The interpersonal dynamics of collaborative reasoning in peer interactive dyads

Journal of Experimental Education

Volumn 71, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 333-370

  Kumpulainen, Kristiina ^a   Kaartinen, Sinikka ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

Collaborative problem solving; Peer collaboration; Peer interaction processes

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242299110     PISSN: 00220973     EISSN: 19400683     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220970309602069     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Azmitia, M. (1996). Peer interactive minds: Developmental, theoretical, and methodological issues. In P. B. Baltes & U. M. Staudinger (Eds.), Interactive minds: Life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition (pp. 133-162). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Azmitia, M., & Montgomery, R. (1993). Friendship, trarisactive dialogs, and the development of scientific reasoning. Social Development, 2, 202-221.
3. Berkowitz, M. W., Oser, F., & Althof, W. (1987). The development of sociomoral discourse. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Moral development through social interaction (pp. 322-352). New York: Wiley.
4. Champagne, A. (1992). Cognitive research on thinking in academic science and mathematics: Implications for practice and policy. In D. F. Halpem (Ed.), Enhancing thinking skills in the sciences and mathematics (pp. 117-133). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Chan, C. K. K. (2001). Peer collaboration and discourse patterns in learning from incompatible information. Instructional Science, 29, 443-479.
6. Chi, M. T. H., & Bassock, M. (1989). Learning from examples via self-explanations. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 251-282). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Cohen, E. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35.
8. Damon, W., & Phelps, E. (1989). Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 9-19.
9. Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.). (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
10. Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984). The social development of the intellect. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
11. Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge. London: Methuen.
12. Forman, E. (1989). The role of peer interaction in the social construction of mathematical knowledge. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 55-70.
13. Forman, E., & Cazden, C. (1985). Exploring Vygotskian perspectives in education: The cognitive value of peer interaction. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 323-347). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Kams, K., Hamlett, C. L., Dutka, S., & Katzaroff, M. (1996), The relation between student ability and the quality and effectiveness of explanations. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 631-664.
15. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Kazdan, S., Kams, K., Calhoon, M., Hamlett, C., & Hewlett, S. (2000). Effects of workgroup structure and size on student productivity during collaborative work on complex tasks. The Elementary School Journal, 100 183-212.
16. Grossen, M. (1994). Theoretical and methodological consequences of a change in the unit of analysis for the study of peer interactions in a problem-solving situation. European Journal of Psychol? ogy of Education, 71(1), 159-173.
17. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989), Language, context, and text. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
18. Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (2000). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instructiont 17, 379-432.
19. King, A. (1989). Verbal interaction and problem solving within computer-assisted cooperative learning groups. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 1-15.
20. King, A. (1992). Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning. Educational Psychologist, 27, 111-126.
21. Kruger, A. C. (1993). Peer collaboration: Conflict, cooperation, or both? Social Development, 2, 165-183.
22. Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children's collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 6, 359-377.
23. Moschkovich, J. N. (1996). Moving up and getting steeper: Negotiating shared descriptions of linear graphs. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(3), 239-277.
24. Murray, F. B. (1982). Teaching through social conflict. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 7, 257-271.
25. O'Donnell, A. M., & Dansereau, D. F. (1992). Scripted cooperation in student dyads: A method for analysing and enhancing academic learning and performance. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 120-141). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Perret-Clermont, A-N. (1980). Social interaction and cognitive development in children. London: Academic Press.
27. Perret-Clermont, A-N., Perret, J-F., & Bell, N. (1991). The social construction of meaning and cognitive activity in elementary school children. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 41-62). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
28. Peterson, P. L., Wilkinson, L. C., Spinelli, F., & Swing, S. (1984). Merging the process-product and sociolinguistic paradigms: Research on small group processes. In P. L. Peterson, L. C. Wilkinson, & M. Hallinan (Eds.), The social context of instruction: Group organization and group processes (pp. 126-152). New York: Academic Press.
29. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Rogoff, B., & Toma, C. (1997). Shared thinking: Community and institutional variations. Discourse Processes, 23,471-497.
31. Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1993). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In S. Lajoie & S. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 229-258), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Sharan, S., Shachar, H., & Levine, T. (1999). The innovative school: Organization and instruction. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey (Greenwood).
33. Shaw, M. (1976), Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
34. Stevens, R., & Slavin, R. (1995). The cooperative elementary school: Effects on students' achievement, attitudes, and social relations. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 321-351.
35. Teasley, S. (1995). The role of talk in children's peer collaborations. Developmental Psychology; 31, 207-220.
36. Tolmie, A., Howe, C., MacKenzie, M., & Greer, K. (1993). Task design as an influence on dialog and learning: Primary school work with object flotation. Social Development, 2, 183-201.
37. Tudge, J. R. H. (1992). Processes and consequences of peer collaboration: A Vygotskian analysis. Child Development, 63, 1364-1379.
38. Tudge, J. R. H., & Rogoff, B. (1989). Peer influences on cognitive development: Piagetian and Vygotskian perspectives. In M. H. Bomstein & J. S. Bruner (Eds.), Interaction in human development (pp. 17-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Vion, R. (1992). La communication verbale: Analyse des interactions [Verbal communication: Analysis of interactions]. Paris: Hachette.
40. Webb, N. M. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 366-389.
41. Webb, N., & Kenderski, C. (1984). Student interaction and learning in small-group and whole-class settings. In P. Peterson, L. Wilkinson, & M. Hallinan (Eds.), The social context of instruction: Group organization and group processes (pp. 153-170). New York: Academic Press.
42. Webb, N. M., Troper, J., & Fall, J. R. (1995). Constructive activity and learning in collaborative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 406-423.