The effects of group composition of self-efficacy and collective efficacy on computer-supported collaborative learning

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 2256-2268

  Wang, Shu Ling ^a   Lin, Sunny S J ^b  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Collective efficacy; Computer supported collaborative learning; Group composition; Learning strategies; Motivation; Self efficacy

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; E-LEARNING; MOTIVATION; STUDENTS;

COLLECTIVE EFFICACY; COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; GROUP COMPOSITION; LEARNING STRATEGIES; SELF-EFFICACY;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK;

EID: 33947600328     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2006.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Abrami P.C., Chambers B., Poulsen C., De Simone C., d'Apollonia S., and Howden J. Classroom connections: Understanding and using cooperative learning (1996), Harcourt Brace, Toronto, CA
2. Ahern T.C., and El-Hindi A.E. Improving the instructional congruency of a computer-mediated small-group discussion: a case study in design and delivery. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 32 3 (2000) 385-400
3. Azmitia M. Peer interaction and problem solving: when are two heads better than one?. Child Development 59 (1988) 87-96
4. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory (1986), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
5. Bandura A. Failures in self-regulation: energy depletion or selective disengagement?. Psychological Inquiry 7 1 (1996) 20-25
6. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control (1997), Freeman, New York
7. Bandura A. Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science 9 (2000) 75-78
8. Bloom B.S. Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook of cognitive domain (1956), McKay, New York
9. Brown D.C. Cognitive and affective minds: a necessary marriage in criminal justice education. Journal of Criminal Justice Education 12 1 (2001) 101-115
10. Campion M.A., Medsker G.J., and Higgs C. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology 46 (1993) 823-850
11. Cohen E.G. Restructuring the classroom: conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research 64 1 (1994) 1-35
12. Durham C., Knight D., and Locke E. Effects of leader role, team-set goal difficulty, efficacy, and tactics on team effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 72 2 (1997) 203-231
13. Fernández-Ballesteros R., Díez-Nicolás J., Caprara G.V., Barbaranelli C., and Bandura A. Determinants and structural relation of personal efficacy to collective efficacy. Applied Psychology: An International Review 51 1 (2002) 107-125
14. Fuchs L.S., Fuchs D., Hamlett C.L., and Karns K. High achieving students' interactions and performance on complex mathematical tasks as a function of homogeneous and heterogeneous pairings. American Educational Research Journal 35 2 (1998) 227-267
15. Garrison D.R., Anderson T., and Archer W. Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education 15 1 (2001) 7-23
16. Gibson C.B., Randel A.E., and Earley P.C. Understanding group efficacy. Group and Organization Management 25 1 (2000) 67-97
17. Goddard R.D. Collective efficacy: a neglected construct in the study of schools and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 93 3 (2001) 467-476
18. Greenlees I.A., Graydon J.K., and Maynard I.W. The impact of collective efficacy beliefs on effort and persistence in a group task. Journal of Sports Sciences 17 (1999) 151-158
19. Hara N., Bonk C.J., and Angeli C. Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science 28 (2000) 115-152
20. Hodges L., and Carron A.V. Collective efficacy and group performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology 23 1 (1992) 48-59
21. Hooper S., and Hannafin M.J. Cooperative CBI: the effects of heterogeneous versus homogeneous grouping on the learning of progressively complex concepts. Journal of Educational Computing Research 4 4 (1988) 413-424
22. Hooper S., Ward T.J., Hannafin M.J., and Clark H.T. The effects of aptitude composition on achievement during small group learning. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 16 (1989) 102-109
23. Hsu, Y.-C. (2003). Evaluation theory in problem-based learning approach. Papers Presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Houston, TX.
24. Huxham M., and Land R. Assigning students in groups work projects: can we do better than random?. Innovative in Education and Training International. 37 1 (2000) 17-22
25. Johnson D.W. Social interdependence: interrelationships among theory, research, and practice. American Psychologists 58 11 (2003) 934-945
26. Johnson D.W., and Johnson R.T. Cooperation and competition: Theory and research (1989), Interaction Book.Co, Edina, MN
27. Johnson D.W., and Johnson R.T. Positive interdependence: key to effective cooperation. In: Hertz-Lazarowitz R., and Miller N. (Eds). Interaction in cooperative groups (1992), Cambridge University Press, New York 174-199
28. Johnson D.W., and Johnson R.T. Cooperative learning and social; interdependence theory. In: Tindale R.S., et al. (Ed). Theory and research on small groups (1998), Plenum Press, New York 9-35
29. Johnson D.W., and Johnson R.T. Learning together and along: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. 5th ed. (1999), Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA
30. Joo Y.J., Bong M., and Choi H.J. Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development 48 2 (2000) 5-17
31. Kreijns K., Kirschner P.A., and Jochems W. Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior 19 (2003) 335-353
32. Lent R.W., Brown S.D., and Larkin K.C. Comparison of three theoretically derived variables in predicting career and academic behavior: Self-efficacy, interest congruence, and consequence thinking. Journal of Counseling Psychology 34 (1987) 293-298
33. Leonard L.J. From indignation to indifference: teacher concerns about externally imposed classroom interruptions. Journal of Educational Research 95 2 (2001) 103-109
34. Liu E.Z.F., Lin S.S.J., and Yuan S.-M. Design of a networked portfolio system. British Journal of Educational Technology 32 4 (2001) 492-494
35. Linchevski L., and Kutscher B. Tell me with whom you're learning, and I'll tell you how much you've learned: mixed-ability versus same-ability grouping in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 29 5 (1998) 533-554
36. Linnenbrink E.A., and Pintrich P.R. Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review 31 2 (2002) 313-327
37. Little B.L., and Madigan R.L. The relationship between collective efficacy and performance in manufacturing work teams. Small Group Research 28 4 (1997) 517-534
38. Pajares, F., & Kranzler, J. (1995). Role of self-efficacy and general mental ability in mathematical problem-solving: a path analysis. (ERIC Documents Reproduction Service NO. ED 387 342).
39. Pajares F., and Miller M.D. Mathematics self-efficacy and mathematical problem-solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology 21 (1995) 325-344
40. Palmieri P. Technology in education ... Do we need it?. ARIS Bulletin 8 2 (1997) 1-5
41. Pearce J.A., and Ravlin E.C. The design and activation of self-regulating work groups. Human Relations 40 (1987) 473-488
42. Peterson E., Mitchell T.R., Thompson L., and Burr R. Collective efficacy and aspects of shared mental models as predictors of performance over time in work groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 3 3 (2000) 296-316
43. Pinsonneault A., and Kraemer K.L. The impact of technological support on groups: an assessment of the empirical research. Decision Support Systems 5 (1989) 197-216
44. Pintrich P.R., and De Groot E. Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (1990) 33-40
45. Pintrich P.R., and Schunk D.H. Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (1996), Prentice Hall, New Jersey
46. Pintrich P.R., and Schunk D.H. Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. 2nd ed. (2002), Merrill-Prentice Hall, Columbus, OH
47. Pintrich P.R., Smith D., Garcia T., and McKeachie W. The motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ) (1991), NCRIPTAL, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
48. Shaw M. Group dynamics (1980), McGraw-Hill, NY
49. Schunk D.H. Goal setting and self-evaluation: a social cognitive perspective on self-regulation. Advances in Motivation and Achievement 7 (1991) 85-113
50. Slavin R.E. Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (1990), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
51. Wang, S. L., & Lin, S. (2000). The cross-cultural validation of motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Paper presented at the 2000 Annual Conference of American Psychological Association. Washington D.C.
52. Watson C.B., Chemers M.M., and Preiser N. Collective efficacy: A multilevel analysis. Personality and Social Psychology 27 8 (2001) 1057-1068
53. Webb N.M. A process-outcome analysis of learning in group and individual settings. Educational Psychologist 15 (1980) 69-83
54. Webb N.M., and Palincsar A.S. Group processes in the classroom. In: Berliner D.C., and Calfee R.C. (Eds). Handbook of educational psychology (1996), Simon & Schuster, New York 841-873