Direct and indirect effects of action on object classification

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 1131-1146

  Yoon, Eun Young ^a   Humphreys, Glyn W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HAND GRIP; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; VISION; ADOLESCENT; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; LEARNING; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; RECALL; SEMANTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS;

EID: 33645730869     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193218     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. BARSALOU, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660.
2. BEAUVOIS, M. F. (1982). Optic aphasia: A process of interaction between vision and language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 298, 35-47.
3. BIEDERMAN, I., & COOPER, E. E. (1991). Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming. Perception, 20, 585-593.
4. BOUCART, M., HUMPHREYS, G. W., & LORENCEAU, J. (1995). Automatic access to object identity: Attention to global information, not to particular physical dimensions, is important. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 584-601.
5. BUCCINO, G., BINKOFSKI, F., FINK, G. R., FADIGA, L., FOGASSI, L., GALLESE, R. J., ET AL. (2001). Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: An fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 400-404.
6. CHAINAY, H., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2002). Privileged access to action for objects relative to words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 348-355.
7. CHAO, L. L., HAXBY, J. V., & MARTIN, A. (1999). Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 913-919.
8. CHAO, L. L., & MARTIN, A. (2000). Representation of manipulate man-made objects in the dorsal stream. NeuroImage, 12, 478-484.
9. COHEN, J. D., DUNBAR, K., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361.
10. COSLETT, H. M., & SAFFRAN, E. M. (1992). Optic aphasia and the right hemisphere: A replication and extension. Brain & Language, 13, 95-98.
11. CRAIGHERO, L., FADIFA, L., RIZZOLATTI, G., & UMILTÀ, C. (1998). Visuomotor priming. Visual Cognition, 5, 109-126.
12. CRAIGHERO, L., FADIFA, L., RIZZOLATTI, G., & UMILTÀ, C. (1999). Action for perception: A motor-visual attentional effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1673-1692.
13. DECETY, J., PERANI, D., JEANNEROD, M., BETTINARDI, V., WOODS, R., MAZZIOTTA, J. C., & FAZIO, F. (1994). Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography. Nature, 371, 600-602.
14. DERENZI, E., FAGLIONI, P., & SORGATO, P. (1982). Modality-specific and supramodal mechanisms of apraxia. Brain, 105, 301-312.
15. DEVLIN, J. T., MOORE, C. J., MUMMERY, C. J., GORNO-TEMPINI, M. L., PHILLIPS, J. A., NOPPENEY, U., ET AL. (2002). Anatomic constraints on cognitive theories of category specificity. NeuroImage, 15, 675-685.
16. GIBSON, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
17. GLASER, W. R. (1992). Picture naming. Cognition, 42, 61-105.
18. GLENBERG, A. M., & KASCHAK, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558-565.
19. GRABOWSKI, T., DAMASIO, H., & DAMASIO, A. R. (1998). Premotor and prefrontal correlates of category-related lexical retrieval. NeuroImage, 7, 232-243.
20. GRAFTON, S. T., ARBIB, M. A., FADIGA, L., & RIZZOLATTI, G. (1996). Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography: 2. Observation compared with imagination. Experimental Brain Research, 112, 103-111.
21. GREZES, J., & DECETY, J. (2002). Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia, 40, 212-222.
22. GREZES, J., TUCKER, M., ELLIS, R., & PASSINGHAM, R. E. (2003). Objects automatically potentiate action: An fMRI study of implicit processing. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 2735-2740.
23. HANDY, T. C., GRAFTON, S. T., SHROFF, N. M., KETAY, S., & GAZZANIGA, M.S. (2003). Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 421-427.
24. HEYWOOD, C. A., & ZIHL, J. (1999). Motion blindness. In G. W. Humphreys (Ed.), Case studies in the neumpsychology of vision (p. 1-16). Hove, U.K. Psychology Press.
25. HILLIS, A., & CARAMAZZA, A. (1995). Cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying visual and semantic processing: Implication from "optic aphasia." Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 457-478.
26. HINTZMAN, D. L. (1984). MINERVA 2: A simulation model of human memory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 16, 96-101.
27. HINTZMAN, D. L. (1986). "Schema abstraction" in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411-428.
28. HODGES, J. R., BOZEAT, S., LAMBON RALPH, M. A., PATTERSON, K., & SPATT, J. (2000). The role of conceptual knowledge in object use: Evidence from semantic dementia. Brain, 123, 1913-1925.
29. HODGES, J. R., SPATT, J., & PATTERSON, K. (1999). "What" and "how": Evidence for the dissociation of object knowledge and mechanical problem-solving skills in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 9444-9448.
30. HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2001). Objects, affordances . . . action! The Psychologist, 14, 408-412.
31. HUMPHREYS, G. W., & RIDDOCH, M. J. (2001). Detection by action: Neuropsychological evidence for action-defined templates in search. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 84-88.
32. HUMPHREYS, G. W., & RIDDOCH, M. J. (2003). From vision to action, and action to vision: A convergent route approach to vision, action and attention. In D. Irwin & B. Ross (Eds.), Cognitive vision: Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 42, pp. 225-264). New York: Elsevier.
33. JEANNEROD, M., DECETY, J., & MICHEL, F. (1994). Impairment of grasping movements following a bilateral posterior parietal lesion. Neumpsychologia, 32, 369-380.
34. KELLENBACH, M. L., BRETT, M., & PATTERSON, K. (2003). Actions speak louder than functions: The importance of manipulability and action in tool representation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 30-46.
35. KOURTZI, Z., & KANWISHER, N. (2000). Activation in human MT/MST by static images with implied motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 48-55.
36. LHERMITTE, F., & BEAUVOIS, M. F. (1973). A visual-speech disconnection syndrome: Report of a case with optic aphasia. Brain, 96, 695-714.
37. MACLEOD, C. M. (1991). Half century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
38. MACLEOD, C. M. (1992). The Stroop task: The "gold standard" of attentional measures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 12-14.
39. MANNING, L., & CAMPBELL, R. (1992). Optic aphasia with spared action naming: A description and possible loci of impairment. Neuropsychologia, 30, 587-592.
40. OCHIPA, C, ROTHI, L. J., & HEILMAN, K. M. (1992). Conceptual apraxia in Alzheimer's disease. Brain, 115, 1061-1071.
41. PILGRIM, E., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1991). Impairment of action to visual objects in a case of ideomotor apraxia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 459-473.
42. RIDDOCH, M. J., EDWARDS, M. G., HUMPHREYS, G. W., WEST, R., & HEAFIELD, T. (1998). An experimental study of anarchic hand syndrome: Evidence that visual affordances direct action. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 645-683.
43. RIDDOCH, M. J., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1987). Visual object processing in optic aphasia: A case of semantic access agnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 4, 131-185.
44. RIDDOCH, M. J., HUMPHREYS, G. W., & EDWARDS, M. G. (2000). Visual affordances and object selection. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 603-626). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. RIDDOCH, M. J., HUMPHREYS, G. W., HESLOP, J., & CASTERMANS, E. (2002). Dissociations between object knowledge and everyday action. Neurocase, 8, 100-110.
46. RIDDOCH, M. J., HUMPHREYS, G. W., & PRICE, C. J. (1989). Routes to action: Evidence from apraxia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 6, 437-454.
47. ROY, E. A., & SQUARE, P. A. (1985). Common considerations in the study of limb, verbal, and oral apraxia. In E. A. Roy (Ed.), Neuropsychological studies of apraxia and related disorders (pp. 112-162). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
48. RUMIATI, R. I., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1998). Recognition by action: Dissociating visual and semantic routes to actions in normal observers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 631-647.
49. SAENZ, M., BURACAS, G. T., & BOYNTON, G. M. (2002). Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 631-632.
50. SIMON, J. R., & SMALL, A. M. (1969). Processing auditory information: Interference from an irrelevant cue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 433-435.
51. SIRIOU, A., DUHAMEL, J. R., COHEN, L., PILLON, B., DUBOIS, B., & AGID, Y. (1996). The mental representation of hand movements after parietal cortex damage. Science, 273, 1564-1568.
52. SNOWDEN, J. S., GOULDING, P. J., & NEARY, D. (1989). Semantic dementia: A form of circumscribed cerebral atrophy. Behavioural Neurology, 2, 167-182.
53. STROOP, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
54. TUCKER, M., & ELLIS, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 830-846.
55. WARRINGTON, E. K. (1975). The selective impairment of semantic memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 187-199.
56. YOON, E. Y., HEINKE, D., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2002). Modelling direct constraints on action selection: The naming and action model (NAM). Visual Cognition, 9, 615-661.
57. YOON, E. Y., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2005). Dissociative effects of viewpoint and semantic priming on action and semantic decisions: Evidence for dual route to action from vision. Manuscript submitted for publication.