Students' activity in computer-supported collaborative problem solving in mathematics

International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 49-73

  Hurme, Tarja Riitta ^a   Järvelä, Sanna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Computer supported collaborative learning; Mathematics; Metacognition; Problem solving

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; DATA ACQUISITION; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES; STUDENTS;

COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATED LEARNING; METACOGNITION;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 23944515984     PISSN: 13823892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10758-005-4579-3     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Anderson, J., Greeno, J., Reder, L. and Simon, H. (2000). Perspectives on learning, thinking and activity. Educational Researcher 29(4). 11-13.
2. Bransford, J., Brown, A. and Cocking, R. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington: National Academy Press.
3. Brown, A.L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other mysterious mechanisms. In F. Weinert and R. Kluwe (Eds), Metacognition, Motivation and Understanding (pp. 65-115). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Brown, A.L., Bransford, J., Ferrara, R. and Campione, J. (1983). Learning, remembering and understanding. In P. Mussen (Ed), Handbook of Child Psychology 3 (pp. 77-166). J. Flavell and E. Markman (Vol. Eds.) New York: Wiley.
5. Chi, M.T.H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analysis of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences 6, 271-315.
6. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1994). From visual word problems to learning communities: Changing conceptions of cognitive research. In K. McGilly (Ed), Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory and Classroom Practice (pp. 157-200). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
7. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1996). Multimedia environments for enchaning learning in mathematics. In S. Vosniadau, E. De Corte, R. Glaser and H. Mandl (Eds), International Perspectives on the Design of Technology-Supported Learning Environments (pp. 285-306). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
8. Davidson, J.E. and Sternberg, RJ. (1998). Smart problem solving: How metacognition helps. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky and A. Graesser (Eds), Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practise (pp. 47-68). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
9. De Corte, E. (1996). Changing views of computer-supported learning environments for the acquisition of knowledge and thinking skills. In S. Vosniadau, E. De Corte, R. Glaser and H. Mandl (Eds), International Perspectives on the Design of Technology-Supported Learning Environments (pp. 129-148). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
10. De Corte, E. (2000). Marrying theory building and the improvement of school practise: A permanent challenge for instructional psychology. Learning and Instruction 10, 249-266.
11. De Corte, E., Greer, B. and Verschaffel, L.(1996). Mathematics teaching and learning. In D. Berliner and R. Calfee (Eds), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 491-549). New York: Macmillan.
12. Fischer, F. and Mandl, H. (2001). Fostering Shared Knowledge with Graphical Repre-sentation Tools in Different Collaboration Scenarios. Research Report Nr. 135. München: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
13. Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist 34(10), 906-911.
14. Flavell, J. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. Weinert and R. Kluwe (Eds), Metacognition, Motivation and Understanding (pp. 21-29). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Garofalo, J. and Lester, F.K. Jr. (1985). Metacognition, cognitive monitoring, and mathematical performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 16(3), 163-176.
16. Goos, M., Galbraith, P. and Renshaw, P. (2002). Socially mediated metacognition: creating collaborative zones of proximal development in small group problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics 2(2), 193-223.
17. Greeno, J. (1989). A perspective on thinking. American Psychologist 44(2), 134-141.
18. Kaput, J. (1992). Technology and mathematics education. In D. Grouws (Ed), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, (pp. 515-556). New York: Macmillan.
19. Kaput, J. and Thompson, P. (1994). Technology in mathematics education research: The first 25 years in the JRME. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 25(6), 676-684.
20. Koschmann, T. (1996). Paradigm shifts and instructional technology: An introduction. In T. Koschmann (Ed), CSCL: Theory and Practice of an Emerging Paradigm (pp. 1-24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
21. Koschmann, T., Hall, R. and Miyake, N. (2002). CSCL 2. Carrying Forward the Conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
22. Lampert, M. and Loewenberg Ball, D. (1998). Teaching, Multimedia, and Mathematics: Investigations of Real Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
23. Lehtinen, E. (2003). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An approach to powerful learning environments. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffet, N. Entwistle and J. Van Merriëboer (Eds), Powerful Learning Environments: Unravelling Basic Components and Dimensions (pp. 35-54). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
24. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorm: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic Books.
25. Pintrich, P., Wolters, C. and Baxter, G. (2000). Assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning. In G.Schraw and J. Impara (Eds), Issues in the Measurements of Metacognition (pp. 43-98). Buros Institute of Mental Measurements. University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
26. Polya,G. (1973). How to solve it. New Jersey: Princeton.
27. Resnick, L.B. (1991). Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice. In L.B.Resnick, J. Levine and S. Teasley (Eds), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (pp. 1-22). Washington: American Psychological Association.
28. Resnick, L.B., Levine, J. and Teasley, S. (1991). Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington: American Psychological Association.
29. Roschelle, J. and Teasley, S.D. (1995). Construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O'Malley (Ed), Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 69-100). New York: Springer-Verlag.
30. Scardamalia, M. and Bereiter, C. (1996). Adaptation and understanding. A case for new cultures of schooling. In S. Vosniadau, E. De Corte, R. Glaser and H. Mandl (Eds), International Perspectives on the Design of Technology-Supported Learning Environments (pp. 149-164). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
31. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C. and Lamon, M. (1994). The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into world 3. In K. McGilly (Ed), Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory and Classroom Practice (pp. 201-229). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
32. Schoenfeld, A.H. (1985). Mathematical Problem Solving. Orlando: Academic Press, Inc.
33. Schoenfeld, A.H. (1987). What's all the fuss about metacognition? In A. Schoenfeld (Ed), Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education (pp. 189-215). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Schoenfeld, A.H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed), Handbook for Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, (pp.334-370). New York: Macmillan.
35. Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science 26, 113-125.
36. Sfard, A. (2000). On reform movement and the limits of mathematical discourse. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 2(3), 157-189.
37. Sfard, A., Nesher, P., Streefland, L., Cobb, P. and Mason, J. (1998). Learning mathematics through conversation: Is it as good as they say? For the Learning of Mathematics 18(1), 41-51.
38. Silver, E. (1996). Moving beyond learning alone and in silence: Observations from the quasar project concerning communication in mathematics classroom. In L. Schauble and R. Glaser (Eds), Innovations in Learning, New Environments for Education (pp. 127-159). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39. Steinbring, H. (1998). Mathematical understanding in classroom interaction: The interrelation of social and epistemological constrains. In F. Seeger, J. Voigt and U. Waschescio (Eds), The Culture of the Mathematics Classroom (pp. 344-372). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Van Oers, B. (2001). Educational forms of iniation in mathematical culture. Educational Studies in Mathematics 46(1-3), 59-85.
41. Weinert, F.E. (1987). Introduction and overview: Metacognition and motivation as determinants of effective learning and understanding. In F. Weinert and R. Kluwe (Eds), Metacognition, Motivation and Understanding (pp. 1-16). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Yerushalmy, M. and Chazan, D. (1990). Overcoming visual obstacles with the aid of the supposer. Educational Studies in Mathematics 21(3), 199-220.