Scaffolding the appropriation of self-regulatory activity: A socio-cultural analysis of changes in teacher-student discourse about a graduate research portfolio

Instructional Science

Volumn 33, Issue 5-6, 2005, Pages 413-450

  Hadwin, Allyson Fiona ^a   Wozney, Lori ^b   Pontin, Oonagh ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^b Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 26844469744     PISSN: 00204277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11251-005-1274-7     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Aleven, V. & Koedinger, K. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science 26(2): 147-181.
2. Azevedo, R. & Cromley, J. G. (2003). The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students' understanding of complex systems with hypermedia, Chicago, IL: Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association.
3. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G. & Seibert, D. (2004). Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students' ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology 29: 344-370.
4. Azevedo, R., Cromly, J.G., Winters, F.I., Moos, D.C., & Greene J.A. (2005). Adaptive human scaffolding facilitates adolescents' self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Instructional Science 33 (5-6), 381-412 (this issue).
5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6. Biemans, H. & Simons, P. (1995). Computer-assisted instruction and conceptual change. San Francisco, CA: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
7. Corno, L. & Mandinach, E. B. (2004). What we have learned about student engagement in the past twenty years. In D. M. McInerney and S. Van Etten, eds, Big theories revisited: Vol 4. Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning, pp. 299-328. Information Age Publishing: Greenwich, CT.
8. Corno, L. & Snow, R. E. (1986). Adapting teaching to individual differences among learners. In M. C. Wittrock ed. Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.), pp. 605-629. Macmillan Publishing Co: New York.
9. Dabbagh, N. & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Using web-based tools as scaffolds for self-regulated learning. Instructional Science 33 (5-6), 513-540 (this issue).
10. Diaz, R. M., Neal, C. J. & Amaya-Williams, M. (1990). The social origins of self-regulation. In L. C. Moll ed. Vygotsky and education, pp. 127-154. Cambridge: New York.
11. Gallimore, R. & Tharpe, R. (1990). Teaching mind in society: Teaching schooling and literate discourse. In L. C. Moll ed. Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology, pp. 175-205. Cambridge University Press: New York.
12. Hadwin, A. F. (2000). Building a case for self-regulating as a socially constructed phenomenon. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
13. Hadwin, A. F., Boutara, L., Knoetze, T. & Thompson, S. (2004). Cross case study of self-regulation as a series of events. Educational Research and Evaluation 10: 365-418.
14. Hadwin, A. F., Wozney, L. & Venkatesh, V. (2003). A narrative analysis of the dynamic interplay between students' emerging task understanding and instructional scaffolds. Chicago, IL, USA: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
15. Howell, D. C. (2004). Fundamental statistics for the behavioral sciences (5th ed.). Boston: Thomson, Brooks/Cole.
16. Kao, M. & Lehman, J. (1997). Scaffolding in a computer-constructivist environment for teaching statistics to college learners. Chicago, IL: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
17. Karasavvidis, I., Pieters, J. M. & Plomp, T. (2000). Investigating how secondary school students learn to solve correlational problems: Quantitative and qualitative discourse approaches to the development of self-regulation. Learning and Instruction 10: 267-292.
18. Karasavvidis, J., Pieters, J. & Plomp, T. (2003). Exploring the mechanisms through which computers contribute to learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 19: 115-128.
19. King, A. (1999). Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning. Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 87-115). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Kramarski, B. & Hirsch, C. (2003). Using computer algebra systems in mathematical classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 19: 35-46.
21. Lindner, R. W. & Harris, B. R. (1998). Self-regulated learning in education majors. The Journal of General Education 47: 63-78.
22. McCaslin, M. & Hickey, D. T. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A Vygotskian view. In B. J. Zimmerman and D. H. Schunk, eds, Self-regulated learning and academic achievement, pp. 227-252. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ.
23. Merrill, D., Reiser, B., Merrill, S. & Landes, S. (1995). Tutoring: Guided learning by doing. Cognition and Instruction 13: 315-372.
24. Meyer, D. K. & Turner, J. C. (2002). Using instructional discourse analysis to study the scaffolding of student self-regulation. Educational Psychologist 37: 17-25.
25. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Perry, N. E. (1998). Young children's self-regulated learning and contexts that support it. Journal of Educational Psychology 90: 715-729.
27. Perry, N. E. (2002). Introduction: Using qualitative methods to enrich understandings of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist 37: 1-4.
28. Perry, N. E., VandeKamp, K. O., Mercer, L. K. & Nordby, C. J. (2002). Investigating teacher-student interactions that foster self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist 37: 5-15.
29. Person, N. K. & Graesser, A. G. (1999). Evolution of discourse during cross-age tutoring. In A. M. O'Donnell ed. Cognitive perspectives on peer learning, pp. 69-86. Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ.
30. Pintrich, P. R. (1995). Understanding self-regulated learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 63: 10-12.
31. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning. In G. Schraw and J. C. Impara, eds, Issues in the measurement of metacognition, pp. 43-97. Buros Institute of Mental Measurement: Lincoln, NE.
32. Puntambeker, S. & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist 40: 1-12.
33. Schunk, D. H. (1998). Teaching elementary students to self-regulate practice of mathematical skills with modelling. In D. H. Schunk and B. J. Zimmerman, eds, Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice, pp. 137-159. The Guilford Press: New York.
34. Schunk, D. H. (2001). Social cognitive theory and self-regulation. In B. J. Zimmerman and D. H. Schunk, eds, Self-regulated learning and academic achievement, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ.
35. Schunk, D. & Zimmerman, B. (1997). Social origins of self-regulatory competence. Educational Psychologist 32: 195-208.
36. Spandel, V. (1997). Reflections on portfolios. Epilogue: Classroom learning, looking ahead. In G. D. Phye ed. Handbook of academic learning: Construction of knowledge, pp. 550-607. Academic Press: San Diego, CA.
37. Stone, C. A. (1998). The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities. The Journal of Learning Disabilities 31: 344-364.
38. White, B., Shimoda, T. & Frederiksen, J. (2000). Facilitating students' inquiry learning and metacognitive development through modifiable software advisors. In S. Lajoie ed. Computers as cognitive tools: No more walls, pp. 97-132. Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ.
39. Winne, P. H. & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated engagement in learning. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky and A. Graesser, eds, Metacognition in educational theory and practice, pp. 277-304. Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.
40. Winne, P. H., Hadwin, A. F., Nesbit, J. C., Kumar, V., Perry, N. E., Lajoie S. et al. (2004). The Learning Kit: Theory and cognitive tools to enhance learning skills and support life-long learning [Grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada: Initiative in the New Economy - Collaborative Research Initiative].
41. Winne, P. H., Jamieson-Noel, D. L. & Muis, K. (2001). Methodological issues and advances in researching tactics, strategies, and self-regulated learning. In M. L. Maehr and P. R. Pintrich, eds. Advances in motivation and achievement. (Vol. 12), pp. 121-155. JAI: Greenwhich, CT.
42. Winne, P. H. & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich and M. Zeidner, eds, Handbook of self-regulation, pp. 531-566. Academic Press: Orlando, FL.
43. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S. & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology 17: 89-100.
44. Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social-cognitive view of self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 81: 329-339.
45. Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist 25: 3-17.
46. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich and M. Zeidner, eds, Handbook of self-regulation, pp. 13-39. Academic Press: San Diego, CA.
47. Zimmerman, B. J. & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.