Analyzing regulation of motivation as an individual and social process: A situated approach

Interpersonal Regulation of Learning and Motivation: Methodological Advances

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 170-187

  Järvelä, Sanna ^a   Järvenoja, Hanna ^a   Näykki, Piia ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873852466     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203117736     Document Type: Chapter

References (67)

1. Ainley, M. and Hidi, S. (2002). Dynamic measures for studying interest and learning. In P. R. Pintrich and M. L. Maehr (eds.), Advances in Motivation and Achievement: New Directions in Measures and Methods, 12: 43-76. Amsterdam: JAI Press.
2. Ainley, M. and Patrick, L. (2006). Measuring self-regulated learning processes through tracking patterns of student interaction with achievement activities, Educational Psychology Review, 18(3): 267-86.
3. Arvaja, M., Salovaara, H., Häkkinen, P., and Järvelä, S. (2007). Combining individual and group-level perspectives for studying collaborative knowledge construction in context, Learning and Instruction, 17(4): 448-59.
4. Azevedo, R., Johnson, A., Chauncey, A., and Graesser, A. C. (2010). Use of hypermerdia to convey and assess self-regulated learning. In B. Zimmerman and D. Schunk (eds.), Handbook of Self-regulation of Learning and Performance. New York: Routledge, pp. 102-21.
5. Boekaerts, M. and Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2): 199-231.
6. Boekaerts, M. and Cascallar, E. (2006). How far have we moved toward the integration of theory and practice in self-regulation?, Educational Psychology Review, 18(3): 199-210.
7. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., and Zeidner, M. (eds.) (2000). Handbook of Selfregulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
8. Butler, D. L. (2011). Investigating self-regulated learning using in-depth case studies. In B. Zimmerman and D. Schunk (eds.), Handbook of Self-regulation of Learning and Performance. New York: Routledge, pp. 346-60.
9. Cleary, T. J. (2011). Emergence of self-regulated learning-microanalysis. Historical overview, essential features, and implications for research and practice. In B. Zimmerman and D. Schunk (eds.), Handbook of Self-regulation of Learning and Performance. New York: Routledge, pp. 329-45.
10. Cleary, T. J. and Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Self-regulation differences during athletic practice by experts, non-experts, and novices, Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13: 185-206.
11. Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. New York: Routledge.
12. Corno, L. and Mandinach, E. B. (2004). What we have learned about student engagement in the past twenty years. In D. M. McInerney and S. Van Etten (eds.), Big Theories Revised. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, pp. 299-328.
13. Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experiencesampling method, Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175: 526-36.
14. Decuyper, S., Dochy, F., and Van den Bossche, P. (2010). Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organizations, Educational Research Review, 5(2): 111-33.
15. Dowson, M. and McInerney, D. M. (2003). What do students say about their motivational goals?: Towards a more complex and dynamic perspective on student motivation, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(1): 91-113.
16. Gläezer-Ziguda, M. and Järvelä, S. (2008). Application of qualitative and quantitative methods to enrich understanding of emotional and motivational aspects of learning, International Journal of Educational Research, 4(1): 79-83.
17. Greene, J. A. and Azevedo, R. (2007). A theoretical review of Winne and Hadwin's model of self-regulated learning: New perspectives and directions, Review of Educational Research, 77(3): 334-72.
18. Hadwin, A. F. and Oshige, M. (2011). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and sociallyshared regulation: Exploring perspectives of social in self-regulated learning theory, Teachers College Record, 113: 240-64.
19. Hadwin, A. F., Wosney, L., and Pontin, O. (2005). Scaffolding the appropriation of self-regulatory activity: A sociocultural analysis of changes in student-teacher discourse about a graduate research portfolio, Instructional Science, 33(5-6): 413-50.
20. Hadwin, A., Oshige, M., Gress, G. Z., and Winne, P. (2010). Innovative ways for using gStudy to orchestrate and research social aspects of self-regulated learning, Computers in Human Behavior, 26: 794-805.
21. Hadwin, A., Järvelä, S., and Miller, M. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In B. Zimmerman and D. Schunk (eds.), Handbook of Self-regulation of Learning and Performance. New York: Routledge, pp. 65-84.
22. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. and Bromme, R. (2007). Coding discussions and discussing coding: Research on collaborative learning in computer-supported environments, Learning and Instruction, 17: 460-64.
23. Hurme, T.-R. and Järvelä, S. (2005). Students' activity in computer-supported collaborative problem solving in mathematics, International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 10(1): 49-73.
24. Iiskala, T., Vauras, M., and Lehtinen, E. (2004). Socially-shared metacognition in peer learning?, Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 1: 147-78.
25. Järvelä, S. (1995). The cognitive apprenticeship model in a technologically rich learning environment: Interpreting the learning interaction, Learning and Instruction, 5: 237-59.
26. Järvelä, S. and Järvenoja, H. (2011). Socially constructed self-regulated learning in collaborative learning groups, Teachers College Records, 113(2): 350-74.
27. Järvelä, S., Salonen P., and Lepola, J. (2001). Dynamic assessment as a key to understanding student motivation in a classroom context. In P. Pintrich and M. Maehr (eds.), Advances in Research on Motivation: New Directions in Measures and Methods, 12: 217-40. Greenwich: Elsevier.
28. Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., and Veermans, M. (2008). Understanding dynamics of motivation in socially shared learning, International Journal of Educational Research, 47(1): 122-35.
29. Järvelä, S., Volet, S., and Järvenoja, H. (2010). Research on motivation in collaborative learning: Moving beyond the cognitive-situative divide and combining individual and social processes, Educational Psychologist, 45(1): 15-27.
30. Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., and Hadwin, A. (2012). Exploring Socially-Shared Regulation in the Context of Collaboration. Submitted.
31. Järvenoja, H. and Järvelä, S. (2005). How the students explain their social, emotional and motivational experiences during their learning processes, Learning and Instruction, 15, 465-80.
32. Järvenoja, H. and Järvelä, S. (2009). Emotion control in collaborative learning situations-Do students regulate emotions evoked from social challenges?, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3): 463-81.
33. Järvenoja, H., Volet, S., and Järvelä, S. (2012). Regulation of emotions in socially challenging learning situations: An instrument to measure the adaptive and social nature of the regulation process, Educational Psychology.
34. Malmberg, J., Järvenoja, H., and Järvelä, S. (2010). Tracing elementary school students' study tactic use in gStudy by examining a strategic and self-regulated learning, [Quick Edit] Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5): 1034-42.
35. McCaslin, M. (2004). Coregulation of opportunity, activity, and identity in student motivation: Elaborations on Vygotskian themes. In D. M. McInerney and S. Van Etten (eds.), Research on Sociocultural Influences on Motivation and Learning: Vol. 4: Big Theories Revisited. Greenwich, CT: Information Age, pp. 249-74.
36. Meyer, D. K. and Turner, J. C. (2002). Discovering emotion in classroom motivation research, Educational Psychologist, 37: 107-14.
37. Näykki, P. and Järvelä, S. (2008). How pictorial knowledge representations mediate collaborative knowledge construction in groups, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 4(3): 359-87.
38. Näykki, P., Järvenoja, H., and Järvelä, S. (2012). How Small Groups Regulate Their Collaborative Learning-Characterizing the Differences and Temporal Variation between the High and Low Succeeding Groups. Manuscript submitted for publication.
39. Nolen, S. B. and Ward, C. J. (2008). Sociocultural and situative approaches to studying motivation. In M. Maehr, S. Karabenick, and T. Urdan (eds.), Social Psychological Perspective on Motivation and Achievement. Advances in Motivation and Achievement (Vol. 15). London: Emerald Group.
40. Op't Eynde, P., De Corte, E., and Verschaffel, L. (2001). "What to learn from what we feel": The role of students' emotions in the mathematics classroom. In S. Volet and S. Järvelä (eds.), Motivation in Learning Contexts: Theoretical and Methodological Implications. Oxford, Pergamon, pp. 149-67.
41. Patrick, H. and Middleton, M. J. (2002). Turning the kaleidoscope: What we see when self-regulated learning is viewed with a qualitative lens, Educational Psychologist, 37: 27-39.
42. Perry, N. E. (1998). Young children's self-regulated learning and contexts that support it, Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4): 715-29.
43. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner (eds.), Handbook of Self-regulated Learning. San Diego; CA: Academic Press, pp. 451-502.
44. Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., and Teasley, S. D. (eds.) (1991). Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington D. C.: American Psychological Association.
45. Rogat, T. K. and Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2011). Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups: An analysis of the interplay between quality of social regulation and group processes, Cognition and Instruction, 29(4): 375-415.
46. Roschelle, J. and Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. E. O'Malley (ed.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 69-97.
47. Salomon, G. (1991). Effects with and of computers and the study of computer based learning environments. In E. De Corte, M. Linn, H. Mandl, and L. Verschaffel (eds.), Computer-based Learning Environments and Problem Solving. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 247-62.
48. Salovaara, H. and Järvelä, S. (2003). Students' knowledge building strategies in computer supported collaborative learning, Learning Environments Research, 6(3): 267-84.
49. Schunk, D. H. and Zimmerman, B. J. (eds.) (2008). Motivation and Self-regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Applications. NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
50. Schwartz, D. L. (1995). The emergence of abstract representations in dyad problem solving, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(3): 321-54.
51. Turner, J. C. (2001). Using context to enrich and challenge our understanding of motivational theory. In S. Volet and S. Järvelä (eds.), Motivation in Learning Contexts: Theoretical Advances and Methodological Implications. Oxford: Pergamon, pp. 85-104.
52. Turner, J. C. and Meyer, D. K. (1999). Integrating classroom context into motivation theory and research, Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 11: 87-121.
53. Vauras, M., Salonen, P., and Kinnunen, R. (2008). Influences of group processes and interpersonal regulation on motivation, affect and achievement. In M. Maehr, S. A. Karabenick and T. Urdan (eds.), Advances in Motivation and Achievement, Vol. 15. Bingley, UK: JAI Press, pp. 275-314.
54. Volet, S. E. and Järvelä, S. (eds.) (2001). Motivation in Learning Contexts: Theoretical Advances and Methodological Implications. London: Pergamon.
55. Volet, S. E. and Mansfield, C. (2006). Group work at university: significance of personal goals in the regulation strategies of students with positive and negative appraisals, Higher Education Research and Development, 25(4): 341-56.
56. Volet, S. E., Summers, M., and Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained?, Learning and Instruction, 19(2): 128-43.
57. Winne, P. H. (1982). Minimizing the black box problem to enhance the validity of theories about instructional effects, Instructional Science, 11: 13-28.
58. Winne, P. H. (2004). Theoretical and methodological challenges when researching motivation in context, European Psychologist, 9: 257-63.
59. Winne, P. H. and Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner (eds.), Handbook of Self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 531-66.
60. Winne, P. H. and Jamieson-Noel, D. L. (2002). Exploring students' calibration of self-reports about study tactics and achievement, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27: 551-72.
61. Winne, P. H. and Hadwin, A. (2008). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk and B. J. Zimmerman (eds.), Motivation and Self-regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Applications. NY: Taylor and Francis, pp. 297-314.
62. Winne, P. H., Zhou, M., and Egan, R. (2011). Designing assessments of self-regulated learning. In G. Schraw (ed.), Assessment of Higher Order Thinking Skills. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, pp. 89-118.
63. Winters, F. I. and Alexander, P. A. (2010). Peer collaboration: the relation of regulatory behaviors to learning with hypermedia, Instructional Science, 39(4): 407-27.
64. Wolters, C. (1998). Self-regulated learning and college students' regulation of motivation, Journal of Educational Psychology, 90: 224-35.
65. Wolters, C. and Pintrich, P. (1998). Contextual difference in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, English, and social studies classrooms, Instructional Science, 26: 27-47.
66. Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects, American Educational Research Journal, 45: 166-83.
67. Zimmerman, B. (2011). Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance. In B. Zimmerman and D. Schunk (eds.), Handbook of Selfregulation of Learning and Performance. New York: Routledge, pp. 49-64.