Action semantics: A unifying conceptual framework for the selective use of multimodal and modality-specific object knowledge

Physics of Life Reviews

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 220-250

  van Elk, Michiel ^a   van Schie, Hein ^b   Bekkering, Harold ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Action planning; Action semantics; Affordances; Conceptual knowledge; Objects; Tool use

Indexed keywords

NEUROIMAGING;

ACTION PLANNING; ACTION SEMANTICS; AFFORDANCES; CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE; OBJECTS; TOOL USE;

SEMANTICS;

ANIMAL; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RESEARCH; SEMANTICS;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RESEARCH; SEMANTICS;

EID: 84901597424     PISSN: 15710645     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.005     Document Type: Review

References (320)

1. Rothi L.J.G., Ochipa C., Heilman K.M. A cognitive neuropsychological model of limb praxis. Cogn Neuropsychol 1991, 8:443-458.
2. Patterson K., Nestor P.J., Rogers T.T. Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007, 8:976-987.
3. Pobric G., Jefferies E., Ralph M.A.L. Amodal semantic representations depend on both anterior temporal lobes: evidence from repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:1336-1342.
4. Pulvermüller F. How neurons make meaning: brain mechanisms for embodied and abstract-symbolic systems. Trends Cogn Sci 2013.
5. Rueschemeyer S.A., Lindemann O., van Elk M., Bekkering H. Embodied cognition: the interplay between automatic resonance and selection-for-action mechanisms. Eur J Soc Psychol 2009, 39:1180-1187.
6. Cesario J., Plaks J.E., Hagiwara N., Navarrete C.D., Higgins E.T. The ecology of automaticity: how situational contingencies shape action. Semant Soc Behav Psychol Sci 2010, 21:1311-1317.
7. Heilman K.M., Maher L.H., Greenwald M.L., Rothi L.JG. Conceptual apraxia from lateralized lesions. Neurology 1995, 5.
8. Hodges J.R., Spatt J., Patterson K. "What" and "how": evidence for the dissociation of object knowledge and mechanical problem-solving skills in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999, 96:9444-9448.
9. Hoeren M., Kaller C.P., Glauche V., Vry M.S., Rijntjes M., Hamzei F., et al. Action semantics and movement characteristics engage distinct processing streams during the observation of tool use. Exp Brain Res 2013, 229:243-260.
10. Labruna L., Fernandez-del-Olmo M., Landau A., Duque J., Ivry R.B. Modulation of the motor system during visual and auditory language processing. Exp Brain Res 2011, 211:243-250.
11. Lindemann O. Semantic activation in action planning. J Exp Psychol Hum 2006, 32:633-643.
12. Noppeney U. The neural systems of tool and action semantics: a perspective from functional imaging. J Physiol 2008, 102:40-49.
13. Noppeney U., Price C.J. Retrieval of visual, auditory, and abstract semantics. Neuroimage 2002, 15(4):917-926.
14. Schwartz R.L., Adair J.C., Raymer A.M., Williamson D.J.G., Crosson B., Rothi L.J.G., et al. Conceptual apraxia in probable Alzheimer's disease as demonstrated by the Florida action recall test. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2000, 6:265-270.
15. Springer A., Prinz W. Action semantics modulate action prediction. Q J Exp Psychol 2010, 63:2141-2158.
16. van Elk M., Viswanathan S., van Schie HT Bekkering H., Grafton S.T. Pouring or chilling a bottle of wine: an fMRI study on the prospective planning of object-directed actions. Exp Brain Res 2012, 218:189-200.
17. Vingerhoets G., Vandekerckhove E., Honore P., Vandemaele P., Achten E. Neural correlates of pantomiming familiar and unfamiliar tools: action semantics versus mechanical problem solving?. Hum Brain Mapp 2011, 32:905-918.
18. Willems R.M., Casasanto D. Flexibility in embodied language understanding. Front Physiol 2011, 2:116.
19. Yamazaki Y., Yokochi H., Tanaka M., Okanoya K., Iriki A. Potential role of monkey inferior parietal neurons coding action semantic equivalences as precursors of parts of speech. Soc Neurosci 2010, 5:105-117.
20. Yoon E.Y., Humphreys G.W., Riddoch M.J. Action naming with impaired semantics: neuropsychological evidence contrasting naming and reading for objects and verbs. Cogn Neuropsychol 2005, 22:753-767.
21. Lhermitte F. Utilization behavior and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. Brain 1983, 106:237-255.
22. Shallice T., Burgess P.W., Schon F., Baxter D.M. The origins of utilization behavior. Brain 1989, 112:1587-1598.
23. Bub D.N., Masson M.E., Cree G.S. Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words. Cognition 2007.
24. Bub D.N., Masson M.E.J., Cree G.S. Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words. Cognition 2008, 106:27-58.
25. Ellis R., Tucker D. Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects. Br J Psychol 2000, 91(4):451-471.
26. Klatzky R.L., Pellegrino J.W., McCloskey B.P., Doherty S. Can you squeeze a tomato? The role of motor representations in semantic sensibility judgments. J Mem Lang 1989, 28:56-77.
27. Tucker M., Ellis R. The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Vis Cogn 2001, 8:769-800.
28. Phillips J.C., Ward R. S-R correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance: time course and specificity of response activation. Vis Cogn 2002, 9:540-558.
29. Riddoch M.J., Edwards M.G., Humphreys G.W., West R., Heafield T. Visual affordances direct action: neuropsychological evidence from manual interference. Cogn Neuropsychol 1998, 15:645-683.
30. Tipper S.P., Howard L.A., Houghton G. Action-based mechanisms of attention. Philos Trans R Soc B 1998, 353:1385-1393.
31. Chao L.L., Martin A. Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage 2000, 12:478-484.
32. Garcea F.E., Almeida J., Mahon B.Z. A right visual field advantage for visual processing of manipulable objects. Cogn Affect Behav Ne 2012, 12:813-825.
33. Johnson-Frey S.H. The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends Cogn Sci 2004, 8:71-78.
34. Almeida J., Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. The role of the dorsal visual processing stream in tool identification. Psychol Sci 2010, 21:772-778.
35. Harris I.M., Murray A.M., Hayward W.G., O'Callaghan C.., Andrews S. Repetition blindness reveals differences between the representations of manipulable and nonmanipulable objects. J Exp Psychol Hum 2012, 38:1228-1241.
36. Witt J.K., Kemmerer D., Linkenauger S.A., Culham J. A functional role for motor simulation in identifying tools. Psychol Sci 2010, 21:1215-1219.
37. Bub D.N., Masson M.E.J., Lin T. Features of planned hand actions influence identification of graspable objects. Psychol Sci 2013, 24:1269-1276.
38. van Dam W.O., van Dijk M., Bekkering H., Rueschemeyer S.A. Flexibility in embodied lexical-semantic representations. Hum Brain Mapp 2012, 33:2322-2333.
39. van Elk M., van Schie H.T., Bekkering H. Short-term action intentions overrule long-term semantic knowledge. Cognition 2009, 111:72-83.
40. Costantini M., Ambrosini E., Tieri G., Sinigaglia C., Committeri G. Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space. Exp Brain Res 2010, 207:95-103.
41. Anelli F., Borghi A.M., Nicoletti R. Grasping the pain: motor resonance with dangerous affordances. Conscious Cogn 2012, 21:1627-1639.
42. Bub D.N., Masson M.E.J. Grasping beer mugs: on the dynamics of alignment effects induced by handled objects. J Exp Psychol Hum 2010, 36:341-358.
43. Masson M.E.J., Bub D.N., Breuer A.T. Priming of reach and grasp actions by handled objects. J Exp Psychol Hum 2011, 37:1470-1484.
44. Randerath J., Martin K.R., Frey S.H. Are tool properties always processed automatically? The role of tool use context and task complexity. Cortex 2013, 49:1679-1693.
45. van Elk M., van Schie H.T., Bekkering H. Action semantic knowledge about objects is supported by functional motor activation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2009, 35:1118-1128.
46. van Elk M., Bousardt R., Bekkering H., van Schie H.T. Using goal- and grip-related information for understanding the correctness of other's actions: an ERP study. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e36450.
47. van Elk M., van Schie H.T., Bekkering H. Conceptual knowledge for understanding other's actions is organized primarily around action goals. Exp Brain Res 2008, 189:99-107.
48. Buxbaum L.J., Saffran E.M. Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects. Brain Lang 2002, 82:179-199.
49. Kellenbach M.L., Brett M., Patterson K. Actions speak louder than functions: the importance of manipulability and action in tool representation. J Cogn Neurosci 2003, 15:30-46.
50. Bekkering H., Wohlschlager A., Gattis M. Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. Q J Exp Psychol, A Hum Exp Psychol 2000, 53:153-164.
51. van Elk M., van Schie H.T., Bekkering H. Imitation of hand and tool actions is effector-independent. Exp Brain Res 2011, 214:539-547.
52. Wohlschlager A., Gattis M., Bekkering H. Action generation and action perception in imitation: an instance of the ideomotor principle. Philos Trans R Soc B 2003, 358:501-515.
53. Rosenbaum D.A., Cohen R.G., Jax S.A., Weiss D.J., van der Wel R. The problem of serial order in behavior: Lashley's legacy. Hum Mov Sci 2007, 26:525-554.
54. Rosenbaum D.A., Loukopoulos L.D., Meulenbroek R.G.J., Vaughan J., et al. Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures. Psychol Rev 1995, 102:28-67.
55. Rosenbaum D.A., Vaughan J., Barnes H.J., Jorgensen M.J. Time course of movement planning: selection of handgrips for object manipulation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1992, 18:1058-1073.
56. Cohen R.G., Rosenbaum D.A. Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: generation and recall of motor plans. Exp Brain Res 2004, 157:486-495.
57. Marteniuk R.G., MacKenzie C.L., Jeannerod M., Athenes S., Dugas C. Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. Can J Psychol 1987, 41:365-378.
58. Grafton S.T., Hamilton A.F. Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain. Hum Mov Sci 2007, 26:590-616.
59. Graziano M. The organization of behavioral repertoire in motor cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 2006, 29:105-134.
60. Botvinick M. Hierarchical models of behavior and prefrontal function. Trends Cogn Sci 2008, 12:201-208.
61. Majdandzic J., Grol M.J., van Schie H.T., Verhagen L., Toni I., Bekkering H. The role of immediate and final goals in action planning: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2007, 37:589-598.
62. van Schie H.T., Bekkering H. Neural mechanisms underlying immediate and final action goals in object use reflected by slow wave brain potentials. Brain Res 2007, 1148:183-197.
63. Jax S.A., Buxbaum L.J. Response interference between functional and structural actions linked to the same familiar object. Cognition 2010, 115:350-355.
64. Osiurak F., Roche K., Ramone J., Chainay H. Handing a tool to someone can take more time than using it. Cognition 2013, 128:76-81.
65. Valyear K.F., Chapman C.S., Gallivan J.P., Mark R.S., Culham J.C. To use or to move: goal-set modulates priming when grasping real tools. Exp Brain Res 2011, 212:125-142.
66. Bach P., Knoblich G., Gunter T., Friederici A.D., Prinz W. Action comprehension: deriving spatial and functional relations. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2005, 31:465-479.
67. van Elk M., Paulus M., Pfeiffer C., van Schie H.T., Bekkering H. Learning to use novel objects: a training study on the acquisition of novel action representations. Conscious Cogn 2011, 20:1304-1314.
68. Kawato M. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1999, 9:718-727.
69. Scott S.H., Norman K.E. Computational approaches to motor control and their potential role for interpreting motor dysfunction. Curr Opin Neurol 2003, 16:693-698.
70. Wolpert D.M. Computational approaches to motor control. Trends Cogn Sci 1997, 1:209-216.
71. Wolpert D.M., Kawato M. Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Netw 1998, 11:1317-1329.
72. Feldman A.G. Functional tuning of the nervous system during control of movement or maintenance of a steady posture - II. Controllable parameters of the muscle. Biophysics 1966, 11:565-578.
73. Gottlieb G.L. The generation of the efferent command and the importance of joint compliance in fast elbow movements. Exp Brain Res 1994, 97:545-550.
74. Shadmehr R., Mussaivaldi F.A. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 1994, 14:3208-3224.
75. Rosenbaum D.A., Meulenbroek R.J., Vaughan J., Jansen C. Posture-based motion planning: applications to grasping. Psychol Rev 2001, 108:709-734.
76. Sirigu A., Duhamel J.R. Motor and visual imagery as two complementary but neurally dissociable mental processes. J Cogn Neurosci 2001, 13:910-919.
77. Hommel B., Musseler J., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behav Brain Sci 2001, 24:849-878. [discussion 78-937].
78. Elsner B., Hommel B. Effect anticipation and action control. J Exp Psychol Hum 2001, 27:229-240.
79. Hommel B. Ideomotor action control: on the perceptual grounding of voluntary actions and agents. Action science: foundations of an emerging discipline 2013, 113-136. MIT University Press. W. Prinz, M. Beizert, A. Herwig (Eds.).
80. Rosenbaum D.A., Chapman K.M., Weigelt M., Weis D.J., van der We R. Cognition, action, and object manipulation. Psychol Bull 2012, 138:924-946.
81. Paulus M., Hunnius S., Bekkering H. Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying social learning in infancy: infants' neural processing of the effects of others' actions. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2013.
82. Paulus M., Hunnius S., van Elk M., Bekkering H. How learning to shake a rattle affects 8-month-old infants' perception of the rattle's sound: electrophysiological evidence for action-effect binding in infancy. Dev Cogn Neuros-Neth 2012, 2:90-96.
83. van Elk M., van Schie H.T., van den Heuvel R., Bekkering H. Semantics in the motor system: motor-cortical Beta oscillations reflect semantic knowledge of end-postures for object use. Front Human Neurosci 2010, 4:8.
84. Boulenger V., Roy A.C., Paulignan Y., Deprez V., Jeannerod M., Nazir T.A. Cross-talk between language processes and overt motor behavior in the first 200 msec of processing. J Cogn Neurosci 2006, 18:1607-1615.
85. Creem S.H., Proffitt D.R. Grasping objects by their handles: a necessary interaction between cognition and action. J Exp Psychol Hum 2001, 27:218-228.
86. Gentilucci M., Gangitano M. Influence of automatic word reading on motor control. Eur J Neurosci 1998, 10:752-756.
87. Glover S., Dixon P. Semantics affect the planning but not control of grasping. Exp Brain Res 2002, 146:383-387.
88. Glover S., Rosenbaum D.A., Graham J., Dixon P. Grasping the meaning of words. Exp Brain Res 2004, 154:103-108.
89. Nazir T.A., Boulenger V., Roy A., Silber B., Jeannerod M., Paulignan Y. Language-induced motor perturbations during the execution of a reaching movement. Q J Exp Psychol 2008, 61:933-943.
90. Fischer M.H., Zwaan R.A. Embodied language: a review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Q J Exp Psychol 2008, 61:825-850.
91. Glenberg A.M., Kaschak M.P. Grounding language in action. Psychon Bull Rev 2002, 9:558-565.
92. Zwaan R.A., Taylor L.J. Seeing, acting, understanding: motor resonance in language comprehension. J Exp Psychol Gen 2006, 135:1-11.
93. Glover S., Dixon P. Semantics affect the planning but not control of grasping. Exp Brain Res 2002, 146:383-387.
94. Boulenger V., Roy A.C., Paulignan Y., Deprez V., Jeannerod M., Nazir T.A. Cross-talk between language processes and overt motor behavior in the first 200 ms of processing. J Cogn Neurosci 2006, 18:1607-1615.
95. Chainay H., Humphreys G.W. Privileged access to action for objects relative to words. Psychon Bull Rev 2002, 9:348-355.
96. Yoon E.Y., Humphreys G.W. Direct and indirect effects of action on object classification. Mem Cogn 2005, 33:1131-1146.
97. Helbig H.B., Graf M., Kiefer M. The role of action representations in visual object recognition. Exp Brain Res 2006, 174:221-228.
98. McNair N.A., Harris I.M. Disentangling the contributions of grasp and action representations in the recognition of manipulable objects. Exp Brain Res 2012, 220:71-77.
99. van Elk M., van Schie H.T., Bekkering H. The N400-concreteness effect reflects the retrieval of semantic information during the preparation of meaningful actions. Biol Psychol 2010, 85:134-142.
100. Gallagher S. How the body shapes the mind 2006, Oxford University Press, New York.
101. Zoia S., Blason L., D'Ottavio G., Bulgheroni M., Pezzetta E., Scabar A., et al. Evidence of early development of action planning in the human foetus: a kinematic study. Exp Brain Res 2007, 176:217-226.
102. Fagard J., von Spelke E., Hofsten C. Reaching and grasping a moving object in 6-, 8-, and 10-month-old infants: laterality and performance. Infant Behav Dev 2009, 32:137-146.
103. McCarty M.E., Clifton R.K., Ashmead D.H., Lee P., Goubet N. How infants use vision for grasping objects. Child Dev 2001, 72:973-987.
104. McCarty M.E., Clifton R.K., Collard R.R. The beginnings of tool use by infants and toddlers. Infancy 2001, 2:233-256.
105. Claxton L.J., Keen R., McCarty M.E. Evidence of motor planning in infant reaching behavior. Psychol Sci 2003, 14:354-356.
106. Bourgeois K.S., Khawar A.W., Neal S.A., Lockman J.J. Infant manual exploration of objects, surfaces, and their interrelations. Infancy 2005, 8:233-252.
107. Fein G. Pretend play in childhood: an integrated review. Child Dev 1981, 52:1095-1118.
108. Piaget J. The origin of intelligence in the child 1953, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
109. Capirci O., Contaldo A., Caselli M.C., Volterra V. From action to language through gesture: a longitudinal perspective. Gesture 2005, 5:155-177.
110. Iverson J.M., Goldin-Meadow S. Gesture paves the way for language development. Psychol Sci 2005, 16:367-371.
111. Acredolo L., Goodwyn S. Symbolic gesturing in normal infants. Child Dev 1988, 59:450-466.
112. Werner H., Kaplan B. Symbol formation 1963, Wiley & Sons, New York.
113. Oreilly A.W. Using representations - comprehension and production of actions with imagined objects. Child Dev 1995, 66:999-1010.
114. Overton W.F., Jackson J.P. The representation of imagined in action sequences: a developmental study. Child Dev 1973, 44:309-314.
115. Marshall P.J., Meltzoff A.N. Neural mirroring systems: exploring the EEG mu rhythm in human infancy. Dev Cogn Neuros-Neth 2011, 1:110-123.
116. Pfurtscheller G., da Silva F.H.L. Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles. Clin Neurophysiol 1999, 110:1842-1857.
117. Caetano G., Jousmaki V., Hari R. Actor's and observer's primary motor cortices stabilize similarly after seen or heard motor actions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007, 104:9058-9062.
118. van Elk M., van Schie H.T., Hunnius S., Vesper C., Bekkering H. You'll never crawl alone: neurophysiological evidence for experience-dependent motor resonance in infancy. Neuroimage 2008, 43:808-814.
119. Nystrom P., Ljunghammar T., Rosander K., von Hofsten C. Using mu rhythm desynchronization to measure mirror neuron activity in infants. Dev Sci 2011, 14:327-335.
120. Southgate V., Begus K. Motor activation during the prediction of nonexecutable actions in infants. Psychol Sci 2013, 24:828-835.
121. Southgate V., Johnson M.H., El Karoui I., Csibra G. Motor system activation reveals infants' on-line prediction of others' goals. Psychol Sci 2010, 21:355-359.
122. Southgate V., Johnson M.H., Osborne T., Csibra G. Predictive motor activation during action observation in human infants. Biol Lett 2009, 5:769-772.
123. Stapel J.C., Hunnius S., van Elk M., Bekkering H. Motor activation during observation of unusual versus ordinary actions in infancy. Soc Neurosci 2010, 5:451-460.
124. Marshall P.J., Saby J.N., Meltzoff A.N. Infant brain responses to object weight: exploring goal-directed actions and self-experience. Infancy 2013, 1-19.
125. Koslowski B., Bruner J.S. Learning to use a lever. Child Dev 1972, 43:790-799.
126. Willatts P. Development and rapid adjustment of means-ends behavior in infants aged 6-months to 8-months. Can Psychol Cogn 1985, 5:248-249.
127. Willatts P. Adjustment of means ends coordination and the representation of spatial relations in the production of search errors by infants. Br J Dev Psychol 1985, 3:259-272.
128. Willatts P. Adjustment of means-ends coordination by stage-Iv infants on tasks involving the use of supports. B Br Psychol Soc 1983, 36:259-272.
129. Willatts P. Development of means-end behavior in young infants: pulling a support to retrieve a distant object. Dev Psychol 1999, 35:651-667.
130. Bates E., Carlsonluden V., Bretherton I. Perceptual aspects of tool using in infancy. Infant Behav Dev 1980, 3:127-140.
131. Chen Z., Sanchez R.P., Campbell T. From beyond to within their grasp: the rudiments of analogical problem solving in 10- and 13-month-olds. Dev Psychol 1997, 33:790-801.
132. Gergely G., Csibra G. Teleological reasoning in infancy: the naive theory of rational action. Trends Cogn Sci 2003, 7:287-292.
133. Greenfield P.M. Language tools, and brain - the ontogeny and phylogeny of hierarchically organized sequential behavior. Behav Brain Sci 1991, 14:531-550.
134. Elsner B., Hommel B. Contiguity and contingency in action-effect learning. Psychol Res 2004, 68:138-154.
135. Hauf P., Aschersleben G. Action-effect anticipation in infant action control. Psychol Res 2008, 72:203-210.
136. Hauf P., Elsner B., Aschersleben G. The role of action effects in infants' action control. Psychol Res 2004, 68:115-125.
137. Hofer T., Hauf P., Aschersleben G. Infant's perception of goal-directed actions performed by a mechanical device. Infant Behav Dev 2005, 28:466-480.
138. Gergely G., Nadasdy Z., Csibra G., Biro S. Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition 1995, 56:165-193.
139. Philips A.T., Wellman H.M. Infants' understanding of object-directed action. Cognition 2005, 98:137-155.
140. Meltzoff A.N. Understanding the intentions of others: re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Dev Psychol 1995, 31:1-16.
141. Carpenter M., Akhtar N., Tomasello M. Fourteen through 18-month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions. Infant Behav Dev 1998, 315-330.
142. Sommerville J.A., Woodward A.L., Needham A. Action experience alters 3-month-old infants' perception of others' actions. Cognition 2005, 96:B1-B11.
143. Woodward A.L. Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach. Cognition 1998, 69:1-34.
144. Biro S., Leslie A.M. Infants' perception of goal-directed actions: development through cue-based bootstrapping. Dev Sci 2007, 10:379-398.
145. Falck-Ytter T., Gredeback G., von Hofsten C. Infants predict other people's action goals. Nat Neurosci 2006, 9:878-879.
146. Hunnius S., Bekkering H. The early development of object knowledge: a study of infants' visual anticipations during action observation. Dev Psychol 2010, 46:446-454.
147. Kochukhova O., Gredeback G. Preverbal infants anticipate that food will be brought to the mouth: an eye tracking study of manual feeding and flying spoons. Child Dev 2010, 81:1729-1738.
148. Reid V.M., Csibra G., Belsky J., Johnson M.H. Neural correlates of the perception of goal-directed action in infants. Acta Psychol 2007, 124:129-138.
149. Reid V.M., Striano T. N400 involvement in the processing of action sequences. Neurosci Lett 2008, 433:93-97.
150. Kilner J., Friston K.J., Frith C.D. Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system. Cogn Process 2007, 8:159-166.
151. Reid V.M., Hoehl S., Grigutsch M., Groendahl A., Parise E., Striano T. The neural correlates of infant and adult goal prediction: evidence for semantic processing systems. Dev Psychol 2009, 45:620-629.
152. Kutas M., Federmeier K.D. Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annu Rev Psychol 2011, 62. 62:621-647.
153. McCarty M.E., Clifton R.K., Collard R.R. Problem solving in infancy: the emergence of an action plan. Dev Psychol 1999, 35:1091-1101.
154. Barrett T.M., Davis E.F., Needham A. Learning about tools in infancy. Dev Psychol 2007, 43:352-368.
155. Mccunenicolich L. Toward symbolic functioning - structure of early pretend games and potential parallels with language. Child Dev 1981, 52:785-797.
156. Contaldo A., Cola E., Minichilli F., Crecchi A., Carboncini M.C., Rossi B., et al. Object use affects motor planning in infant prehension. Hum Mov Sci 2013, 32:498-510.
157. Killen M., Uzgiris I.C. Imitation of actions with objects - the role of social meaning. J Genet Psychol 1981, 138:219-229.
158. Geschwind N., Damasio A.R. Apraxia. Handbook of clinical neurology 1985, 423-432. Elsevier, Amsterdam. J.A.M. Frederiks (Ed.).
159. Heilman K.M., Rothi L.J.G. Apraxia. Clinical neuropsychology 1993, 141-164. Oxford University Press, New York. K.M. Heilman, E. Valenstein (Eds.).
160. Goldenberg G. Apraxia and the parietal lobes. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:1449-1459.
161. Liepmann H. Drei aufsatze aus dem apraxiegebiet 1908, Karger, Berlin.
162. Heilman K.M., Rothi L.J., Valenstein E. Two forms of ideomotor apraxia. Neurology 1982, 32:342-346.
163. Sirigu A., Cohen L., Duhamel J.R., Pillon B., Dubois B., Agid Y. A selective impairment of hand posture for object utilization in apraxia. Cortex 1995, 31:41-55.
164. Ochipa C., Rothi L.J.G., Heilman K.M. Ideational apraxia - a deficit in tool selection and use. Ann Neurol 1989, 25:190-193.
165. Belanger S.A., Duffy R.J., Coelho C.A. The assessment of limb apraxia: an investigation of task effects and their cause. Brain Cogn 1996, 32:384-404.
166. Schnider A., Hanlon R.E., Alexander D.N., Benson D.F. Ideomotor apraxia: behavioral dimensions and neuroanatomical basis. Brain Lang 1997, 58:125-136.
167. Buxbaum L.J. Ideomotor apraxia: a call to action. Neurocase 2001, 7:445-458.
168. Buxbaum L.J., Kyle K., Grossman M., Coslett H.B. Left inferior parietal representations for skilled hand-object interactions: evidence from stroke and corticobasal degeneration. Cortex 2007, 43:411-423.
169. Goldenberg G. Apraxia and beyond: life and work of Hugo Liepmann. Cortex 2003, 39:509-524.
170. Goldenberg G., Hagmann S. The meaning of meaningless gestures: a study of visuo-imitative apraxia. Neuropsychologia 1997, 35:333-341.
171. Tessari A., Canessa N., Ukmar M., Rumiati R.I. Neuropsychological evidence for a strategic control of multiple routes in imitation. Brain 2007, 130:1111-1126.
172. Tessari A., Rumiati R.I. The strategic control of multiple routes in imitation of actions. J Exp Psychol Hum 2004, 30:1107-1116.
173. Barsalou L.W. Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philos Trans R Soc B 2009, 364:1281-1289.
174. Kiefer M., Pulvermuller F. Conceptual representations in mind and brain: theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. Cortex 2012, 48:805-825.
175. Warrington E.K., Shallice T. Category specific semantic impairments. Brain 1984, 107:829-854.
176. Fodor J.A. The language of thought 1975, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
177. Kintsch W. The representation of knowledge in minds and machines. Int J Psychol 1998, 33:411-420.
178. Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. J Physiol 2008, 102:59-70.
179. Shallice T. From neuropsychology to mental structure 1988, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
180. Visser M., Jefferies E., Ralph M.A.L. Semantic processing in the anterior temporal lobes: a meta-analysis of the functional neuroimaging literature. J Cogn Neurosci 2010, 22:1083-1094.
181. Wong C., Gallate J. The function of the anterior temporal lobe: a review of the empirical evidence. Brain Res 2012, 1449:94-116.
182. Schwartz M.F., Reed E.S., Montgomery M., Palmer C., Mayer N.H. The quantitative description of action disorganization after brain-damage - a case-study. Cogn Neuropsychol 1991, 8:381-414.
183. Humphreys G.W., Forde E.M.E. Disordered action schema and action disorganisation syndrome. Cogn Neuropsychol 1998, 15:771-811.
184. Schwartz M.F., Montgomery M.W., Buxbaum L.J., Lee S.S., Carew T.G., Coslett H.B., et al. Naturalistic action impairment in closed head injury. Neuropsychology 1998, 12:13-28.
185. Buxbaum L.J., Schwartz M.F., Carew T.G. The role of semantic memory in object use. Cogn Neuropsychol 1997, 14:219-254.
186. Forde E.M.E., Humphreys G.W. The role of semantic knowledge and working memory in everyday tasks. Brain Cogn 2000, 44:214-252.
187. Schwartz M.F. Re-examining the role of executive functions in routine action production. Struct Funct Hum Prefront Cortex 1995, 769:321-335.
188. Hartmann K., Goldenberg G., Daumuller M., Hermsdorfer J. It takes the whole brain to make a cup of coffee: the neuropsychology of naturalistic actions involving technical devices. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:625-637.
189. Luria A.R. Higher cortical functions in man 1966, Basic Books, New York.
190. Morady K., Humphreys G.W. Comparing action disorganization syndrome and dual-task load on normal performance in everyday action tasks. Neurocase 2009, 15:1-12.
191. Cooper R.P., Shallice T. Contention scheduling and the control of routine activities. Cogn Neuropsychol 2000, 17:297-338.
192. Norman D.A., Shallice T. Attention to action - willed and automatic-control of behavior. Bull Psychon Soc 1983, 21:354.
193. Zalla T., Plassiart C., Pillon B., Grafman J., Sirigu A. Action planning in a virtual context after prefrontal cortex damage. Neuropsychologia 2001, 39:759-770.
194. Humphreys G.W., Forde E.M.E. Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: "category-specific" neuropsychological deficits. Behav Brain Sci 2001, 24:453.
195. Botvinick M., Plaut D.C. Doing without schema hierarchies: a recurrent connectionist approach to normal and impaired routine sequential action. Psychol Rev 2004, 111:395-429.
196. Warrington E.K. The selective impairment of semantic memory. Q J Exp Psychol 1975, 27:635-657.
197. Hamanaka T., Matsui A., Yoshida S., Nakanishi M., Fujita K., Banno T., et al. Cerebral laterality and category-specificity in cases of semantic memory impairment with PET-findings and associated with identification amnesia for familiar persons. Brain Cogn 1996, 30:368-372.
198. Hodges J.R., Bozeat S., Lambon Ralph M.A., Patterson K., Spatt J. The role of conceptual knowledge in object use evidence from semantic dementia. Brain 2000, 123(Pt 9):1913-1925.
199. Lauro-Grotto R., Piccini C., Shallice T. Modality-specific operations in semantic dementia. Cortex 1997, 33:593-622.
200. Mion M., Patterson K., Acosta-Cabronero J., Pengas G., Izquierdo-Garcia D., Hong Y.T., et al. What the left and right anterior fusiform gyri tell us about semantic memory. Brain 2010, 133:3256-3268.
201. Nestor P.J., Fryer T.D., Hodges J.R. Declarative memory impairments in Alzheimer's disease and semantic dementia. Neuroimage 2006, 30:1010-1020.
202. Rogers T.T., Lambon Ralph M.A., Garrard P., Bozeat S., McClelland J.L., Hodges J.R., et al. Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychol Rev 2004, 111:205-235.
203. Chao L.L., Haxby J.V., Martin A. Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nat Neurosci 1999, 2:913-919.
204. Martin A., Haxby J.V., Lalonde F.M., Wiggs C.L., Ungerleider L.G. Discrete cortical regions associated with knowledge of color and knowledge of action. Science 1995, 270:102-105.
205. Thompson-Schill S.L., Aguirre G.K., D'Esposito M., Farah M.J. A neural basis for category and modality specificity of semantic knowledge. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37:671-676.
206. Grafton S.T., Fadiga L., Arbib M.A., Rizzolatti G. Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. Neuroimage 1997, 6:231-236.
207. Martin A., Wiggs C.L., Ungerleider L.G., Haxby J.V. Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature 1996, 379:649-652.
208. Allport D.A. Distributed memory, modular systems and dysphasia. Current perspectives in dysphasia 1985, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh. S.K. Newman, R. Epstein (Eds.).
209. Caspers S., Zilles K., Laird A.R., Eickhoff S.B. ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain. Neuroimage 2010, 50:1148-1167.
210. Grabowski T.J., Damasio H., Damasio A.R. Premotor and prefrontal correlates of category-related lexical retrieval. Neuroimage 1998, 7:232-243.
211. Grezes J., Decety J. Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40:212-222.
212. Grezes J., Tucker M., Armony J., Ellis R., Passingham R.E. Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing. Eur J Neurosci 2003, 17:2735-2740.
213. Creem-Regehr S.H., Lee J.N. Neural representations of graspable objects: are tools special?. Cogn Brain Res 2005, 22:457-469.
214. Price C.J., Devlin J.T., Moore C.J., Morton C., Laird A.R. Meta-analyses of object naming: effect of baseline. Hum Brain Mapp 2005, 25:70-82.
215. Noppeney U., Josephs O., Kiebel S., Friston K.J., Price C.J. Action selectivity in parietal and temporal cortex. Cogn Brain Res 2005, 25:641-649.
216. Okada T., Tanaka S., Nakai T., Nishizawa S., Inui T., Sadato N., et al. Naming of animals and tools: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of categorical differences in the human brain areas commonly used for naming visually presented objects. Neurosci Lett 2000, 296:33-36.
217. Murata A., Gallese V., Luppino G., Kaseda M., Sakata H. Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. J Neurophysiol 2000, 83:2580-2601.
218. Sakata H., Taira M., Murata A., Mine S. Neural mechanisms of visual guidance of hand action in the parietal cortex of the monkey. Cereb Cortex 1995, 5:429-438.
219. Beauchamp M.S., Lee K., Haxby J., Martin A. Parallel visual motion processing streams in lateral temporal cortex for manipulable objects and human movements. J Cogn Neurosci 2002, 92-93.
220. Beauchamp M.S., Lee K.E., Haxby J.V., Martin A. fMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving humans and manipulable objects. J Cogn Neurosci 2003, 15:991-1001.
221. Kable J., Chatterjee A. The role of lateral occipitotemporal cortex in action recognition: evidence from repetition suppression using fMRI. J Cogn Neurosci 2005, 116.
222. Kable J., Wilson A., Chatterjee A. Neural substrates of verb knowledge: motion and movement. J Cogn Neurosci 2002, 108-109.
223. Phillips J.A., Humphreys G.W., Price C.J. The neural substrates of action retrieval: an examination of semantic and visual routes to action. J Cogn Neurosci 2000, 124.
224. Born R.T., Bradley D.C. Structure and function of visual area MT. Annu Rev Neurosci 2005, 28:157-189.
225. Beauchamp M.S., Martin A. Grounding object concepts in perception and action: evidence from fMRI studies of tools. Cortex 2007, 43:461-468.
226. Mahon B.Z., Milleville S.C., Negri G.A., Rumiati R.I., Caramazza A., Martin A. Action-related properties shape object representations in the ventral stream. Neuron 2007, 55:507-520.
227. Mizelle J.C., Kelly R.L., Wheaton L.A. Ventral encoding of functional affordances: a neural pathway for identifying errors in action. Brain Cogn 2013, 82:274-282.
228. Vingerhoets G., Acke F., Vandemaele P., Achten E. Tool responsive regions in the posterior parietal cortex: effect of differences in motor goal and target object during imagined transitive movements. Neuroimage 2009, 47:1832-1843.
229. Pelgrims B., Olivier E., Andres M. Dissociation between manipulation and conceptual knowledge of object use in the supramarginalis gyrus. Hum Brain Mapp 2011, 32:1802-1810.
230. Rushworth M.F.S., Behrens T.E.J., Johansen-Berg H. Connection patterns distinguish 3 regions of human parietal cortex. Cereb Cortex 2006, 16:1418-1430.
231. Zhong Y.M., Rockland K.S. Inferior parietal lobule projections to anterior inferotemporal cortex (area TE) in macaque monkey. Cereb Cortex 2003, 13:527-540.
232. Watson C.E., Cardillo E.R., Ianni G.R., Action C.A. Concepts in the brain: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. J Cogn Neurosci 2013, 25:1191-1205.
233. Kiefer M., Sim E.J., Liebich S., Hauk O., Tanaka J. Experience-dependent plasticity of conceptual representations in human sensory-motor areas. J Cogn Neurosci 2007, 19:525-542.
234. Pulvermuller F. Semantic embodiment, disembodiment or misembodiment? In search of meaning in modules and neuron circuits. Brain Lang 2013.
235. Binkofski F., Buccino G., Posse S., Seitz R.J., Rizzolatti G., Freund H.J. A fronto-parietal circuit for object manipulation in man: evidence from an fMRI-study. Eur J Neurosci 1999, 11:3276-3286.
236. Binkofski F., Buccino G., Stephan K.M., Rizzolatti G., Seitz R.J., Freund H.J. A parieto-premotor network for object manipulation: evidence from neuroimaging. Exp Brain Res 1999, 128:210-213.
237. Binkofski F., Dohle C., Posse S., Stephan K.M., Hefter H., Seitz R.J., et al. Human anterior intraparietal area subserves prehension - a combined lesion and functional MRI activation study. Neurology 1998, 50:1253-1259.
238. Kalenine S., Shapiro A.D., Buxbaum L.J. Dissociations of action means and outcome processing in left-hemisphere stroke. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51:1224-1233.
239. Graziano M.S., Aflalo T.N. Mapping behavioral repertoire onto the cortex. Neuron 2007, 56:239-251.
240. Mushiake H., Saito N., Sakamoto K., Itoyama Y., Tanji J. Activity in the lateral prefrontal cortex reflects multiple steps of future events in action plans. Neuron 2006, 50:631-641.
241. Shima K., Isoda M., Mushiake H., Tanji J. Categorization of behavioural sequences in the prefrontal cortex. Nature 2007, 445:315-318.
242. Shima K., Tanji J. Neuronal activity in the supplementary and presupplementary motor areas for temporal organization of multiple movements. J Neurophysiol 2000, 84:2148-2160.
243. Majdandzic J., Bekkering H., van Schie H.T., Toni I. Movement-specific repetition suppression in ventral and dorsal premotor cortex during action observation. Cereb Cortex 2009, 19:2736-2745.
244. Fogassi L., Ferrari P.F., Gesierich B., Rozzi S., Chersi F., Rizzolatti G. Parietal lobe: from action organization to intention understanding. Science 2005, 308:662-667.
245. Snyder L.H., Batista A.P., Andersen R.A. Intention-related activity in the posterior parietal cortex: a review. Vis Res 2000, 40:1433-1441.
246. Hamilton A.F., Grafton S.T. Goal representation in human anterior intraparietal sulcus. J Neurosci 2006, 26:1133-1137.
247. Hamilton A.F., Grafton S.T. Action outcomes are represented in human inferior frontoparietal cortex. Cereb Cortex 2008, 18:1160-1168.
248. Gallivan J., McLean A., Valyear K., Culham J. Decoding the neural mechanisms of human tool use. Can J Exp Psychol 2012, 66:323.
249. Choi S.H., Na D.L., Kang E., Lee K.M., Lee S.W., Na D.G. Functional magnetic resonance imaging during pantomiming tool-use gestures. Exp Brain Res 2001, 139:311-317.
250. Hermsdorfer J., Terlinden G., Muhlau M., Goldenberg G., Wohlschlager A.M. Neural representations of pantomimed and actual tool use: evidence from an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage 2007, 36. T109-T18.
251. Johnson-Frey S.H., Newman-Norlund R., Grafton S.T. A distributed left hemisphere network active during planning of everyday tool use skills. Cereb Cortex 2005, 15:681-695.
252. Kroliczak G., Frey S.H. A common network in the left cerebral hemisphere represents planning of tool use pantomimes and familiar intransitive gestures at the hand-independent level. Cereb Cortex 2009, 19:2396-2410.
253. Moll J., de Oliveira-Souza R., Passman L.J., Cunha F.C., Souza-Lima F., Andreiuolo P.A. Functional MRI correlates of real and imagined tool-use pantomimes. Neurology 2000, 54:1331-1336.
254. Ohgami Y., Matsuo K., Uchida N., Nakai T. An fMRI study of tool-use gestures: body part as object and pantomime. NeuroReport 2004, 15:1903-1906.
255. Peeters R.R., Rizzolatti G., Orban G.A. Functional properties of the left parietal tool use region. Neuroimage 2013, 78:83-93.
256. Valyear K.F., Cavina-Pratesi C., Stiglick A.J., Culham J.C. Does tool-related fMRI activity within the intraparietal sulcus reflect the plan to grasp?. Neuroimage 2007, 36:T94-T108.
257. Valyear K.F., Gallivan J.P., McLean D.A., Culham J.C. fMRI repetition suppression for familiar but not arbitrary actions with tools. J Neurosci 2012, 32:4247-4259.
258. Boronat C.B., Buxbaum L.J., Coslett H.B., Tang K., Saffran E.M., Kimberg D.Y., et al. Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cogn Brain Res 2005, 23:361-373.
259. Canessa N., Borgo F., Cappa S.F., Perani D., Falini A., Buccino G., et al. The different neural correlates of action and functional knowledge in semantic memory: an fMRI study. Cereb Cortex 2008, 18:740-751.
260. Ebisch S.J.H., Babiloni C., Del Gratta C., Ferretti A., Perrucci M.G., Caulo M., et al. Human neural systems for conceptual knowledge of proper object use: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Cereb Cortex 2007, 17:2744-2751.
261. Kan I.P., Kable J.W., Van Scoyoc A., Chatterjee A., Thompson-Schill S.L. Fractionating the left frontal response to tools: dissociable effects of motor experience and lexical competition. J Cogn Neurosci 2006, 18:267-277.
262. Binder J.R., Desai R.H., Graves W.W., Conant L.L. Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cereb Cortex 2009, 19:2767-2796.
263. Visser M., Embleton K.V., Jefferies E., Parker G.J., Ralph M.A.L. The inferior, anterior temporal lobes and semantic memory clarified: novel evidence from distortion-corrected fMRI. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:1689-1696.
264. Gainotti G. The format of conceptual representations disrupted in semantic dementia: a position paper. Cortex 2012, 48:521-529.
265. Gainotti G. The organization and dissolution of semantic-conceptual knowledge: is the 'amodal hub' the only plausible model?. Brain Cogn 2011, 75:299-309.
266. Amoruso L., Gelormini C., Aboitiz F., Gonzalez M.A., Manes F., Cardona J.F., et al. N400 ERPs for actions: building meaning in context. Front Human Neurosci 2013, 7.
267. Bach P., Gunter T.C., Knoblich G., Prinz W., Friederici A.D. N400-like negativities in action perception reflect the activation of two components of an action representation. Soc Neurosci 2009, 4:212-232.
268. Balconi M., Caldiroli C. Semantic violation effect on object-related action comprehension. N400-like event-related potentials for unusual and incorrect use. Neuroscience 2011, 197:191-199.
269. Balconi M., Vitaloni S. The tDCS effect on alpha brain oscillation for correct vs. incorrect object use. The contribution of the left DLPFC. Neurosci Lett 2012, 517:25-29.
270. Proverbio A.M., Riva F. RP and N400 ERP components reflect semantic violations in visual processing of human actions. Neurosci Lett 2009, 459:142-146.
271. Sitnikova T., Holcomb P.J., Kiyonaga K.A., Kuperberg G.R. Two neurocognitive mechanisms of semantic integration during the comprehension of visual real-world events. J Cogn Neurosci 2008, 20:2037-2057.
272. Sitnikova T., Kuperberg G., Holcomb P.J. Semantic integration in videos of real-world events: an electrophysiological investigation. Psychophysiology 2003, 40:160-164.
273. van Elk M., van Schie H.T., Bekkering H. Semantics in action: an electrophysiological study on the use of semantic knowledge for action. J Physiol 2008, 102:95-100.
274. Nobre A.C., Allison T., Mccarthy G. Word recognition in the human inferior temporal-lobe. Nature 1994, 372:260-263.
275. Nobre A.C., Mccarthy G. Language-related field potentials in the anterior-medial temporal-lobe. 2. Effects of word type and semantic priming. J Neurosci 1995, 15:1090-1098.
276. Bellebaum C., Tettamanti M., Marchetta E., Della Rosa P., Rizzo G., Daum I., et al. Neural representations of unfamiliar objects are modulated by sensorimotor experience. Cortex 2013, 49:1110-1125.
277. Cross E.S., Cohen N.R., Hamilton A.F., Ramsey R., Wolford G., Grafton S.T. Physical experience leads to enhanced object perception in parietal cortex: insights from knot tying. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50:3207-3217.
278. Weisberg J., van Turennout M., Martin A. A neural system for learning about object function. Cereb Cortex 2007, 17:513-521.
279. Vingerhoets G. Knowing about tools: neural correlates of tool familiarity and experience. Neuroimage 2008, 40:1380-1391.
280. Newman-Norlund R., van Schie H.T., van Hoek M.E.C., Cuijpers R.H., Bekkering H. The role of inferior frontal and parietal areas in differentiating meaningful and meaningless object-directed actions. Brain Res 2010, 1315:63-74.
281. Cooper R.P., Shallice T. Hierarchical schemas and goals in the control of sequential behavior. Psychol Rev 2006, 113:887-916.
282. de Lange FP Spronk M., Willems R.M., Toni I., Bekkering H. Complementary systems for understanding action intentions. Curr Biol 2008, 18:454-457.
283. Ondobaka S., Bekkering H. Hierarchy of idea-guided action and perception-guided movement. Front Psychol 2012, 3:1-5.
284. Uithol S., van Rooij I., Bekkering H., Haselager P. Hierarchies in action and motor control. J Cogn Neurosci 2012, 24:1077-1086.
285. Pacherie E. The phenomenology of action: a conceptual framework. Cognition 2008, 107:179-217.
286. Barsalou L.W. Grounded cognition. Annu Rev Psychol 2008, 59:617-645.
287. Ralph M.A.L., Patterson K. Generalization and differentiation in semantic memory - insights from semantic dementia. Year Cogn Neurosci 2008, 1124:61-76.
288. Pulvermuller F. Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005, 6:576-582.
289. Louwerse M.M. Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition. Top Cogn Sci 2011, 3:273-302.
290. Louwerse M.M., Jeuniaux P. The linguistic and embodied nature of conceptual processing. Cognition 2010, 114:96-104.
291. van Schie HT, Wijers A.A., Mars R.B., Benjamins J.S., Stowe L.A. Processing of visual semantic information to concrete words: temporal dynamics and neural mechanisms indicated by event-related brain potentials. Cogn Neuropsychol 2005, 22:364-386.
292. Damasio A.R. Category-related recognition defects as a clue to the neural substrates of knowledge. Trends Neurosci 1990, 13:95-98.
293. Barsalou L.W. Perceptual symbol systems. Behav Brain Sci 1999, 22:577.
294. Ryle G. Knowing how and knowing that 1971, Barnes and Nobles, New York.
295. Wheeler M. Reconstructing the cognitive world: the next step 2005, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
296. Ondobaka S., de Lange FP, Newman-Norlund R.D., Wiemers M., Bekkering H. Interplay between action and movement intentions during social interaction. Psychol Sci 2012, 23:30-35.
297. Badre D. Cognitive control, hierarchy, and the rostro-caudal organization of the frontal lobes. Trends Cogn Sci 2008, 12:193-200.
298. Fuster J.M. Upper processing stages of the perception-action cycle. Trends Cogn Sci 2004, 8:143-145.
299. Petrides M. Lateral prefrontal cortex: architectonic and functional organization. Philos Trans R Soc B 2005, 360:781-795.
300. Gerloff C., Corwell B., Chen R., Hallett M., Cohen L.G. Stimulation over the human supplementary motor area interferes with the organization of future elements in complex motor sequences. Brain 1997, 120:1587-1602.
301. Mummery C.J., Patterson K., Wise R.J.S., Vandenbergh R., Price C.J., Hodges J.R. Disrupted temporal lobe connections in semantic dementia. Brain 1999, 122:61-73.
302. Gloor P. The temporal lobe and the limbic system 1997, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
303. Catani M., Jones D.K., Donato R., ffytche D.H. Occipito-temporal connections in the human brain. Brain 2003, 126:2093-2107.
304. Rizzolatti G., Luppino G., Matelli M., Ffytche D.H. The organization of the cortical motor system: new concepts. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998, 106:283-296.
305. Reynolds J.R., O'reilly R.C. Developing PFC representations using reinforcement learning. Cognition 2009, 113:281-292.
306. Rempel-Clower N.L., Barbas H. The laminar pattern of connections between prefrontal and anterior temporal cortices in the rhesus monkey is related to cortical structure and function. Cereb Cortex 2000, 10:851-865.
307. Friederici A.D. Pathways to language: fiber tracts in the human brain. Trends Cogn Sci 2009, 13:175-181.
308. Barsalou L.W. Grounded cognition: past, present, and future. Top Cogn Sci 2010, 2:716-724.
309. Rizzolatti G., Fabbri-Destro M. The mirror system and its role in social cognition. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2008, 18:179-184.
310. Jacob P. The tuning-fork model of human social cognition: a critique. Conscious Cogn 2009, 18:229-243.
311. Rizzolatti G., Sinigaglia C. The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations. Nat Rev Neurosci 2010, 11:264-274.
312. Rueschemeyer S.A., Lindemann O., van Rooij D., van Dam W., Bekkering H. Effects of intentional motor actions on embodied language processing. Exp Psychol 2010, 57:260-266.
313. van Elk M., van Schie H.T., Neggers S.F., Bekkering H. Neural and temporal dynamics underlying visual selection for action. J Neurophysiol 2010, 104:972-983.
314. van Dam W.O., van Dongen E.V., Bekkering H., Rueschemeyer S.A. Context-dependent changes in functional connectivity of auditory cortices during the perception of object words. J Cogn Neurosci 2012, 24:2108-2119.
315. Poljac E., van Schie H.T., Bekkering H. Understanding the flexibility of action-perception coupling. Psychol Res 2009, 73:578-586.
316. Ondobaka S., Wittmann M., de Lange F., Bekkering H. Context-dependent expectations influence neural processing of observed goal-directed action. J Cogn Neurosci 2013, 262.
317. van Schie H.T., van Waterschoot B.M., Bekkering H. Understanding action beyond imitation: reversed compatibility effects of action observation in imitation and joint action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2008, 34:1493-1500.
318. Sakreida K., Scorolli C., Menz M.M., Heim S., Borghi A.M., Binkofski F. Are abstract action words embodied? An fMRI investigation at the interface between language and motor cognition. Front Human Neurosci 2013, 7.
319. Schuil K.D.I., Smits M., Zwaan R.A. Sentential context modulates the involvement of the motor cortex in action language processing: an fMRI study. Front Human Neurosci 2013, 7.
320. Andersen R.A., Cui H. Intention, action planning, and decision making in parietal-frontal circuits. Neuron 2009, 63:568-583.