Metacognitive scaffolding in an innovative learning arrangement

Instructional Science

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 785-803

  Molenaar, Inge ^a   van Boxtel, Carla A M ^a   Sleegers, Peter J C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Elementary education; Innovative learning arrangements; Metacognition; Scaffolding; Virtual agents

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054034688     PISSN: 00204277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11251-010-9154-1     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students' learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 523-535.
2. Azevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition-implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33(5-6), 367-379.
3. Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F. I., & Cromley, J. G. (2008). Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(1), 45-72.
4. Bannert, M. (2006). Effects of reflection prompts when learning with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 359-375.
5. Bannert, M., Hildebrand, M., & Mengelkamp, C. (2009). Effects of a metacognitive support device in learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 829-835.
6. Bannert, M., & Mengelkamp, C. (2008). Assessment of metacognitive skills by means of instruction to think aloud and reflect when prompted. Does the verbalisation method affect learning? Metacognition and Learning, 3(1), 39-58.
7. Ericsson, K., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49(8), 725-747.
8. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
9. Franke, R. H., & Kaul, J. D. (1978). The Hawthorne experiments: First statistical interpretation. American Sociological Review, 43, 623-643.
10. Hadwin, A., & Oshige, M. (2007). Self-regulation, co-regulation and socially shareed regulation: Examining many faces of social in models of of SRL. Paper presented at the EARLI.
11. Hannafin, M. J., & Land, S. M. (1997). The foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced student-centered learning environments. Instructional Science, 25(3), 167-202.
12. Igo, L. B., Bruning, R., & McCrudden, M. T. (2005). Exploring differences in students' copy-and-paste decision making and processing: A mixed-methods study. Journals of Education Psychology, 87, 103-116.
13. Janssen, J. (2008). Using visualizations to support collaboration and coordination during computer-supported collaborative learning. UU Universiteit Utrecht, doctoral thesis.
14. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2001). Learner experience and efficiency of instructional guidance. Educational Psychology, 21(1), 5-23.
15. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
16. Land, S. M., & Greene, B. A. (2000). Project-based learning with the World Wide Web: A qualitative study of resource integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(1), 45-67.
17. Lin, X., & Lehman, J. D. (1999). Supporting learning of variable control in a computer-based biology environment: Effects of prompting college students to reflect on their own thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(7), 837-858.
18. liskala, T., Vauras, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Socially-shared metacognition in peer learning? Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 1(2), 147-178.
19. Luckin, R., & Boulay, B. d. (2002). Construction and abstraction: Contrasting methods of supporting model building in learning science. In P. Brna, M. Baker, K. Stenning, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), The role of communication in learning to model (pp. 99-125). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
20. Molenaar, I. (2003). Knowledge exchange from citizens to learners through online collaboration. Paper presented at the Edmedia.
21. Molenaar, I., & Roda, C. (2008). Attention management for dynamic and adaptive scaffolding. Pragmatics & Cognition, 16(2), 224-271.
22. Molenaar, I., van boxtel, C., Sleegers, P., & Roda, C. (2010). Atgentschool; dynamic scaffolding with attention management. In C. Roda (Ed.), Human attention in digital environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51, 102-116.
24. O'Donnell, A. M. (Ed.). (2006). Introduction: Learning with technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligences and design for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions; psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Puntambekar, S., & Hubscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational psychologist, 40(1), 1-12.
27. Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 273-304.
28. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (revised). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29. Salomon, G. (1993). Distributed cognitions; psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Simons, P. R. J. (2000). Leren en Instructie. Den Haag: NWO/PROO.
31. Vauras, M., Iiskala, T., Kajamies, A., Kinnunen, R., & Lehtinen, E. (2003). Shared-regulation and motivation of collaborating peers: A case analysis. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 46(1), 19-37.
32. Veenman, M. V. J. (2005). The assessment of metacognitive skills: What can be learned from multimethod designs? In C. Artelt & B. Moschner (Eds.), Lernstrategien und Metakognition: Implikationen für Forschung und Praxis. Berlin: Waxmann.
33. Veenman, M. V. J., Kok, R., & Blote, A. W. (2005). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills in early adolescence. Instructional Science, 33(3), 193-211.
34. Veenman, M. V. J., van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition Learning, 1(1), 3-14.
35. Volet, S., Vauras, M., & Salonen, P. (2009). Self-and social regulation in learning contexts: An integrative perspective. Educational Psychologist, 44(4), 215-226.
36. Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
37. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 42(2), 64-70.