Regulation During Cooperative and Collaborative Learning: A Theory-Based Review of Terms and Concepts

Educational Psychologist

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 97-119

  Schoor, Cornelia ^a   Narciss, Susanne ^b   Körndle, Hermann ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BAMBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PASSAU   (Germany)

^c DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930031227     PISSN: 00461520     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2015.1038540     Document Type: Article

References (115)

1. References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the review.
2. Ashby, W. R. (1964). An introduction to cybernetics. London, England: Routledge.
3. Azevedo, R., Winters, F. I., & Moos, D. C. (2004). Can students collaboratively use hypermedia to learn science? The dynamics of self- and other-regulatory processes in an ecology classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31, 215–245. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/HFT6-8EB1-TN99-MJVQ
4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Routledge.
5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Routledge.
6. Bennett, N., & Dunne, E. (1992). Managing classroom groups. Hemel Hempstead, England: Routledge.
7. *Boekaerts, M. (2011). What have we learned about the social context-student engagement link? Teachers College Record, 113, 375–393.
8. Bratman, M. E. (2009). Shared agency. In C. Mantzavinos (Ed.), Philosophy of the social sciences: Philosophical theory and scientific practice (pp. 41–59). Cambridge, England: Routledge.
9. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543065003245
10. *Chan, C. K. K. (2012). Co-regulation of learning in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 7, 63–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-012-9086-z
11. Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP Framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49, 219–243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823
12. Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). Washington, DC: Routledge.
13. Damsa, C. I., Kirschner, P. A., Andriessen, J. E., Erkens, G., & Sins, P. H. (2010). Shared epistemic agency: An empirical study of an emergent construct. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19, 143–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10508401003708381
14. *DiDonato, N. C. (2013). Effective self- and co-regulation in collaborative learning groups: An analysis of how students regulate problem solving of authentic interdisciplinary tasks. Instructional Science, 41, 25–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9206-9
15. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by ‘collaborative learning’? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning (pp. 1–19). Oxford, England: Routledge.
16. Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O'Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reimann (Eds.), Learning in humans and machine (pp. 189–211). Oxford, England: Routledge.
17. Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning. From design to orchestration. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. De Jong, A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning. Principles and products (pp. 3–19). Heidelberg, Germany: Routledge.
18. Dinsmore, D. L., Alexander, P. A., & Loughlin, S. M. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 391–409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9083-6
19. *Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition. Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13, 277–287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.277
20. Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013). Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist, 48, 56–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.748005
21. *Goos, M., Galbraith, P., & Renshaw, P. (2002). Socially mediated metacognition: creating collaborative zones of proximal development in small group problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 193–223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1016209010120
22. *Grau, V., & Whitebread, D. (2012). Self and social regulation of learning during collaborative activities in the classroom: The interplay of individual and group cognition. Learning and Instruction, 22, 401–412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.03.003
23. Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). A theoretical review of Winne and Hadwin's model of self-regulated learning: New perspectives and directions. Review of Educational Research, 77, 334–372. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/003465430303953
24. Greeno, J. G. (2006). Learning in activity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 79–96). Cambridge, England: Routledge.
25. Greitemeyer, T., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2003). Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: Beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 322–339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.322
26. Gross, J. J. (2001). Emotion regulation in adulthood: Timing is everything. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 214–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00152
27. *Hadwin, A. F., & Järvelä, S. (2011). Introduction to a special issue on social aspects of self-regulated learning: Where social and self meet in the strategic regulation of learning. Teachers College Record, 113, 235–239.
28. *Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 65–84). New York, NY: Routledge.
29. *Hadwin, A. F., & Oshige, M. (2011). Self-Regulation, coregulation, and socially shared regulation: Exploring perspectives of social in self-regulated learning theory. Teachers College Record, 113, 240–264.
30. *Hadwin, A. F., Oshige, M., Gress, C. L. Z., & Winne, P. H. (2010). Innovative ways for using gStudy to orchestrate and research social aspects of self-regulated learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 794–805. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.06.007
31. Hadwin, A. F., Wozney, L., & Pontin, O. (2005). Scaffolding the appropriation of self-regulatory activity: A socio-cultural analysis of changes in teacher–student discourse about a graduate research portfolio. Instructional Science, 33, 413–450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1274-7
32. *Hurme, T.-R., & Järvelä, S. (2005). Students' activity in computer-supported collaborative problem solving in mathematics. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 10, 49–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10758-005-4579-3
33. *Hurme, T.-R., Merenluoto, K., & Järvelä, S. (2009). Socially shared metacognition of pre-service primary teachers in a computer-supported mathematics course and their feelings of task difficulty: A case study. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15, 503–524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13803610903444659
34. Hutchins, E. (1995). How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science, 19, 265–288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1903_1
35. *Iiskala, T., Vauras, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Socially-shared metacognition in peer learning? Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 1, 147–178.
36. *Iiskala, T., Vauras, M., Lehtinen, E., & Salonen, P. (2011). Socially shared metacognition of dyads of pupils in collaborative mathematical problem-solving processes. Learning and Instruction, 21, 379–393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.05.002
37. *Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G., & Jaspers, J. (2007). Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? Computers & Education, 49, 1037–1065. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.004
38. *Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P., & Kanselaar, G. (2012). Task-related and social regulation during online collaborative learning. Metacognition and Learning, 7, 25–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-010-9061-5
39. *Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48, 25–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.748006
40. *Järvelä, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2011). Socially constructed self-regulated learning and motivation regulation in collaborative learning groups. Teachers College Record, 113, 350–374.
41. *Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., & Näykki, P. (2013). Analyzing regulation of motivation as an individual and social process. A situated approach. In S. Volet & M. Vauras (Eds.), Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation (pp. 170–187). London, England: Routledge.
42. *Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., & Veermans, M. (2008). Understanding the dynamics of motivation in socially shared learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 122–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2007.11.012
43. *Järvelä, S., Näykki, P., Laru, J., & Luokkanen, T. (2007). Structuring and regulating collaborative learning in higher education with wireless networks and mobile tools. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 71–79.
44. *Järvelä, S., Volet, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2010). Research on motivation in collaborative learning: Moving beyond the cognitive-situative divide and combining individual and social processes. Educational Psychologist, 45, 15–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520903433539
45. *Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2009). Emotion control in collaborative learning situations: Do students regulate emotions evoked by social challenges. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 463–481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709909X402811
46. *Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2013). Regulating emotions together for motivated collaboration. In M. Baker, J. Andriessen, & S. Järvelä (Eds.), Affective learning together. Social and emotional dimensions of collaborative learning (pp. 162–181). London, England: Routledge.
47. *Järvenoja, H., Volet, S., & Järvelä, S. (2013). Regulation of emotions in socially challenging learning situations: An instrument to measure the adaptive and social nature of the regulation process. Educational Psychology, 33, 31–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2012.742334
48. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1992). Positive interdependence: Key to effective cooperation. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups. The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 174–199). New York, NY: Routledge.
49. Kaplan, A. (2008). Clarifying metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning: What's the purpose? Educational Psychology Review, 20, 477–484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9087-2
50. Kerr, N. L., & Bruun, S. E. (1983). Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.78
51. Koole, S. L. (2009). The psychology of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Cognition & Emotion, 23, 4–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699930802619031
52. *Kumar, V. S., Gress, C. L. Z., Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (2010). Assessing process in CSCL: An ontological approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 825–834. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.07.004
53. *Lajoie, S. P. (2008). Metacognition, self regulation, and self-regulated learning: A rose by any other name? Educational Psychology Review, 20, 469–475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9088-1
54. *Lajoie, S. P., & Lu, J. (2012). Supporting collaboration with technology: does shared cognition lead to co-regulation in medicine? Metacognition and Learning, 7, 45–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9077-5
55. *Liu, L., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2010). Conceptual representations embodied in hypermedia: Promoting co-regulated learning. In M. S. Khine & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning: cognition, computers and collaboration in education (pp. 341–356). New York, NY: Routledge.
56. Martin, J. (2004). Self-regulated learning, social cognitive theory, and agency. Educational Psychologist, 39, 135–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_4
57. Martin, J. (2007). The selves of educational psychology: Conceptions, contexts, and critical considerations. Educational Psychologist, 42, 79–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263244
58. McCaslin, M. (2009). Co-regulation of student motivation and emergent identity. Educational Psychologist, 44, 137–146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520902832384
59. McCaslin, M., & Burross, H. L. (2011). Research on individual differences within a sociocultural perspective: Co-regulation and adaptive learning. Teachers College Record, 113, 325–349.
60. McCaslin, M., & Hickey, D. T. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A Vygotskian view. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 227–252). New York, NY: Routledge.
61. Meier, A., & Spada, H. (2007). Information pooling and processing in group problem solving: Analysis and promotion of collaborative inferences from distributed information. In D. McNamara & J. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society (pp. 473–479). Austin, TX: Routledge.
62. *Molenaar, I., van Boxtel, C. A. M., & Sleegers, P. J. C. (2011). Metacognitive scaffolding in an innovative learning arrangement. Instructional Science, 39, 785–803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9154-1
63. Moreland, R. L. (2010). Are dyads really groups? Small Group Research, 41, 251–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496409358618
64. *Morris, R., Hadwin, A. F., Gress, C. L. Z., Miller, M., Fior, M., Church, H., & Winne, P. H. (2010). Designing roles, scripts, and prompts to support CSCL in gstudy. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 815–824. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.001
65. Narciss, S. (2008). Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. J. G. Van Merrienboer, & M. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 125–144). Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
66. Näykki, P., Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., & Järvenoja, H. (2014). Socio-emotional conflict in collaborative learning—A process-oriented case study in a higher education context. International Journal of Educational Research, 68, 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2014.07.001
67. Nolen, S. B., & Ward, C. J. (2008). Sociocultural and situative approaches to studying motivation. In M. L. Maehr, S. A. Karabenick, & T. C. Urdan (Eds.), Social psychological perspectives. Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 15, pp. 425–460). Bingley, England: Routledge.
68. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
69. *Perry, N. E., & Winne, P. H. (2013). Tracing students' regulation of learning in complex collaborative tasks. In S. Volet & M. Vauras (Eds.), Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation (pp. 45–66). London, England: Routledge.
70. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Routledge.
71. Powers, W. T. (1973). Feedback: Beyond behaviorism. Science, 179, 351–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.179.4071.351
72. Resnick, L. B. (1991). Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 1–20). Washington, DC: Routledge.
73. *Rogat, T. K., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2011). Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups: An analysis of the interplay between quality of social regulation and group processes. Cognition and Instruction, 29, 375–415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2011.607930
74. *Rogat, T. K., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2013). Understanding quality variation in socially shared regulation. A focus on methodology. In S. Volet & M. Vauras (Eds.), Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation (pp. 102–124). London, England: Routledge.
75. *Romero, M., & Lambropoulos, N. (2011). Internal and external regulation to support knowledge construction and convergence in computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL). Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9, 309–329.
76. Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O'Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). Heidelberg, Germany: Routledge.
77. Roth, A. S. (2011). Shared agency. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/shared-agency/.
78. *Saab, N. (2012). Team regulation, regulation of social activities or co-regulation: Different labels for effective regulation of learning in CSCL. Metacognition and Learning, 7, 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9085-5
79. *Saab, N., van Joolingen, W., & van Hout-Wolters, B. (2012). Support of the collaborative inquiry learning process: influence of support on task and team regulation. Metacognition and Learning, 7, 7–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9068-6
80. *Salonen, P., Vauras, M., & Efklides, A. (2005). Social interaction—What can it tell us about metacognition and coregulation in learning? European Psychologist, 10, 199–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.10.3.199
81. *Salovaara, H., & Järvelä, S. (2003). Student' strategic actions in computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning Environments Research, 6, 267–284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1027379824485
82. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–115). Cambridge, England: Routledge.
83. *Schoor, C., & Bannert, M. (2012). Exploring regulatory processes during a computer-supported collaborative learning task using process mining. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1321–1331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.016
84. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1997). Social origins of self-regulatory competence. Educational Psychologist, 32, 195–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3204_1
85. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (1998). Self-regulated learning. From teaching to self-reflective practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
86. Searle, J. (1990). Collective intentions and actions. In P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan, & M. E. Pollack (Eds.), Intentions in communication (pp. 401–415). Cambridge, MA: Routledge.
87. *Shi, Y., Frederiksen, C. H., & Muis, K. R. (2013). A cross-cultural study of self-regulated learning in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 23, 52–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.007
88. Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2011). A meta-analysis of self-regulated learning in work-related training and educational attainment: What we know and where we need to go. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 421–442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0022777
89. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467–1478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467
90. Strijbos, J.-W., Martens, R. L., Jochems, W. M. G., & Broers, N. J. (2004). The effect of functional roles on group efficiency: Using multilevel modeling and content analysis to investigate computer-supported collaboration in small groups. Small Group Research, 35, 195–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496403260843
91. Thiede, K. W., & Dunlosky, J. (1999). Toward a general model of self-regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1024–1037.
92. Thompson, L., & Fine, G. A. (1999). Socially shared cognition, affect, and behavior: A review and integration. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 278–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0304_1
93. *Vauras, M., Iiskala, T., Kajamies, A., Kinnunen, R., & Lehtinen, E. (2003). Shared-regulation and motivation of collaborating peers: A case analysis. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 46, 19–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.2117/psysoc.2003.19
94. *Vauras, M., Kinnunen, R., Kajamies, A., & Lehtinen, E. (2013). Interpersonal regulation in instructional interaction. A dynamic systems analysis of scaffolding. In S. Volet & M. Vauras (Eds.), Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation (pp. 125–146). London, England: Routledge.
95. *Vauras, M., Salonen, P., & Kinnunen, R. (2008). Influences of group processes and interpersonal regulation on motivation, affect and achievement. In M. L. Maehr, S. A. Karabenick, & T. C. Urdan (Eds.), Social psychological perspectives. Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 15, pp. 275–314). Bingley, England: Routledge.
96. *Vauras, M., & Volet, S. (2013). The study of interpersonal regulation in learning and its challenge to the research methodology. In S. Volet & M. Vauras (Eds.), Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation (pp. 1–13). London, England: Routledge.
97. *Volet, S., & Summers, M. (2013). Interpersonal regulation in collaborative learning activities. Reflections on emerging research methodologies. In S. Volet & M. Vauras (Eds.), Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation (pp. 204–220). London, England: Routledge.
98. *Volet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained? Learning and Instruction, 19, 128–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.001
99. *Volet, S., Vauras, M., Khosa, D., & Iiskala, T. (2013). Metacognitive regulation in collaborative learning. Conceptual developments and methodological contextualizations. In S. Volet & M. Vauras (Eds.), Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation (pp. 67–101). London, England: Routledge.
100. *Volet, S., Vauras, M., & Salonen, P. (2009). Self- and social regulation in learning contexts: An integrative perspective. Educational Psychologist, 44, 215–226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520903213584
101. Wang, S.-L., & Lin, S. S. J. (2007). The effects of group composition of self-efficacy and collective efficacy on computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2256–2268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.03.005
102. Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841–873). New York, NY: Routledge.
103. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2007). Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: concepts and assessment. Learning and Instruction, 17, 416–426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.03.007
104. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, England: Routledge.
105. Wertsch, J., & Bivens, J. (1992). The social origins of individual mental functioning: Alternatives and Perspectives. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 14, 35–44.
106. *Whitebread, D., Bingham, S., Grau, V., Pino Pasternak, D., & Sangster, C. (2007). Development of metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children: Role of collaborative and peer-assisted learning. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 6, 433–455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/194589507787382043
107. Williams, K. D. (2010). Dyads can be groups (and often are). Small Group Research, 41, 268–274. doi: 10.1177/1046496409358619
108. Winne, P. H. (2014). Issues in researching self-regulated learning as patterns of events. Metacognition and Learning, 9, 229–237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9113-3
109. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
110. *Winne, P. H., Hadwin, A. F., & Perry, N. E. (2013). Metacognition and computer-supported collaborative learning. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, C. A. Chinn, C. K. K. Chan, & A. O'Donnell (Eds.), The international handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 462–479). New York, NY: Routledge.
111. *Winters, F. I., & Alexander, P. A. (2011). Peer collaboration: the relation of regulatory behaviors to learning with hypermedia. Instructional Science, 39, 407–427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9134-5
112. *Winters, F. I., & Azevedo, R. (2005). High-school students' regulation of learning during computer-based science inquiry. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33, 189–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/F7HM-9JN5-JUX8-4BM9
113. Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 189–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3804_1
114. Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329–339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329
115. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation. A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Routledge.