Corrigendum to: Change Their Choice! Changing Behavior Using the CAN Approach and Activism Research : CHANGE THEIR CHOICE! (Psychology & Marketing, (2015), 32, 5, (486-500), 10.1002/mar.20794);Change their choice! Changing behavior using the CAN approach and activism research

Psychology and Marketing

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 486-500

  Wansink, Brian ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928569281     PISSN: 07426046     EISSN: 15206793     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mar.21054     Document Type: Erratum

References (104)

1. Atalay, A. S., & Meloy, M. G. (2011). Retail therapy: A strategic effort to improve mood. Psychology & Marketing, 28, 638-659.
2. Aydi{dotless}noğlu, N. Z., & Krishna, A. (2011). Guiltless gluttony: The asymmetric effect of size labels on size perceptions and consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 1095-1112.
3. Bolhuis, D. P., Lakemond, C. M., de Wijk, R. A., Luning, P. A., & de Graaf, C. (2013). Consumption with large sip sizes increases food intake and leads to underestimation of the amount consumed. PloS One, 8(1), e53288.
4. Cardello, A. V. (1996). The role of the human senses in food acceptance. Food Choice, Acceptance and Consumption (pp. 1-82) Springer.
5. Carels, R. A., Konrad, K., & Harper, J. (2007). Individual differences in food perceptions and calorie estimation: An examination of dieting status, weight, and gender. Appetite, 49, 450-458.
6. Chandon, P., & Ordabayeva, N. (2009). Supersize in one dimension, downsize in three dimensions: Effects of spatial dimensionality on size perceptions and preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(6), 739-753.
7. Chandon, P., & Wansink, B. (2002). When are stockpiled products consumed faster? A convenience-salience framework of postpurchase consumption incidence and quantity. Journal of Marketing Research, 39, 321-335.
8. Chandon, P., & Wansink, B. (2006). How biased household inventory estimates distort shopping and storage decisions. Journal of Marketing, 70, 118-135.
9. Chandon, P., & Wansink, B. (2007). The biasing health halos of fast-food restaurant health claims: Lower calorie estimates and higher side-dish consumption intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 301-314.
10. Cheema, A., & Soman, D. (2008). The effect of partitions on controlling consumption. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 665-675.
11. Chernev, A. (2011). The dieter's paradox. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21, 178-183.
12. Cornil, Y., & Chandon, P. (2013). From fan to fat? Vicarious losing increases unhealthy eating, but self-affirmation is an effective remedy. Psychological Science, doi:10.1177/0956797613481232.
13. Desai, K. K., & Talukdar, D. (2003). Relationship between product groups' price perceptions, shopper's basket size, and grocery store's overall store price image. Psychology & Marketing, 20, 903-933.
14. Dyer, R. F., & Shimp, T. A. (1977). Enhancing the role of marketing-research in public-policy decision-making. Journal of Marketing, 41, 63-67.
15. Finkelstein, S. R., & Fishbach, A. (2010). When healthy food makes you hungry. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 357-367.
16. Garber Jr., L. L., Hyatt, E. M., & Starr Jr., R. G. (2003). Measuring consumer response to food products. Food Quality and Preference, 14(1), 3-15. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00030-7.
17. Gardner, M. P., Wansink, B., Kim, J., & Park, S. (2014). Better moods for better eating? How mood influences food choice. J. Consumer Psychol., 24, 320-335.
18. Garg, N., Wansink, B., & Inman, J. J. (2007). The influence of incidental affect on consumers' food intake. Journal of Marketing, 71, 194-206.
19. Geier, A., Wansink, B., & Rozin, P. (2012). Red potato chips: Segmentation cues can substantially decrease food intake. Health Psychology, 31(3), 398-401.
20. Grunert, K. G., Bolton, L. E., & Raats, M. M. (2011). Processing and acting upon nutrition labeling on food: The state of knowledge and new directions for transformative consumer research. In D. G. Mick, S. Pettigrew, J. L. Ozanne, & C. Pechmann (Eds.), Transformative consumer research for personal and collective well-being (pp. 333-351). New York: Routledge.
21. Hanks, A. S., Just, D. R., Smith, L. E., & Wansink, B. (2012). Healthy convenience: Nudging students toward healthier choices in the lunchroom. Journal of Public Health, 34, 370-376.
22. Hanks, A. S., Just, D. R., & Wansink, B. (2013). Smarter lunchrooms can address new school lunchroom guidelines and childhood obesity. Journal of Pediatrics, 162(4), 867-869.
23. Hanks, A. S., Just, D. R., & Wansink, B. (2013). Chocolate milk consequences: A pilot study evaluating the consequences of banning chocolate milk in school cafeterias. PLoS One, 9(4), e91022. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0091022.
24. Hansen, T., & Thomsen, T. U. (2013). I know what I know, but I will probably fail anyway: How learned helplessness moderates the knowledge calibration-Dietary choice quality relationship. Psychology & Marketing, 30, 1008-1028.
25. Hantula, D. A. (2003). Guest editorial: Evolutionary psychology and consumption. Psychology & Marketing, 20, 757-763.
26. Hauser, M., Nussbeck, F. W., & Jonas, K. (2013). The impact of food-related values on food purchase behavior and the mediating role of attitudes: A Swiss study. Psychology & Marketing, 30, 765-778.
27. Hermans, R. C., Herman, C. P., Larsen, J. K., & Engels, R. C. (2010). Social modeling effects on snack intake among young men. The role of hunger. Appetite, 54(2), 378-383.
28. Hermans, R. C., Larsen, J. K., Herman, C. P., & Engels, R. C. (2008). Modeling of palatable food intake in female young adults. Effects of perceived body size. Appetite, 51(3), 512-518.
29. Hermans, R. C., Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A., Bevelander, K. E., Herman, C. P., Larsen, J. K., & Engels, R. C. (2012). Mimicry of food intake: The dynamic interplay between eating companions. PloS One, 7(2), e31027.
30. Hetherington, M. M., Anderson, A. S., Norton, G. N. M., & Newson, L. (2006). Situational effects on meal intake: A comparison of eating alone and eating with others. Physiology and Behavior, 88, 498-505.
31. Higgs, S. (2008). Cognitive influences on food intake: The effects of manipulating memory for recent eating. Physiology and Behavior, 94, 734-739.
32. Higgs, S., & Woodward, M. (2009). Television watching during lunch increases afternoon snack intake of young women. Appetite, 52, 39-43.
33. Hoegg, J., & Alba, J. W. (2007). Taste perception: More than meets the tongue. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 490-498.
34. Irmak, C., Vallen, B., & Robinson, S. R. (2011). The impact of product name on dieters' and nondieters' food evaluations and consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 390-405.
35. Just, D. R., & Wansink, B. (2009). Better school meals on a budget: Using behavioral economics and food psychology to improve meal selection. Choices, 24, 1-6.
36. Just, D. R., & Wansink, B. (2013). One man's tall is another man's small: How framing of portion size influences food choice. Health Economics, 23, 776-791. doi: 10.1002/hec.2949.
37. Keller, P. (2008). Presidential address. Advances in Consumer Research, 32, 1-7.
38. Khare, A., & Inman, J. J. (2009). Daily, week-part, and holiday patterns in consumers' caloric intake. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 28, 234-252.
39. Kozup, J. C., Creyer, E. H., & Burton, S. (2003). Making healthful food choices: The influence of health claims and nutrition information on consumers' evaluations of packaged food products and restaurant menu items. Journal of Marketing, 67, 19-34.
40. Laroche, H. H., Ford, C., Hansen, K., Cai, X., Just, D. R., Hanks, A. S., & Wansink, B. (2015). Concession stand makeovers: A pilot study of offering healthy foods at high school concession stands. Journal of Public Health (Oxford, England), 37(1), 116-124. doi:fdu015 [pii].
41. Lee, L., Frederick, S., & Ariely, D. (2006). Try it, you'll like it: The influence of expectation, consumption, and revelation on preferences for beer. Psychological Science, 17, 1054-1058.
42. Levy, S. J. (1996). Stalking the amphisbaena. Journal of Consumer Research, 163-176.
43. Lowe, B., de Souza-Monteiro, D. M., & Fraser, I. (2013). Nutritional labelling information: Utilisation of new technologies. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(11-12), 1337-1366. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2013.798673.
44. Marchiori, D., Corneille, O., & Klein, O. (2012). Container size influences snack food intake independently of portion size. Appetite, 58, 814-817.
45. McFerran, B., Dahl, D. W., Fitzsimons, G. J., & Morales, A. C. (2010). I'll have what she's having: Effects of social influence and body type on the food choices of others. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 915-929.
46. Mick, D. G. (2006). Meaning and mattering through transformative consumer research. Advances in Consumer Research, 33(1), 1-4.
47. Moorman, C., Ferraro, R., & Huber, J. (2012). Unintended nutrition consequences: Firm responses to the nutrition labeling and education act. Marketing Science, 31(5), 717-737.
48. Mori, D., Chaiken, S., & Pliner, P. (1987). "Eating lightly" and the self-presentation of femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(4), 693.
49. Murray, J. B., Ozanne, J. L., & Shapiro, J. M. (1994). Revitalizing the critical imagination: Unleashing the crouched tiger. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 559-565.
50. Musicus, A., Tal, A., & Wansink, B. (2014). Eyes in the aisles: Why is Cap'n Crunch looking down at my child? Environment and Behavior, doi:10.1177/0013916514528793.
51. Nies, S., & Natter, M. (2012). Does private label quality influence consumers' decision on where to shop? Psychology & Marketing, 29, 279-292.
52. Nocella, G., Boecker, A., Hubbard, L., & Scarpa, R. (2012). Eliciting consumer preferences for certified animal-friendly foods: Can elements of the theory of planned behavior improve choice experiment analysis? Psychology & Marketing, 29, 850-868.
53. Olsen, S. O., & Mai, H. T. X. (2013). Consumer participation: The case of home meal preparation. Psychology & Marketing, 30, 1-11.
54. Ozanne, J. L., & Saatcioglu, B. (2008). Participatory action research. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 423-439.
55. Painter, J. E., Wansink, B., & Hieggelke, J. B. (2002). How visibility and convenience influence candy consumption. Appetite, 38(3), 237-238.
56. Parmar, N. (2007). 10 things your bartender won't tell you. Smart Money, 31. www.smartmoney.com, retrieved 2/1/2008.
57. Phillips, D. M., & Hallman, W. K. (2013). Consumer risk perceptions and marketing strategy: The case of genetically modified food. Psychology & Marketing, 30, 739-748.
58. Provencher, V., Polivy, J., & Herman, C. P. (2008). Perceived healthiness of food. If it's healthy, you can eat more! Appetite, 52, 340-344.
59. Roberts, M., & Pettigrew, S. (2013). Psychosocial influences on children's food consumption. Psychology & Marketing, 30, 103-120.
60. Romero, N. D., Epstein, L. H., & Salvy, S. (2009). Peer modeling influences girls' snack intake. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 109(1), 133-136.
61. Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515-530.
62. Sharpe, K. M., Staelin, R., & Huber, J. (2008). Using extremeness aversion to fight obesity: Policy implications of context dependent demand. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 406-422.
63. Sheth, J. N., & Sisodia, R. S. (2005). A dangerous divergence: Marketing and society. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 24, 160-162.
64. Shimizu, M., Johnson, M., & Wansink, B. (2014). In good company: The effect of an eating companion's appearance on food intake. Appetite, 83, 263-268.
65. Shimp, T. A. (1994). Academic Appalachia and the discipline of consumer research. Advances in Consumer Research, 21, 1-7.
66. Shiv, B., & Nowlis, S. M. (2004). The effect of distractions while tasting a food sample: The interplay of informational and affective components in subsequent choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 599-608.
67. Smarandescu, L., Walker, D., & Wansink, B. (2014). Big drinkers: How BMI, gender and rules of thumb influence the free pouring of wine. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25(6), 1060-1065.
68. Sobal, J., & Wansink, B. (2007). Kitchenscapes, tablescapes, platescapes, and foodscapes: Influences of microscale built environments on food intake. Environment and Behavior, 39, 124-142.
69. Spence, C., & Gallace, A. (2011). Multisensory design: Reaching out to touch the consumer. Psychology & Marketing, 28, 267-308.
70. Stroebele, N., & De Castro, J. M. (2004). Effect of ambience on food intake and food choice. Nutrition, 20, 821-838.
71. Tarkiainen, A., & Sundqvist, S. (2009). Product involvement in organic food consumption: Does ideology meet practice? Psychology & Marketing, 26, 844-863. doi:10.1002/mar.20302.
72. Tuorila, H., Meiselman, H. L., Bell, R., Cardello, A. V., & Johnson, W. (1994). Role of sensory and cognitive information in the enhancement of certainty and linking for novel and familiar foods. Appetite, 23, 231-246.
73. Tuorila, H. M., Meiselman, H. L., Cardello, A. V., & Lesher, L. L. (1998). Effect of expectations and the definition of product category on acceptance of unfamiliar foods. Food Quality and Preference, 13, 561-569.
74. van Kleef, E., Otten, K., & van Trijp, H. C. (2012). Healthy snacks at the checkout counter: A lab and field study on the impact of shelf arrangement and assortment structure on consumer choices. BMC Public Health, 12, 1072-2458-12-1072. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-1072.
75. Van Ittersum, K., & Wansink, B. (2012). Plate size and color suggestibility: The Delboeuf illusion's bias on serving and eating behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 215-228.
76. Van Ittersum, K., & Wansink, B. (2013). Extraverted children are more biased by bowl sizes than introverts. PLoS One, 8, e78224.
77. Vega Zamora, M., Ruiz, F. J. T., Armenteros, E. M. M., & Rosa, M. P. (2014). Organic as a heuristic cue: What Spanish consumers mean by organic foods. Psychology & Marketing, 31, 349-359.
78. Vermeir, I., & Van Kenhove, P. (2005). The influence of need for closure and perceived time pressure on search effort for price and promotional information in a grocery shopping context. Psychology & Marketing, 22, 71-95.
79. Vermeer, W. M., Steenhuis, I. H., & Seidell, J. C. (2010). Portion size: A qualitative study of consumers' attitudes toward point-of-purchase interventions aimed at portion size. Health Education Research, 25(1), 109-120. doi:10.1093/her/cyp051.
80. Wansink, B. (2005). Marketing nutrition. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
81. Wansink, B. (2006). Mindless eating-Why we eat more than we think. New York: Bantam Dell.
82. Wansink, B. (2011). Activism research: Designing research that intends to transform. In Mick, Pettigrew, Pechmann, and Ozanne (Eds.), Transformative consumer research for personal and collective well-being (pp. 67-88). New York: Taylor & Francis/Routledge.
83. Wansink, B. (2013). Convenient, attractive, and normal: The CAN approach to making children slim by design. Childhood Obesity, 9, 277-278.
84. Wansink, B. (2014). Slim by design-Mindless eating solutions for everyday life. New York: William-Morrow.
85. Wansink, B., & Chandon, P. (2014). Slim by design: Redirecting the accidental drivers of mindless overeating. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24, 446-451.
86. Wansink, B., & Huckabee, M. (2005). De-marketing obesity. California Management Review, 47(4), 6-18.
87. Wansink, B., & Park, S.-B. (2002). Sensory suggestiveness and labeling: Do soy labels bias taste? Journal of Sensory Studies, 17(5), 483-491.
88. Wansink, B., Payne, C. R., & Shimizu, M. (2011). The 100-calorie semi-solution: Sub-packaging most reduces intake among the heaviest. Obesity, 19(5), 1098-1100.
89. Wansink, B., & Hanks, A. S. (2013). Slim by design: Serving healthy foods first in buffet lines improves overall meal selection, PLoS One, 8:10, e77055.
90. Wansink, B., & Johnson, K. A. (2014). The clean plate club: About 92% of self-served food is eaten. International Journal of Obesity, 39, 371-374.
91. Wansink, B., & Just, D. R. (2015). Trayless cafeterias lead diners to take less salad and relatively more dessert. Public Health Nutrition, FirstView, 1-2. doi:10.1017/S1368980013003066.
92. Wansink, B., & Pope, L. (2014). When do gain framed health messages work better than fear appeals? Nutrition Reviews, 73, 4-11.
93. Wansink, B., & Sobal, J. (2007). Mindless eating: The 200 daily food decisions we overlook. Environment & Behavior, 39, 106-123.
94. Wansink, B., & Van Ittersum, K. (2003). Bottoms up! The influence of elongation on pouring and consumption volume. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 455-463.
95. Wansink, B., Van Ittersum, K., & Painter, J. E. (2006). Ice cream illusions: Bowls, spoons, and self-served portion sizes. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 31(3), 240-243.
96. Wansink, B., Just, D. R., & Payne, C. R. (2012). Can branding improve school lunches? Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 166, 967-968.
97. Wansink, B., Just, D. R., Payne, C. R., & Klinger, M. Z. (2012). Attractive names sustain increased vegetable intake in schools. Preventive Medicine, 55, 330-332.
98. Wansink, B., Just, D. R., Hanks, A. S., & Smith, L. S. (2013). Pre-sliced fruit in schools increases selection and intake. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 44, 477-480.
99. Wansink, B., Painter, J. E., & North, J. (2005). Bottomless bowls: Why visual cues of portion size may influence intake. Obesity Research, 13(1), 93-100.
100. Whyte, W. F. (1991). Participatory action research (Sage focus edition). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
101. Wilcox, K., Vallen, B., Block, L., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2009). Vicarious goal fulfillment: When the mere presence of a healthy option leads to an ironically indulgent decision. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 380-393.
102. Wilkie, W. L., & Gardner, D. M. (1974). The role of marketing research in public policy decision making. The Journal of Marketing, 38, 38-47.
103. Xie, C., Bagozzi, R. P., & Østli, J. (2013). Cognitive, emotional, and sociocultural processes in consumption. Psychology & Marketing, 30, 12-25.
104. Young, L., & Nestle, M. (2002). The contribution of expanding portion sizes to the US obesity epidemic. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 246-249.