Ventral encoding of functional affordances: A neural pathway for identifying errors in action

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 82, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 274-282

  Mizelle, J C ^a,b   Kelly, Rachel L ^b   Wheaton, Lewis A ^b  

^a ATLANTA VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Action encoding; FMRI; Functional affordances; Tool use; Ventral stream

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INSULA; MALE; MIDDLE TEMPORAL GYRUS; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NORMAL HUMAN; OBJECT MANIPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUPERIOR TEMPORAL GYRUS; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL CORTEX;

ACTION ENCODING; FMRI; FUNCTIONAL AFFORDANCES; TOOL USE; VENTRAL STREAM;

ADULT; BRAIN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; NEURAL PATHWAYS; TOOL USE BEHAVIOR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84879249226     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Andersson, J. L. R., Jenkinson, M., & Smith, S. M. (2007a). Non-linear optimisation. FMRIB technical report. TR07JA1.
2. Andersson, J. L. R., Jenkinson, M., & Smith, S. M. (2007b). Non-linear registration, aka spatial normalisation. FMRIB technical report. TR07JA2.
3. Barde L.H., Buxbaum L.J., Moll A.D. Abnormal reliance on object structure in apraxics' learning of novel object-related actions. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2007, 13(6):997-1008.
4. Beckmann C.F., Jenkinson M., Smith S.M. General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in FMRI. Neuroimage 2003, 20(2):1052-1063.
5. Borghi A.M., Flumini A., Natraj N., Wheaton L.A. One hand, two objects: Emergence of affordance in contexts. Brain and Cognition 2012, 80(1):64-73.
6. Boronat C.B., Buxbaum L.J., Coslett H.B., Tang K., Saffran E.M., Kimberg D.Y., et al. Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 23(2-3):361-373.
7. Bozeat S., Lambon Ralph M.A., Patterson K., Hodges J.R. When objects lose their meaning: What happens to their use?. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2002, 2(3):236-251.
8. Chao L.L., Martin A. Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage 2000, 12(4):478-484.
9. Creem S.H., Proffitt D.R. Defining the cortical visual systems: "What", "where", and "how". Acta Psychologica (Amst) 2001, 107(1-3):43-68.
10. Cui R.Q., Huter D., Egkher A., Lang W., Lindinger G., Deecke L. High resolution DC-EEG mapping of the Bereitschaftspotential preceding simple or complex bimanual sequential finger movement. Experimental Brain Research 2000, 134(1):49-57.
11. Damasio H., Tranel D., Grabowski T., Adolphs R., Damasio A. Neural systems behind word and concept retrieval. Cognition 2004, 92(1-2):179-229.
12. Decety J., Grezes J. Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1999, 3(5):172-178.
13. Decety J., Ingvar D.H. Brain structures participating in mental simulation of motor behavior: A neuropsychological interpretation. Acta Psychologica (Amst) 1990, 73(1):13-34.
14. Ellis R., Tucker M. Micro-affordance: The potentiation of components of action by seen objects. British Journal of Psychology 2000, 91(Pt 4):451-471.
15. Evans, A., Collins, D., Mills, S., Brown, E., Kelly, R., & Peters, T. (1993). 3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes. In Paper presented at the IEEE-nuclear science symposium and medical imaging conference, Piscataway, NJ.
16. Fleming M.K., Stinear C.M., Byblow W.D. Bilateral parietal cortex function during motor imagery. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 201(3):499-508.
17. Frey S.H. What puts the how in where? Tool use and the divided visual streams hypothesis. Cortex 2007, 43(3):368-375.
18. Gallese V. Motor abstraction: A neuroscientific account of how action goals and intentions are mapped and understood. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung 2009, 73(4):486-498.
19. Garavan H., Ross T.J., Murphy K., Roche R.A., Stein E.A. Dissociable executive functions in the dynamic control of behavior: Inhibition, error detection, and correction. Neuroimage 2002, 17(4):1820-1829.
20. Gerlach C., Law I., Gade A., Paulson O.B. The role of action knowledge in the comprehension of artefacts - A PET study. Neuroimage 2002, 15(1):143-152.
21. Gerlach C., Law I., Paulson O.B. When action turns into words. Activation of motor-based knowledge during categorization of manipulable objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2002, 14(8):1230-1239.
22. Gibson J.J. The theory of affordances. Perceiving, acting, and knowing. Toward an ecological psychology 1977, 67-82. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. R. Shaw, J. Bransford (Eds.).
23. Grafton S.T., Fadiga L., Arbib M.A., Rizzolatti G. Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. Neuroimage 1997, 6(4):231-236.
24. Grezes J., Decety J. Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping 2001, 12(1):1-19.
25. Hartson H.R. Cognitive, physical, sensory, and functional affordances in interaction design. Behaviour & Information Technology 2003, 22(5):315-338.
26. Hattori N., Shibasaki H., Wheaton L., Wu T., Matsuhashi M., Hallett M. Discrete parieto-frontal functional connectivity related to grasping. Journal of Neurophysiology 2009, 101(3):1267-1282.
27. Heilman K.M, Gonzalez Rothi L.J Apraxia. Clinical neurophysiology 2003, 215-235. Oxford University Press, New York. K.M. Heilman, E. Valenstein (Eds.).
28. Clinical neuropsychology 2003, Oxford University Press, New York. 4th ed. K.M. Heilman, E. Valenstein (Eds.).
29. Higuchi S., Imamizu H., Kawato M. Cerebellar activity evoked by common tool-use execution and imagery tasks: An fMRI study. Cortex 2007, 43(3):350-358.
30. Ito M. Control of mental activities by internal models in the cerebellum. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2008, 9(4):304-313.
31. Jeannerod M. Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage 2001, 14(1 Pt 2):S103-109.
32. Jenkinson M. Fast, automated, N-dimensional phase-unwrapping algorithm. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2003, 49(1):193-197.
33. Jenkinson M., Bannister P., Brady M., Smith S. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 2002, 17(2):825-841.
34. Kellenbach M.L., Brett M., Patterson K. Actions speak louder than functions: The importance of manipulability and action in tool representation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003, 15(1):30-46.
35. Krawitz A., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Brown J.W. Impaired error-likelihood prediction in medial prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia. Neuroimage 2011, 54(2):1506-1517.
36. Kroliczak G., McAdam T.D., Quinlan D.J., Culham J.C. The human dorsal stream adapts to real actions and 3D shape processing: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neurophysiology 2008, 100(5):2627-2639.
37. Kuhtz-Buschbeck J.P., Mahnkopf C., Holzknecht C., Siebner H., Ulmer S., Jansen O. Effector-independent representations of simple and complex imagined finger movements: A combined fMRI and TMS study. European Journal of Neuroscience 2003, 18(12):3375-3387.
38. Lancaster J.L., Rainey L.H., Summerlin J.L., Freitas C.S., Fox P.T., Evans A.C., et al. Automated labeling of the human brain: A preliminary report on the development and evaluation of a forward-transform method. Human Brain Mapping 1997, 5(4):238-242.
39. Lancaster J.L., Woldorff M.G., Parsons L.M., Liotti M., Freitas C.S., Rainey L., et al. Automated Talairach atlas labels for functional brain mapping. Human Brain Mapping 2000, 10(3):120-131.
40. Lorey B., Pilgramm S., Bischoff M., Stark R., Vaitl D., Kindermann S., et al. Activation of the parieto-premotor network is associated with vivid motor imagery - A parametric FMRI study. PLoS ONE 2011, 6(5):e20368.
41. Lotze M., Montoya P., Erb M., Hulsmann E., Flor H., Klose U., et al. Activation of cortical and cerebellar motor areas during executed and imagined hand movements: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1999, 11(5):491-501.
42. Luu P., Pederson S. The anterior cingulate cortex: Regulating actions in context. Cognitive neuroscience of attention 2004, 232-245. Guilford Press, New York. M. Posner (Ed.).
43. Maldjian J.A., Laurienti P.J., Burdette J.H. Precentral gyrus discrepancy in electronic versions of the Talairach atlas. Neuroimage 2004, 21(1):450-455.
44. Maldjian J.A., Laurienti P.J., Kraft R.A., Burdette J.H. An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets. Neuroimage 2003, 19(3):1233-1239.
45. Manto M., Bower J.M., Conforto A.B., Delgado-Garcia J.M., da Guarda S.N., Gerwig M., et al. Consensus paper: Roles of the cerebellum in motor control - The diversity of ideas on cerebellar involvement in movement. Cerebellum 2011.
46. Martin A., Wiggs C.L., Ungerleider L.G., Haxby J.V. Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature 1996, 379(6566):649-652.
47. Masson M.E., Bub D.N., Breuer A.T. Priming of reach and grasp actions by handled objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2011, 37(5):1470-1484.
48. Mecklinger A., Gruenewald C., Besson M., Magnie M.N., Von Cramon D.Y. Separable neuronal circuitries for manipulable and non-manipulable objects in working memory. Cerebral Cortex 2002, 12(11):1115-1123.
49. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46(3):774-785.
50. Mizelle J.C., Forrester L., Hallett M., Wheaton L.A. Electroencephalographic reactivity to unimodal and bimodal visual and proprioceptive demands in sensorimotor integration. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 203(4):659-670.
51. Mizelle J.C., Forrester L., Hallett M., Wheaton L.A. Theta frequency band activity and attentional mechanisms in visual and proprioceptive demand. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 204(2):189-197.
52. Mizelle J.C., Wheaton L. Testing perceptual limits of functional units: Are there "automatic" tendencies to associate tools and objects?. Neuroscience Letters 2011, 488(1):92-96.
53. Mizelle J.C., Wheaton L.A. Neural activation for conceptual identification of correct versus incorrect tool-object pairs. Brain Research 2010, 1354:100-112.
54. Mizelle J.C., Wheaton L.A. The neuroscience of storing and molding tool action concepts: How "Plastic" is grounded cognition?. Frontiers in Psychology 2010, 1:195.
55. Mizelle J.C., Wheaton L.A. Why is that hammer in my coffee? A multimodal imaging investigation of contextually based tool understanding. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2010, 4:233.
56. Mon-Williams M., Bingham G.P. Discovering affordances that determine the spatial structure of reach-to-grasp movements. Experimental Brain Research 2011, 211(1):145-160.
57. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9(1):97-113.
58. Paulus M. Action mirroring and action understanding: an ideomotor and attentional account. Psychological Research 2011.
59. Pellicano A., Iani C., Borghi A.M., Rubichi S., Nicoletti R. Simon-like and functional affordance effects with tools: The effects of object perceptual discrimination and object action state. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Hove) 2010, 63(11):2190-2201.
60. Pellicano A., Thill S., Ziemke T., Binkofski F. Affordances, adaptive tool use and grounded cognition. Frontiers in Psychology 2011, 2:53.
61. Peran P., Demonet J.F., Cherubini A., Carbebat D., Caltagirone C., Sabatini U. Mental representations of action: The neural correlates of the verbal and motor components. Brain Research 2010, 1328:89-103.
62. Rizzolatti G., Luppino G., Matelli M. The organization of the cortical motor system: New concepts. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1998, 106(4):283-296.
63. Rorden C., Karnath H.O., Bonilha L. Improving lesion-symptom mapping. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2007, 19(7):1081-1088.
64. Roth M., Decety J., Raybaudi M., Massarelli R., Delon-Martin C., Segebarth C., et al. Possible involvement of primary motor cortex in mentally simulated movement: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. NeuroReport 1996, 7(7):1280-1284.
65. Sartori L., Straulino E., Castiello U. How objects are grasped: The interplay between affordances and end-goals. PLoS ONE 2011, 6(9):e25203.
66. Shin Y.K., Proctor R.W., Capaldi E.J. A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin 2010, 136(6):943-974.
67. Smith S.M. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Human Brain Mapping 2002, 17(3):143-155.
68. Smith S.M., Jenkinson M., Woolrich M.W., Beckmann C.F., Behrens T.E., Johansen-Berg H., et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 2004, 23(Suppl. 1):S208-219.
69. Sunderland A., Wilkins L., Dineen R., Dawson S.E. Tool-use and the left hemisphere: What is lost in ideomotor apraxia?. Brain and Cognition 2013, 81(2):183-192.
70. Thill S., Caligiore D., Borghi A.M., Ziemke T., Baldassarre G. Theories and computational models of affordance and mirror systems: An integrative review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2013, 37(3):491-521.
71. Toni I., Rushworth M.F., Passingham R.E. Neural correlates of visuomotor associations. Spatial rules compared with arbitrary rules. Experimental Brain Research 2001, 141(3):359-369.
72. Tranel D., Damasio H., Damasio A.R. A neural basis for the retrieval of conceptual knowledge. Neuropsychologia 1997, 35(10):1319-1327.
73. Tranel D., Feinstein J., Manzel K. Further lesion evidence for the neural basis of conceptual knowledge for persons and other concrete entities. Journal of Neuropsychology 2008, 2(Pt 1):301-320.
74. Tranel D., Kemmerer D., Adolphs R., Damasio H., Damasio A.R. Neural correlates of conceptual knowledge for actions. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2003, 20(3):409-432.
75. Valyear K.F., Culham J.C. Observing learned object-specific functional grasps preferentially activates the ventral stream. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 22(5):970-984.
76. Vingerhoets G. Knowing about tools: Neural correlates of tool familiarity and experience. Neuroimage 2008, 40(3):1380-1391.
77. Warren W.H. Action modes and laws of control for the visual guidance of action. Complex movement behaviour: "The" motor-action controversy 1988, 339-379. North-Holland, Amsterdam. O.G. Meijer, K. Roth (Eds.).
78. Wheaton L.A., Yakota S., Hallett M. Posterior parietal negativity preceding self-paced praxis movements. Experimental Brain Research 2005, 163(4):535-539.
79. Woolrich M.W., Behrens T.E., Beckmann C.F., Jenkinson M., Smith S.M. Multilevel linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference. Neuroimage 2004, 21(4):1732-1747.
80. Woolrich M.W., Ripley B.D., Brady M., Smith S.M. Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modeling of FMRI data. Neuroimage 2001, 14(6):1370-1386.
81. Worsley K.J., Evans A.C., Marrett S., Neelin P. A three-dimensional statistical analysis for CBF activation studies in human brain. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 1992, 12(6):900-918.
82. Young G. Are different affordances subserved by different neural pathways?. Brain and Cognition 2006, 62(2):134-142.