Examining evolutions in the adoption of metacognitive regulation in reciprocal peer tutoring groups

Metacognition and Learning

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 187-213

  De Backer, Liesje ^a   Van Keer, Hilde ^a   Moerkerke, Beatrijs ^a   Valcke, Martin ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Higher education; Metacognitive regulation; Peer tutoring; Time bound evolutions; Video analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929649066     PISSN: 15561623     EISSN: 15561631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11409-015-9141-7     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.
2. Bannert, M., & Mengelkamp, C. (2008). Assessment of metacognitive skills by means of instruction to think-aloud and reflect when prompted. Does the verbalization method affect learning? Metacognition and Learning, 3, 39–58.
3. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 307–359.
4. Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65–116). Hillsdale: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Bruinsma, M. (2004). Motivation, cognitive processing, and achievement in higher education. Learning and Instruction, 14, 549–568.
6. Butler, D. L. (2002). Qualitative approaches to investigating self-regulated learning: contributions and challenges. Educational Psychologist, 37, 59–63.
7. Case, J., & Gunstone, R. (2002). Metacognitive development as a shift in approach to learning: an in-depth study. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 459–470.
8. Chi, M., Siler, S., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25, 471–533.
9. Chi, M., Roy, M., & Hausmann, R. (2008). Observing tutorial dialogues collaboratively: Insights about human tutoring effectiveness from vicarious learning. Cognitive Science, 32, 301–341.
10. Chin, C., & Brown, D. (2000). Learning in Science: a comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 109–138.
11. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: essays in honour of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
12. Colvin, J. W. (2007). Peer tutoring and social dynamics in higher education. Mentoring and Tutoring, 15, 165–181.
13. De Backer, L., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2012). Exploring the potential impact of reciprocal peer tutoring on higher education students' metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive regulation. Instructional Science, 40, 559–588.
14. Duran, D., & Monereo, C. (2005). Styles and sequences of collaborative learning in fixed and reciprocal peer tutoring. Learning and Instruction, 15, 179–199.
15. Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition. Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13, 277–287.
16. Falchikov, N. (2001). Learning together. Peer tutoring in higher education. London: Routledge Falmer.
17. Goos, M., Galbraith, P., & Renshaw, P. (2002). Socially mediated metacognition: creating collaborative zones of proximal development in small group problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 193–223.
18. Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 104–137.
19. Graesser, A. C., Person, N. K., & Magliano, J. P. (1995). Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 1–28.
20. Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). A theoretical review of Winne and Hadwin’s model of self-regulated learning: new perspectives and directions. Review of Educational Research, 77, 334–372.
21. Hadwin, A. F., Wozney, L., & Pontin, O. (2005). Scaffolding the appropriation of self-regulatory activity: a socio-cultural analysis of changes in teacher-student discourse about a graduate research portfolio. Instructional Science, 33, 413–450.
22. Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 65–84). New York: Routledge.
23. Heikkilä, A., & Lonka, K. (2006). Studying in higher education: students’ approaches to learning, self-regulation, and cognitive strategies. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 99–117.
24. Hurme, T. L., Palonen, T., & Järvelä, S. (2006). Metacognition in joint discussions: an analysis of the patterns of interaction and the metacognitive content of the networked discussions in mathematics. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 181–200.
25. Iiskala, T., Vauras, M., Lehtinen, E., & Salonen, P. K. (2011). Socially shared metacognition in dyads of pupils in collaborative mathematical problem-solving processes. Learning and Instruction, 21, 379–393.
26. Järvelä, S., Järvenojä, H., Malmberg, J., & Hadwin, A. (2013). Exploring socially shared regulation in the context of collaboration. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12, 267–286.
27. King, A. (1997). Ask to think-tell why©: a model to transactive peer tutoring for scaffolding higher level complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 32, 221–235.
28. King, A. (1998). Transactive peer tutoring: distributing cognition and metacognition. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 57–74.
29. King, A. (2002). Structuring peer interaction to promote high-level cognitive processing. Theory Into Practice, 41, 33–39.
30. Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 178–181.
31. Kumpulainen, K., & Kaartinen, S. (2003). The interpersonal dynamics of collaborative reasoning in peer interactive dyads. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71, 333–371.
32. McLuckie, J., & Topping, K. J. (2004). Transferable skills for online peer learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 563–584.
33. Meijer, J., Veenman, M. V. J., & van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2006). Metacognitive activities in text-studying and problem-solving: development of a taxonomy. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 209–237.
34. Michinov, N., & Michinov, E. (2009). Investigating the relationship between transactive memory and performance in collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 19, 43–54.
35. Molenaar, I. (2011). It’s all about metacognitive activities: Computerized scaffolding of self-regulated learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
36. Molenaar, I., van Boxtel, C., & Sleegers, P. (2010). The effects of scaffolding metacognitive activities in small groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1727–1738.
37. Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2009). Self-efficacy and prior domain knowledge: to what extent does monitoring mediate their relationship with hypermedia learning? Metacognition and Learning, 4, 197–216.
38. Nath, L. R., & Ross, S. M. (2001). The influence of a peer-tutoring training model for implementing cooperative groupings with elementary students. Educational Technology Research & Development, 49, 41–56.
39. Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., Weinberger, A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2013). Scripting for construction of a transactive memory system in multidisciplinary CSCL environments. Learning and Instruction, 25, 1–12.
40. Nota, L., Soresi, S., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Self-regulation and academic achievement: a longitudinal study. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 198–215.
41. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.
42. Parr, J. M., & Townsend, M. A. R. (2002). Environments, processes, and mechanisms in peer learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 403–423.
43. Pastor, R., & Guallar, E. (1998). Use of two-segmented logistic regression to estimate change-points in epidemiologic studies. American Journal of Psychology, 148, 631–642.
44. Pata, K., Sarapuu, T., & Lehtinen, E. (2005). Tutor scaffolding styles of dilemma solving in network-based role-play. Learning and Instruction, 15, 571–587.
45. Perfect, T., & Schwartz, B. (2002). Applied metacognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Perry, N. E., & Winne, P. H. (2013). Tracing students’ regulation of learning in complex collaborative tasks. In S. Volet & M. Vauras (Eds.), Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation: Methodological advances (pp. 45–66). London: Routledge.
47. Pifarré, M., & Cobos, R. (2010). Promoting metacognitive skills through peer scaffolding in a CSCL environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5, 237–253.
48. Pintrich, P. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667–386.
49. Prins, F. J., Veenman, M. V. J., & Elshout, J. J. (2006). The impact of intellectual ability and metacognition on learning: new support for the threshold of problematicity theory. Learning and Instruction, 16, 374–387.
50. Puntambekar, S. (2006). Analyzing collaborative interactions: divergence, shared understanding, and construction of knowledge. Computers & Education, 47, 332–351.
51. Rasku-Puttonen, H., Eteläpelto, A., Arvaja, M., & Häkkinen, P. (2003). Is successful scaffolding an illusion? Shifting patterns of responsibility and control in teacher-student interaction in a long-term learning project. Instructional Science, 31, 377–393.
52. Robinson, D., Schofield, J., & Steers-Wentzell, K. (2005). Peer and cross-age tutoring in math: outcomes and their design implications. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 327–362.
53. Rogat, T. K., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2011). Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups: an analysis of the interplay between quality of social regulation and group processes. Cognition and Instruction, 29, 375–415.
54. Roscoe, R. D., & Chi, M. (2007). Understanding tutor learning: knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors’ explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research, 77, 334–374.
55. Roscoe, R. D., & Chi, M. (2008). Tutor learning: the role of explaining and responding to questions. Instructional Science, 36, 321–350.
56. Rosé, C., Wang, Y., Cui, Y., Arguello, J., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2008). Analyzing collaborative learning processes automatically: exploiting the advances of computational linguistics in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 237–271.
57. Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: a review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64, 479–530.
58. Schmidt, H. G., & Moust, J. H. C. (1998). Probleemgestuurd onderwijs: Praktijk en theorie (Problem based education: Practice and theory). Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
59. Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111–139.
60. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2007). Influencing children’s self-efficacy and self-regulation of reading and writing through modeling. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 23, 7–25.
61. Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25, 631–645.
62. van der Stel, M., & Veenman, M. (2010). The development of metacognitive skilfulness: a longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 220–224.
63. Vauras, M., & Volet, S. (2013). The study of interpersonal regulation in learning and its challenge to the research methodology. In S. Volet & M. Vauras (Eds.), Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation: Methodological advances (pp. 1–13). London: Routledge.
64. Veenman, M. V. J., Elshout, J. J., & Meijer, J. (1997). The generality vs. domain-specificity of metacognitive skills in novice learning across domains. Learning and Instruction, 7, 187–209.
65. Veenman, M. V. J., Kok, R., & Blöte, A. W. (2005). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills in early adolescence. Instructional Science, 33, 193–211.
66. Veenman, M. V. J., van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14.
67. Volet, S., & Summers, M. (2013). Interpersonal regulation in collaborative learning activities: Reflections and emerging research methodologies. In S. Volet & M. Vauras (Eds.), Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation: Methodological advances (pp. 204–220). London: Routledge.
68. Volet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: how does it emerge and how is it sustained? Learning and Instruction, 19, 128–143.
69. Volet, S., Vauras, M., Khosa, D., & Iiskala, T. (2013). Metacognitive regulation in collaborative learning: Conceptual developments and methodological contextualizations. In S. Volet & M. Vauras (Eds.), Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation: Methodological advances (pp. 67–101). London: Routledge.
70. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
71. Webb, N. M. (2009). The teacher’s role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 1–28.
72. Webb, N. M., & Mastergeorge, A. (2003). Promoting effective helping behaviour in peer-directed groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 73–97.
73. Webb, N. M., Ing, M., Kersting, N., & Nemer, K. M. (2006). Help seeking in cooperative learning groups. In S. A. Karabenick & R. S. Newman (Eds.), Help seeking in academic settings. Goals, groups, and context (pp. 45–88). New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
74. Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46, 71–95.
75. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance: an introduction and an overview. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 1–12). New York: Routledge.