Innate immunity at mucosal surfaces: The IRE1-RIDD-RIG-I pathway

Trends in Immunology

Volumn 36, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 401-409

  Lencer, Wayne I ^a,b   DeLuca, Heidi ^a   Grey, Michael J ^a   Cho, Jin Ah ^a,b  

^a BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Inflammation; Innate immunity; Intestine; IRE1; Mucosal immunity; RIG I

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATING TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 6; CHOLERA TOXIN; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; PATTERN RECOGNITION RECEPTOR; PROTEIN IRE1; RETINOIC ACID INDUCIBLE PROTEIN I; RIDD PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; DDX58 PROTEIN, HUMAN; DEAD BOX PROTEIN; ERN1 PROTEIN, HUMAN; PROTEIN SERINE THREONINE KINASE; RIBONUCLEASE;

ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM ASSOCIATED DEGRADATION; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM MEMBRANE; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM STRESS; EVOLUTION; HOST CELL; HUMAN; IMMUNE SYSTEM; IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY; IMMUNOSURVEILLANCE; INFECTION; INFLAMMATION; INNATE IMMUNITY; MICROORGANISM; MUCOSA; MUCOSAL IMMUNITY; NONHUMAN; PATHOGENESIS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; UNFOLDED PROTEIN RESPONSE; IMMUNOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY;

DEAD BOX PROTEIN 58; DEAD-BOX RNA HELICASES; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; ENDORIBONUCLEASES; HUMANS; IMMUNITY, INNATE; IMMUNITY, MUCOSAL; MUCOUS MEMBRANE; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84937639173     PISSN: 14714906     EISSN: 14714981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2015.05.006     Document Type: Review

References (106)

1. Rutkowski D.T., Hegde R.S. Regulation of basal cellular physiology by the homeostatic unfolded protein response. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 189:783-794.
2. Walter P., Ron D. The unfolded protein response: from stress pathway to homeostatic regulation. Science 2011, 334:1081-1086.
3. Friedman J.R., Voeltz G.K. The ER in 3D: a multifunctional dynamic membrane network. Trends Cell Biol. 2011, 21:709-717.
4. Jager R., et al. The unfolded protein response at the crossroads of cellular life and death during endoplasmic reticulum stress. Biol. Cell 2012, 104:259-270.
5. Zhang K., Kaufman R.J. From endoplasmic-reticulum stress to the inflammatory response. Nature 2008, 454:455-462.
6. Kohno K. Stress-sensing mechanisms in the unfolded protein response: similarities and differences between yeast and mammals. J. Biochem. 2010, 147:27-33.
7. Mori K. Signalling pathways in the unfolded protein response: development from yeast to mammals. J. Biochem. 2009, 146:743-750.
8. Gardner B.M., et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress sensing in the unfolded protein response. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2013, 5:a013169.
9. Richardson C.E., et al. An essential role for XBP-1 in host protection against immune activation in C. elegans. Nature 2010, 463:1092-1095.
10. Todd D.J., et al. The endoplasmic reticulum stress response in immunity and autoimmunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 8:663-674.
11. Janssens S., et al. Emerging functions of the unfolded protein response in immunity. Nat. Immunol. 2014, 15:910-919.
12. Cox J.S., et al. Transcriptional induction of genes encoding endoplasmic reticulum resident proteins requires a transmembrane protein kinase. Cell 1993, 73:1197-1206.
13. +/CDC28-related kinase activity is required for signaling from the ER to the nucleus. Cell 1993, 74:743-756.
14. Cho J.A., et al. The unfolded protein response element IRE1α senses bacterial proteins invading the ER to activate RIG-I and innate immune signaling. Cell Host Microbe 2013, 13:558-569.
15. Eckard S.C., et al. The SKIV2L RNA exosome limits activation of the RIG-I-like receptors. Nat. Immunol. 2014, 15:839-845.
16. Korennykh A., Walter P. Structural basis of the unfolded protein response. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2012, 28:251-277.
17. Credle J.J., et al. On the mechanism of sensing unfolded protein in the endoplasmic reticulum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:18773-18784.
18. Zhou J., et al. The crystal structure of human IRE1 luminal domain reveals a conserved dimerization interface required for activation of the unfolded protein response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:14343-14348.
19. Kimata Y., Kohno K. Endoplasmic reticulum stress-sensing mechanisms in yeast and mammalian cells. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2011, 23:135-142.
20. Gardner B.M., Walter P. Unfolded proteins are Ire1-activating ligands that directly induce the unfolded protein response. Science 2011, 333:1891-1894.
21. Okamura K., et al. Dissociation of Kar2p/BiP from an ER sensory molecule, Ire1p, triggers the unfolded protein response in yeast. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000, 279:445-450.
22. Bertolotti A., et al. Dynamic interaction of BiP and ER stress transducers in the unfolded-protein response. Nat. Cell Biol. 2000, 2:326-332.
23. Aragon T., et al. Messenger RNA targeting to endoplasmic reticulum stress signalling sites. Nature 2009, 457:736-740.
24. Li H., et al. Mammalian endoplasmic reticulum stress sensor IRE1 signals by dynamic clustering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:16113-16118.
25. Korennykh A.V., et al. Structural and functional basis for RNA cleavage by Ire1. BMC Biol. 2011, 9:47.
26. Korennykh A.V., et al. The unfolded protein response signals through high-order assembly of Ire1. Nature 2009, 457:687-693.
27. Kimata Y., et al. Two regulatory steps of ER-stress sensor Ire1 involving its cluster formation and interaction with unfolded proteins. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 179:75-86.
28. Ghosh R., et al. Allosteric inhibition of the IRE1α RNase preserves cell viability and function during endoplasmic reticulum stress. Cell 2014, 158:534-548.
29. Kimata Y., et al. A role for BiP as an adjustor for the endoplasmic reticulum stress-sensing protein Ire1. J. Cell Biol. 2004, 167:445-456.
30. Oikawa D., et al. Activation of mammalian IRE1α upon ER stress depends on dissociation of BiP rather than on direct interaction with unfolded proteins. Exp. Cell Res. 2009, 315:2496-2504.
31. Volmer R., et al. Membrane lipid saturation activates endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response transducers through their transmembrane domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:4628-4633.
32. Hetz C., et al. Proapoptotic BAX and BAK modulate the unfolded protein response by a direct interaction with IRE1α. Science 2006, 312:572-576.
33. Hetz C., Glimcher L.H. Fine-tuning of the unfolded protein response: assembling the IRE1α interactome. Mol. Cell 2009, 35:551-561.
34. Korennykh A.V., et al. Cofactor-mediated conformational control in the bifunctional kinase/RNase Ire1. BMC Biol. 2011, 9:48.
35. Wiseman R.L., et al. Flavonol activation defines an unanticipated ligand-binding site in the kinase-RNase domain of IRE1. Mol. Cell 2010, 38:291-304.
36. Calfon M., et al. IRE1 couples endoplasmic reticulum load to secretory capacity by processing the XBP-1 mRNA. Nature 2002, 415:92-96.
37. Gonzalez T.N., et al. Mechanism of non-spliceosomal mRNA splicing in the unfolded protein response pathway. EMBO J. 1999, 18:3119-3132.
38. Kawahara T., et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced mRNA splicing permits synthesis of transcription factor Hac1p/Ern4p that activates the unfolded protein response. Mol. Biol. Cell 1997, 8:1845-1862.
39. Sidrauski C., Walter P. The transmembrane kinase Ire1p is a site-specific endonuclease that initiates mRNA splicing in the unfolded protein response. Cell 1997, 90:1031-1039.
40. Urano F., et al. Coupling of stress in the ER to activation of JNK protein kinases by transmembrane protein kinase IRE1. Science 2000, 287:664-666.
41. Hu P., et al. Autocrine tumor necrosis factor alpha links endoplasmic reticulum stress to the membrane death receptor pathway through IRE1α-mediated NF-κB activation and down-regulation of TRAF2 expression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006, 26:3071-3084.
42. Hollien J., Weissman J.S. Decay of endoplasmic reticulum-localized mRNAs during the unfolded protein response. Science 2006, 313:104-107.
43. Hollien J., et al. Regulated Ire1-dependent decay of messenger RNAs in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 186:323-331.
44. Reid D.W., et al. The unfolded protein response triggers selective mRNA release from the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell 2014, 158:1362-1374.
45. Upton J.P., et al. IRE1α cleaves select microRNAs during ER stress to derepress translation of proapoptotic caspase-2. Science 2012, 338:818-822.
46. Oslowski C.M., et al. Thioredoxin-interacting protein mediates ER stress-induced beta cell death through initiation of the inflammasome. Cell Metab. 2012, 16:265-273.
47. + dendritic cells. Nat. Immunol. 2014, 15:248-257.
48. So J.S., et al. Silencing of lipid metabolism genes through IRE1α-mediated mRNA decay lowers plasma lipids in mice. Cell Metab. 2012, 16:487-499.
49. Han D., et al. IRE1α kinase activation modes control alternate endoribonuclease outputs to determine divergent cell fates. Cell 2009, 138:562-575.
50. Lee A.H., et al. Dual and opposing roles of the unfolded protein response regulated by IRE1α and XBP1 in proinsulin processing and insulin secretion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:8885-8890.
51. Hasnain S.Z., et al. The interplay between endoplasmic reticulum stress and inflammation. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2012, 90:260-270.
52. Lerner A.G., et al. IRE1α induces thioredoxin-interacting protein to activate the NLRP3 inflammasome and promote programmed cell death under irremediable ER stress. Cell Metab. 2012, 16:250-264.
53. Martinon F., et al. TLR activation of the transcription factor XBP1 regulates innate immune responses in macrophages. Nat. immunol. 2010, 11:411-418.
54. Martinon F., Glimcher L.H. Regulation of innate immunity by signaling pathways emerging from the endoplasmic reticulum. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2011, 23:35-40.
55. Bork P., Sander C. A hybrid protein kinase-RNase in an interferon-induced pathway?. FEBS Lett. 1993, 334:149-152.
56. Malathi K., et al. Small self-RNA generated by RNase L amplifies antiviral innate immunity. Nature 2007, 448:816-819.
57. Bowzard J.B., et al. PAMPer and tRIGer: ligand-induced activation of RIG-I. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2011, 36:314-319.
58. Hornung V., et al. 5'-Triphosphate RNA is the ligand for RIG-I. Science 2006, 314:994-997.
59. Pichlmair A., et al. RIG-I-mediated antiviral responses to single-stranded RNA bearing 5'-phosphates. Science 2006, 314:997-1001.
60. Zheng C., Wu H. RIG-I 'sees' the 5'-triphosphate. Structure 2010, 18:894-896.
61. Poeck H., et al. Recognition of RNA virus by RIG-I results in activation of CARD9 and inflammasome signaling for interleukin 1 beta production. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 11:63-69.
62. Tam A.B., et al. Ire1 has distinct catalytic mechanisms for XBP1/HAC1 splicing and RIDD. Cell Rep. 2014, 9:850-858.
63. Lee A.H., et al. Regulation of hepatic lipogenesis by the transcription factor XBP1. Science 2008, 320:1492-1496.
64. Kaser A., et al. XBP1 links ER stress to intestinal inflammation and confers genetic risk for human inflammatory bowel disease. Cell 2008, 134:743-756.
65. Bertolotti A., et al. Increased sensitivity to dextran sodium sulfate colitis in IRE1β-deficient mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2001, 107:585-593.
66. Wang X.Z., et al. Cloning of mammalian Ire1 reveals diversity in the ER stress responses. EMBO J. 1998, 17:5708-5717.
67. Imagawa Y., et al. RNase domains determine the functional difference between IRE1α and IRE1β. FEBS Lett. 2008, 582:656-660.
68. Duerkop B.A., et al. Immune responses to the microbiota at the intestinal mucosal surface. Immunity 2009, 31:368-376.
69. Huttenhower C. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 2012, 486:207-214.
70. Ley R.E., et al. Worlds within worlds: evolution of the vertebrate gut microbiota. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 6:776-788.
71. Backhed F., et al. Host-bacterial mutualism in the human intestine. Science 2005, 307:1915-1920.
72. Martino M.B., et al. The ER stress transducer IRE1β is required for airway epithelial mucin production. Mucosal Immunol. 2013, 6:639-654.
73. Tsuru A., et al. Negative feedback by IRE1β optimizes mucin production in goblet cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:2864-2869.
74. Iwawaki T., et al. Translational control by the ER transmembrane kinase/ribonuclease IRE1 under ER stress. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001, 3:158-164.
75. Iqbal J., et al. IRE1β inhibits chylomicron production by selectively degrading MTP mRNA. Cell Metab. 2008, 7:445-455.
76. Elson C.O., Ealding W. Generalized systemic and mucosal immunity in mice after mucosal stimulation with cholera toxin. J. Immunol. 1984, 132:2736-2741.
77. Dertzbaugh M.T., Elson C.O. Cholera toxin as a mucosal adjuvant. Topics in Vaccine Adjuvant Research 1990, 119-131. CRC Press. D.R. Spriggs, W.C. Koff (Eds.).
78. Elson C.O., Ealing W. Genetic control of the murine immune response to cholera toxin. J. Immunol. 1985, 135:930-932.
79. Anosova N.G., et al. Cholera toxin, E. coli heat-labile toxin, and non-toxic derivatives induce dendritic cell migration into the follicle-associated epithelium of Peyer's patches. Mucosal Immunol. 2008, 1:59-67.
80. Dickinson B.L., Clements J.D. Dissociation of Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin adjuvanticity from ADP-ribosyltransferase activity. Infect. Immun. 1995, 63:1617-1623.
81. Bhuiyan T.R., et al. Cholera caused by Vibrio cholerae O1 induces T-cell responses in the circulation. Infect. Immun. 2009, 77:1888-1893.
82. + T-cell responses in blood and intestinal mucosa of infected humans. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2011, 18:1371-1377.
83. Dangl J.L., Jones J.D. Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection. Nature 2001, 411:826-833.
84. Vance R.E., et al. Patterns of pathogenesis: discrimination of pathogenic and nonpathogenic microbes by the innate immune system. Cell Host Microbe 2009, 6:10-21.
85. Keestra A.M., et al. Manipulation of small Rho GTPases is a pathogen-induced process detected by NOD1. Nature 2013, 496:233-237.
86. Xu H., et al. Innate immune sensing of bacterial modifications of Rho GTPases by the Pyrin inflammasome. Nature 2014, 513:237-241.
87. Celli J., Tsolis R.M. Bacteria, the endoplasmic reticulum and the unfolded protein response: friends or foes?. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 13:71-82.
88. Medzhitov R., Janeway C.A. Decoding the patterns of self and nonself by the innate immune system. Science 2002, 296:298-300.
89. Claudio N., et al. Mapping the crossroads of immune activation and cellular stress response pathways. EMBO J. 2013, 32:1214-1224.
90. Pahl H.L., Baeuerle P.A. Expression of influenza virus hemagglutinin activates transcription factor NF-kappa B. J. Virol. 1995, 69:1480-1484.
91. Pahl H.L., et al. Activation of transcription factor NF-kappaB by the adenovirus E3/19K protein requires its ER retention. J. Cell Biol. 1996, 132:511-522.
92. 5 subtilase cytotoxin inactivates the endoplasmic reticulum chaperone BiP. Nature 2006, 443:548-552.
93. Wolfson J.J., et al. Subtilase cytotoxin activates PERK. IRE1 and ATF6 endoplasmic reticulum stress-signalling pathways. Cell. Microbiol. 2008, 1775-1786.
94. Stahl S., et al. Cytomegalovirus downregulates IRE1 to repress the unfolded protein response. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9:e1003544.
95. Janeway C.A., Medzhitov R. Innate immune recognition. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2002, 20:197-216.
96. Oikawa D., et al. Direct association of unfolded proteins with mammalian ER stress sensor. IRE1β. PLoS One 2012, 7:e51290.
97. Dufey E., et al. Cellular mechanisms of endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling in health and disease. 1. An overview. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2014, 307:C582-C594.
98. Hayashi F., et al. The innate immune response to bacterial flagellin is mediated by Toll-like receptor 5. Nature 2001, 410:1099-1103.
99. Eletto D., et al. Protein disulfide isomerase A6 controls the decay of IRE1α signaling via disulfide-dependent association. Mol. Cell 2014, 53:562-576.
100. English A.R., Voeltz G.K. Endoplasmic reticulum structure and interconnections with other organelles. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2013, 5:a013227.
101. Dixit E., et al. Peroxisomes are signaling platforms for antiviral innate immunity. Cell 2010, 141:668-681.
102. Horner S.M., et al. Mitochondrial-associated endoplasmic reticulum membranes (MAM) form innate immune synapses and are targeted by hepatitis C virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:14590-14595.
103. Inoue T., et al. How viruses and toxins disassemble to enter host cells. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 65:287-305.
104. Johannes L., Romer W. Shiga toxins-from cell biology to biomedical applications. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8:105-116.
105. Cho J.A., et al. Insights on the trafficking and retro-translocation of glycosphingolipid-binding bacterial toxins. Front Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2012, 2:51.
106. Ruggiano A., et al. Quality control: ER-associated degradation: protein quality control and beyond. Cell Biol. 2014, 204:869-879.