RAD51-and MRE11-dependent reassembly of uncoupled CMG helicase complex at collapsed replication forks

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 17-25

  Hashimoto, Yoshitami ^a   Puddu, Fabio ^a   Costanzo, Vincenzo ^a  

^a London Research Institute   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CMG HELICASE; HELICASE; MRE11 PROTEIN; RAD51 PROTEIN; SINGLE STRANDED DNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; EUKARYOTE; GENE REPLICATION; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN REASSEMBLY; REPLISOME;

ANIMALS; BLOTTING, WESTERN; CARRIER PROTEINS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; COMET ASSAY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA HELICASES; DNA REPLICATION; DNA, SINGLE-STRANDED; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; ELECTROPHORESIS, AGAR GEL; FEMALE; MALE; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; MUTATION; OOCYTES; PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN; PROTEIN BINDING; RAD51 RECOMBINASE; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; XENOPUS LAEVIS; XENOPUS PROTEINS;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 84855427966     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: 15459985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.2177     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Michel, B., Grompone, G., Flores, M.J. & Bidnenko, V. Multiple pathways process stalled replication forks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 12783-12788 (2004). (Pubitemid 39167536)
2. Santocanale, C., Sharma, K. & Diffley, J.F. Activation of dormant origins of DNA replication in budding yeast. Genes Dev. 13, 2360-2364 (1999). (Pubitemid 29453606)
3. Woodward, A.M.et al. Excess Mcm2-7 license dormant origins of replication that can be used under conditions of replicative stress. J. Cell Biol. 173, 673-683 (2006). (Pubitemid 46165576)
4. Petermann, E. & Helleday, T. Pathways of mammalian replication fork restart. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 683-687 (2010).
5. Chang, D.J. & Cimprich, K.A. DNA damage tolerance: when it's OK to make mistakes. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5, 82-90 (2009).
6. Andersen, P.L., Xu, F. & Xiao, W. Eukaryotic DNA damage tolerance and translesion synthesis through covalent modifications of PCNA. Cell Res. 18, 162-173 (2008).
7. Daigaku, Y., Davies, A.A. & Ulrich, H.D. Ubiquitin-dependent DNA damage bypass is separable from genome replication. Nature 465, 951-955 (2010).
8. Karras, G.I. & Jentsch, S. The RAD6 DNA damage tolerance pathway operates uncoupled from the replication fork and is functional beyond S phase. Cell 141, 255-267 (2010).
9. Lambert, S.et al. Homologous recombination restarts blocked replication forks at the expense of genome rearrangements by template exchange. Mol. Cell 39, 346-359 (2010).
10. Moriel-Carretero, M. & Aguilera, A. A postincision-deficient TFIIH causes replication fork breakage and uncovers alternative Rad51-or Pol32-mediated restart mechanisms. Mol. Cell 37, 690-701 (2010).
11. Petermann, E., Orta, M.L., Issaeva, N., Schultz, N. & Helleday, T. Hydroxyurea-stalled replication forks become progressively inactivated and require two different RAD51-mediated pathways for restart and repair. Mol. Cell 37, 492-502 (2010).
12. Huertas, P. DNA resection in eukaryotes: deciding how to fix the break. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 11-16 (2010).
13. Llorente, B., Smith, C.E. & Symington, L.S. Break-induced replication: what is it and what is it for? Cell Cycle 7, 859-864 (2008). (Pubitemid 351573777)
14. Lydeard, J.R.et al. Break-induced replication requires all essential DNA replication factors except those specific for pre-RC assembly. Genes Dev. 24, 1133-1144 (2010).
15. Gambus, A.et al. GINS maintains association of Cdc45 with MCM in replisome progression complexes at eukaryotic DNA replication forks. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 358-366 (2006).
16. Tanaka, S. & Araki, H. Regulation of the initiation step of DNA replication by cyclin-dependent kinases. Chromosoma 119, 565-574 (2010).
17. Moyer, S.E., Lewis, P.W. & Botchan, M.R. Isolation of the Cdc45/Mcm2-7/GINS (CMG) complex, a candidate for the eukaryotic DNA replication fork helicase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10236-10241 (2006). (Pubitemid 44051150)
18. Errico, A. & Costanzo, V. Differences in the DNA replication of unicellular eukaryotes and metazoans: known unknowns. EMBO Rep. 11, 270-278 (2010).
19. De Haro, L.P.et al. Metnase promotes restart and repair of stalled and collapsed replication forks. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 5681-5691 (2010).
20. Hashimoto, Y., Chaudhuri, A.R., Lopes, M. & Costanzo, V. Rad51 protects nascent DNA from Mre11-dependent degradation and promotes continuous DNA synthesis. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 1305-1311 (2010).
21. Trenz, K., Errico, A. & Costanzo, V. Plx1 is required for chromosomal DNA replication under stressful conditions. EMBO J. 27, 876-885 (2008). (Pubitemid 351417175)
22. Krokan, H., Wist, E. & Krokan, R.H. Aphidicolin inhibits DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase alpha and isolated nuclei by a similar mechanism. Nucleic Acids Res. 9, 4709-4719 (1981). (Pubitemid 12237221)
23. Sutherland, G.R. The role of nucleotides in human fragile site expression. Mutat. Res. 200, 207-213 (1988).
24. Balestrini, A., Cosentino, C., Errico, A., Garner, E. & Costanzo, V. GEMC1 is a TopBP1-interacting protein required for chromosomal DNA replication. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 484-491 (2010).
25. Chong, J.P., Mahbubani, H.M., Khoo, C.Y. & Blow, J.J. Purification of an MCM-containing complex as a component of the DNA replication licensing system. Nature 375, 418-421 (1995).
26. McGarry, T.J. & Kirschner, M.W. Geminin, an inhibitor of DNA replication, is degraded during mitosis. Cell 93, 1043-1053 (1998). (Pubitemid 28280797)
27. Costanzo, V.et al. Reconstitution of an ATM-dependent checkpoint that inhibits chromosomal DNA replication following DNA damage. Mol. Cell 6, 649-659 (2000).
28. Falck, J., Petrini, J.H., Williams, B.R., Lukas, J. & Bartek, J. The DNA damage-dependent intra-S phase checkpoint is regulated by parallel pathways. Nat. Genet. 30, 290-294 (2002).
29. Edwards, M.C.et al. MCM2-7 complexes bind chromatin in a distributed pattern surrounding the origin recognition complex in Xenopus egg extracts. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 33049-33057 (2002). (Pubitemid 34984820)
30. Pacek, M., Tutter, A.V., Kubota, Y., Takisawa, H. & Walter, J.C. Localization of MCM2-7, Cdc45, and GINS to the site of DNA unwinding during eukaryotic DNA replication. Mol. Cell 21, 581-587 (2006). (Pubitemid 43228013)
31. Mimura, S. & Takisawa, H. Xenopus Cdc45-dependent loading of DNA polymerase alpha onto chromatin under the control of S-phase Cdk. EMBO J. 17, 5699-5707 (1998). (Pubitemid 28445981)
32. Errico, A.et al. Tipin/Tim1/And1 protein complex promotes Pol alpha chromatin binding and sister chromatid cohesion. EMBO J. 28, 3681-3692 (2009).
33. Matsuoka, S.et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 316, 1160-1166 (2007). (Pubitemid 46877472)
34. Sclafani, R.A. & Holzen, T.M. Cell cycle regulation of DNA replication. Annu. Rev. Genet. 41, 237-280 (2007).
35. Meijer, L.et al. Biochemical and cellular effects of roscovitine, a potent and selective inhibitor of the cyclin-dependent kinases cdc2, cdk2 and cdk5. Eur. J. Biochem. 243, 527-536 (1997). (Pubitemid 27060443)
36. Trenz, K., Smith, E., Smith, S. & Costanzo, V. ATM and ATR promote Mre11 dependent restart of collapsed replication forks and prevent accumulation of DNA breaks. EMBO J. 25, 1764-1774 (2006).
37. Bryant, H.E.et al. PARP is activated at stalled forks to mediate Mre11-dependent replication restart and recombination. EMBO J. 28, 2601-2615 (2009).
38. Ira, G. & Haber, J.E. Characterization of RAD51-independent break-induced replication that acts preferentially with short homologous sequences. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 6384-6392 (2002).
39. Davis, A.P. & Symington, L.S. RAD51-dependent break-induced replication in yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 2344-2351 (2004). (Pubitemid 38325991)
40. Malkova, A.et al. RAD51-independent break-induced replication to repair a broken chromosome depends on a distant enhancer site. Genes Dev. 15, 1055-1060 (2001). (Pubitemid 32417298)
41. Signon, L., Malkova, A., Naylor, M.L., Klein, H. & Haber, J.E. Genetic requirements for RAD51-and RAD54-independent break-induced replication repair of a chromosomal double-strand break. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 2048-2056 (2001). (Pubitemid 32479627)
42. Kraus, E., Leung, W.Y. & Haber, J.E. Break-induced replication: a review and an example in budding yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 8255-8262 (2001). (Pubitemid 32678021)
43. Li, S.J. & Hochstrasser, M. The Ulp1 SUMO isopeptidase: distinct domains required for viability, nuclear envelope localization, and substrate specificity. J. Cell Biol. 160, 1069-1081 (2003). (Pubitemid 36443875)
44. Kubota, Y.et al. A novel ring-like complex of Xenopus proteins essential for the initiation of DNA replication. Genes Dev. 17, 1141-1152 (2003). (Pubitemid 36534988)
45. Takayama, Y.et al. GINS, a novel multiprotein complex required for chromosomal DNA replication in budding yeast. Genes Dev. 17, 1153-1165 (2003). (Pubitemid 36534989)
46. Costa, A.et al. The structural basis for MCM2-7 helicase activation by GINS and Cdc45. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 471-477 (2011).
47. Bruck, I. & Kaplan, D.L. GINS and Sld3 compete with one another for Mcm2-7 and Cdc45 binding. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 14157-14167 (2011).
48. Bjergbaek, L., Cobb, J.A., Tsai-Pflugfelder, M. & Gasser, S.M. Mechanistically distinct roles for Sgs1p in checkpoint activation and replication fork maintenance. EMBO J. 24, 405-417 (2005). (Pubitemid 40216144)
49. Cobb, J.A.et al. Replisome instability, fork collapse, and gross chromosomal rearrangements arise synergistically from Mec1 kinase and RecQ helicase mutations. Genes Dev. 19, 3055-3069 (2005). (Pubitemid 41798120)
50. Tittel-Elmer, M., Alabert, C., Pasero, P. & Cobb, J.A. The MRX complex stabilizes the replisome independently of the S phase checkpoint during replication stress. EMBO J. 28, 1142-1156 (2009).
51. Muramatsu, S., Hirai, K., Tak, Y.S., Kamimura, Y. & Araki, H. CDK-dependent complex formation between replication proteins Dpb11, Sld2, Pol ε, and GINS in budding yeast. Genes Dev. 24, 602-612 (2010).
52. Kawamoto, T.et al. Dual roles for DNA polymerase eta in homologous DNA recombination and translesion DNA synthesis. Mol. Cell 20, 793-799 (2005). (Pubitemid 41740700)
53. McIlwraith, M.J.et al. Human DNA polymerase eta promotes DNA synthesis from strand invasion intermediates of homologous recombination. Mol. Cell 20, 783-792 (2005).
54. Stephens, P.J.et al. Complex landscapes of somatic rearrangement in human breast cancer genomes. Nature 462, 1005-1010 (2009).
55. Buis, J.et al. Mre11 nuclease activity has essential roles in DNA repair and genomic stability distinct from ATM activation. Cell 135, 85-96 (2008).