ES, Lundblad V, Spencer FA. Saccharomyces cerevisiae CTF18 and CTF4 are required for sister chromatid cohesion. Mol Cell Biol 2001; 21:3144-58; PMID:11287619; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.21.9.3144-3158.2001.
107. Mayer ML, Gygi SP, Aebersold R, Hieter P. Identification of RFC(Ctf18p, Ctf8p, Dcc1p): an alternative RFC complex required for sister chromatid cohesion in S. cerevisiae. Mol Cell 2001; 7:959-70; PMID:11389843; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/S1097-2765(01)00254-4.
108. Naiki T, Kondo T, Nakada D, Matsumoto K, Sugimoto K. Chl12 (Ctf18) forms a novel replication factor C-related complex and functions redundantly with Rad24 in the DNA replication checkpoint pathway. Mol Cell Biol 2001; 21:5838-45; PMID:11486023; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.21.17.5838-5845.2001.
109. Warren CD, Eckley DM, Lee MS, Hanna JS, Hughes A, Peyser B, et al. S-phase checkpoint genes safeguard high-fidelity sister chromatid cohesion. Mol Biol Cell 2004; 15:1724-35; PMID:14742710; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E03-09- 0637.
110. Ansbach AB, Noguchi C, Klansek IW, Heidlebaugh M, Nakamura TM, Noguchi E. RFCCtf18 and the Swi1-Swi3 complex function in separate and redundant pathways required for the stabilization of replication forks to facilitate sister chromatid cohesion in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Biol Cell 2008; 19:595-607; PMID:18045993; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E07-06-0618.
111. Errico A, Cosentino C, Rivera T, Losada A, Schwob E, Hunt T, et al. Tipin/Tim1/And1 protein complex promotes Pol alpha chromatin binding and sister chromatid cohesion. EMBO J 2009; 28:3681-92; PMID:19893489; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/emboj.2009.304.
112. Dheekollu J, Wiedmer A, Hayden J, Speicher D, Gotter AL, Yen T, et al. Timeless links replication termination to mitotic kinase activation. PLoS ONE 2011; 6:e19596; PMID:21573113; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019596.
113. Smith-Roe SL, Patel SS, Simpson DA, Zhou YC, Rao S, Ibrahim JG, et al. Timeless functions independently of the Tim-Tipin complex to promote sister chromatid cohesion in normal human fibroblasts. Cell Cycle 2011; 10:1618-24; PMID:21508667; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.10.10.15613.
114. Wu Y, Suhasini AN, Brosh RM Jr. Welcome the family of FANCJ-like helicases to the block of genome stability maintenance proteins. Cell Mol Life Sci 2009; 66:1209-22; PMID:19099189; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-008-8580- 6.
115. L Holloway S. CHL1 is a nuclear protein with an essential ATP binding site that exhibits a size-dependent effect on chromosome segregation. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28:3056-64; PMID:10931920; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.16. 3056.
116. Ctf18/Dcc1/Ctf8, the helicase Chl1 and the polymerase-alpha- associated protein Ctf4 is essential for chromatid disjunction during meiosis II. J Cell Sci 2004; 117:3547-59; PMID:15226378; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs. 01231.
117. Skibbens RV. Chl1p, a DNA helicase-like protein in budding yeast, functions in sister-chromatid cohesion. Genetics 2004; 166:33-42; PMID:15020404; http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.166.1.33.
118. van der Lelij P, Chrzanowska KH, Godthelp BC, Rooimans MA, Oostra AB, Stumm M, et al. Warsaw breakage syndrome, a cohesinopathy associated with mutations in the XPD helicase family member DDX11/ChlR1. Am J Hum Genet 2010; 86:262-6; PMID:20137776; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.01.008.
119. Parish JL, Rosa J, Wang X, Lahti JM, Doxsey SJ, Androphy EJ. The DNA helicase ChlR1 is required for sister chromatid cohesion in mammalian cells. J Cell Sci 2006; 119:4857-65; PMID:17105772; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.03262.
120. Xu H, Boone C, Brown GW. Genetic dissection of parallel sister-chromatid cohesion pathways. Genetics 2007; 176:1417-29; PMID:17483413; http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.072876.
121. Farina A, Shin JH, Kim DH, Bermudez VP, Kelman Z, Seo YS, et al. Studies with the human cohesin establishment factor, ChlR1. Association of ChlR1 with Ctf18-RFC and Fen1. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:20925-36; PMID:18499658; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M802696200.
122. Liu Y, Kao HI, Bambara RA. Flap endonuclease 1: a central component of DNA metabolism. Annu Rev Biochem 2004; 73:589-615; PMID:15189154; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.012803.092453.
123. Uhlmann F. A matter of choice: the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. EMBO Rep 2009; 10:1095-102; PMID:19745840; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ embor.2009.207.
124. Lengronne A, McIntyre J, Katou Y, Kanoh Y, Hopfner KP, Shirahige K, et al. Establishment of sister chromatid cohesion at the S. cerevisiae replication fork. Mol Cell 2006; 23:787-99; PMID:16962805; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. molcel.2006.08.018.
125. Rudra S, Skibbens RV. Sister chromatid cohesion establishment occurs in concert with lagging strand synthesis. Cell Cycle 2012; 11:2114-21; PMID:22592531; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.20547.
126. Sherwood R, Takahashi TS, Jallepalli PV. Sister acts: coordinating DNA replication and cohesion establishment. Genes Dev 2010; 24:2723-31; PMID:21159813; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1976710.
127. Onn I, Heidinger-Pauli JM, Guacci V, Unal E, Koshland DE. Sister chromatid cohesion: a simple concept with a complex reality. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2008; 24:105-29; PMID:18616427; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio. 24.110707.175350.
128. Noguchi E. Division of labor of the replication fork protection complex subunits in sister chromatid cohesion and Chk1 activation. Cell Cycle 2011; 10:2055-6; PMID:21593589; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.10.13.15805.