The study of interpersonal regulation in learning and its challenge to the research methodology

Interpersonal Regulation of Learning and Motivation: Methodological Advances

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-13

  Vauras, Marja ^a   Volet, Simone ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906105275     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203117736     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Johnson, A. M., and Chauncey, A. D. (2010). Measuring cognitive and metacognitive regulatory processes during hypermedia learning: Issues and challenges, Educational Psychologist, 45(4): 210-23.
2. Corning, P. A. (2002). The re-emergence of "emergence": A venerable concept in search of a theory, Complexity, 7(3): 18-30.
3. Derry, S., Pea, R. P., Barron, B., Engle, R. A., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., Hall, R., Koschmann, T., Lemke, J. L., Gamoran Sherin, M., and Sherin, B. L. (2010). Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology and ethics, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(3): 33-53.
4. Dumas, J. E. and LaFreniere, P. J. (1993). Mother-child relationships as sources of support or stress: A comparison of competent, normative, aggressive, and anxious dyads, Child Development, 64(6): 1732-54.
5. Dumas, J. E., Lemay, P., and Dauwalder, J.-P. (2001). Dynamic analyses of motherchild interactions in functional and dysfunctional dyads: A synergetic approach, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29(4): 317-29.
6. Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. Feltovich, and R. R. Hoffman (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 685-706.
7. Gallimore, R. and Tharp, R. (1990). Teaching mind in society: Teaching, schooling and literate discourse. In L. C. Moll (ed.), Vygotsky and Education: Instructional Implications of Sociohistorical Psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 175-205.
8. Goldstein, J. (1999). Emergence as a construct: History and issues, Emergence, 1(1): 49-72.
9. Granic, I. and Lamey, A. V. (2002). Combining dynamic systems and multivariate analyses to compare the mother-child interactions of externalizing subtypes, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30(3): 265-83.
10. Granic, I. and Dishion, T. J. (2003). Deviant talk in adolescent friendships: A step toward measuring a pathogenic attractor process, Social Development, 12(3), 314-34.
11. Granic, I. and Patterson, G. R. (2006). Toward a comprehensive model of antisocial development: A dynamic systems approach, Psychological Review, 113(1): 101-31.
12. Greeno, J. G. (2006). Learning in activity. In R. K. Sawyer (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 79-96.
13. Greeno, J. G. and Gresalfi, M. S. (2008). Opportunities to learn in practice and identity. In P. A. Moss, D. C. Pullin, J. P. Gee, E. H. Haertel, and L. J. Young (eds.), Assessment, Equity, and Opportunity to Learn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 170-99.
14. Hadwin, A. F., Oshige, M., Gress, C. L. Z., and Winne, P. H. (2010). Innovative ways for using gStudy to orchestrate and research social aspects of self-regulated learning, Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5): 794-805.
15. Hinde, R. A. and Stevenson-Hinde, J. (1987). Interpersonal relationships and child development, Developmental Review, 7(1): 1-21.
16. Hmelo-Silver, C., O'Donnell, A., Chan, C., and Chinn, C. (in press). International Handbook of Collaborative Learning (Volume on Metacognition and CSCL). New York: Taylor and Francis.
17. Horn, I. S., Nolen, S. B., and Ward, C. J. (2012). Recontextualizing practices: Situative methods for studying the development of motivation, identity and learning in and through multiple contexts over time. In S. Volet and M. Vauras (eds.), Interpersonal Regulation of Learning and Motivation: Methodological Advances (this volume). London: Routledge.
18. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., and Kanselaar, G. (in press). Task-related and social regulation during online collaborative learning, Metacognition and Learning, DOI 10. 1007/s11409-012-9086-z.
19. Järvelä, S., Volet, S. E., and Järvenoja, H. (2010). Research on motivation in collaborative learning: Moving beyond the cognitive-situative divide and combining individual and social processes, Educational Psychologist, 45(1): 15-27.
20. Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., and Näykki, P. (2012). Analyzing regulation of motivation as an individual and social process-A situated approach. In S. Volet and M. Vauras (eds), Interpersonal Regulation of Learning and Motivation: Methodological Advances (this volume). London: Routledge.
21. Koffka, K. (1935). The Principles of Gestalt Psychology. New York: Harcourt.
22. Lajoie, S. P. and Lu, J. (2012). Supporting collaboration with technology: Does shared cognition lead to co-regulation in medicine?, Metacognition and Learning, 7(1): 45-62.
23. Lewis, M. D. (2004). Trouble ahead: Predicting antisocial trajectories with dynamic systems concepts and methods, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32(6): 665-71.
24. Lewis, M., Lamey, A., and Douglas, L. (1999). A new dynamic systems method for the analysis of early socioemotional development, Developmental Science, 2(4): 457-75.
25. Meyer, D. K. and Turner, J. C. (2002). Using instructional discourse analysis to study the scaffolding of student self-regulation, Educational Psychologist, 37(1): 17-25.
26. Miller, J. G. (1978). Living Systems. New York: McGraw Hill.
27. Nolen, S. B. and Ward, C. J. (2008). Sociocultural and situative research on motivation. In M. Maehr, S. Karabenick, and T. Urdan (eds.), Social Psychological Perspective on Motivation and Achievement. Advances in Motivation and Achievement. London: Emerald Group, Vol. 15, pp. 428-60.
28. Perry, N. E. and Winne, P. H. (2012). Tracing students' regulation of learning in complex collaborative tasks. In S. Volet and M. Vauras (eds.), Interpersonal Regulation of Learning and Motivation: Methodological Advances (this volume). London: Routledge.
29. Puntambekar, S., Erkens, G., and Hmelo-Silver, C. (eds.) (2011). Analyzing Interaction in Computer-supported Collaborative Learning. New York: Springer.
30. Rogat, T. K. and Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Understanding quality variation in socially shared regulation: A focus on methodology. In S. Volet and M. Vauras (eds.), Interpersonal Regulation of Learning and Motivation: Methodological Advances (this volume). London: Routledge.
31. Saab, N., van Joolingen, W., and van Hout-Wolters, B. (2012). Support of the collaborative inquiry learning process: Influence of support on task and team regulation, Metacognition and Learning, 7(1): 7-23.
32. Salomon, G. and Globerson, T. (1987). Skill is not enough: The role of mindfulness in learning and transfer, International Journal of Educational Research, 11(6): 623-37.
33. Salonen, P., Vauras, M., and Efklides, A. (2005). Social interaction-what can it tell us about metacognition and coregulation in learning?, European Psychologist, 10(3): 199-208.
34. Stefanou, C. R., Perencevich, K. C., DiCintio, M., and Turner, J. C. (2004). Supporting autonomy in the classroom: Ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership, Educational Psychologist, 39(2): 97-110.
35. Thelen, E. and Smith, L. B. (2006). Dynamic systems theories. In R. M. Lerner (ed.), Theoretical Models of Human Development. Handbook of Child Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, Vol. 1, pp. 258-312.
36. Turner, J. C. and Fulmer, S. M. (2012). Observing interpersonal regulation of engagement during instruction in middle school classroom. In S. Volet and M. Vauras (eds.), Interpersonal Regulation of Learning and Motivation: Methodological Advances (this volume). London: Routledge.
37. van de Pol, J., Volman, M. and Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research, Educational Psychology Review, 22(3): 271-96.
38. van Geert, P. and Steenbeek, H. (2005). The dynamics of scaffolding, New Ideas in Psychology, 23(3): 115-28.
39. Vauras, M., Salonen, P., Lehtinen, E., and Kinnunen, R. (2009b). Motivation in school from contextual and longitudinal perspectives. In M. Wosnitza, S. A. Karabenick, A. Efklides, and P. Nenniger (eds.), Contemporary Motivation Research: From Global to Local Perspectives, Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe-Huber, pp. 1-23.
40. Vauras, M., Kinnunen, R., Kajamies, A., and Lehtinen, E. (2012). Interpersonal regulation in instructional interaction: A dynamic systems analysis of scaffolding. In S. Volet and M. Vauras (eds), Interpersonal Regulation of Learning and Motivation: Methodological Advances (this volume). London: Routledge.
41. Volet, S. E., Summers, M., and Thurman, J. (2009a). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained? Learning and Instruction, 19(2): 128-43.
42. Volet, S. E., Vauras, M., and Salonen, P. (2009b). Self-and social-regulation in learning contexts: An integrative perspective, Educational Psychologist, 44(4): 215-26.
43. Volet, S. E., Vauras, M., Khosa, D., and Iiskala, T. (2012). Metacognitive regulation in collaborative learning: Theoretical advances and methodological contextualizations. In S. Volet and M. Vauras (eds), Interpersonal Regulation of Learning and Motivation: Methodological Advances (this volume). London: Routledge.
44. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, and E. Souberman, trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1930.).
45. Whitebread, D. and Pino-Pasternak, D. (2012). Video analysis of self-regulated learning in social and naturalistic contexts: The case of preschool and primary school children. In S. Volet and M. Vauras (eds), Interpersonal Regulation of Learning and Motivation: Methodological Advances (this volume). London: Routledge.
46. Winne, P. H. and Perry, N. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner (eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation, Orlando, FL: Academic Press, pp. 532-66.
47. Winne, P. H. and Hadwin, A. F. (in press). nStudy: Tracing and supporting selfregulated learning in the Internet. In R. Azevedo and V. Aleven (eds), International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies. New York: Springer.
48. Winters, F. I., Greene, J. A., and Costich, C. M. (2008). Self-regulation of learning within computer-based learning environments. A critical analysis, Educational Psychology Review, 20(4): 429-44.
49. Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects, American Educational Research Journal, 45(1): 166-83.